| Title | Ionian Philosophy |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Publication Place | Athen |
| Publisher | International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture |
| Series | Studies in Greek Philosophy |
| Volume | 1 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Boudouris, Konstantin, J. |
| Translator(s) |
| ‘The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)’ (from the editor’s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an ‘Italian’ sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually BOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera" [Review Scolnicov] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"238","_score":null,"_source":{"id":238,"authors_free":[{"id":2413,"entry_id":238,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":328,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin, J.","free_first_name":"Konstantin, J.","free_last_name":"Boudouris","norm_person":{"id":328,"first_name":"Konstantin J.","last_name":"Boudouris,","full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1041800053","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ionian Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"Ionian Philosophy"},"abstract":"\u2018The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)\u2019 (from the editor\u2019s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an \u2018Italian\u2019 sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually\r\nBOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera\" [Review Scolnicov]","btype":4,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":328,"full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":238,"pubplace":"Athen","publisher":"International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture","series":"Studies in Greek Philosophy","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1989]}
| Title | Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Published in | Ionian Philosophy |
| Pages | 369-374 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sylvestre, Maria Luisa |
| Editor(s) | Boudouris, Konstantin, J. |
| Translator(s) |
| This text discusses Simplicius' testimony concerning Anaxagoras and the authenticity of the fragments attributed to Anaxagoras, which are mostly preserved by Simplicius. While scholars have debated the authenticity of Simplicius' fragments, the author believes in Simplicius' faithfulness to the true doctrine of Anaxagoras. However, the author notes that Simplicius wrote about a thousand years after Anaxagoras, was a pupil of Proclus, and a neo-Platonist himself. The text highlights the importance of comparing Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle with the corresponding text of Aristotle to understand his personal interpretation of Anaxagoras. Finally, the text briefly discusses Anaxagoras' concept of nous and its interpretation by Plato, Aristotle, and Simplicius. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/PAjPTmTFazOu2UQ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1385","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":1385,"authors_free":[{"id":2137,"entry_id":1385,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":327,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","free_first_name":"Maria Luisa","free_last_name":"Sylvestre","norm_person":{"id":327,"first_name":"Maria Luisa","last_name":"Sylvestre","full_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2138,"entry_id":1385,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":328,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin, J.","free_first_name":"Konstantin, J.","free_last_name":"Boudouris","norm_person":{"id":328,"first_name":"Konstantin J.","last_name":"Boudouris,","full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1041800053","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras"},"abstract":"This text discusses Simplicius' testimony concerning Anaxagoras and the authenticity of the fragments attributed to Anaxagoras, which are mostly preserved by Simplicius. While scholars have debated the authenticity of Simplicius' fragments, the author believes in Simplicius' faithfulness to the true doctrine of Anaxagoras. However, the author notes that Simplicius wrote about a thousand years after Anaxagoras, was a pupil of Proclus, and a neo-Platonist himself. The text highlights the importance of comparing Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle with the corresponding text of Aristotle to understand his personal interpretation of Anaxagoras. Finally, the text briefly discusses Anaxagoras' concept of nous and its interpretation by Plato, Aristotle, and Simplicius. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":2,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/PAjPTmTFazOu2UQ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":327,"full_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":328,"full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1385,"section_of":238,"pages":"369-374","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":238,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"Ionian Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Boudouris1989","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1989","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1989","abstract":"\u2018The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)\u2019 (from the editor\u2019s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an \u2018Italian\u2019 sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually\r\nBOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera\" [Review Scolnicov]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":238,"pubplace":"Athen","publisher":"International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture","series":"Studies in Greek Philosophy","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1989]}
| Title | Ionian Philosophy |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Publication Place | Athen |
| Publisher | International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture |
| Series | Studies in Greek Philosophy |
| Volume | 1 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Boudouris, Konstantin, J. |
| Translator(s) |
‘The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)’ (from the editor’s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an ‘Italian’ sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually BOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera" [Review Scolnicov] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"238","_score":null,"_source":{"id":238,"authors_free":[{"id":2413,"entry_id":238,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":328,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin, J.","free_first_name":"Konstantin, J.","free_last_name":"Boudouris","norm_person":{"id":328,"first_name":"Konstantin J.","last_name":"Boudouris,","full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1041800053","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ionian Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"Ionian Philosophy"},"abstract":"\u2018The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)\u2019 (from the editor\u2019s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an \u2018Italian\u2019 sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually\r\nBOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera\" [Review Scolnicov]","btype":4,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":328,"full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":238,"pubplace":"Athen","publisher":"International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture","series":"Studies in Greek Philosophy","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Ionian Philosophy"]}
| Title | Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Published in | Ionian Philosophy |
| Pages | 369-374 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sylvestre, Maria Luisa |
| Editor(s) | Boudouris, Konstantin, J. |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses Simplicius' testimony concerning Anaxagoras and the authenticity of the fragments attributed to Anaxagoras, which are mostly preserved by Simplicius. While scholars have debated the authenticity of Simplicius' fragments, the author believes in Simplicius' faithfulness to the true doctrine of Anaxagoras. However, the author notes that Simplicius wrote about a thousand years after Anaxagoras, was a pupil of Proclus, and a neo-Platonist himself. The text highlights the importance of comparing Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle with the corresponding text of Aristotle to understand his personal interpretation of Anaxagoras. Finally, the text briefly discusses Anaxagoras' concept of nous and its interpretation by Plato, Aristotle, and Simplicius. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/PAjPTmTFazOu2UQ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1385","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":1385,"authors_free":[{"id":2137,"entry_id":1385,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":327,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","free_first_name":"Maria Luisa","free_last_name":"Sylvestre","norm_person":{"id":327,"first_name":"Maria Luisa","last_name":"Sylvestre","full_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2138,"entry_id":1385,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":328,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin, J.","free_first_name":"Konstantin, J.","free_last_name":"Boudouris","norm_person":{"id":328,"first_name":"Konstantin J.","last_name":"Boudouris,","full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1041800053","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras"},"abstract":"This text discusses Simplicius' testimony concerning Anaxagoras and the authenticity of the fragments attributed to Anaxagoras, which are mostly preserved by Simplicius. While scholars have debated the authenticity of Simplicius' fragments, the author believes in Simplicius' faithfulness to the true doctrine of Anaxagoras. However, the author notes that Simplicius wrote about a thousand years after Anaxagoras, was a pupil of Proclus, and a neo-Platonist himself. The text highlights the importance of comparing Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle with the corresponding text of Aristotle to understand his personal interpretation of Anaxagoras. Finally, the text briefly discusses Anaxagoras' concept of nous and its interpretation by Plato, Aristotle, and Simplicius. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":2,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/PAjPTmTFazOu2UQ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":327,"full_name":"Sylvestre, Maria Luisa","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":328,"full_name":"Boudouris, Konstantin J.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1385,"section_of":238,"pages":"369-374","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":238,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"Ionian Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Boudouris1989","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1989","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1989","abstract":"\u2018The articles in this volume are, in the main, the texts of papers read either in full or in part at the First International Conference on Greek Philosophy (Samos 1988)\u2019 (from the editor\u2019s Preface). Appropriately to such a first conference, it was devoted to the beginnings of philosophy in Greece and, more specifically, in Ionia itself. The volume includes forty- seven papers dealing with all the major figures of Ionian philosophy, from the Milesians to Anaxagoras. Pythagoras, the most illustrious native of Samos, and the Pythagoreans (technically considered an \u2018Italian\u2019 sect, but included by courtesy in the theme of the conference), attract the attention of seven scholars. The other notable Samian, Melissus, is the subject of only one contribution, by D. Furley, possibly because Melissus is usually\r\nBOOK REVIEWS 141classified by the doxographers as an Eleatic. Xenophanes of Colophon is dealt with in five of the articles. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost half of the papers deal with Heraclitus of Ephesus, just across the water from Samos. Among those excluded from this book are the Italians Parmenides, Zeno and Empedocles, and the atomists of Abdera\" [Review Scolnicov]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2D5JCcZSv7k0WeN","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":238,"pubplace":"Athen","publisher":"International Association for Greek Philosophy and Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture","series":"Studies in Greek Philosophy","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Simplicius' Testimony Concerning Anaxagoras"]}