{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"34","_score":null,"_source":{"id":34,"authors_free":[{"id":40,"entry_id":34,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ebbesen, S","free_first_name":"S","free_last_name":"Ebbesen","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition","main_title":{"title":"Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition"},"abstract":"About thirteen years ago when I was preparing an edition of some Latin 13th century quaestiones on the Sophistici Elenchi, I discovered some puzzling references to a commentary\r\nby \"Alexander\", obviously a Greek. He appeared to have been a very important man to the\r\nWesterners, for often he was simply called 'Commentator', a title reserved in other contexts for Averroes.\r\nThis discovery gave rise to the questions,(!) Who was Alexander? (2) Are there more references to him in other Latin texts? (3) Is his work extant in Latin? (4) Is it extant in Greek?\r\nRe 1 At first I thought he must be Alexander of Aphrodisias. Now I do not know how to answer the question.\r\nRe 2 I soon found that Minio-Paluello and De Rijk had already signalled some other references to Alexander.\r\nRe 3 My first investigations indicated the answer would be no, and I still have not found the text in any manuscript. \r\nRe 4 My early research indicated the answer would be no, but that extant Greek scholia were often comparable to the Latin quotations of Alexander.\r\nThe preliminary probings suggested that a search for more Latin references to Alexander and an inquiry into the Greek scholia on the Elenchi might throw light on the origins of Western scholasticism and at the same time prove the existence of a Byzantine scholasticism comparable to that of Western Europe in the High Middle Ages. A systematic search for more fragments of the Latin translation of Alexanders's commentary resulted in the collection that figures as Vol. II, Part 2, of this study.\r\nStudying the Greek scholia I soon realized that they could not be used for any serious purpose as long as elementary questions of dating and attribution had not been solved. Trying to find the answer to such questions, I found that investigating the whole manuscript tradition\r\nwas inescapable. The results of that investigation are presented in Vol. 1 chapter V and the appendices (in Vol. III).\r\nReading the Greek scholia I became convinced that Byzantine scholasticism never produced results comparable to those of its Western counterpart; but, on the other hand, a study of the late ancient and medieval Greek scholastic tradition could, indeed, throw light on the\r\norigins of Western logic.\r\nThe results of my investigations are presented partly in the notes on \"Alexander's\" fragments (in Vol. Ill), partly in a series of essays on central problems (Vol. I ch.IV).\r\nVol. I chapters I-II contain sketches of pre-scholastic theories of fallacies, some of which were to influence the scholastics, whereas chapter III introduces scholasticism.\r\nAs both Vol. I and Vol. III discuss Greek texts that have never been printed, I have collected a number of such texts in Vol. II, editing also Galen's De captionibus because the earlier editions are no longer satisfactory.\r\nChapters I through W of Vol. I all have a speculative character. I have tried to rein in my imagination, but I may not always have achieved my aim. I feel sure I have misunderstood the old philosophers on several points. Perhaps it can serve as an excuse that most of the problems I deal with have not been investigated before. If there are fundamental errors in chapter V, the consequences for the rest of 'Commentators and Commentaries' will be serious, if not disastrous. I trust, however, that my results concerning the Byzantine tradition are\r\nessentially correct. [preface]\r\n","btype":1,"date":"1981","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/gtXiqKQ2uGtS14q","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[],"book":{"id":34,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"255","_score":null,"_source":{"id":255,"authors_free":[{"id":324,"entry_id":255,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":246,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Licciardi, Ivan Adriano","free_first_name":"Ivan Adriano","free_last_name":"Licciardi","norm_person":{"id":246,"first_name":"Ivan Adriano","last_name":"Licciardi","full_name":"Licciardi, Ivan Adriano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Critica dell\u2019apparente e critica apparente. Simplicio interprete di Parmenide nel Commentario al De Caelo di Aristotele. Saggio introduttivo, raccolta dei testi, traduzione e commentario","main_title":{"title":"Critica dell\u2019apparente e critica apparente. Simplicio interprete di Parmenide nel Commentario al De Caelo di Aristotele. Saggio introduttivo, raccolta dei testi, traduzione e commentario"},"abstract":"Nell'opera di Simplicio l'esegesi non pu\u00f2 essere separata dalla filosofia neoplatonica presa nel suo senso pi\u00f9 ampio: ci\u00f2 che egli ci propone non \u00e8 soltanto una interpretazione complessiva del reale a partire da premesse platonico-aristoteliche, ma anche una Weltanschauung che \u00e8, o ritiene di essere, quella degli Elleni, e che trova la sua espressione pi\u00f9 completa nell'accordo, \u00b5 , tra le filosofie di Aristotele, di Platone e dei Preplatonici e le antiche tradizioni teologiche. Questo libro di Ivan Adriano Licciardi, che completa felicemente la sua opera precedente, persegue del tutto opportunamente questa linea di ricerca e arricchisce la nostra visione su Simplicio filosofo, che cita e interpreta Parmenide. Questo libro mostra, attraverso una lettura minuziosa dei passi interessati del Commentario al De Caelo, che, secondo l'esegesi del filosofo neoplatonico, il vecchio filosofo di Elea - come altri filosofi che rappresentano la - anticipa Platone e, nella prospettiva della \u00b5 , anche Aristotele, nella misura in cui Parmenide concep\u00ec una ontologia dualista, che ingloba tanto il mondo dell'essere - uno quanto il mondo del divenire - molteplice, e nella quale la verit\u00e0 del mondo intelligibile conferisce uno statuto apparente al mondo sensibile'.","btype":1,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/OU817EiB5vZ4blF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":246,"full_name":"Licciardi, Ivan Adriano","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":255,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia Verlag","series":"Symbolon","volume":"44","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Critica dell\u2019apparente e critica apparente. Simplicio interprete di Parmenide nel Commentario al De Caelo di Aristotele. Saggio introduttivo, raccolta dei testi, traduzione e commentario"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"208","_score":null,"_source":{"id":208,"authors_free":[{"id":265,"entry_id":208,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":443,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Salatowsky, Sascha","free_first_name":"Sascha","free_last_name":"Salatowsky","norm_person":{"id":443,"first_name":"Sascha","last_name":"Salatowsky","full_name":"Salatowsky, Sascha","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1055053654","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"De Anima: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert","main_title":{"title":"De Anima: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":"Aristotle\u2019s On the soul is one of the most important books in the history of philosophy. Its fundamental achievement is based on the ontological-ontical definition of the soul and its virtues, which embrace all living beings, including the doctrine of the mind (nous), and whose further explication has been interpreted controversially since antiquity. With respect to the traditional schools of Alexandrism, Neoplatonism, Averroism and Thomism the present study studies the various philosophical and theological constellations of the 16th and 17th century, which were determined by the intracatholical as well as by the interdenominational controversies between the Catholics, Lutherans and Calvinists. From this point of view the works of Luther and Melanchthon, of the Renaissance-Aristotelians Portio, Toletus, Zabarella, and the Conimbricenses as well as the works of the Lutheran and Calvinistic Philosophers of the 17th century are interpreted, these last ones being taken into consideration here for the first time. [authors abstract]\r\n\r\n","btype":1,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ugCqpC74hxamOz2","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":443,"full_name":"Salatowsky, Sascha","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":208,"pubplace":"Amsterdam","publisher":"B.R. Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"4","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["De Anima: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1414","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1414,"authors_free":[{"id":2215,"entry_id":1414,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":393,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gemelli Marciano, Millj Laura","free_first_name":"Millj Laura","free_last_name":"Gemelli Marciano","norm_person":{"id":393,"first_name":"Millj Laura","last_name":"Gemelli Marciano","full_name":"Gemelli Marciano, Millj Laura","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/124333133","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Democrito e l'Accademia. Studi sulla trasmissione dell\u2019atomismo antico da Aristotele a Simplicio","main_title":{"title":"Democrito e l'Accademia. Studi sulla trasmissione dell\u2019atomismo antico da Aristotele a Simplicio"},"abstract":"\r\n\r\nWie sind die antiken Atomisten zur Annahme der Atome gekommen, und wie haben sie deren Unteilbarkeit aufgefasst? Dies sind die schwierigsten Fragen in der Forschung zum antiken Atomismus, und ihnen widmet sich Laura Gemelli in der vorliegenden Studie. Sie \u00fcberpr\u00fcft die antike \u00dcberlieferung unter einem neuen Gesichtspunkt: n\u00e4mlich ausgehend von dem Einfluss, den der akademische Atomismus und die damit verbundenen Problemstellungen und Begriffe auf die Interpretation des antiken Atomismus bei Aristoteles hatten.\r\n\r\nDiese bisher vernachl\u00e4ssigte Perspektive f\u00fchrt zur kritischen Revision allgemein akzeptierter Thesen wie der Entstehung des Atomismus aus dem Eleatismus und der Annahme des Atoms als L\u00f6sung der Aporien \u00fcber die unendliche Teilbarkeit. Die von Aristoteles und von Theophrast ausgehenden Auffassungen des Atomismus werden dann in ihrer weiteren Entwicklung bis zum Neuplatonismus verfolgt. Das Buch schafft die Grundlagen f\u00fcr eine Neubewertung der Quellen und f\u00fcr eine Verschiebung der Perspektive in der Forschung zum antiken Atomismus.","btype":1,"date":"2007","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Knuh4l3200poKNB","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":393,"full_name":"Gemelli Marciano, Millj Laura","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1414,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"De Gruyter ","series":"Studia Praesocratica","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Democrito e l'Accademia. Studi sulla trasmissione dell\u2019atomismo antico da Aristotele a Simplicio"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"65","_score":null,"_source":{"id":65,"authors_free":[{"id":73,"entry_id":65,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr.","main_title":{"title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr."},"abstract":"Durch seine Tendenzen und seine Leistungen unterscheidet sich der Aristotelismus der beiden ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte kaum von dem der zweiten H\u00e4lfte des ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. In der hier behandelten fr\u00fchen Kaiserzeit lassen sich keine neuen Merkmale beobachten, die eine scharfe Trennung zwischen diesen beiden Jahrhunderten und dem vorhergehenden rechtfertigten. Vielmehr erscheint die Periode von Andronikos bis einschlie\u00dflich Alexander von Aphrodisias als relativ einheitlich in ihrer Interpretation des Aristoteles. Sie unterscheidet sich vom neuplatonischen Aristotelesverst\u00e4ndnis haupts\u00e4chlich dadurch, dass sie sich noch nicht zur grunds\u00e4tzlichen Identit\u00e4t zwischen Aristoteles und Platon bekennt. Nur die Menge des Materials, das es zu untersuchen galt, hat mich gezwungen, die Darstellung dieser ganzen Periode auf drei B\u00e4nde zu verteilen. [...]\r\nIn der zweiten H\u00e4lfte dieser Arbeit wollen wir uns mit dem Aristotelismus in der Sicht anderer Schulen befassen. Die Entlehnungen aus dem Aristotelismus bei einigen Mittelplatonikern, ferner die gegen Aristoteles gerichtete Kritik und schlie\u00dflich die Auseinandersetzungen von Nicht-Aristotelikern mit Schriften des Stagiriten d\u00fcrfen in einer Untersuchung \u00fcber den Aristotelismus in den ersten beiden nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten nicht au\u00dfer Acht gelassen werden. Auch dort wird sich zeigen, wie in der Einleitung zum zweiten Buch ausf\u00fchrlicher dargelegt wird, dass etwa bei Platonikern das grunds\u00e4tzliche Bekenntnis zum Platonismus oft Hand in Hand geht mit einem tats\u00e4chlichen Eklektizismus. Die Deutung Platons unter Benutzung typisch aristotelischer Errungenschaften erschien also als durchaus legitim. [preface]","btype":1,"date":"1984","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/nSxL9S7Z1RoD9mZ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":65,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi","volume":"6","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr."]}