{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"971","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":971,"authors_free":[{"id":1462,"entry_id":971,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":39,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Baltussen, Han","free_first_name":"Han","free_last_name":"Baltussen","norm_person":{"id":39,"first_name":"Han","last_name":"Baltussen","full_name":"Baltussen, Han","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/136236456","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2351,"entry_id":971,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":42,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","free_first_name":"Robert W.","free_last_name":"Sharples","norm_person":{"id":42,"first_name":"Robert W.","last_name":"Sharples","full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114269505","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2352,"entry_id":971,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":43,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Sheppard, Anne D.","free_first_name":"Anne D.","free_last_name":"Sheppard","norm_person":{"id":43,"first_name":"Anne D.","last_name":"Sheppard","full_name":"Sheppard, Anne D.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1158024592","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Early Reactions to Plato\u2019s Timaeus: polemic and exegesis in Theophrastus and Epicurus","main_title":{"title":"Early Reactions to Plato\u2019s Timaeus: polemic and exegesis in Theophrastus and Epicurus"},"abstract":"We are reasonably well informed about what might justly be thought of as the commentary \r\ntradition of the late Hellenistic and late antique period. In this series of papers on the theme \r\n\u2018Plato\u2019s Timaeus and the Commentary Tradition\u2019 an obvious choice of topic has been to \r\ndiscuss the works of authors who explicitly declare to be commenting upon or clarifying the \r\ntext o f an author. Most papers in this volume have therefore justly seen it as their task to \r\nclarify the interaction between one commentator and the Timaeus.\r\nMy perspective is slightly different. Commentary as we usually see it must have had its \r\nprecursors in some form or other. As it happens, we have some evidence related to the \r\nTimaeus which makes this a reasonable assumption. I therefore want to look at two thinkers \r\nwhose interpretative efforts occur at the beginnings of the \u2018commentary tradition\u2019 . Here \r\nthings are less clear and well-defined in that at this end o f the scale we are dealing with the \r\nemergence o f exegesis. This means that certain fundamental assumptions - eg. what a \r\ncommentary or a commentator is - would no longer have an obvious value as starting points \r\nand that important questions about the interaction between authors and texts (such as \u2018what \r\nis a commentary?\u2019, \u2018what form did the interpretation of texts take?\u2019 or \u2018when do \r\ncommentaries emerge?\u2019) require a fresh look. [p. 49]","btype":2,"date":"2003","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/MH2yCoPHJ3hq5XF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":39,"full_name":"Baltussen, Han","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":42,"full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":43,"full_name":"Sheppard, Anne D.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":971,"section_of":157,"pages":"49-71","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":157,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"Ancient Approaches to Plato's Timaeus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Sharples\/Sheppard2003","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2003","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2003","abstract":"Twelve academic essays, given during the Institute of Classical Studies research seminar in 2000 and 2001, examine Plato's vision of the `real world' as he presented it in Timaeus while considering the text's influence on classical philosophers and scientists. Specific subjects include astronomy, the reactions of Aristotle and others to Timaeus , Hellenistic musicology, Proclus' Commentary , comparisons with Aristotle's Physics , mythology.","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2ocEqA4hdMXnPzv","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":157,"pubplace":"University of London","publisher":"Institute of Classical Studies","series":"Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies","volume":"46, Supplement 78","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Early Reactions to Plato\u2019s Timaeus: polemic and exegesis in Theophrastus and Epicurus"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"515","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":515,"authors_free":[{"id":714,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":5,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Harlfinger, Dieter","free_first_name":"Dieter","free_last_name":"Harlfinger","norm_person":{"id":5,"first_name":"Dieter","last_name":"Harlfinger","full_name":"Harlfinger, Dieter","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107988674","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":715,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Einige Aspekte der handschriftlichen \u00dcberlieferung des Physikkommentars des Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Einige Aspekte der handschriftlichen \u00dcberlieferung des Physikkommentars des Simplikios"},"abstract":"In der Geschichte der Simplikios-Philologie spielen Frauen eine besondere Rolle. Aus der Feder der byzantinischen Prinzessin Theodora Palaiologina Rhaulaina (ca. 1240\u20141300)1 stammt eine der \u2014wie sich zeigen wird \u2014 textkritisch relevantesten Handschriften des f\u00fcr die Erforschung der Vorsokratik, der Peripatetik wie auch des Neuplatonismus bekannterma\u00dfen unsch\u00e4tzbaren Kommentars zur aristotelischen Physik des Simplikios. Der zwischen 1261 und 1282 datierende2 Codex Mosquensis Muz. 3649 mit den B\u00fcchern I\u2014IV und dem Beginn von Buch V (desinit mutile3 803, 8 Diels4) ist die of- fensichtlich sehr gewissenhafte5 Abschrift jener Frau, die keinesfalls nur als Schreiberin hervorgetreten ist, sondern insbesondere auch als selbst\u00e4ndige hagiographische Schriftstellerin, als t\u00e4tige Patronin eines Scriptoriums und Buchilluminationsateliers, als Besitzerin einer wohl umfangreichen Bibliothek und nicht zuletzt als bedeutendes Mitglied eines Gelehrtenkreises, dem unter anderen auch Maximos Planudes, Gregorios von Zypern und Manuel Holobolos angeh\u00f6rten. Als sich auf Initiative und unter Leitung von Ilsetraut H a d o t die f\u00fchrenden Simplikios-Forscher unserer T a g e im Herbst 1985 in Paris zu ihrem ersten Fachkolloquium versammelten, durfte der Verfasser dieser Zeilen \u2014 obwohl kein Simplikianer \u2014 unter ihnen referieren, \u00fcber ebenjenen Mosquensis von der H a n d der Rhaulaina. Ilsetraut H a d o t wu\u00dfte, da\u00df ich auf einer Bibliotheksreise des Jahres 1966 die Handschrift eingesehen hatte und sie aufgrund der Bewertung des \u201elocus fenestratus\" am Ende von Buch III p. 518 als neuen unabh\u00e4ngigen Texttr\u00e4ger erkannt zu haben glaubte6. D a s Referat konnte zwar von der Klassifizierung des in der T a t unabh\u00e4ngigen Mosquensis ausgehen, mu\u00dfte sich aber zur Kl\u00e4rung der stemmatischen Aporien, die beim Studium der Dielsschen Praefatio und des apparatus criticus zutage traten, auf die Situation der Handschrift \u0395 (Vorlagenwechsel sowie Eb und E\u00e4 als dislozierte Partien in \u0395 bzw. der Vorlage von E) und der Handschrift D (Duktus\u00e4nderung und Vorlagenwechsel) konzentrieren und konnte dar\u00fcber hinaus auf die interessante Rolle einer weiteren Moskauer Handschrift (Len) aufmerksam machen und Fingerzeige zu dem einen oder anderen j\u00fcngeren Manuskript geben. \u2014 Inzwischen habe ich noch einmal \u00fcber den Codex F nachgedacht und nunmehr fast alle Simplikios-Handschriften im Film \u2014 soweit im Berliner Aristoteles-Archiv vorhanden7 \u2014 rasch eingese hen8. Im folgenden wage ich \u2014 der Veranstalterin des Kolloquiums und Editorin der Akten habe ich dabei f\u00fcr Ermunterung und Geduld zu danken \u2014, meine ersten Eindr\u00fccke zu publizieren. Es sind lediglich vorl\u00e4ufige Ergebnisse, die durch systematische Untersuchungen verifiziert werden m\u00fc\u00dften; hierin ein Pl\u00e4doyer f\u00fcr eine kodikologische Stemmatik. [introduction]","btype":2,"date":"1987","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Wc1QgoSJI3npeNI","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":5,"full_name":"Harlfinger, Dieter","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":515,"section_of":171,"pages":"267-286","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Simplicius. Sa vie, son \u0153uvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Hadot1987","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1987","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1987","abstract":"Depuis une quinzaine d'annees, on assiste en Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Amerique et en France \u00e4 un renouveau des etudes sur Simplicius. Differents chercheurs, partis de problematiques et de preoccupations differentes, se sont rencontres dans ce domaine de recherche d'une importance capitale pour l'histoire de toute la philosophic\r\nantique. C'etait done pour faciliter une etude coordonnee et systematique \u00e4 la fois du texte et de la pensee de Simplicius que la Recherche\r\nCooperative Programmee 739 \u00abRecherches sur les oeuvres et la pensee de Simplicius\u00bb fut fondee en 1982 dans le cadre du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S., Paris). Depuis cette date,\r\nses recherches se deroulent en etroite collaboration avec l'equipe anglo-americaine de recherche de M. le professeur Richard Sorabji, intitulee \u00abAncient Commentators on Aristotle\u00bb, et avec l'Aristoteles-Archiv de la Freie Universit\u00e4t de Berlin-Ouest dirige par M. le professeur Dieter Harlfinger.\r\nPour permettre aux differents membres de la R.C.P., dont plusieurs\r\nhabitent \u00e4 l'etranger, ainsi qu'\u00e4 d'autres savants impresses par les etudes sur Simplicius d'entrer en contact personnel, de resoudre oralement des questions diverses se rapportant \u00e4 l'organisation du travail,\r\nd'echanger entre eux les tout derniers resultats de leurs recherches et\r\nd'engager une discussion sur des problemes difficiles, j'ai organise,\r\ndans le cadre de la R.C.P. 739, un colloque international qui s'est\r\ntenu \u00e4 Paris, \u00e4 la Fondation Hugot, du 28 septembre au ler octobre\r\n1985. Ce colloque a ete entierement finance par la Fondation Hugot\r\ndu College de France, \u00e4 laquelle j'exprime toute ma gratitude. Je tiens\r\naussi \u00e4 remercier M. et Mme de Morant pour la sollicitude et la bienveillance avec laquelle ils ont accueilli les membres du colloque et\r\nveille \u00e4 leur procurer un merveilleux confort.\r\nLe Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique a subventionne la\r\nparution des Actes du Colloque, et je remercie \u039c. le professeur\r\nDr. H. Wenzel d'avoir rendu possible leur parution dans la Serie prestigieuse des Peripatoi de la maison d'edition De Gruyter. (preface]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KWOQ53Rg82cBRpD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus","volume":"15","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Einige Aspekte der handschriftlichen \u00dcberlieferung des Physikkommentars des Simplikios"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"621","_score":null,"_source":{"id":621,"authors_free":[{"id":877,"entry_id":621,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":124,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gardella, Mariana","free_first_name":"Mariana","free_last_name":"Gardella","norm_person":{"id":124,"first_name":"Mariana","last_name":"Gardella","full_name":"Gardella, Mariana","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"El testimonio de Arist\u00f3teles sobre Zen\u00f2n de Elea como un detractor de \"lo uno\"","main_title":{"title":"El testimonio de Arist\u00f3teles sobre Zen\u00f2n de Elea como un detractor de \"lo uno\""},"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to discuss the traditional interpretation according to which the arguments of Zeno of Elea against multiplicity constitute a defense of monism. I will try to prove that Zeno\u2019s objections on plurality suppose a previous critique to the existence of the one. Therefore Zeno is neither a monist nor a pluralist but a philosopher who criticizes metaphysical theories that consider being in numerical terms, i. e. as many or as one. I will focus on the analysis of the interpretation of Zeno\u2019s philosophy developed by Aristotle. I will consider some passages from Physics, Sophistical Re\u00adfutations and mainly Metaphysics Hi. 4. 1001b7-I3 (DK 29 A 21). I will also include some testimonies from Simplicius\u2019 commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Physics, where he discusses the interpretations of Eudemus of Rhodes and Alexander of Aphrodisias that support the Aristotelian point of view on Zeno\u2019s philosophy (In Ph. 99.7-18, DK 29 A 21; 138. 3-6, DK 29 A 22). [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/7Ft81rfWlW1HB3z","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":124,"full_name":"Gardella, Mariana","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":621,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Eidos: Revista de Filosof\u00eda de la Universidad del Norte","volume":"23","issue":"","pages":"157-181"}},"sort":["El testimonio de Arist\u00f3teles sobre Zen\u00f2n de Elea como un detractor de \"lo uno\""]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1018","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1018,"authors_free":[{"id":1534,"entry_id":1018,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":320,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sider, David","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Sider","norm_person":{"id":320,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Sider","full_name":"Sider, David","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1129478610","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion"},"abstract":"Notes on Empedocles B 96","btype":3,"date":"1984","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/lRzi7I5P45Zw57Q","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":320,"full_name":"Sider, David","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1018,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mnemosyne, Fourth Series","volume":"37","issue":"1-2","pages":"14-24"}},"sort":["Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1376,"authors_free":[{"id":2120,"entry_id":1376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation of the word \"z\u00f4ros\" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"15","issue":"1","pages":"1-4"}},"sort":["Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"]}