| Title | Heraklit zitiert Anaximander |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1956 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 382-384 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bröcker, Walter |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Note on a quote of Heraclitus |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/toXxGP6G9zJTv6B |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1069","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1069,"authors_free":[{"id":1623,"entry_id":1069,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":19,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","free_first_name":"Walter","free_last_name":"Br\u00f6cker","norm_person":{"id":19,"first_name":"Walter ","last_name":"Br\u00f6cker","full_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116559500","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Heraklit zitiert Anaximander","main_title":{"title":"Heraklit zitiert Anaximander"},"abstract":"Note on a quote of Heraclitus","btype":3,"date":"1956","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/toXxGP6G9zJTv6B","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":19,"full_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1069,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"84","issue":"3","pages":"382-384"}},"sort":[1956]}
| Title | Some Problems in Anaximander |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1955 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 21-38 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kirk, G.S. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with four almost classic problems in Anaximander. Of these the first is of comparatively minor importance, and the second is important not for what Anaximander thought but for what Aristotle thought he thought. Problem I is: Did Anaximander describe his 3 dE"repov as apX-, ? Problem 2: Did Aristotle mean Anaximander when he referred to people who postulated an intermediate substance? Problem 3: Did Anaximander think that there were innumerable successive worlds? Problem 4: What is the extent and implication of the extant fragment of Anaximander ? Appended is a brief con- sideration of the nature of Theophrastus' source-material for Anaximander; on one's opinion of this question the assessment of the last two problems will clearly depend. [p. 21] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/cO7A7jXgYgxes2N |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"737","_score":null,"_source":{"id":737,"authors_free":[{"id":1100,"entry_id":737,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":216,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk, G.S.","free_first_name":"G.S.","free_last_name":"Kirk","norm_person":{"id":216,"first_name":"G. S.","last_name":"Kirk","full_name":"Kirk, G. S.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Some Problems in Anaximander","main_title":{"title":"Some Problems in Anaximander"},"abstract":"This article deals with four almost classic problems in Anaximander. Of these \r\nthe first is of comparatively minor importance, and the second is important not \r\nfor what Anaximander thought but for what Aristotle thought he thought. \r\nProblem I is: Did Anaximander describe his 3 dE\"repov as apX-, ? Problem 2: Did Aristotle mean Anaximander when he referred to people who postulated \r\nan intermediate substance? Problem 3: Did Anaximander think that there \r\nwere innumerable successive worlds? Problem 4: What is the extent and \r\nimplication of the extant fragment of Anaximander ? Appended is a brief con- \r\nsideration of the nature of Theophrastus' source-material for Anaximander; \r\non one's opinion of this question the assessment of the last two problems will \r\nclearly depend. [p. 21]","btype":3,"date":"1955","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/cO7A7jXgYgxes2N","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":216,"full_name":"Kirk, G. S.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":737,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"5","issue":"1\/2","pages":"21-38"}},"sort":[1955]}
| Title | Der Bericht des Theophrast über Heraklit |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1955 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 385-411 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kerschensteiner, Jula |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Die Hauptquelle für die Darstellung der Lehren Heraklits, die Theophrast in seinen Phusikôn doxai gab, ist der Bericht bei Diogenes Laertius 9, 7-II. Er zerfällt in zwei Teile, eine knappe Übersicht (im folgenden DL1) und ein ausführliches Referat (im folgenden DL2). Nach DIELS stammt DL1 aus einer Mittelquelle biographischer Tradition, auf die auch der Einschub mit den Zitaten und die Bemerkung über Heraklits Stil zurückgehe, der zweite Teil dagegen direkt aus Theophrast (Doxographi Graeci I63 f., vgl. auch I80). Dagegen hat K. DEICHGRABER, Bemerkungen zu Diogenes' Bericht fiber Heraklit (Philol. 93, I938, I2ff.) 23ff., zu zeigen versucht, daB es sich nicht um zwei verschiedene Fassungen derselben Vorlage handelt, sondern daß die beiden Teile schon urspruinglich zusammengehören und aufeinander abgestimmt seien, nur durch den spateren Einschub unterbrochen: der Aufbau entspreche der Gewohnheit Theophrasts, den Einzeldarlegungen eine allgemeine Übersicht vorauszuschicken. Eine Klärung des Problems wird sich im folgenden ergeben. [introduction, p. 25] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/46Sh00HA2QdbR2l |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1368","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1368,"authors_free":[{"id":2061,"entry_id":1368,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":233,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kerschensteiner, Jula","free_first_name":"Jula","free_last_name":"Kerschensteiner","norm_person":{"id":233,"first_name":"Jula","last_name":"Kerschensteiner","full_name":"Kerschensteiner, Jula","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116142448","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Bericht des Theophrast \u00fcber Heraklit","main_title":{"title":"Der Bericht des Theophrast \u00fcber Heraklit"},"abstract":"Die Hauptquelle f\u00fcr die Darstellung der Lehren Heraklits, die Theophrast in seinen Phusik\u00f4n doxai gab, ist der Bericht bei Diogenes Laertius 9, 7-II. Er zerf\u00e4llt in zwei Teile, eine knappe \u00dcbersicht (im folgenden DL1) und ein ausf\u00fchrliches Referat (im folgenden DL2). Nach DIELS stammt DL1 aus einer Mittelquelle biographischer Tradition, auf die auch der Einschub mit den Zitaten und die Bemerkung \u00fcber Heraklits Stil zur\u00fcckgehe, der zweite Teil dagegen direkt aus Theophrast (Doxographi Graeci I63 f., vgl. auch I80). Dagegen hat K. DEICHGRABER, Bemerkungen zu Diogenes' Bericht fiber Heraklit (Philol. 93, I938, I2ff.) 23ff., zu zeigen versucht, daB es sich nicht um zwei verschiedene Fassungen derselben Vorlage handelt, sondern da\u00df die beiden Teile schon urspruinglich zusammengeh\u00f6ren und aufeinander abgestimmt seien, nur durch den spateren Einschub unterbrochen: der Aufbau entspreche der Gewohnheit Theophrasts, den Einzeldarlegungen eine allgemeine \u00dcbersicht vorauszuschicken. Eine Kl\u00e4rung des Problems wird sich im folgenden ergeben. [introduction, p. 25]","btype":3,"date":"1955","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/46Sh00HA2QdbR2l","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":233,"full_name":"Kerschensteiner, Jula","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1368,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"83","issue":"4","pages":"385-411"}},"sort":[1955]}
| Title | Le chrétien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'École d'Alexandrie au VIe siècle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1954 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Grecques |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 316-318 |
| Pages | 396-410 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Saffrey, Henri Dominique |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ammonias, bien que païen et élève de Proclus, avait su, dès la fin du Ve siècle, faire à l'Église les concessionsnécessaires pour que fût toléré son enseignement officiel à Alexandrie. Mais il convient de reconnaître le rôle capital quedut jouer, quelque vingt à trente ans plus tard, un de ses élèves chrétiens, Jean le grammairien, philoponos dans l'Églised'Alexandrie : il couvrit son maître, et en éditant sous son nom à lui ses rédactions des commentaires à Aristote exposésoralement par Ammonius, et en publiant, dans l'année critique 529, son propre ouvrage De aeternitate mundi ContraProclum, qui détachait opportunément de l'École d'Athènes l'École d'Alexandrie. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/C0QcH7vjb2PYNkY |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"401","_score":null,"_source":{"id":401,"authors_free":[{"id":536,"entry_id":401,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":228,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","free_first_name":"Henri Dominique","free_last_name":"Saffrey","norm_person":{"id":228,"first_name":"Henri Dominique","last_name":"Saffrey","full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130160059","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Le chr\u00e9tien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie au VIe si\u00e8cle","main_title":{"title":"Le chr\u00e9tien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie au VIe si\u00e8cle"},"abstract":"Ammonias, bien que pa\u00efen et \u00e9l\u00e8ve de Proclus, avait su, d\u00e8s la fin du Ve si\u00e8cle, faire \u00e0 l'\u00c9glise les concessionsn\u00e9cessaires pour que f\u00fbt tol\u00e9r\u00e9 son enseignement officiel \u00e0 Alexandrie. Mais il convient de reconna\u00eetre le r\u00f4le capital quedut jouer, quelque vingt \u00e0 trente ans plus tard, un de ses \u00e9l\u00e8ves chr\u00e9tiens, Jean le grammairien, philoponos dans l'\u00c9glised'Alexandrie : il couvrit son ma\u00eetre, et en \u00e9ditant sous son nom \u00e0 lui ses r\u00e9dactions des commentaires \u00e0 Aristote expos\u00e9soralement par Ammonius, et en publiant, dans l'ann\u00e9e critique 529, son propre ouvrage De aeternitate mundi ContraProclum, qui d\u00e9tachait opportun\u00e9ment de l'\u00c9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1954","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/C0QcH7vjb2PYNkY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":228,"full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":401,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Grecques","volume":"67","issue":"316-318","pages":"396-410"}},"sort":[1954]}
| Title | Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1954 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 145-182 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This text discusses the limited knowledge of the history of Aristotle's text, De caelo, due to the large number of Greek manuscripts and translations in various languages. The author focuses on the indirect tradition of the text, which includes summaries, paraphrases, and extracts by ancient commentators such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Proclus, Philoponus, and Simplicius. The author compares this indirect tradition to the direct tradition and notes the difficulties in reconstructing the original text due to the multiple manuscript variants resulting from the philological activities of ancient commentators and scribes. The author's aim is to offer a modest contribution to the study of the text's transmission history. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/6Fkmqyu6w6bNEsQ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1208","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1208,"authors_free":[{"id":1789,"entry_id":1208,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote","main_title":{"title":"Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote"},"abstract":"This text discusses the limited knowledge of the history of Aristotle's text, De caelo, due to the large number of Greek manuscripts and translations in various languages. The author focuses on the indirect tradition of the text, which includes summaries, paraphrases, and extracts by ancient commentators such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Proclus, Philoponus, and Simplicius. The author compares this indirect tradition to the direct tradition and notes the difficulties in reconstructing the original text due to the multiple manuscript variants resulting from the philological activities of ancient commentators and scribes. The author's aim is to offer a modest contribution to the study of the text's transmission history. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1954","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/6Fkmqyu6w6bNEsQ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1208,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"82","issue":"2","pages":"145-182"}},"sort":[1954]}
| Title | Anaximander und die Anfänge der Philosophie |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1953 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 257-277 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hölscher, Uvo |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Der Satz HERMANN FRANKELS, daß alle doxographischen Berichte solange unbestimmt sind, als nicht originaler Wortlaut hinzukommt, gilt in gewissem Sinne auch umgekehrt. Denn obwohl jener Satz gerade auch mit Rücksicht auf Anaximander gesagt worden ist, hat doch die Diskussion des Anaximanderfragments gezeigt, wie vieldeutig ein Satzbruchstück bleibt, wenn man es für sich betrachtet, aber auch, wieviel Hilfe aus der Analyse der Überlieferung kommen kann. Aus dieser wird noch einiges herangezogen, ohne daß hinlänglich gefragt würde, wo es herrührt. Sofern es sich im folgenden noch einmal um die Lehre von den Gegensatzen handelt, kommt es mir weniger darauf an, dem einzelnen Placitum sein Recht zu bestreiten, als etwas von der Weise dieses schwer zugänglichen Denkens zu erkennen. Es wird dabei zunächst in einer Untersuchung fortgefahren werden, die sich schon ausgewiesen hat: der Kritik der aristotelischen Berichte. Im zweiten Teil soll dagegen versucht werden, jene Denkform von den Voraussetzungen her zu bestimmen, aus denen Anaximander seine Konzeption des Ursprungs entwickelt hat. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Zpxp2NKd2Uv79s7 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1398","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1398,"authors_free":[{"id":2177,"entry_id":1398,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":198,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","free_first_name":"Uvo","free_last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","norm_person":{"id":198,"first_name":"Uvo","last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118705571","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Anaximander und die Anf\u00e4nge der Philosophie","main_title":{"title":"Anaximander und die Anf\u00e4nge der Philosophie"},"abstract":"Der Satz HERMANN FRANKELS, da\u00df alle doxographischen Berichte solange unbestimmt sind, als nicht originaler Wortlaut hinzukommt, gilt in gewissem Sinne auch umgekehrt. Denn obwohl jener Satz gerade auch mit R\u00fccksicht auf Anaximander gesagt worden ist, hat doch die Diskussion des Anaximanderfragments gezeigt, wie vieldeutig ein Satzbruchst\u00fcck bleibt, wenn man es f\u00fcr sich betrachtet, aber auch, wieviel Hilfe aus der Analyse der \u00dcberlieferung kommen kann. Aus dieser wird noch einiges herangezogen, ohne da\u00df hinl\u00e4nglich gefragt w\u00fcrde, wo es herr\u00fchrt. Sofern es sich im folgenden noch einmal um die Lehre von den Gegensatzen handelt, kommt es mir weniger darauf an, dem einzelnen Placitum sein Recht zu bestreiten, als etwas von der Weise dieses schwer zug\u00e4nglichen Denkens zu erkennen. Es wird dabei zun\u00e4chst in einer Untersuchung fortgefahren werden, die sich schon ausgewiesen hat: der Kritik der aristotelischen Berichte. Im zweiten Teil soll dagegen versucht werden, jene Denkform von den Voraussetzungen her zu bestimmen, aus denen Anaximander seine Konzeption des Ursprungs entwickelt hat.","btype":3,"date":"1953","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Zpxp2NKd2Uv79s7","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":198,"full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1398,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"81","issue":"3","pages":"257-277"}},"sort":[1953]}
| Title | Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux «Météorologiques» |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1953 |
| Journal | Bulletin de la classe des lettres, sciences morales et politiques de l'Académie Royale de Belgique |
| Volume | 5e Série, Tome 39 |
| Pages | 299–357 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Evrard, Étienne |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Philopon était probablement un chrétien de naissance. Rien en tout cas n’indique qu'il ait jamais été païen. Dès le début de son activité littéraire, il manifeste son christianisme en interprétant Aristote d’une manière favorable à l’immortalité de l'âme humaine et en le critiquant à propos de la création du monde et de l’éternité du mouvement. Il fut peut-être séduit un instant par les idées d’Origène, mais les abandonna bientôt. La fermeture de l’école d’Athènes a sans doute produit sur son esprit une assez forte impression. Il est remarquable en tout cas que son Contre Proclus est l’exact contemporain de cet événement. Peut-être la mesure de Justinien fut-elle difficilement admise dans les cercles philosophiques d'Alexandrie, où païens et chrétiens semblent avoir fait un effort pour harmoniser leurs points de vue. Philopon aurait alors voulu montrer qu’elle atteignait les disciples d’un philosophe dont l’enseignement était fort criticable et qui n’avait consenti aucune concession au christianisme. C’est peut-être pour la même raison qu’un peu après, dans son Commentaire aux Météorologiques, il attaqua à plusieurs reprises Damascius, qui dirigeait l’école d'Athènes au moment de sa fermeture. A ce moment encore, il prit apparemment une conscience plus nette des contradictions entre les doctrines des païen’s et sa religion. C’est en effet dans le Contre Proclus qu’apparaît pour la première fois la critique de la cinquième essence. Un ouvrage postérieur que nous ne possédons plus y ajoutait une réfutation de la théorie du mouvement surnaturel du feu. On peut penser que Philopon craignait dans ces doctrines une certaine divinisation du ciel dans laquelle il voyait une atteinte à la majesté de Dieu. Le Commentaire aux Météorologiques, composé après 529, révèle une accentuation de cette attitude. On y voit en plus apparaître la critique de l’astrologie. Enfin le Contre Aristote constitue comme une somme des griefs de Philopon contre le système péripatéticien. Dans le De Opificio mundi, postérieur au Contre Aristote et écrit après 557, la philosophie n’apparaît plus qu’indirectement et cède la place à la théologie et à l’exégèse biblique.Seule une étude exhaustive des œuvres de Philopon révélerait le degré d'exactitude de cette reconstitution provisoire. Celle-ci me semble du moins respecter plus complètement que celle de Gudeman les indications sur lesquelles j’ai attiré l’attention. Elle permet en outre de mieux comprendre les répercussions des événements de la première moitié du VIe siècle sur l'esprit de Philopon. [conclusion, p. 356-357] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/vWLkdYndnRLFCbW |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"553","_score":null,"_source":{"id":553,"authors_free":[{"id":782,"entry_id":553,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":92,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","free_first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","free_last_name":"Evrard","norm_person":{"id":92,"first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","last_name":"Evrard","full_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118945750","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux \u00abM\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques\u00bb","main_title":{"title":"Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux \u00abM\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques\u00bb"},"abstract":"Philopon \u00e9tait probablement un chr\u00e9tien de naissance. Rien en tout cas n\u2019indique qu'il ait jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 pa\u00efen. D\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de son activit\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire, il manifeste son christianisme en interpr\u00e9tant Aristote d\u2019une mani\u00e8re favorable \u00e0 l\u2019immortalit\u00e9 de l'\u00e2me humaine et en le \r\ncritiquant \u00e0 propos de la cr\u00e9ation du monde et de l\u2019\u00e9ternit\u00e9 du mouvement. Il fut peut-\u00eatre s\u00e9duit un instant par les id\u00e9es d\u2019Orig\u00e8ne, mais les abandonna bient\u00f4t. La fermeture de l\u2019\u00e9cole \r\nd\u2019Ath\u00e8nes a sans doute produit sur son esprit une assez forte impression. Il est remarquable en tout cas que son Contre Proclus est l\u2019exact contemporain de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement. Peut-\u00eatre la mesure de Justinien fut-elle difficilement admise dans les cercles philoso\u00adphiques d'Alexandrie, o\u00f9 pa\u00efens et chr\u00e9tiens semblent avoir \r\nfait un effort pour harmoniser leurs points de vue. Philopon aurait alors voulu montrer qu\u2019elle atteignait les disciples d\u2019un philosophe dont l\u2019enseignement \u00e9tait fort criticable et qui n\u2019avait \r\nconsenti aucune concession au christianisme. C\u2019est peut-\u00eatre pour la m\u00eame raison qu\u2019un peu apr\u00e8s, dans son Commentaire aux M\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques, il attaqua \u00e0 plusieurs reprises Damascius, qui dirigeait l\u2019\u00e9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes au moment de sa fermeture. A ce moment encore, il prit apparemment une conscience plus nette \r\ndes contradictions entre les doctrines des pa\u00efen\u2019s et sa religion. C\u2019est en effet dans le Contre Proclus qu\u2019appara\u00eet pour la premi\u00e8re fois la critique de la cinqui\u00e8me essence. Un ouvrage post\u00e9rieur \r\nque nous ne poss\u00e9dons plus y ajoutait une r\u00e9futation de la th\u00e9orie du mouvement surnaturel du feu. On peut penser que Philopon craignait dans ces doctrines une certaine divinisation du ciel dans laquelle il voyait une atteinte \u00e0 la majest\u00e9 de Dieu. Le Com\u00admentaire aux M\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques, compos\u00e9 apr\u00e8s 529, r\u00e9v\u00e8le une accentuation de cette attitude. On y voit en plus appara\u00eetre la \r\ncritique de l\u2019astrologie. Enfin le Contre Aristote constitue comme une somme des griefs de Philopon contre le syst\u00e8me p\u00e9ripat\u00e9ticien. Dans le De Opificio mundi, post\u00e9rieur au Contre Aristote \r\net \u00e9crit apr\u00e8s 557, la philosophie n\u2019appara\u00eet plus qu\u2019indirectement et c\u00e8de la place \u00e0 la th\u00e9ologie et \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8se biblique.Seule une \u00e9tude exhaustive des \u0153uvres de Philopon r\u00e9v\u00e9lerait le degr\u00e9 d'exactitude de cette reconstitution provisoire. Celle-ci me semble du moins respecter plus compl\u00e8tement que celle de Gudeman les indications sur lesquelles j\u2019ai attir\u00e9 l\u2019attention. \r\nElle permet en outre de mieux comprendre les r\u00e9percussions des \u00e9v\u00e9nements de la premi\u00e8re moiti\u00e9 du VIe si\u00e8cle sur l'esprit \r\nde Philopon. [conclusion, p. 356-357]","btype":3,"date":"1953","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/vWLkdYndnRLFCbW","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":92,"full_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":553,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de la classe des lettres, sciences morales et politiques de l'Acad\u00e9mie Royale de Belgique","volume":"5e S\u00e9rie, Tome 39","issue":"","pages":"299\u2013357"}},"sort":[1953]}
| Title | Andronikos von Rhodos und die Postprädikamente bei Boethius |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1953 |
| Journal | Vigiliae Christianae |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 98-115 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Pfligersdorffer, Georg |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In der Erläuterungsschrift des Boethius zu den Kategorien des Aristoteles ist nach Absolvierung der einzelnen Kategorien das vierte Buch der Besprechung der sogenannten Postprädikamente 1 eingeräumt (Migne PL 64, 263-294), wozu freilich gleich auch gesagt werden musz, dasz die handschriftliche Überlieferung vielfach die Abtrennung eines vierten Buches nicht aufweist, sondern die uns geläufigen Bücher III und IV zu einem zusammenfaszt2, worauf hier jedoch nicht weiter eingegangen werden soll. Mit diesem Sachverhalt scheint zusammenzuhängen, dasz — soweit ich bis jetzt sagen kann — die Handschriften C(odex) l(atinus) m(ona- censis) 6403 und 14516, Bern. 265, Paris. B. N. lat. 11129 sowie die Sangallenses 817 und 821 gegenüber der Ausgabe von Migne das Aristoteles-Lemma de oppositis (Kateg. 10, 11b 16 ff.) vor die Kommentar-Partie 263 B-264 B Migne (Expeditis . . . ) treten lassen. [...] Die Zweifel, die sich an die Stelle 263 B M. knüpfen, möchte ich im folgenden, um einschlägige Arbeiten anderer nicht indirekt zu hemmen, schon vor meiner Ausgabe möglichst einschränken und vielleicht auch beheben. [pp. 98 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/mCsRFrGz5HP1MnJ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"776","_score":null,"_source":{"id":776,"authors_free":[{"id":1140,"entry_id":776,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":290,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pfligersdorffer, Georg","free_first_name":"Georg","free_last_name":"Pfligersdorffer","norm_person":{"id":290,"first_name":"Georg","last_name":"Pfligersdorffer","full_name":"Pfligersdorffer, Georg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118911864","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Andronikos von Rhodos und die Postpr\u00e4dikamente bei Boethius","main_title":{"title":"Andronikos von Rhodos und die Postpr\u00e4dikamente bei Boethius"},"abstract":"In der Erl\u00e4uterungsschrift des Boethius zu den Kategorien des \r\nAristoteles ist nach Absolvierung der einzelnen Kategorien das \r\nvierte Buch der Besprechung der sogenannten Postpr\u00e4dikamente 1 \r\neinger\u00e4umt (Migne PL 64, 263-294), wozu freilich gleich auch \r\ngesagt werden musz, dasz die handschriftliche \u00dcberlieferung vielfach \r\ndie Abtrennung eines vierten Buches nicht aufweist, sondern die \r\nuns gel\u00e4ufigen B\u00fccher III und IV zu einem zusammenfaszt2, \r\nworauf hier jedoch nicht weiter eingegangen werden soll. Mit \r\ndiesem Sachverhalt scheint zusammenzuh\u00e4ngen, dasz \u2014 soweit ich \r\nbis jetzt sagen kann \u2014 die Handschriften C(odex) l(atinus) m(ona- \r\ncensis) 6403 und 14516, Bern. 265, Paris. B. N. lat. 11129 sowie \r\ndie Sangallenses 817 und 821 gegen\u00fcber der Ausgabe von Migne \r\ndas Aristoteles-Lemma de oppositis (Kateg. 10, 11b 16 ff.) vor die \r\nKommentar-Partie 263 B-264 B Migne (Expeditis . . . ) treten \r\nlassen. [...] Die Zweifel, die sich an die Stelle 263 B M. kn\u00fcpfen, m\u00f6chte ich \r\nim folgenden, um einschl\u00e4gige Arbeiten anderer nicht indirekt zu hemmen, schon vor meiner Ausgabe m\u00f6glichst einschr\u00e4nken und \r\nvielleicht auch beheben. [pp. 98 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1953","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mCsRFrGz5HP1MnJ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":290,"full_name":"Pfligersdorffer, Georg","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":776,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vigiliae Christianae","volume":"7","issue":"2","pages":"98-115"}},"sort":[1953]}
| Title | Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1953 |
| Journal | Harvard Studies in Classical Philology |
| Volume | 61 |
| Pages | 85-156 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | McDiarmid, John B. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The most important ancient writing on the history of European thought was the Physical Opinions of Theophrastus.1 In this work of sixteen or eighteen books Theophrastus gave for the first time a systematic treatment of earlier views on the main problems of science and philosophy. Its influence in antiquity is attested by the frequency and respect with which it was referred to by later ancient writers. But its unique position was not fully appreciated by modern scholars until Usener2 collected the fragments of it and Diels scrutinized these fragments in relation to the large body of other doxographical writings. Diels proved that these writings, far from being isolated and independent, were virtually all derived directly or indirectly from the Physical Opinions.3 This fact has been of great consequence for the evaluation of both the doxographers and Theo- phrastus. Statements of such writers as Aetius have been invested with the full authority of Theophrastus, and, on the other hand, this authority has seemingly been enhanced by the very number of the doxographers who accepted it. When a report has been traced back to the Physical Opinions, scholars have been satisfied that it has been traced to an "unimpeachable source" and that it "must have been based on direct acquaintance" with the original Presocratic writing. [p. 85] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/fhUUw8OxTbUV8FH |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"991","_score":null,"_source":{"id":991,"authors_free":[{"id":1492,"entry_id":991,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":251,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"McDiarmid, John B.","free_first_name":"John B.","free_last_name":"McDiarmid","norm_person":{"id":251,"first_name":"John B.","last_name":"McDiarmid","full_name":"McDiarmid, John B.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1200165888","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes"},"abstract":"The most important ancient writing on the history of European \r\nthought was the Physical Opinions of Theophrastus.1 In this \r\nwork of sixteen or eighteen books Theophrastus gave for the first \r\ntime a systematic treatment of earlier views on the main problems of \r\nscience and philosophy. Its influence in antiquity is attested by the \r\nfrequency and respect with which it was referred to by later ancient \r\nwriters. But its unique position was not fully appreciated by modern \r\nscholars until Usener2 collected the fragments of it and Diels \r\nscrutinized these fragments in relation to the large body of other \r\ndoxographical writings. Diels proved that these writings, far from \r\nbeing isolated and independent, were virtually all derived directly or \r\nindirectly from the Physical Opinions.3 This fact has been of great \r\nconsequence for the evaluation of both the doxographers and Theo- \r\nphrastus. Statements of such writers as Aetius have been invested \r\nwith the full authority of Theophrastus, and, on the other hand, this \r\nauthority has seemingly been enhanced by the very number of the \r\ndoxographers who accepted it. When a report has been traced back \r\nto the Physical Opinions, scholars have been satisfied that it has been \r\ntraced to an \"unimpeachable source\" and that it \"must have been \r\nbased on direct acquaintance\" with the original Presocratic writing. [p. 85]","btype":3,"date":"1953","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/fhUUw8OxTbUV8FH","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":251,"full_name":"McDiarmid, John B.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":991,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Harvard Studies in Classical Philology","volume":"61","issue":"","pages":"85-156"}},"sort":[1953]}
| Title | Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1950 |
| Journal | Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 82–120 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Allan, Donald J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the authorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made their appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt to begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers concerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became known in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0PjZnKu9FMvQiNF |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1013,"authors_free":[{"id":1529,"entry_id":1013,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":32,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Allan, Donald J.","free_first_name":"Donald J.","free_last_name":"Allan","norm_person":{"id":32,"first_name":"Donald J.","last_name":"Allan","full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1158470029","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"},"abstract":"The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the \r\nauthorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made \r\ntheir appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt \r\nto begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers \r\nconcerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became \r\nknown in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82]","btype":3,"date":"1950","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0PjZnKu9FMvQiNF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":32,"full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies","volume":"2","issue":"","pages":"82\u2013120"}},"sort":[1950]}
| Title | Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1997 |
| Publication Place | New Brunswick & London |
| Publisher | Transaction Publishers |
| Series | Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities |
| Volume | 8 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | van Ophuijsen, Johannes M. , Raalte, Marlein van |
| Translator(s) |
Theophrastus was Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Apart from two botanical works, a collection of character sketches, and several scientific opuscula, his works survive only through quotations and reports in secondary sources. Recently these quotations and reports have been collected and published, thereby making the thought of Theophrastus accessible to a wide audience. The present volume contains seventeen responses to this material. There are chapters dealing with Theophrastus' views on logic, physics, biology, ethics, politics, rhetoric, and music, as well as the life of Theophrastus. Together these writings throw considerable light on fundamental questions concerning the development and importance of the Peripatos in the early Hellenistic period. The authors consider whether Theophrastus was a systematic thinker who imposed coherence and consistency on a growing body of knowledge, or a problem-oriented thinker who foreshadowed the dissolution of Peripatetic thought into various loosely connected disciplines. Of special interest are those essays which deal with Theophrastus' intellectual position in relation to the lively philosophic scene occupied by such contemporaries as Zeno, the founder of the Stoa, and Epicurus, the founder of the Garden, as well as Xenocrates and Polemon hi the Academy, and Theophrastus' fellow Peripatetics, Eudemus and Strato. The contributors to the volume are Suzanne Amigues, Antonio Battegazzore, Tiziano Dorandi, Woldemar Gorier, John Glucker, Hans Gottschalk, Frans de Haas, Andre Laks, Anthony Long, Jorgen Mejer, Mario Mignucci, Trevor Saunders, Dirk Schenkeveld, David Sedley, Robert Sharpies, C. M. J. Sicking and Richard Sorabji. The Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities series is a forum for seminal thinking in the field of philosophy, and this volume is no exception. Theophrastus is a landmark achievement in intellectual thought. Philosophers, historians, and classicists will all find this work to be enlightening. [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/BHjWf7YSg3OWWKi |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1298","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1298,"authors_free":[{"id":1891,"entry_id":1298,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":87,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"van Ophuijsen, Johannes M. ","free_first_name":"Johannes M. ","free_last_name":"van Ophuijsen","norm_person":{"id":87,"first_name":"Johannes M. ","last_name":"van Ophuijsen","full_name":"van Ophuijsen, Johannes M. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120962365","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1990,"entry_id":1298,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":154,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Raalte, Marlein van","free_first_name":"Marlein","free_last_name":"Raalte, van","norm_person":{"id":154,"first_name":"Marlein van","last_name":"Raalte","full_name":"Raalte, Marlein van","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172515270","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources"},"abstract":"Theophrastus was Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Apart from two botanical works, a collection of character sketches, and several scientific opuscula, his works survive only through quotations and reports in secondary sources. Recently these quotations and reports have been collected and published, thereby making the thought of Theophrastus accessible to a wide audience. The present volume contains seventeen responses to this material.\r\n\r\nThere are chapters dealing with Theophrastus' views on logic, physics, biology, ethics, politics, rhetoric, and music, as well as the life of Theophrastus. Together these writings throw considerable light on fundamental questions concerning the development and importance of the Peripatos in the early Hellenistic period. The authors consider whether Theophrastus was a systematic thinker who imposed coherence and consistency on a growing body of knowledge, or a problem-oriented thinker who foreshadowed the dissolution of Peripatetic thought into various loosely connected disciplines. Of special interest are those essays which deal with Theophrastus' intellectual position in relation to the lively philosophic scene occupied by such contemporaries as Zeno, the founder of the Stoa, and Epicurus, the founder of the Garden, as well as Xenocrates and Polemon hi the Academy, and Theophrastus' fellow Peripatetics, Eudemus and Strato.\r\n\r\nThe contributors to the volume are Suzanne Amigues, Antonio Battegazzore, Tiziano Dorandi, Woldemar Gorier, John Glucker, Hans Gottschalk, Frans de Haas, Andre Laks, Anthony Long, Jorgen Mejer, Mario Mignucci, Trevor Saunders, Dirk Schenkeveld, David Sedley, Robert Sharpies, C. M. J. Sicking and Richard Sorabji. The Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities series is a forum for seminal thinking in the field of philosophy, and this volume is no exception. Theophrastus is a landmark achievement in intellectual thought. Philosophers, historians, and classicists will all find this work to be enlightening. [author's abstract]","btype":4,"date":"1997","language":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/BHjWf7YSg3OWWKi","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":87,"full_name":"van Ophuijsen, Johannes M. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":154,"full_name":"Raalte, Marlein van","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1298,"pubplace":"New Brunswick & London","publisher":"Transaction Publishers","series":"Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities","volume":"8","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources"]}
| Title | Theophrastus’ De Igne: Orthodoxy, Reform and Readjustment in the Doctrine of Elements |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2002 |
| Published in | On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Akten der 3. Tagungder Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 19.-23. Juli 1999 in Trier |
| Pages | 75-90 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bodnár, István M. |
| Editor(s) | Fortenbaugh, William W. , Wöhrle, Georg |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Msf7lIDW37Bvix8 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"929","_score":null,"_source":{"id":929,"authors_free":[{"id":1373,"entry_id":929,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":6,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bodn\u00e1r, Istv\u00e1n M.","free_first_name":"Istv\u00e1n M.","free_last_name":"Bodn\u00e1r","norm_person":{"id":6,"first_name":"Istv\u00e1n M.","last_name":"Bodn\u00e1r","full_name":"Bodn\u00e1r, Istv\u00e1n M.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1031829717","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1374,"entry_id":929,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":7,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W.","free_first_name":"William W.","free_last_name":"Fortenbaugh","norm_person":{"id":7,"first_name":"William W. ","last_name":"Fortenbaugh","full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/110233700","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1832,"entry_id":929,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":8,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"W\u00f6hrle, Georg ","free_first_name":"Georg","free_last_name":"W\u00f6hrle","norm_person":{"id":8,"first_name":"Georg","last_name":"W\u00f6hrle","full_name":"W\u00f6hrle, Georg ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172458277","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus\u2019 De Igne: Orthodoxy, Reform and Readjustment in the Doctrine of Elements","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus\u2019 De Igne: Orthodoxy, Reform and Readjustment in the Doctrine of Elements"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Msf7lIDW37Bvix8","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":6,"full_name":"Bodn\u00e1r, Istv\u00e1n M.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":7,"full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":8,"full_name":"W\u00f6hrle, Georg ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":929,"section_of":31,"pages":"75-90","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":31,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Akten der 3. Tagungder Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 19.-23. Juli 1999 in Trier","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Fortenbaugh2002d","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2002","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2002","abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/BA4SQToR9Hp9pxg","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":31,"pubplace":"Stuttgart","publisher":"Franz Steiner Verlag","series":"Die Philosophie der Antike","volume":"14","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Theophrastus\u2019 De Igne: Orthodoxy, Reform and Readjustment in the Doctrine of Elements"]}
| Title | Thomas' Neoplatonic Histories: His following of Simplicius |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2002 |
| Journal | Dionysius |
| Volume | 20 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hankey, Wayne J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Following Simplicius, Thomas set up the Platonic and Aristotelian philosophical viae as complementary oppositions each of which contributed to the truth. Thomas also followed Simplicius in discerning differences between the hermeneutic methods of the two great schools. He reproduced the history of philosophy of Simplicius as soon as he had his commentaries, agreed with many of his conciliating judgments, and used the same reconciling logical figures. He does not identify himself as a Peripatetic or as a Platonist. However, when he agrees that Aristotle’s way of reasoning, per viam motus, to the existence of separate substances is manifestior et certior, he is sitting in judgment with, not against, Simplicius. For both the sixth and the thirteenth century commentators, Plato and Aristotle are assimilated to each other in various ways, and the real possibility of any beginning except that from the sensible is excluded. Thomas’ hermeneutic is that of the Platonic tradition in late Antiquity – Thomas certainly thought that the truth was veiled under poetic and symbolic language and judged this to be essential for revealing the truth to humans. Consistently with this approach, in the exposition of the De Caelo, Aquinas goes so far with Simplicius as to find “something divine (fabula aliquid divinum continet)” in the myth that Atlas holds up the heavens.106 He would seem, thus, to be on his way to the reconciliation of religious as well as of philosophical traditions. If this should, in fact, be his intent, Thomas would be following Simplicius and his Neoplatonic predecessors in their deepest purposes. This Christian priest, friar, and saint would have placed himself with the “divine” Proclus among the successors of Plato. [Conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/iv8aERtbvhiRAMo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1349","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1349,"authors_free":[{"id":2004,"entry_id":1349,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":167,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","free_first_name":"Wayne J.","free_last_name":"Hankey","norm_person":{"id":167,"first_name":" Wayne J.","last_name":"Hankey","full_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054015821","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Thomas' Neoplatonic Histories: His following of Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Thomas' Neoplatonic Histories: His following of Simplicius"},"abstract":"Following Simplicius, Thomas set up the Platonic and Aristotelian philosophical viae as complementary oppositions each of which contributed to the truth. Thomas also followed \r\nSimplicius in discerning differences between the hermeneutic methods of the two great schools. He reproduced the history of philosophy of Simplicius as soon as he had his commentaries, agreed with many of his conciliating judgments, and used the same reconciling logical figures. He does not identify himself as a Peripatetic or as a Platonist. \r\nHowever, when he agrees that Aristotle\u2019s way of reasoning, per viam motus, to the existence of \r\nseparate substances is manifestior et certior, he is sitting in judgment with, not against, Simplicius. For both the sixth and the thirteenth century commentators, Plato and Aristotle are assimilated to each other in various ways, and the real possibility of any beginning except that from the sensible is excluded. Thomas\u2019 hermeneutic is that of the Platonic tradition in late Antiquity \u2013 Thomas certainly thought that the truth was veiled under poetic and symbolic language and judged this to be essential for revealing the truth to humans. \r\nConsistently with this approach, in the exposition of the De Caelo, Aquinas goes so far with \r\nSimplicius as to find \u201csomething divine (fabula aliquid divinum continet)\u201d in the myth that Atlas \r\nholds up the heavens.106 He would seem, thus, to be on his way to the reconciliation of religious as well as of philosophical traditions. If this should, in fact, be his intent, Thomas would be following Simplicius and his Neoplatonic predecessors in their deepest purposes. This Christian priest, friar, and saint would have placed himself with the \u201cdivine\u201d Proclus among the successors of Plato. [Conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/iv8aERtbvhiRAMo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":167,"full_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1349,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dionysius","volume":"20","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":["Thomas' Neoplatonic Histories: His following of Simplicius"]}
| Title | Three Thêtas in the "Empédocle de Strasbourg" |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Mnemosyne, Fourth Series |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 78-84 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Algra, Keimpe A. , Mansfeld, Jaap |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
[Conclusion, p. 81]: ies of books that do not sell fast enough. We conclude that we cannot, merely on the basis of the Strasbourg fragments, confidendy assign to (book two of?) the physical poem the grue- some fragment (now plus its new context) Stein and Diels assigned to the Purifications. Until further evidence turns up, only a non liquet is feasible, and we should keep open the possibility that we are dealing with 'Z?y Empedocle de Strasbourg'. And the 6s in the papyrus fragments discussed above are simply wrong. The slighdy bizarre interpretation based on them may be abandoned. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/boL2U41aTbpaPuO |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"779","_score":null,"_source":{"id":779,"authors_free":[{"id":1143,"entry_id":779,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":28,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Algra, Keimpe A.","free_first_name":"Keimpe A.","free_last_name":"Algra","norm_person":{"id":28,"first_name":"Keimpe A.","last_name":"Algra","full_name":"Algra, Keimpe A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115110992","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1144,"entry_id":779,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":29,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mansfeld, Jaap","free_first_name":"Jaap","free_last_name":"Mansfeld","norm_person":{"id":29,"first_name":"Jaap","last_name":"Mansfeld","full_name":"Mansfeld, Jaap","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119383217","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Three Th\u00eatas in the \"Emp\u00e9docle de Strasbourg\"","main_title":{"title":"Three Th\u00eatas in the \"Emp\u00e9docle de Strasbourg\""},"abstract":"[Conclusion, p. 81]: ies of books that do not sell fast enough. \r\nWe conclude that we cannot, merely on the basis of the Strasbourg \r\nfragments, confidendy assign to (book two of?) the physical poem the grue- \r\nsome fragment (now plus its new context) Stein and Diels assigned to the \r\nPurifications. Until further evidence turns up, only a non liquet is feasible, \r\nand we should keep open the possibility that we are dealing with 'Z?y \r\nEmpedocle de Strasbourg'. And the 6s in the papyrus fragments discussed \r\nabove are simply wrong. The slighdy bizarre interpretation based on them \r\nmay be abandoned.","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/boL2U41aTbpaPuO","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":28,"full_name":"Algra, Keimpe A.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":29,"full_name":"Mansfeld, Jaap","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":779,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mnemosyne, Fourth Series","volume":"54","issue":"1","pages":"78-84"}},"sort":["Three Th\u00eatas in the \"Emp\u00e9docle de Strasbourg\""]}
| Title | Théodoret, Graec. Aff. Cur., IV. 12 et l’ordre des fragments de Théophraste issus de Simplicius In Phys. p. 22-28 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Journal | Unpublished |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Journée, Gérard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the comparison between the fragments of Hippasus and Heraclitus by Theodoret of Cyrus. The similarities between the two texts suggest that they have a common source, which is probably Theophrastus. This observation confirms Theophrastus' use of systematic categories, including unity and plurality, motion, limitation and restriction. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/6htB0UTUmPPPeyr |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1361","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1361,"authors_free":[{"id":2037,"entry_id":1361,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":206,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Journ\u00e9e, G\u00e9rard","free_first_name":"G\u00e9rard","free_last_name":"Journ\u00e9e","norm_person":{"id":206,"first_name":"G\u00e9rard ","last_name":"Journ\u00e9e","full_name":"Journ\u00e9e, G\u00e9rard ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9odoret, Graec. Aff. Cur., IV. 12 et l\u2019ordre des fragments de Th\u00e9ophraste issus de Simplicius In Phys. p. 22-28","main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9odoret, Graec. Aff. Cur., IV. 12 et l\u2019ordre des fragments de Th\u00e9ophraste issus de Simplicius In Phys. p. 22-28"},"abstract":"This text discusses the comparison between the fragments of Hippasus and Heraclitus by Theodoret of Cyrus. The similarities between the two texts suggest that they have a common source, which is probably Theophrastus. This observation confirms Theophrastus' use of systematic categories, including unity and plurality, motion, limitation and restriction. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/6htB0UTUmPPPeyr","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":206,"full_name":"Journ\u00e9e, G\u00e9rard ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1361,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Unpublished","volume":"","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":["Th\u00e9odoret, Graec. Aff. Cur., IV. 12 et l\u2019ordre des fragments de Th\u00e9ophraste issus de Simplicius In Phys. p. 22-28"]}
| Title | Théories de la phrase et de la proposition, de Platon à Averroès |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1999 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Presses de l’École normale supérieure |
| Series | Études de littérature ancienne |
| Volume | 10 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Diebler, Stéphane , Büttgen, Philippe , Rashed, Marwan |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/nIOEYMvLHnwCRsV |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"363","_score":null,"_source":{"id":363,"authors_free":[{"id":477,"entry_id":363,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":192,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Diebler, St\u00e9phane","free_first_name":"St\u00e9phane ","free_last_name":"Diebler","norm_person":{"id":192,"first_name":"St\u00e9phane ","last_name":" Diebler","full_name":"Diebler, St\u00e9phane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/135973635","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":478,"entry_id":363,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":193,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"B\u00fcttgen, Philippe","free_first_name":"Philippe","free_last_name":"B\u00fcttgen","norm_person":{"id":193,"first_name":"Philippe ","last_name":" B\u00fcttgen","full_name":"B\u00fcttgen, Philippe","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1071071025","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":479,"entry_id":363,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":194,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Rashed, Marwan","free_first_name":"Marwan","free_last_name":"Rashed","norm_person":{"id":194,"first_name":"Marwan","last_name":"Rashed","full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054568634","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9ories de la phrase et de la proposition, de Platon \u00e0 Averro\u00e8s","main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9ories de la phrase et de la proposition, de Platon \u00e0 Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":4,"date":"1999","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/nIOEYMvLHnwCRsV","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":192,"full_name":"Diebler, St\u00e9phane","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":193,"full_name":"B\u00fcttgen, Philippe","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":194,"full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":363,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Presses de l\u2019\u00c9cole normale sup\u00e9rieure","series":"\u00c9tudes de litt\u00e9rature ancienne","volume":"10","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Th\u00e9ories de la phrase et de la proposition, de Platon \u00e0 Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Théories et practiques de la prière à la fin de l'antiquité |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2020 |
| Publication Place | Turnhout |
| Publisher | Brepols |
| Series | Bibliothèque de l'école des hautes études sciences religieuses |
| Volume | 185 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Hoffmann, Philippe , Timotin, Andrei |
| Translator(s) |
Ce livre étudie les différents modes de rapport entre les théories et les pratiques de la prière à la fin de l’Antiquité dans un cadre interdisciplinaire qui réunit des spécialistes de l’histoire religieuse des mondes grec et romain, de la philosophie religieuse tardo-antique et de la littérature patristique. [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/CTKw8APVQcq7YHq |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1397","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1397,"authors_free":[{"id":2173,"entry_id":1397,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":138,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe","free_first_name":"Philippe","free_last_name":"Hoffmann","norm_person":{"id":138,"first_name":"Philippe ","last_name":"Hoffmann","full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/189361905","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2174,"entry_id":1397,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":373,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Timotin, Andrei","free_first_name":"Andrei","free_last_name":"Timotin","norm_person":{"id":373,"first_name":"Andrei","last_name":"Timotin","full_name":"Timotin, Andrei","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1074855116","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9ories et practiques de la pri\u00e8re \u00e0 la fin de l'antiquit\u00e9","main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9ories et practiques de la pri\u00e8re \u00e0 la fin de l'antiquit\u00e9"},"abstract":"Ce livre \u00e9tudie les diff\u00e9rents modes de rapport entre les th\u00e9ories et les pratiques de la pri\u00e8re \u00e0 la fin de l\u2019Antiquit\u00e9 dans un cadre interdisciplinaire qui r\u00e9unit des sp\u00e9cialistes de l\u2019histoire religieuse des mondes grec et romain, de la philosophie religieuse tardo-antique et de la litt\u00e9rature patristique. [author's abstract]","btype":4,"date":"2020","language":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/CTKw8APVQcq7YHq","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":138,"full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":373,"full_name":"Timotin, Andrei","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1397,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Biblioth\u00e8que de l'\u00e9cole des hautes \u00e9tudes sciences religieuses","volume":"185","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Th\u00e9ories et practiques de la pri\u00e8re \u00e0 la fin de l'antiquit\u00e9"]}
| Title | Time, Perpetuity and Eternity in Late Antique Platonism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | KronoScope |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 213-235 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Siniossoglou, Nikētas |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This paper focuses on the late antique conception of time, eternity and perpetual duration and examines the relation between these concepts and Plato’s cosmology. By exploring the controversy between pagan philosophers (Proclus, Ammonius, Simplicius, Olympiodorus) and Christian writers (Aeneas of Gaza, Zacharias of Mytilene, Philoponus) in respect to the interpretation of Plato’s Timaeus, I argue that the Neoplatonic doctrine of the perpetuity (ἀïδιότης) of the world derives from a) the intellectual paradigm presupposed by the conceptual framework of late antiquity and b) the commentators’ principal concern for a coherent conception of Platonic cosmology essentially free from internal contradictions. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/r5SKTg8d7h2L4OM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1017","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1017,"authors_free":[{"id":1533,"entry_id":1017,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":319,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Siniossoglou, Nik\u0113tas","free_first_name":"Nik\u0113tas","free_last_name":"Siniossoglou","norm_person":{"id":319,"first_name":"Nik\u0113tas","last_name":"Siniossoglou","full_name":"Siniossoglou, Nik\u0113tas","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116027585","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Time, Perpetuity and Eternity in Late Antique Platonism","main_title":{"title":"Time, Perpetuity and Eternity in Late Antique Platonism"},"abstract":"This paper focuses on the late antique conception of time, eternity and perpetual duration and examines the relation between these concepts and Plato\u2019s cosmology. By exploring the controversy between pagan philosophers (Proclus, Ammonius, Simplicius, Olympiodorus) and Christian writers (Aeneas of Gaza, Zacharias of Mytilene, Philoponus) in respect to the interpretation of Plato\u2019s Timaeus, I argue that the Neoplatonic doctrine of the perpetuity (\u1f00\u00ef\u03b4\u03b9\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2) of the world derives from a) the intellectual paradigm presupposed by the conceptual framework of late antiquity and b) the commentators\u2019 principal concern for a coherent conception of Platonic cosmology essentially free from internal contradictions.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/r5SKTg8d7h2L4OM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":319,"full_name":"Siniossoglou, Nik\u0113tas","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1017,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"KronoScope","volume":"5","issue":"2","pages":"213-235"}},"sort":["Time, Perpetuity and Eternity in Late Antique Platonism"]}
| Title | Traces d’un commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique à Byzance? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2000 |
| Journal | Revue de sciences philosophiques et théologiques |
| Volume | 84 |
| Pages | 275–284 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Rashed, Marwan |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/FP40JgmUffORIf2 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1060,"authors_free":[{"id":1609,"entry_id":1060,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":194,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rashed, Marwan","free_first_name":"Marwan","free_last_name":"Rashed","norm_person":{"id":194,"first_name":"Marwan","last_name":"Rashed","full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054568634","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Traces d\u2019un commentaire de Simplicius sur la M\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 Byzance?","main_title":{"title":"Traces d\u2019un commentaire de Simplicius sur la M\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 Byzance?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/FP40JgmUffORIf2","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":194,"full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"84","issue":"","pages":"275\u2013284"}},"sort":["Traces d\u2019un commentaire de Simplicius sur la M\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 Byzance?"]}
| Title | Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1987 |
| Published in | Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985 |
| Pages | 289-325 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bossier, Fernand |
| Editor(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Translator(s) |
«Über dem Commentar des Simplicius zu Aristoteles de caelo hat bisher ein besonderer Unglücksstern gewaltet »; c’est par cette phrase que Heiberg entama sa communication pour l’Académie de Berlin. Elle exprime sa profonde conviction d’avoir réussi à neutraliser |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/kOBodA7cDoo95yh |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"568","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":568,"authors_free":[{"id":806,"entry_id":568,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":12,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bossier, Fernand","free_first_name":"Fernand","free_last_name":"Bossier","norm_person":{"id":12,"first_name":"Fernand ","last_name":"Bossier","full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1017981663","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":807,"entry_id":568,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)","main_title":{"title":"Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)"},"abstract":"\u00ab\u00dcber dem Commentar des Simplicius zu Aristoteles de caelo hat bisher ein besonderer Ungl\u00fccksstern gewaltet \u00bb; c\u2019est par cette phrase \r\nque Heiberg entama sa communication pour l\u2019Acad\u00e9mie de Berlin. Elle exprime sa profonde conviction d\u2019avoir r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 neutraliser <en- \r\nfin> l\u2019influence de cet astre fatal \u00e0 la suite d\u2019une \u00e9tude syst\u00e9matique de l\u2019ensemble de la tradition grecque (texte authentique, recension de \r\nBessarion, retraduction grecque). Assur\u00e9ment, personne ne contes\u00adtera que ses recherches et son \u00e9dition n\u2019aient marqu\u00e9 un tournant \r\ndans l\u2019\u00e9tude de l\u2019In De caelo. Cependant, nos propres recherches ont d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que l\u2019astre fatal dont parle Heiberg, n\u2019a pas manqu\u00e9 d\u2019exer\u00ad\r\ncer quelque influence jusque sur sa propre \u00e9dition. S\u2019\u00e9tant m\u00e9pris \u00e0 l\u2019apparence \u00abm\u00e9di\u00e9vale\u00bb des premi\u00e8res lignes de l\u2019\u00e9dition princeps la\u00ad\r\ntine, il a prononc\u00e9 sur l\u2019ensemble de cette \u00e9dition un \u00abcredo\u00bb \u2014 venia sit dicto \u2014 fatal. Il en r\u00e9sulte que son \u00e9dition remarquable est rest\u00e9e \r\nen d\u00e9faut d\u2019exactitude et qu\u2019elle demande \u00e0 \u00eatre achev\u00e9e par une \u00e9di\u00adtion nouvelle qui mettra \u00e0 profit la traduction de R. Grosseteste et le \r\ntexte critique de la traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. [conclusion, p. 325]","btype":2,"date":"1987","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/kOBodA7cDoo95yh","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":12,"full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":568,"section_of":171,"pages":"289-325","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Simplicius. Sa vie, son \u0153uvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Hadot1987","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1987","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1987","abstract":"Depuis une quinzaine d'annees, on assiste en Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Amerique et en France \u00e4 un renouveau des etudes sur Simplicius. Differents chercheurs, partis de problematiques et de preoccupations differentes, se sont rencontres dans ce domaine de recherche d'une importance capitale pour l'histoire de toute la philosophic\r\nantique. C'etait done pour faciliter une etude coordonnee et systematique \u00e4 la fois du texte et de la pensee de Simplicius que la Recherche\r\nCooperative Programmee 739 \u00abRecherches sur les oeuvres et la pensee de Simplicius\u00bb fut fondee en 1982 dans le cadre du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S., Paris). Depuis cette date,\r\nses recherches se deroulent en etroite collaboration avec l'equipe anglo-americaine de recherche de M. le professeur Richard Sorabji, intitulee \u00abAncient Commentators on Aristotle\u00bb, et avec l'Aristoteles-Archiv de la Freie Universit\u00e4t de Berlin-Ouest dirige par M. le professeur Dieter Harlfinger.\r\nPour permettre aux differents membres de la R.C.P., dont plusieurs\r\nhabitent \u00e4 l'etranger, ainsi qu'\u00e4 d'autres savants impresses par les etudes sur Simplicius d'entrer en contact personnel, de resoudre oralement des questions diverses se rapportant \u00e4 l'organisation du travail,\r\nd'echanger entre eux les tout derniers resultats de leurs recherches et\r\nd'engager une discussion sur des problemes difficiles, j'ai organise,\r\ndans le cadre de la R.C.P. 739, un colloque international qui s'est\r\ntenu \u00e4 Paris, \u00e4 la Fondation Hugot, du 28 septembre au ler octobre\r\n1985. Ce colloque a ete entierement finance par la Fondation Hugot\r\ndu College de France, \u00e4 laquelle j'exprime toute ma gratitude. Je tiens\r\naussi \u00e4 remercier M. et Mme de Morant pour la sollicitude et la bienveillance avec laquelle ils ont accueilli les membres du colloque et\r\nveille \u00e4 leur procurer un merveilleux confort.\r\nLe Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique a subventionne la\r\nparution des Actes du Colloque, et je remercie \u039c. le professeur\r\nDr. H. Wenzel d'avoir rendu possible leur parution dans la Serie prestigieuse des Peripatoi de la maison d'edition De Gruyter. (preface]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KWOQ53Rg82cBRpD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus","volume":"15","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)"]}