| Title | Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. v. Chr. |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1973 |
| Publication Place | Berlin – New York |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Series | Peripatoi |
| Volume | 5 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/VBBIsjdgwwe3ta8 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"14","_score":null,"_source":{"id":14,"authors_free":[{"id":15,"entry_id":14,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. v. Chr.","main_title":{"title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. v. Chr."},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1973","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/VBBIsjdgwwe3ta8","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":14,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1973]}
| Title | Pseudo-Archytas über die Kategorien |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1972 |
| Publication Place | Berlin – New York |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Series | Peripatoi |
| Volume | 4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Szlezák, Thomas Alexander |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ZcsapEJyDS8Uc5F |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"220","_score":null,"_source":{"id":220,"authors_free":[{"id":282,"entry_id":220,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":509,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","free_first_name":"Thomas Alexander","free_last_name":"Szlez\u00e1k","norm_person":{"id":509,"first_name":"Thomas Alexander","last_name":"Szlez\u00e1k","full_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11775403X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Pseudo-Archytas \u00fcber die Kategorien","main_title":{"title":"Pseudo-Archytas \u00fcber die Kategorien"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1972","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZcsapEJyDS8Uc5F","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":509,"full_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":220,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi","volume":"4","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1972]}
| Title | Poion and Poiotes in Stoic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1972 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 279-285 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Reesor, Margaret E. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The quality or principal cause exists in its sub- stratum by fate. "Virtue benefits," therefore, is a necessary proposition because the predicate is derived from the principal cause inherent by fate in the subject. In order that I may show more easily the relation- ship among the various terms in this diaeresis, I would like to substitute for "Virtue benefits" a necessary proposition related to the term "lives." [p. 280] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Hk61NJLPYwSqT37 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"859","_score":null,"_source":{"id":859,"authors_free":[{"id":1263,"entry_id":859,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":302,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Reesor, Margaret E.","free_first_name":"Margaret E.","free_last_name":"Reesor","norm_person":{"id":302,"first_name":"Margaret E.","last_name":"Reesor","full_name":"Reesor, Margaret E.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Poion and Poiotes in Stoic Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"Poion and Poiotes in Stoic Philosophy"},"abstract":"The quality or principal cause exists in its sub- \r\nstratum by fate. \"Virtue benefits,\" therefore, is a necessary proposition \r\nbecause the predicate is derived from the principal cause inherent by \r\nfate in the subject. In order that I may show more easily the relation- \r\nship among the various terms in this diaeresis, I would like to substitute \r\nfor \"Virtue benefits\" a necessary proposition related to the term \r\n\"lives.\" [p. 280]","btype":3,"date":"1972","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Hk61NJLPYwSqT37","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":302,"full_name":"Reesor, Margaret E.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":859,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"17","issue":"3","pages":"279-285"}},"sort":[1972]}
| Title | Necessity, Chance, and Freedom in the Early Atomists |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1972 |
| Journal | Phoenix |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 342-357 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Edmunds, Lowell |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Fortune, which Democritus so disparaged, had the last laugh on the laughing philosopher when through the fragmentation of his work it obscured a cardinal principle of the atomist system, necessity. Or would Democritus have called this the fatum libellorum? At any rate, the obscurity of this principle is immediately apparent, both in the ancient doxographical tradition and in modern scholarship. Without endorsing any of the views which variously identify necessity with some one characteristic of the atoms, their weight or aboriginal motion, or with the void they move in,x one can yet attempt to undo the identification of necessity with the famous "whirl" of the atoms2 and to see necessity as a single concept of which the causal operation in the system is uniform. Even Zeus was subject to necessity, and one might think of Democritus as refining and systematizing an ancient belief, in the same way that in making r6 'povev physical he subscribed, says Theophrastus, to a "most antique opinion," to which all the poets and sages adhered... [p. 342] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2OUib0xfSoDLMrh |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"753","_score":null,"_source":{"id":753,"authors_free":[{"id":1118,"entry_id":753,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":80,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Edmunds, Lowell","free_first_name":"Lowell","free_last_name":"Edmunds","norm_person":{"id":80,"first_name":"Lowell","last_name":"Edmunds","full_name":"Edmunds, Lowell","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116147319X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Necessity, Chance, and Freedom in the Early Atomists","main_title":{"title":"Necessity, Chance, and Freedom in the Early Atomists"},"abstract":"Fortune, which Democritus so disparaged, had the last laugh on the \r\nlaughing philosopher when through the fragmentation of his work it \r\nobscured a cardinal principle of the atomist system, necessity. Or would \r\nDemocritus have called this the fatum libellorum? At any rate, the \r\nobscurity of this principle is immediately apparent, both in the ancient \r\ndoxographical tradition and in modern scholarship. Without endorsing \r\nany of the views which variously identify necessity with some one \r\ncharacteristic of the atoms, their weight or aboriginal motion, or with the \r\nvoid they move in,x one can yet attempt to undo the identification of \r\nnecessity with the famous \"whirl\" of the atoms2 and to see necessity as a \r\nsingle concept of which the causal operation in the system is uniform. \r\nEven Zeus was subject to necessity, and one might think of Democritus as \r\nrefining and systematizing an ancient belief, in the same way that in \r\nmaking r6 'povev physical he subscribed, says Theophrastus, to a \"most \r\nantique opinion,\" to which all the poets and sages adhered... [p. 342]","btype":3,"date":"1972","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2OUib0xfSoDLMrh","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":80,"full_name":"Edmunds, Lowell","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":753,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phoenix","volume":"26","issue":"4","pages":"342-357"}},"sort":[1972]}
| Title | Priscianus Lydus en de "In De Anima" van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Dutch |
| Date | 1972 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor Filosofie |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 761-822 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bossier, Fernand , Steel, Carlos |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| What I want to do in this paper is to look at how Aristotle’s successors treated some points in his discussions of reason, and in particular the discussion in the De anima. about their handling of relevant parts of the Nichomachaean Ethics we know very little, for unlike the De anima that treatise was not a major subject of study in the philosophical lectures and seminars of late antiquity. Though a commentary on some of it had been written by Aspasius, and notes by other, probably pre -Neoplatonic, hands survive, exposition of the Nicomachean Ethics seems to have been one of the gaps that the group of Aristotelians around Anna Comnena in twelfth-century Constantinople felt that they needed to fill. [pp. 104 f.] Source: https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/MADsskDf9a78Egx • Bossier, Fernand and Carlos Steel, 1972, “Priscianus Lydus en de ‘In de Anima’ van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius”, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie, 34(4): 761–822. Abstract: Dans cet article, nous avons essayé d'examiner la valeur de l'attribution traditionnelle du commentaire In De Anima à Simplicius. En comparant ce traité aux grands commentaires de Simplicius (sur les Catégories, la Physique et le De Caelo d'Aristote), nous avons été en effet frappés par les divergences de style et de langue, ainsi que par la manière différente de commenter. Dans la première partie, nous démontrons que l'auteur du In De Anima a écrit également la Metaphrasis in Theophrastum, qui nous a été transmise sous le nom de Priscien le Lydien. Dans le In De Anima, l'auteur renvoie à une de ses œuvres, qu'il appelle "Epitomé de la Physique de Théophraste". En réalité, cette référence se rapporte à un passage de la Metaphrase de Priscien, où la même problématique est exposée dans des termes identiques. - 2° Une comparaison détaillée, qui porte sur l'ensemble des deux œuvres, nous révèle une telle ressemblance de style et de pensée - il y a même des phrases à peu près identiques - qu'elle ne peut s'expliquer que par l'hypothèse de l'identité de l'auteur. Dans la deuxième partie, nous essayons d'identifier l'auteur de ces deux œuvres qui nous ont pourtant été transmises sous deux noms différents. L'étude de la tradition directe et indirecte n'apporte guère de solution, puisque l'attribution des deux textes, l'un à Simplicius, l'autre à Priscien, y paraît très solide. Ce n'est donc que par une critique interne du In De Anima, notamment par la confrontation avec les commentaires de Simplicius, dont l'attribution est certaine, que la question pourra être tranchée. Dans le In De Anima, l'auteur renvoie trois fois à son commentaire sur la Physique. Pourtant, il est bien difficile de retrouver dans le grand commentaire de Simplicius trois passages dont le contenu et surtout le vocabulaire prouvent que l'auteur s'y réfère. - 2° Dans le In De Anima, on ne retrouve pas les traits caractéristiques de la méthode de commenter de Simplicius, ni l'approche du texte par la documentation historique, ni les longues discussions avec les exégètes antérieurs, ni l'exposé prolixe et bien structuré ; d'autre part, aucun des commentaires de Simplicius ne témoigne de la phraséologie tortueuse de notre œuvre, ni de ses formules stéréotypées. - 3° La différence doctrinale est encore plus importante. Nulle part chez Simplicius n'apparaît la théorie de l'âme comme "émanation", qui est si fondamentale dans le In De Anima ("émanation" y est un concept-clé). Les rares digressions du In De Anima à propos de questions physiques et logiques ne correspondent pas aux exposés de Simplicius sur les mêmes problèmes. Ainsi, nous avons confronté la doctrine de la "physis", de l'âme et de son "automotion", et enfin le rapport entre le "genre" et les différences "constitutives" et "diérétiques". De tout cela se dégage une telle divergence entre le In De Anima et les autres commentaires qu'elle ne peut s'expliquer par une évolution chez Simplicius lui-même. Le In De Anima lui est donc faussement attribué ; et puisque nous avons établi que ce commentaire est du même auteur que la Metaphrase, nous pouvons conclure qu'il a été vraisemblablement écrit par Priscien le Lydien, un philosophe néoplatonicien dont nous savons seulement qu'il a accompagné Damascius et Simplicius en exil en Perse. [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ufNuMRxWJbAzWRP |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1077","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1077,"authors_free":[{"id":1632,"entry_id":1077,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":12,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bossier, Fernand","free_first_name":"Fernand","free_last_name":"Bossier","norm_person":{"id":12,"first_name":"Fernand ","last_name":"Bossier","full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1017981663","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1633,"entry_id":1077,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":14,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steel, Carlos","free_first_name":"Carlos","free_last_name":"Steel","norm_person":{"id":14,"first_name":"Carlos ","last_name":"Steel","full_name":"Steel, Carlos ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122963083","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Priscianus Lydus en de \"In De Anima\" van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Priscianus Lydus en de \"In De Anima\" van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius"},"abstract":"What I want to do in this paper is to look at how Aristotle\u2019s successors treated some points in his discussions of reason, and in particular the discussion in the De anima. about their handling of relevant parts of the Nichomachaean Ethics we know very little, for unlike the De anima that treatise was not a major subject of study in the philosophical lectures and seminars of late antiquity. Though a commentary on some of it had been written by Aspasius, and notes by other, probably pre -Neoplatonic, hands survive, exposition of the Nicomachean Ethics seems to have been one of the gaps that the group of Aristotelians around Anna Comnena in twelfth-century Constantinople felt that they needed to fill. [pp. 104 f.]\r\nSource: https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/MADsskDf9a78Egx\r\n\u2022\tBossier, Fernand and Carlos Steel, 1972, \u201cPriscianus Lydus en de \u2018In de Anima\u2019 van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius\u201d, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie, 34(4): 761\u2013822.\r\nAbstract: Dans cet article, nous avons essay\u00e9 d'examiner la valeur de l'attribution traditionnelle du commentaire In De Anima \u00e0 Simplicius. En comparant ce trait\u00e9 aux grands commentaires de Simplicius (sur les Cat\u00e9gories, la Physique et le De Caelo d'Aristote), nous avons \u00e9t\u00e9 en effet frapp\u00e9s par les divergences de style et de langue, ainsi que par la mani\u00e8re diff\u00e9rente de commenter. \r\nDans la premi\u00e8re partie, nous d\u00e9montrons que l'auteur du In De Anima a \u00e9crit \u00e9galement la Metaphrasis in Theophrastum, qui nous a \u00e9t\u00e9 transmise sous le nom de Priscien le Lydien. Dans le In De Anima, l'auteur renvoie \u00e0 une de ses \u0153uvres, qu'il appelle \"Epitom\u00e9 de la Physique de Th\u00e9ophraste\". En r\u00e9alit\u00e9, cette r\u00e9f\u00e9rence se rapporte \u00e0 un passage de la Metaphrase de Priscien, o\u00f9 la m\u00eame probl\u00e9matique est expos\u00e9e dans des termes identiques. - 2\u00b0 Une comparaison d\u00e9taill\u00e9e, qui porte sur l'ensemble des deux \u0153uvres, nous r\u00e9v\u00e8le une telle ressemblance de style et de pens\u00e9e - il y a m\u00eame des phrases \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s identiques - qu'elle ne peut s'expliquer que par l'hypoth\u00e8se de l'identit\u00e9 de l'auteur.\r\nDans la deuxi\u00e8me partie, nous essayons d'identifier l'auteur de ces deux \u0153uvres qui nous ont pourtant \u00e9t\u00e9 transmises sous deux noms diff\u00e9rents. L'\u00e9tude de la tradition directe et indirecte n'apporte gu\u00e8re de solution, puisque l'attribution des deux textes, l'un \u00e0 Simplicius, l'autre \u00e0 Priscien, y para\u00eet tr\u00e8s solide. Ce n'est donc que par une critique interne du In De Anima, notamment par la confrontation avec les commentaires de Simplicius, dont l'attribution est certaine, que la question pourra \u00eatre tranch\u00e9e.\r\nDans le In De Anima, l'auteur renvoie trois fois \u00e0 son commentaire sur la Physique. Pourtant, il est bien difficile de retrouver dans le grand commentaire de Simplicius trois passages dont le contenu et surtout le vocabulaire prouvent que l'auteur s'y r\u00e9f\u00e8re. - 2\u00b0 Dans le In De Anima, on ne retrouve pas les traits caract\u00e9ristiques de la m\u00e9thode de commenter de Simplicius, ni l'approche du texte par la documentation historique, ni les longues discussions avec les ex\u00e9g\u00e8tes ant\u00e9rieurs, ni l'expos\u00e9 prolixe et bien structur\u00e9 ; d'autre part, aucun des commentaires de Simplicius ne t\u00e9moigne de la phras\u00e9ologie tortueuse de notre \u0153uvre, ni de ses formules st\u00e9r\u00e9otyp\u00e9es. - 3\u00b0 La diff\u00e9rence doctrinale est encore plus importante. Nulle part chez Simplicius n'appara\u00eet la th\u00e9orie de l'\u00e2me comme \"\u00e9manation\", qui est si fondamentale dans le In De Anima (\"\u00e9manation\" y est un concept-cl\u00e9). Les rares digressions du In De Anima \u00e0 propos de questions physiques et logiques ne correspondent pas aux expos\u00e9s de Simplicius sur les m\u00eames probl\u00e8mes. Ainsi, nous avons confront\u00e9 la doctrine de la \"physis\", de l'\u00e2me et de son \"automotion\", et enfin le rapport entre le \"genre\" et les diff\u00e9rences \"constitutives\" et \"di\u00e9r\u00e9tiques\". De tout cela se d\u00e9gage une telle divergence entre le In De Anima et les autres commentaires qu'elle ne peut s'expliquer par une \u00e9volution chez Simplicius lui-m\u00eame. Le In De Anima lui est donc faussement attribu\u00e9 ; et puisque nous avons \u00e9tabli que ce commentaire est du m\u00eame auteur que la Metaphrase, nous pouvons conclure qu'il a \u00e9t\u00e9 vraisemblablement \u00e9crit par Priscien le Lydien, un philosophe n\u00e9oplatonicien dont nous savons seulement qu'il a accompagn\u00e9 Damascius et Simplicius en exil en Perse.\r\n[author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1972","language":"Dutch","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ufNuMRxWJbAzWRP","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":12,"full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":14,"full_name":"Steel, Carlos ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1077,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Tijdschrift voor Filosofie","volume":"34","issue":"4","pages":"761-822"}},"sort":[1972]}
| Title | The Nature of Zeno's Argument against Plurality in DK 29 B 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1972 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 40-52 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Abraham, William E. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Simplicius has preserved (Phys. 140, 34) a Zenonian argument purporting to show that if an object of positive magnitude has parts from which it derives its size, then any such object must be at once of infinite magnitude and zero magnitude. This surprising consequence is based upon a construction which Zeno makes, but his argument is widely thought to be grossly fallacious. Most often he is supposed to have misunderstood the arithmetic of his own construction. Evidently, any such charge must be premised on some view of the particular nature of the sequence to which Zeno's construction gives rise. I seek to develop a view that Zeno's argument is in fact free from fallacy, and offer reason to fear that his real argument has usually been missed. [p. 40] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/QHBs8Wv701RyPQh |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"780","_score":null,"_source":{"id":780,"authors_free":[{"id":1145,"entry_id":780,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":3,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abraham, William E.","free_first_name":"William E.","free_last_name":"Abraham","norm_person":{"id":3,"first_name":"William E.","last_name":"Abraham","full_name":"Abraham, William E.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1120967007","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Nature of Zeno's Argument against Plurality in DK 29 B 1","main_title":{"title":"The Nature of Zeno's Argument against Plurality in DK 29 B 1"},"abstract":"Simplicius has preserved (Phys. 140, 34) a Zenonian argument purporting to show that if an object of positive magnitude has parts from \r\nwhich it derives its size, then any such object must be at once of \r\ninfinite magnitude and zero magnitude. This surprising consequence \r\nis based upon a construction which Zeno makes, but his argument is \r\nwidely thought to be grossly fallacious. Most often he is supposed to \r\nhave misunderstood the arithmetic of his own construction. Evidently, \r\nany such charge must be premised on some view of the particular \r\nnature of the sequence to which Zeno's construction gives rise. I seek \r\nto develop a view that Zeno's argument is in fact free from fallacy, \r\nand offer reason to fear that his real argument has usually been missed. [p. 40]","btype":3,"date":"1972","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QHBs8Wv701RyPQh","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":3,"full_name":"Abraham, William E.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":780,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"17","issue":"1","pages":"40-52"}},"sort":[1972]}
| Title | Fallgesetz und Massebegriff. Zwei wissenschaftshistorische Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie des Johannes Philoponus |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1971 |
| Publication Place | Berlin |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Series | Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wolff, Michael |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/c1Gv38AYZPU7LNt |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"186","_score":null,"_source":{"id":186,"authors_free":[{"id":242,"entry_id":186,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":364,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wolff, Michael","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Wolff","norm_person":{"id":364,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Wolff","full_name":"Wolff, Michael","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131523120","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Fallgesetz und Massebegriff. Zwei wissenschaftshistorische Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie des Johannes Philoponus","main_title":{"title":"Fallgesetz und Massebegriff. Zwei wissenschaftshistorische Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie des Johannes Philoponus"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1971","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/c1Gv38AYZPU7LNt","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":364,"full_name":"Wolff, Michael","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":186,"pubplace":"Berlin","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1971]}
| Title | Parmenides, Fr. 8, 5 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1971 |
| Published in | God Time Being: Two Studies in the Transcendental Tradition in Greek Philosophy |
| Pages | 16-32 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Whittaker, John H. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/KYNK9TVAyawfHH0 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"439","_score":null,"_source":{"id":439,"authors_free":[{"id":589,"entry_id":439,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":411,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Whittaker, John H.","free_first_name":"John H.","free_last_name":"Whittaker","norm_person":{"id":411,"first_name":"John H.","last_name":"Whittaker","full_name":"Whittaker, John H.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/124441203","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides, Fr. 8, 5","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides, Fr. 8, 5"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1971","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KYNK9TVAyawfHH0","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":411,"full_name":"Whittaker, John H.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":439,"section_of":144,"pages":"16-32","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":144,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":1,"language":"en","title":"God Time Being: Two Studies in the Transcendental Tradition in Greek Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Whittaker1971b","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1971","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1971","abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/uuCsW6AtAJnbmPa","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":144,"pubplace":"Oslo","publisher":"Universitetsforlaget","series":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":"23","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1971]}
| Title | 'Planets' in Simplicius De caelo 471.1 ff. |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1971 |
| Journal | The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
| Volume | 91 |
| Pages | 138-139 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hall, J.J |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Thus all that Simplicius is saying, on Eudemus’ authority, is that Anaximander ‘was the first to discuss’ the sizes and distances of ‘planets’, using the latter term to include sun and moon; and this agrees with what the doxographers tell us: Anaximander had views about the distances of sun and moon, and the size of the sun.11 A sceptic, like Dicks, may question this whole tradition; but it should not be claimed that what Simplicius says of Anaximander and planômena in 471.2-6 is inconsistent with our other authorities. [conclusion, p. 139] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ZmTTpk12fUJCyWj |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1342","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1342,"authors_free":[{"id":2000,"entry_id":1342,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":165,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hall, J.J","free_first_name":"J.J.","free_last_name":"Hall","norm_person":{"id":165,"first_name":"J.J","last_name":"Hall","full_name":"Hall, J. J","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"'Planets' in Simplicius De caelo 471.1 ff.","main_title":{"title":"'Planets' in Simplicius De caelo 471.1 ff."},"abstract":"Thus all that Simplicius is saying, on Eudemus\u2019 \r\nauthority, is that Anaximander \u2018was the first to \r\ndiscuss\u2019 the sizes and distances of \u2018planets\u2019, using the latter term to include sun and moon; and this agrees with what the doxographers tell us: Anaximander had views about the distances of sun and moon, and the size of the sun.11 A sceptic, like Dicks, may question this whole tradition; but it should not be claimed that what Simplicius says of Anaximander and plan\u00f4mena in 471.2-6 is incon\u00adsistent with our other authorities. [conclusion, p. 139]","btype":3,"date":"1971","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZmTTpk12fUJCyWj","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":165,"full_name":"Hall, J. J","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1342,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Journal of Hellenic Studies","volume":"91","issue":"","pages":"138-139"}},"sort":[1971]}
| Title | ΟΜΟΥ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΑΝΤΑ ΗΝ |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1971 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 246-248 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Rösler, Wolfgang |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Wie alle umfangreicheren Fragmente der Abhandlung Περί φύσεως des Anaxagoras ist auch Fr. 1 (VS 59 B 1) durch den Kommentar des Simphkios zur Aristotelischen Physik überliefert. Simplikios hatte die Möglichkeit, ein Exemplar der Schrift des ionischen Philosophen zu benutzen. In seiner ganzen Länge erscheint das Fragment, dessen Stellung am Anfang des Buches aus drücklich bezeugt ist, nur einmal {155, 26) ; daneben gibt es weitere Passagen, in denen lediglich der einleitende Satz bzw. dessen Beginn zitiert wird. Ein Überblick zeigt, daß zwischen den einzelnen Zitaten Unterschiede in der Wort stellung bestehen. Deshalb soll im folgenden der Versuch unternommen werden, die ursprüngliche Anordnung in der Textvorlage des Simphkios zu rekonstru ieren. [p. 246] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/9n12ZGIEEzHXfpF |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"774","_score":null,"_source":{"id":774,"authors_free":[{"id":1138,"entry_id":774,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":383,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"R\u00f6sler, Wolfgang","free_first_name":"Wolfgang","free_last_name":"R\u00f6sler","norm_person":{"id":383,"first_name":"Wolfgang","last_name":"R\u00f6sler","full_name":"R\u00f6sler, Wolfgang","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133199266","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"\u039f\u039c\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0397\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u0391 \u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0391 \u0397\u039d","main_title":{"title":"\u039f\u039c\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0397\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u0391 \u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0391 \u0397\u039d"},"abstract":"Wie alle umfangreicheren Fragmente der Abhandlung \u03a0\u03b5\u03c1\u03af \u03c6\u03cd\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2 des \r\nAnaxagoras ist auch Fr. 1 (VS 59 B 1) durch den Kommentar des Simphkios \r\nzur Aristotelischen Physik \u00fcberliefert. Simplikios hatte die M\u00f6glichkeit, ein \r\nExemplar der Schrift des ionischen Philosophen zu benutzen. In seiner ganzen \r\nL\u00e4nge erscheint das Fragment, dessen Stellung am Anfang des Buches aus\u00ad\r\ndr\u00fccklich bezeugt ist, nur einmal {155, 26) ; daneben gibt es weitere Passagen, \r\nin denen lediglich der einleitende Satz bzw. dessen Beginn zitiert wird. Ein \r\n\u00dcberblick zeigt, da\u00df zwischen den einzelnen Zitaten Unterschiede in der Wort\u00ad\r\nstellung bestehen. Deshalb soll im folgenden der Versuch unternommen werden, \r\ndie urspr\u00fcngliche Anordnung in der Textvorlage des Simphkios zu rekonstru\u00ad\r\nieren. [p. 246]","btype":3,"date":"1971","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9n12ZGIEEzHXfpF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":383,"full_name":"R\u00f6sler, Wolfgang","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":774,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"99","issue":"2","pages":"246-248"}},"sort":[1971]}
| Title | The Text of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1987 |
| Published in | Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985 |
| Pages | 246-266 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Tarán, Leonardo |
| Editor(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Translator(s) |
My main purpose here is to offer reasons why a new and truly critical edition of Simplicius' commentary is necessary. To do so, in what follows, I shall have to point out some of the shortcomings to be found in Diels' edition of this work. [p. 246] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/AGFXKRNVYJNeN2K |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"726","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":726,"authors_free":[{"id":1085,"entry_id":726,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":330,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tar\u00e1n, Leonardo","free_first_name":"Leonardo","free_last_name":"Tar\u00e1n","norm_person":{"id":330,"first_name":"Tar\u00e1n","last_name":" Leonardo ","full_name":"Tar\u00e1n, Leonardo ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168065100","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1086,"entry_id":726,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Text of Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Physics","main_title":{"title":"The Text of Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Physics"},"abstract":"My main purpose here is to offer reasons why a new and truly critical edition of Simplicius' commentary is necessary. To do so, in what follows, I shall have to point out some of the shortcomings to be found in Diels' edition of this work. [p. 246]","btype":2,"date":"1987","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/AGFXKRNVYJNeN2K","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":330,"full_name":"Tar\u00e1n, Leonardo ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":726,"section_of":171,"pages":"246-266","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Simplicius. Sa vie, son \u0153uvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Hadot1987","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1987","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1987","abstract":"Depuis une quinzaine d'annees, on assiste en Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Amerique et en France \u00e4 un renouveau des etudes sur Simplicius. Differents chercheurs, partis de problematiques et de preoccupations differentes, se sont rencontres dans ce domaine de recherche d'une importance capitale pour l'histoire de toute la philosophic\r\nantique. C'etait done pour faciliter une etude coordonnee et systematique \u00e4 la fois du texte et de la pensee de Simplicius que la Recherche\r\nCooperative Programmee 739 \u00abRecherches sur les oeuvres et la pensee de Simplicius\u00bb fut fondee en 1982 dans le cadre du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S., Paris). Depuis cette date,\r\nses recherches se deroulent en etroite collaboration avec l'equipe anglo-americaine de recherche de M. le professeur Richard Sorabji, intitulee \u00abAncient Commentators on Aristotle\u00bb, et avec l'Aristoteles-Archiv de la Freie Universit\u00e4t de Berlin-Ouest dirige par M. le professeur Dieter Harlfinger.\r\nPour permettre aux differents membres de la R.C.P., dont plusieurs\r\nhabitent \u00e4 l'etranger, ainsi qu'\u00e4 d'autres savants impresses par les etudes sur Simplicius d'entrer en contact personnel, de resoudre oralement des questions diverses se rapportant \u00e4 l'organisation du travail,\r\nd'echanger entre eux les tout derniers resultats de leurs recherches et\r\nd'engager une discussion sur des problemes difficiles, j'ai organise,\r\ndans le cadre de la R.C.P. 739, un colloque international qui s'est\r\ntenu \u00e4 Paris, \u00e4 la Fondation Hugot, du 28 septembre au ler octobre\r\n1985. Ce colloque a ete entierement finance par la Fondation Hugot\r\ndu College de France, \u00e4 laquelle j'exprime toute ma gratitude. Je tiens\r\naussi \u00e4 remercier M. et Mme de Morant pour la sollicitude et la bienveillance avec laquelle ils ont accueilli les membres du colloque et\r\nveille \u00e4 leur procurer un merveilleux confort.\r\nLe Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique a subventionne la\r\nparution des Actes du Colloque, et je remercie \u039c. le professeur\r\nDr. H. Wenzel d'avoir rendu possible leur parution dans la Serie prestigieuse des Peripatoi de la maison d'edition De Gruyter. (preface]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KWOQ53Rg82cBRpD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus","volume":"15","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["The Text of Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Physics"]}
| Title | The Tradition about Zeno of Elea Re-Examined |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1971 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 116-141 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Solmsen, Friedrich |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This paper makes no attempt to compete with the brilliant studies through which in the last thirty years several scholars have ad- vanced our understanding of the evidence for Zeno of Elea and in particular of the verbatim preserved fragments. In fact my in- tention is not to replace theories by other theories but to create doubt about matters that for some time have been taken for granted and to change confident assumptions into hypotheses that would tolerate others besides them. [p. 116] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/x10aAvObhnTaTON |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1016","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1016,"authors_free":[{"id":1532,"entry_id":1016,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","free_first_name":"Friedrich","free_last_name":"Solmsen","norm_person":{"id":316,"first_name":"Friedrich","last_name":"Solmsen","full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117754641","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Tradition about Zeno of Elea Re-Examined","main_title":{"title":"The Tradition about Zeno of Elea Re-Examined"},"abstract":"This paper makes no attempt to compete with the brilliant studies \r\nthrough which in the last thirty years several scholars have ad- \r\nvanced our understanding of the evidence for Zeno of Elea and \r\nin particular of the verbatim preserved fragments. In fact my in- \r\ntention is not to replace theories by other theories but to create \r\ndoubt about matters that for some time have been taken for granted \r\nand to change confident assumptions into hypotheses that would \r\ntolerate others besides them. [p. 116]","btype":3,"date":"1971","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/x10aAvObhnTaTON","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":316,"full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1016,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"116-141"}},"sort":["The Tradition about Zeno of Elea Re-Examined"]}
| Title | The Trouble with Fragrance |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1990 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 290-302 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Ellis, John |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
By 'in a subject' I mean what (a) is in something, not as a part, and (b) cannot exist separately from what it is in. (Aristotle, Categories la24-5) These lines have been extensively discussed in recent years. [...] The task I've set for myself in this paper is not to argue for either the weak or the strong interpretation of inherence in Aristotle. That is already a well-tr;odden path. Instead I shall look at what the ancient commentators on Aristotle had to say on the subject. Which interpretation, the strong or the weak, do they support? My strategy is to focus on one of the many problems they consider, that of fragrance, and to see if their treatment of it yields an answer. [pp. 290 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/IaCYIGP7JxpC5ur |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"751","_score":null,"_source":{"id":751,"authors_free":[{"id":1116,"entry_id":751,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":81,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ellis, John","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Ellis","norm_person":{"id":81,"first_name":"John","last_name":"Ellis","full_name":"Ellis, John","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Trouble with Fragrance","main_title":{"title":"The Trouble with Fragrance"},"abstract":"By 'in a subject' I mean what (a) is in something, not as a part, and (b) cannot \r\nexist separately from what it is in. (Aristotle, Categories la24-5) \r\nThese lines have been extensively discussed in recent years. [...] The task I've set for myself in this paper is not to argue for either the weak \r\nor the strong interpretation of inherence in Aristotle. That is already a \r\nwell-tr;odden path. Instead I shall look at what the ancient commentators on Aristotle had to say on the subject. Which interpretation, the strong or the \r\nweak, do they support? My strategy is to focus on one of the many problems \r\nthey consider, that of fragrance, and to see if their treatment of it yields an \r\nanswer. [pp. 290 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1990","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/IaCYIGP7JxpC5ur","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":81,"full_name":"Ellis, John","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":751,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"35","issue":"3","pages":"290-302"}},"sort":["The Trouble with Fragrance"]}
| Title | The development of Philoponus’ thought and its chronology |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1990 |
| Published in | Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence |
| Pages | 233-274 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Verrycken, Koenraad |
| Editor(s) | Sorabji, Richard |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/uTtUrLG6Z68KEQ6 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"449","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":449,"authors_free":[{"id":601,"entry_id":449,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":347,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Verrycken, Koenraad","free_first_name":"Koenraad","free_last_name":"Verrycken","norm_person":{"id":347,"first_name":"Koenraad","last_name":"Verrycken","full_name":"Verrycken, Koenraad","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1048689964","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":602,"entry_id":449,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":133,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Sorabji, Richard","free_first_name":"Richard","free_last_name":"Sorabji","norm_person":{"id":133,"first_name":"Richard","last_name":"Sorabji","full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130064165","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The development of Philoponus\u2019 thought and its chronology","main_title":{"title":"The development of Philoponus\u2019 thought and its chronology"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1990","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/uTtUrLG6Z68KEQ6","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":347,"full_name":"Verrycken, Koenraad","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":133,"full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":449,"section_of":1453,"pages":"233-274","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1453,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1990","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This book brings together twenty articles giving a comprehensive view of the work of the Aristotelian commentators. First published in 1990, the collection is now brought up to date with a new introduction by Richard Sorabji. New generations of scholars will benefit from this reissuing of classic essays, including seminal works by major scholars, and the volume gives a comprehensive background to the work of the project on the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, which has published over 100 volumes of translations since 1987 and has disseminated these crucial texts to scholars worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe importance of the commentators is partly that they represent the thought and classroom teaching of the Aristotelian and Neoplatonist schools and partly that they provide a panorama of a thousand years of ancient Greek philosophy, revealing many original quotations from lost works. Even more significant is the profound influence - uncovered in some of the chapters of this book - that they exert on later philosophy, Islamic and Western. Not only did they preserve anti-Aristotelian material which helped inspire Medieval and Renaissance science, but they present Aristotle in a form that made him acceptable to the Christian church. It is not Aristotle, but Aristotle transformed and embedded in the philosophy of the commentators that so often lies behind the views of later thinkers. [author's abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/M8lXuAdHpDW8tvu","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1453,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Duckworth","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"1","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["The development of Philoponus\u2019 thought and its chronology"]}
| Title | The school of Alexander? |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1990 |
| Published in | Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence |
| Pages | 83-111 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sharples, Robert W. |
| Editor(s) | Sorabji, Richard |
| Translator(s) |
at date the collections were assembled.16 17It is not my concern here to give a full enumeration of the works attributed to Alexander or to classify them in detail. That has been done elsewhere both by myself and by others. Rather, I will proceed to a discussion of what the works can tell us about the context in which they arose. It will be helpful to start with consideration of the relation of Alexander’s works to those of his predecessors, teachers and contem poraries. [p. 85] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/OYiKwntkTSRG9Vz |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1027","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":1027,"authors_free":[{"id":1551,"entry_id":1027,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":42,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","free_first_name":"Robert W.","free_last_name":"Sharples","norm_person":{"id":42,"first_name":"Robert W.","last_name":"Sharples","full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114269505","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1552,"entry_id":1027,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":133,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Sorabji, Richard","free_first_name":"Richard","free_last_name":"Sorabji","norm_person":{"id":133,"first_name":"Richard","last_name":"Sorabji","full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130064165","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The school of Alexander?","main_title":{"title":"The school of Alexander?"},"abstract":"at date the collections were assembled.16 17It is not my concern here to give a full enumeration of the works \r\nattributed to Alexander or to classify them in detail. That has been done \r\nelsewhere both by myself and by others. Rather, I will proceed to a \r\ndiscussion of what the works can tell us about the context in which they \r\narose. It will be helpful to start with consideration of the relation of \r\nAlexander\u2019s works to those of his predecessors, teachers and contem\u00ad\r\nporaries. [p. 85]","btype":2,"date":"1990","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/OYiKwntkTSRG9Vz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":42,"full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":133,"full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1027,"section_of":1453,"pages":"83-111","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1453,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1990","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This book brings together twenty articles giving a comprehensive view of the work of the Aristotelian commentators. First published in 1990, the collection is now brought up to date with a new introduction by Richard Sorabji. New generations of scholars will benefit from this reissuing of classic essays, including seminal works by major scholars, and the volume gives a comprehensive background to the work of the project on the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, which has published over 100 volumes of translations since 1987 and has disseminated these crucial texts to scholars worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe importance of the commentators is partly that they represent the thought and classroom teaching of the Aristotelian and Neoplatonist schools and partly that they provide a panorama of a thousand years of ancient Greek philosophy, revealing many original quotations from lost works. Even more significant is the profound influence - uncovered in some of the chapters of this book - that they exert on later philosophy, Islamic and Western. Not only did they preserve anti-Aristotelian material which helped inspire Medieval and Renaissance science, but they present Aristotle in a form that made him acceptable to the Christian church. It is not Aristotle, but Aristotle transformed and embedded in the philosophy of the commentators that so often lies behind the views of later thinkers. [author's abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/M8lXuAdHpDW8tvu","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1453,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Duckworth","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"1","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["The school of Alexander?"]}
| Title | Themistius: the last Peripatetic commentator on Aristotle? |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1990 |
| Published in | Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence |
| Pages | 113-123 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Blumenthal, Henry J. |
| Editor(s) | Sorabji, Richard |
| Translator(s) |
[B]oth the content of Themistius’ works, and such evidence as we have of the commentators’ attitudes to him, show that he was predominantly a Peripatetic. In this he stood out against the tendencies of his time. His frequently expressed admiration for Plato does not invalidate this conclusion. Themistius may rightly claim to have been the last major figure in antiquity who was a genuine follower of Aristotle. For him, unlike his contemporaries, Plato does not surpass the master of those who know but he, and Socrates, ‘innanzi agli altri piu presso gli stanno’. [Conclusion, p. 123] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/qUf0DABj9Bcfzr5 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"875","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":875,"authors_free":[{"id":1285,"entry_id":875,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":108,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Blumenthal, Henry J.","free_first_name":"Henry J.","free_last_name":"Blumenthal","norm_person":{"id":108,"first_name":"Henry J.","last_name":"Blumenthal","full_name":"Blumenthal, Henry J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051543967","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1286,"entry_id":875,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":133,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Sorabji, Richard","free_first_name":"Richard","free_last_name":"Sorabji","norm_person":{"id":133,"first_name":"Richard","last_name":"Sorabji","full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130064165","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Themistius: the last Peripatetic commentator on Aristotle?","main_title":{"title":"Themistius: the last Peripatetic commentator on Aristotle?"},"abstract":"[B]oth the content of Themistius\u2019 works, and such evidence as we \r\nhave of the commentators\u2019 attitudes to him, show that he was \r\npredominantly a Peripatetic. In this he stood out against the tendencies \r\nof his time. His frequently expressed admiration for Plato does not \r\ninvalidate this conclusion. Themistius may rightly claim to have been the \r\nlast major figure in antiquity who was a genuine follower of Aristotle. For \r\nhim, unlike his contemporaries, Plato does not surpass the master of \r\nthose who know but he, and Socrates, \u2018innanzi agli altri piu presso gli \r\nstanno\u2019. [Conclusion, p. 123]","btype":2,"date":"1990","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/qUf0DABj9Bcfzr5","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":108,"full_name":"Blumenthal, Henry J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":133,"full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":875,"section_of":1453,"pages":"113-123","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1453,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Aristotle Transformed. The ancient commentators and their influence","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1990","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This book brings together twenty articles giving a comprehensive view of the work of the Aristotelian commentators. First published in 1990, the collection is now brought up to date with a new introduction by Richard Sorabji. New generations of scholars will benefit from this reissuing of classic essays, including seminal works by major scholars, and the volume gives a comprehensive background to the work of the project on the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, which has published over 100 volumes of translations since 1987 and has disseminated these crucial texts to scholars worldwide.\r\n\r\nThe importance of the commentators is partly that they represent the thought and classroom teaching of the Aristotelian and Neoplatonist schools and partly that they provide a panorama of a thousand years of ancient Greek philosophy, revealing many original quotations from lost works. Even more significant is the profound influence - uncovered in some of the chapters of this book - that they exert on later philosophy, Islamic and Western. Not only did they preserve anti-Aristotelian material which helped inspire Medieval and Renaissance science, but they present Aristotle in a form that made him acceptable to the Christian church. It is not Aristotle, but Aristotle transformed and embedded in the philosophy of the commentators that so often lies behind the views of later thinkers. [author's abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/M8lXuAdHpDW8tvu","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1453,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Duckworth","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"1","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Themistius: the last Peripatetic commentator on Aristotle?"]}
| Title | Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios Physikkommentar |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1989 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 288-303 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wiesner, Jürgen |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Simplikios hat das Schema von Phys. 12 zweimal für die Monisten vervollständigt. Bei den Eleaten konnte er dabei Aristoteles' eigener Erweiterung im Verlauf von 12 folgen. Dieses Raster liegt nun auch in Metaph. A 5, 986 b 17 sqq. vor; insofern konnte Simplikios die auf diesen letzteren Passus zurückgehenden, das erweiterte Raster aufweisenden Auskünfte Theophrasts ohne weiteres an seine Gliederung nahtlos anfügen. Für die physikalischen Monisten ist theophrastischer Einfluss auf Simplikios' erweitertes Schema in Phys. 23,21-22 und 24,13 kaum abweisbar, da für alle behandelten Denker von Thaies bis Diogenes von Apollonia eine entsprechende Prädizierung beim Eresier belegt ist oder erschlossen werden kann. [S. 292] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/yYnkG6JpdF2tEJA |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"835","_score":null,"_source":{"id":835,"authors_free":[{"id":1239,"entry_id":835,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":75,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","free_first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","free_last_name":"Wiesner","norm_person":{"id":75,"first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","last_name":"Wiesner","full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140610847","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios Physikkommentar","main_title":{"title":"Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios Physikkommentar"},"abstract":"Simplikios hat das Schema von Phys. 12 zweimal f\u00fcr die Monisten vervollst\u00e4ndigt. Bei den Eleaten konnte er dabei Aristoteles' eigener Erweiterung im Verlauf von 12 folgen. Dieses Raster liegt nun auch in Metaph. A 5, 986 b 17 sqq. vor; insofern konnte Simplikios die auf diesen letzteren Passus zur\u00fcckgehenden, das erweiterte Raster aufweisenden Ausk\u00fcnfte Theophrasts ohne weiteres an seine Gliederung nahtlos anf\u00fcgen. F\u00fcr die physikalischen Monisten ist theophrastischer Einfluss auf Simplikios' erweitertes Schema in Phys. 23,21-22 und 24,13 kaum abweisbar, da f\u00fcr alle behandelten Denker von Thaies bis Diogenes von Apollonia eine entsprechende Pr\u00e4dizierung beim Eresier belegt ist oder erschlossen werden kann. [S. 292]","btype":3,"date":"1989","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/yYnkG6JpdF2tEJA","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":75,"full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":835,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"117","issue":"3","pages":"288-303"}},"sort":["Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios Physikkommentar"]}
| Title | Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Publication Place | New Brunswick |
| Publisher | Transaction Books |
| Series | Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Fortenbaugh, William W. , Huby, Pamela M. , Long, Anthony A. |
| Translator(s) |
This series in the field of classics grew out of Project Theophrastus, an international undertaking whose goal is to collect, edit, and comment on the fragments of Theophrastus, Greek philosopher, Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Contributions are by international experts, and each volume will have a particular focus. Volume I is devoted to Arius Didymus, court philosopher to Caesar Augustus and author of an extensive survey of Stoic and Peripatetic ethics. Volumes II and III will concentrate on Theophrastus and disseminate knowledge gained through work on the project. Volume IV will focus on Cicero and his knowledge of Hellenistic philosophy. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/LrsshmpZ2bN6Q9v |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"284","_score":null,"_source":{"id":284,"authors_free":[{"id":2508,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":7,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W.","free_first_name":"William W.","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":7,"first_name":"William W. ","last_name":"Fortenbaugh","full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/110233700","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2509,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":200,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Huby, Pamela M. ","free_first_name":"Pamela M.","free_last_name":"Huby","norm_person":{"id":200,"first_name":"Pamela M.","last_name":"Huby","full_name":"Huby, Pamela M.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120868962","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2510,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":515,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Long, Anthony A.","free_first_name":"Anthony A.","free_last_name":"Long","norm_person":{"id":515,"first_name":"Anthony A.","last_name":"Long","full_name":"Long, Anthony A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118959603","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work"},"abstract":"This series in the field of classics grew out of Project Theophrastus, an international undertaking whose goal is to collect, edit, and comment on the fragments of Theophrastus, Greek philosopher, Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Contributions are by international experts, and each volume will have a particular focus. Volume I is devoted to Arius Didymus, court philosopher to Caesar Augustus and author of an extensive survey of Stoic and Peripatetic ethics. Volumes II and III will concentrate on Theophrastus and disseminate knowledge gained through work on the project. Volume IV will focus on Cicero and his knowledge of Hellenistic philosophy.","btype":1,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/LrsshmpZ2bN6Q9v","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":7,"full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":200,"full_name":"Huby, Pamela M.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":515,"full_name":"Long, Anthony A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":284,"pubplace":"New Brunswick","publisher":"Transaction Books","series":"Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work"]}
| Title | Theophrastus on the Heavens |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Published in | Aristoteles - Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet. Bd. 1: Aristoteles und seine Schule |
| Pages | 577-593 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sharples, Robert W. |
| Editor(s) | Wiesner, Jürgen |
| Translator(s) |
In this paper I shall be discussing two topics; firstly, whether Theophrastus followed Aristotle in holding that the heavens were made of a substance, the ether, distinct from the four sublunary elements, or whether as some have argued he held that the heavens were made of fire; and secondly the exact interpretation of certain technical terms of astronomy attributed to Theophrastus. I am throughout indebted to the work of my colleagues in Project Theophrastus, and especially to Professor William Fortenb |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0XyipV62V4J2FS8 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1028","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1028,"authors_free":[{"id":1553,"entry_id":1028,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":42,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","free_first_name":"Robert W.","free_last_name":"Sharples","norm_person":{"id":42,"first_name":"Robert W.","last_name":"Sharples","full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114269505","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1554,"entry_id":1028,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":75,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","free_first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","free_last_name":"Wiesner","norm_person":{"id":75,"first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","last_name":"Wiesner","full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140610847","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus on the Heavens","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus on the Heavens"},"abstract":"In this paper I shall be discussing two topics; firstly, whether Theophrastus followed Aristotle in holding that the heavens were made of a substance, the ether, distinct from the four sublunary elements, or whether as some have argued he held that the heavens were made of fire; and secondly the exact interpretation of certain technical terms of astronomy attributed to Theophrastus. I am throughout indebted to the work of my colleagues in Project Theophrastus, and especially to Professor William Fortenb","btype":2,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0XyipV62V4J2FS8","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":42,"full_name":"Sharples, Robert W.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":75,"full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1028,"section_of":190,"pages":"577-593","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":190,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Aristoteles - Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet. Bd. 1: Aristoteles und seine Schule","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Wiesner1985","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1985","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1985","abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"http:\/\/zotero.org\/groups\/313293\/items\/F3AKSC7W","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/5lrglDnXrwTfA63","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":190,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"","volume":"1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Theophrastus on the Heavens"]}
| Title | Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1987 |
| Published in | Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985 |
| Pages | 289-325 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bossier, Fernand |
| Editor(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Translator(s) |
«Über dem Commentar des Simplicius zu Aristoteles de caelo hat bisher ein besonderer Unglücksstern gewaltet »; c’est par cette phrase que Heiberg entama sa communication pour l’Académie de Berlin. Elle exprime sa profonde conviction d’avoir réussi à neutraliser |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/kOBodA7cDoo95yh |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"568","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":568,"authors_free":[{"id":806,"entry_id":568,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":12,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bossier, Fernand","free_first_name":"Fernand","free_last_name":"Bossier","norm_person":{"id":12,"first_name":"Fernand ","last_name":"Bossier","full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1017981663","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":807,"entry_id":568,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)","main_title":{"title":"Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)"},"abstract":"\u00ab\u00dcber dem Commentar des Simplicius zu Aristoteles de caelo hat bisher ein besonderer Ungl\u00fccksstern gewaltet \u00bb; c\u2019est par cette phrase \r\nque Heiberg entama sa communication pour l\u2019Acad\u00e9mie de Berlin. Elle exprime sa profonde conviction d\u2019avoir r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 neutraliser <en- \r\nfin> l\u2019influence de cet astre fatal \u00e0 la suite d\u2019une \u00e9tude syst\u00e9matique de l\u2019ensemble de la tradition grecque (texte authentique, recension de \r\nBessarion, retraduction grecque). Assur\u00e9ment, personne ne contes\u00adtera que ses recherches et son \u00e9dition n\u2019aient marqu\u00e9 un tournant \r\ndans l\u2019\u00e9tude de l\u2019In De caelo. Cependant, nos propres recherches ont d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que l\u2019astre fatal dont parle Heiberg, n\u2019a pas manqu\u00e9 d\u2019exer\u00ad\r\ncer quelque influence jusque sur sa propre \u00e9dition. S\u2019\u00e9tant m\u00e9pris \u00e0 l\u2019apparence \u00abm\u00e9di\u00e9vale\u00bb des premi\u00e8res lignes de l\u2019\u00e9dition princeps la\u00ad\r\ntine, il a prononc\u00e9 sur l\u2019ensemble de cette \u00e9dition un \u00abcredo\u00bb \u2014 venia sit dicto \u2014 fatal. Il en r\u00e9sulte que son \u00e9dition remarquable est rest\u00e9e \r\nen d\u00e9faut d\u2019exactitude et qu\u2019elle demande \u00e0 \u00eatre achev\u00e9e par une \u00e9di\u00adtion nouvelle qui mettra \u00e0 profit la traduction de R. Grosseteste et le \r\ntexte critique de la traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. [conclusion, p. 325]","btype":2,"date":"1987","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/kOBodA7cDoo95yh","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":12,"full_name":"Bossier, Fernand ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":568,"section_of":171,"pages":"289-325","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Simplicius. Sa vie, son \u0153uvre, sa survie: Actes du colloque international de Paris 28 sept. - 1er oct. 1985","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Hadot1987","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1987","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1987","abstract":"Depuis une quinzaine d'annees, on assiste en Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Amerique et en France \u00e4 un renouveau des etudes sur Simplicius. Differents chercheurs, partis de problematiques et de preoccupations differentes, se sont rencontres dans ce domaine de recherche d'une importance capitale pour l'histoire de toute la philosophic\r\nantique. C'etait done pour faciliter une etude coordonnee et systematique \u00e4 la fois du texte et de la pensee de Simplicius que la Recherche\r\nCooperative Programmee 739 \u00abRecherches sur les oeuvres et la pensee de Simplicius\u00bb fut fondee en 1982 dans le cadre du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S., Paris). Depuis cette date,\r\nses recherches se deroulent en etroite collaboration avec l'equipe anglo-americaine de recherche de M. le professeur Richard Sorabji, intitulee \u00abAncient Commentators on Aristotle\u00bb, et avec l'Aristoteles-Archiv de la Freie Universit\u00e4t de Berlin-Ouest dirige par M. le professeur Dieter Harlfinger.\r\nPour permettre aux differents membres de la R.C.P., dont plusieurs\r\nhabitent \u00e4 l'etranger, ainsi qu'\u00e4 d'autres savants impresses par les etudes sur Simplicius d'entrer en contact personnel, de resoudre oralement des questions diverses se rapportant \u00e4 l'organisation du travail,\r\nd'echanger entre eux les tout derniers resultats de leurs recherches et\r\nd'engager une discussion sur des problemes difficiles, j'ai organise,\r\ndans le cadre de la R.C.P. 739, un colloque international qui s'est\r\ntenu \u00e4 Paris, \u00e4 la Fondation Hugot, du 28 septembre au ler octobre\r\n1985. Ce colloque a ete entierement finance par la Fondation Hugot\r\ndu College de France, \u00e4 laquelle j'exprime toute ma gratitude. Je tiens\r\naussi \u00e4 remercier M. et Mme de Morant pour la sollicitude et la bienveillance avec laquelle ils ont accueilli les membres du colloque et\r\nveille \u00e4 leur procurer un merveilleux confort.\r\nLe Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique a subventionne la\r\nparution des Actes du Colloque, et je remercie \u039c. le professeur\r\nDr. H. Wenzel d'avoir rendu possible leur parution dans la Serie prestigieuse des Peripatoi de la maison d'edition De Gruyter. (preface]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KWOQ53Rg82cBRpD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus","volume":"15","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Traductions latines et influences du commentaire in De caelo en occident (XlIIe- XIVe s.)"]}