| Title | The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1963 |
| Publication Place | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Momigliano, Arnaldo |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The relations between Paganism and Christianity in the fourth century seemed a suitable theme for a course of lectures at the Warburg Institute. The eight lectures here collected were delivered in the academic year 1958-9 and are published as they were delivered. It was, however, considered expedient to translate into English the two lectures which were given in French and the one which was in German.. The lecturers were left free to choose their own subject and to add the notes they wanted for publication. Specialists will judge each paper on its individual merits. For the general reader I have added, by way of introduction, a few pages on the problem of Christianity and the decline of the Roman empire. They were originally part of the two Taft Lectures which I delivered in the University of Cincinnati in 1959. A. M." [preface] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ztVhur4G6ufes1n |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"182","_score":null,"_source":{"id":182,"authors_free":[{"id":238,"entry_id":182,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":516,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Momigliano, Arnaldo","free_first_name":"Arnaldo","free_last_name":"Momigliano","norm_person":{"id":516,"first_name":"Arnaldo","last_name":"Momigliano","full_name":"Momigliano, Arnaldo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119059843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century","main_title":{"title":"The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century"},"abstract":"The relations between Paganism and Christianity in the fourth century seemed a suitable theme for a course of lectures at the Warburg Institute. The eight lectures here collected were delivered in the academic year 1958-9 and are published as they were delivered. It was, however, considered expedient to translate into English the two lectures which were given in French and the one which was in German.. The lecturers were left free to choose their own subject and to add the notes they wanted for publication. Specialists will judge each paper on its individual merits. For the general reader I have added, by way of introduction, a few pages on the problem of Christianity and the decline of the Roman empire. They were originally part of the two Taft Lectures which I delivered in the University of Cincinnati in 1959. A. M.\" [preface]","btype":1,"date":"1963","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ztVhur4G6ufes1n","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":516,"full_name":"Momigliano, Arnaldo","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":182,"pubplace":"Oxford","publisher":"Oxford University Press ","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1963]}
| Title | Simplicius |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1963 |
| Published in | Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung |
| Pages | 909-915 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Zeller, Eduard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/jquyO8rap8qG2yd |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1450","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":1450,"authors_free":[{"id":2436,"entry_id":1450,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":413,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zeller, Eduard","free_first_name":"Eduard","free_last_name":"Zeller","norm_person":{"id":413,"first_name":"Eduard","last_name":"Zeller,","full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118636383","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1963","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/jquyO8rap8qG2yd","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":413,"full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1450,"section_of":207,"pages":"909-915","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":207,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":1,"language":"de","title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Zeller1903","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1903","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1903","abstract":"Das erstmals zwischen 1844 und 1852 erschienene Werk \u203aDie Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung \u00fcber Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung\u2039 gilt als eine der monumentalsten philosophischen Studien der Geschichte. In nie wieder erreichter Vollst\u00e4ndigkeit und Geschlossenheit beschreibt Eduard Zeller hier den Entwicklungsgang der Philosophie Griechenlands. Als \u00dcbersichts- und Grundlagenwerk ist \u203aDer Zeller\u2039 auch heute noch von gro\u00dfer Bedeutung. Hervorhebenswert an der Arbeit Eduard Zellers ist vor allem, dass er eine akribische Quellenarbeit mit systematisch-philosophischem Interesse verbindet. Obwohl ein klassischer Gelehrter des 19. Jahrhunderts, philosophiert er in modernem wissenschaftlichen Sinne. Zeller, der den Begriff \u203aErkenntnistheorie\u2039 \u00fcberhaupt erst in die philosophische Diskussion eingef\u00fchrt hat, hat mit der \u203aPhilosophie der Griechen\u2039 ein Werk geschaffen, dessen Bedeutung auch im 21. Jahrhundert unbestritten ist. [offical abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QvrnUKEDOeylIfD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":207,"pubplace":"Leipzig","publisher":"Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft","series":"","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1963]}
| Title | Zenone. Testimonianze e frammenti |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1963 |
| Publication Place | Florence |
| Publisher | La Nuova ltalia |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Untersteiner, M. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Questo volume offre la prima edizione integrale dei frammenti e delle testimonianze su Zenone di Elea, grande filosofo presocratico, allievo di Parmenide e padre della dialettica. La traduzione, con testo greco a fronte, e l’ampio commento consentono di ricostruire l’immagine dell’Eleate, celebre per i suoi argomenti contro il movimento e la molteplicità. Emerge la figura di un filosofo consapevole che l’esistenza è una continua tensione tra l’unità realizzata dalla ragione (logos) e la molteplicità degli eventi offerti dall’esperienza, i quali vanno affrontati nella loro problematicità e anche contraddittorietà. Egli opera un attacco possente e complessivo alla realtà fenomenica, insegnando all’Occidente a misurarsi con le aporie, tanto che i suoi paradossi sono ancora al centro della filosofia, della fisica e della matematica contemporanee. Lucia Palpacelli è docente di Storia della filosofia antica all’Università di Macerata. Tra i suoi scritti ricordiamo: L’«Eutidemo» di Platone. Una commedia straordinariamente seria (Vita e Pensiero, 2009); Aristotele interprete di Platone. Anima e cosmo (Morcelliana, 2013). È tra gli autori di Filosofia antica. Una prospettiva multifocale, a cura di Arianna Fermani e Maurizio Migliori (Scholé, 2020). [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/GsDR2BtLWn5dXja |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"53","_score":null,"_source":{"id":53,"authors_free":[{"id":61,"entry_id":53,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Untersteiner, M.","free_first_name":"M.","free_last_name":"Untersteiner","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Zenone. Testimonianze e frammenti","main_title":{"title":"Zenone. Testimonianze e frammenti"},"abstract":"Questo volume offre la prima edizione integrale dei frammenti e delle testimonianze su Zenone di Elea, grande filosofo presocratico, allievo di Parmenide e padre della dialettica. La traduzione, con testo greco a fronte, e l\u2019ampio commento consentono di ricostruire l\u2019immagine dell\u2019Eleate, celebre per i suoi argomenti contro il movimento e la molteplicit\u00e0. Emerge la figura di un filosofo consapevole che l\u2019esistenza \u00e8 una continua tensione tra l\u2019unit\u00e0 realizzata dalla ragione (logos) e la molteplicit\u00e0 degli eventi offerti dall\u2019esperienza, i quali vanno affrontati nella loro problematicit\u00e0 e anche contraddittoriet\u00e0. Egli opera un attacco possente e complessivo alla realt\u00e0 fenomenica, insegnando all\u2019Occidente a misurarsi con le aporie, tanto che i suoi paradossi sono ancora al centro della filosofia, della fisica e della matematica contemporanee.\r\n\r\nLucia Palpacelli \u00e8 docente di Storia della filosofia antica all\u2019Universit\u00e0 di Macerata. Tra i suoi scritti ricordiamo: L\u2019\u00abEutidemo\u00bb di Platone. Una commedia straordinariamente seria (Vita e Pensiero, 2009); Aristotele interprete di Platone. Anima e cosmo (Morcelliana, 2013). \u00c8 tra gli autori di Filosofia antica. Una prospettiva multifocale, a cura di Arianna Fermani e Maurizio Migliori (Schol\u00e9, 2020). [author's abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1963","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GsDR2BtLWn5dXja","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[],"book":{"id":53,"pubplace":"Florence","publisher":"La Nuova ltalia","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1963]}
| Title | The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres. From the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | Dumbarton Oaks Papers |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 65-93 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wolfson, Harry Austryn |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Kepler, who, as we all know, lived under the new heaven created by Copernicus, discusses the question whether the planets are moved by Intelligences or by souls or by nature. His consideration of Intelligences as possible movers of the planets refers to a view held by those who in the Middle Ages lived under the old Ptolemaic heaven, the term Intelligences being, by a complexity of miscegenation, a descendant of what Aristotle describes as incorporeal substances. His consideration of souls or nature as possible movers of the planets touches upon a topic which was made into a problem b y the Byzantine Greek commentators of Aristotle.In this paper I shall try to show how the Byzantine commentators, in their study of the text of Aristotle, were confronted with a certain problem, how they solved that problem, and how their solution of that problem led to other problems and solutions, all of which lingered in philosophic literature down to Kepler. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/M4I0x6wRyI5xwdf |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"422","_score":null,"_source":{"id":422,"authors_free":[{"id":565,"entry_id":422,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":412,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wolfson, Harry Austryn","free_first_name":"Harry Austryn","free_last_name":"Wolfson","norm_person":{"id":412,"first_name":"Harry Austryn","last_name":"Wolfson","full_name":"Wolfson, Harry Austryn","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/123348323","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres. From the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler","main_title":{"title":"The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres. From the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler"},"abstract":"Kepler, who, as we all know, lived under the new heaven created by Copernicus, discusses the question whether the planets are moved by Intelligences or by souls or by nature. His consideration of Intelligences \r\nas possible movers of the planets refers to a view held by those who in the Middle Ages lived under the old Ptolemaic heaven, the term Intelligences being, by a complexity of miscegenation, a descendant of what Aristotle describes as \r\nincorporeal substances. His consideration of souls or nature as possible movers of the planets touches upon a topic which was made into a problem b y the \r\nByzantine Greek commentators of Aristotle.In this paper I shall try to show how the Byzantine commentators, in their study of the text of Aristotle, were confronted with a certain problem, how they solved that problem, and how their solution of that problem led to other \r\nproblems and solutions, all of which lingered in philosophic literature down to Kepler. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/M4I0x6wRyI5xwdf","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":412,"full_name":"Wolfson, Harry Austryn","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":422,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dumbarton Oaks Papers","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"65-93"}},"sort":[1962]}
| Title | The Neoplatonic One and Plato’s Parmenides |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association |
| Volume | 93 |
| Pages | 389–401 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Rist, John M. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| As long ago as 1928 Professor E. R. Dodds' demonstrated the dependence of the One of Plotinus on an interpretation of the first hypothesis of the Parmenides. His demonstration has been universally accepted. But Dodds not only showed the depen- dence of Plotinus on the Parmenides but also offered an account of the history of the doctrine of the One between the late fourth century B.C. and the third century A.D. His view is that the first three hypotheses of the Parmenides were already treated in what we should call a Neoplatonic fashion by Moderatus, a Neo- pythagorean of the second half of the first century A.D.; further, that Moderatus was not the originator of this interpretation, whose origins can in fact be traced back through Eudorus (ca. 25 B.C.) and the Neopythagoreans of his day to the Old Academy. Though Dodds is somewhat unclear at this point,2 he seems to suggest that already before the time of Eudorus the Parmenides was being interpreted in Neopythagorean fashion. In order to check this derivation, we should look at the three stages of it in detail. These stages are the Neopythagoreanism of Moderatus, the theories of Eudorus, and those of Speusippus and the Old Academy in general. [p. 389] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/RfxQJVrvnsxJSva |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1058","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1058,"authors_free":[{"id":1607,"entry_id":1058,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":303,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rist, John M.","free_first_name":"John M.","free_last_name":"Rist","norm_person":{"id":303,"first_name":"John M.","last_name":"Rist","full_name":"Rist, John M.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137060440","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Neoplatonic One and Plato\u2019s Parmenides","main_title":{"title":"The Neoplatonic One and Plato\u2019s Parmenides"},"abstract":"As long ago as 1928 Professor E. R. Dodds' demonstrated the \r\ndependence of the One of Plotinus on an interpretation of the \r\nfirst hypothesis of the Parmenides. His demonstration has been \r\nuniversally accepted. But Dodds not only showed the depen- \r\ndence of Plotinus on the Parmenides but also offered an account \r\nof the history of the doctrine of the One between the late fourth \r\ncentury B.C. and the third century A.D. His view is that the first \r\nthree hypotheses of the Parmenides were already treated in what \r\nwe should call a Neoplatonic fashion by Moderatus, a Neo- \r\npythagorean of the second half of the first century A.D.; further, \r\nthat Moderatus was not the originator of this interpretation, \r\nwhose origins can in fact be traced back through Eudorus \r\n(ca. 25 B.C.) and the Neopythagoreans of his day to the Old \r\nAcademy. Though Dodds is somewhat unclear at this point,2 \r\nhe seems to suggest that already before the time of Eudorus the \r\nParmenides was being interpreted in Neopythagorean fashion. \r\nIn order to check this derivation, we should look at the three \r\nstages of it in detail. These stages are the Neopythagoreanism \r\nof Moderatus, the theories of Eudorus, and those of Speusippus \r\nand the Old Academy in general. [p. 389]","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/RfxQJVrvnsxJSva","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":303,"full_name":"Rist, John M.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1058,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association","volume":"93","issue":"","pages":"389\u2013401"}},"sort":[1962]}
| Title | Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-111 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Arundel, Maureen Rosemary |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word "zôros" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means "mixed" while others argue it means "undiluted." The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to "zôra" meaning "undiluted" and that the modern interpretation of "mixed" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of "zôra" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means "mixed." [whole text] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1262","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1262,"authors_free":[{"id":1848,"entry_id":1262,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":36,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","free_first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","free_last_name":"Arundel","norm_person":{"id":36,"first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","last_name":"Arundel","full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word \"z\u00f4ros\" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means \"mixed\" while others argue it means \"undiluted.\" The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to \"z\u00f4ra\" meaning \"undiluted\" and that the modern interpretation of \"mixed\" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of \"z\u00f4ra\" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means \"mixed.\" [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":36,"full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1262,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"12","issue":"2","pages":"109-111"}},"sort":[1962]}
| Title | The Framework of Greek Cosmology |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1961 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 676-684 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Robinson, John |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The treatises which form the Hippocratic Corpus are not the work of a single individual, and there is abundant evidence that they were itten over a period of at least two hundred years. It is, there ore, essential, in attempting to reconstruct the scientific world view of the early period, that we rely so far as possible on treatises belonging to this period. Unfortunately, in the present state of Hippocratic studies, it is impossible to date these works with any exactitude. On the other hand, certain of them belong pretty clearly to the fifth century; and it seems fairly well established that the view of the constitution of man which most of them assume dates from the time of Alcmaeon, who flourished around the turn of the century. Since this view is based upon an analogy between microcosm and macrocosm, the processes involved in sickness and health reflect on a small scale the greater processes which constitute the life of the cosmos as a whole; thus, indirectly, these treatises illuminate in striking ways aspects of the larger world-view implicit in the fragments of the early cosmologists, but obscured by the fewness of these fragments and the imperfect state in which they have been preserved. In the present study they are used to illuminate just such obscurities. [pp. 676 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/zGcRmbkt0tSeZdr |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"857","_score":null,"_source":{"id":857,"authors_free":[{"id":1261,"entry_id":857,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":304,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Robinson, John","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Robinson","norm_person":{"id":304,"first_name":"John","last_name":"Robinson","full_name":"Robinson, John","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Framework of Greek Cosmology","main_title":{"title":"The Framework of Greek Cosmology"},"abstract":"The treatises which form the Hippocratic Corpus are not the work of \r\na single individual, and there is abundant evidence that they were itten over a period of at least two hundred years. It is, there ore, essential, in attempting to reconstruct the scientific world \r\nview of the early period, that we rely so far as possible on treatises \r\nbelonging to this period. Unfortunately, in the present state of \r\nHippocratic studies, it is impossible to date these works with any \r\nexactitude. On the other hand, certain of them belong pretty \r\nclearly to the fifth century; and it seems fairly well established that \r\nthe view of the constitution of man which most of them assume \r\ndates from the time of Alcmaeon, who flourished around the turn \r\nof the century. Since this view is based upon an analogy between \r\nmicrocosm and macrocosm, the processes involved in sickness and \r\nhealth reflect on a small scale the greater processes which constitute \r\nthe life of the cosmos as a whole; thus, indirectly, these treatises \r\nilluminate in striking ways aspects of the larger world-view \r\nimplicit in the fragments of the early cosmologists, but obscured \r\nby the fewness of these fragments and the imperfect state in which \r\nthey have been preserved. In the present study they are used to \r\nilluminate just such obscurities. [pp. 676 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1961","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/zGcRmbkt0tSeZdr","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":304,"full_name":"Robinson, John","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":857,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"14","issue":"4","pages":"676-684"}},"sort":[1961]}
| Title | Der Metaphysikbegriff in den Aristoteleskommentaren der Ammoniusschule |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1961 |
| Publication Place | Münster |
| Publisher | Aschendorff |
| Series | Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters |
| Volume | 39.1 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kremer, Klaus |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/AWQtFEHstD6bR1g |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"68","_score":null,"_source":{"id":68,"authors_free":[{"id":76,"entry_id":68,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kremer, Klaus","free_first_name":"Klaus","free_last_name":"Kremer","norm_person":{"id":440,"first_name":"Klaus","last_name":"Kremer","full_name":"Kremer, Klaus","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120476452","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Metaphysikbegriff in den Aristoteleskommentaren der Ammoniusschule","main_title":{"title":"Der Metaphysikbegriff in den Aristoteleskommentaren der Ammoniusschule"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1961","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/AWQtFEHstD6bR1g","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":440,"full_name":"Kremer, Klaus","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":68,"pubplace":"M\u00fcnster","publisher":"Aschendorff","series":"Beitr\u00e4ge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters","volume":"39.1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1961]}
| Title | A Note on Fragment 12 of Anaxagoras |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1960 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 4-5 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wasserstein, Abraham |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/EbLIQIMvekyZoAZ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"444","_score":null,"_source":{"id":444,"authors_free":[{"id":596,"entry_id":444,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":356,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wasserstein, Abraham","free_first_name":"Abraham","free_last_name":"Wasserstein","norm_person":{"id":356,"first_name":"Abraham","last_name":"Wasserstein","full_name":"Wasserstein, Abraham","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119380102","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A Note on Fragment 12 of Anaxagoras","main_title":{"title":"A Note on Fragment 12 of Anaxagoras"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1960","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/EbLIQIMvekyZoAZ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":356,"full_name":"Wasserstein, Abraham","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":444,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"10","issue":"1","pages":"4-5"}},"sort":[1960]}
| Title | Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1960 |
| Publication Place | New York |
| Publisher | Columbia University Press |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kahn, Charles H. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Reconstructs the pattern of Anaximander's thought, through a criticism and analysis of ancient traditions. Discusses the evidence for Anaximander's views and how this contributed to his observations of the universe. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Amc3UdOTdHqBeZB |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"151","_score":null,"_source":{"id":151,"authors_free":[{"id":191,"entry_id":151,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":530,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kahn, Charles H.","free_first_name":"Charles H.","free_last_name":"Kahn","norm_person":{"id":530,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Kahn","full_name":"Kahn, Charles H.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129468444","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology","main_title":{"title":"Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology"},"abstract":"Reconstructs the pattern of Anaximander's thought, through a criticism and analysis of ancient traditions. Discusses the evidence for Anaximander's views and how this contributed to his observations of the universe.","btype":1,"date":"1960","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Amc3UdOTdHqBeZB","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":530,"full_name":"Kahn, Charles H.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":151,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Columbia University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1960]}
| Title | Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-148 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Solmsen, Friedrich |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent as long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or groups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is worked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to admit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an alternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von Arnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a good purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly grounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.] our interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and revisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large hypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now near the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- struction of a dual cosmogony in his "cycle", originally a theory which had to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, treated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further inferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which backs up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the merits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since its publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the relative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of Aristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital bearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text book which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- mogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"846","_score":null,"_source":{"id":846,"authors_free":[{"id":1250,"entry_id":846,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","free_first_name":"Friedrich","free_last_name":"Solmsen","norm_person":{"id":316,"first_name":"Friedrich","last_name":"Solmsen","full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117754641","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology","main_title":{"title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology"},"abstract":"In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent \r\nas long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or \r\ngroups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is \r\nworked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to \r\nadmit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an \r\nalternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von \r\nArnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a \r\ngood purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly \r\ngrounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.]\r\nour interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and \r\nrevisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large \r\nhypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now \r\nnear the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- \r\nstruction of a dual cosmogony in his \"cycle\", originally a theory which \r\nhad to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, \r\ntreated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further \r\ninferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which \r\nbacks up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the \r\nmerits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since \r\nits publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the \r\nrelative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of \r\nAristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital \r\nbearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text \r\nbook which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- \r\nmogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":316,"full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":846,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"109-148"}},"sort":["Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology"]}
| Title | Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1954 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 145-182 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the limited knowledge of the history of Aristotle's text, De caelo, due to the large number of Greek manuscripts and translations in various languages. The author focuses on the indirect tradition of the text, which includes summaries, paraphrases, and extracts by ancient commentators such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Proclus, Philoponus, and Simplicius. The author compares this indirect tradition to the direct tradition and notes the difficulties in reconstructing the original text due to the multiple manuscript variants resulting from the philological activities of ancient commentators and scribes. The author's aim is to offer a modest contribution to the study of the text's transmission history. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/6Fkmqyu6w6bNEsQ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1208","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1208,"authors_free":[{"id":1789,"entry_id":1208,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote","main_title":{"title":"Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote"},"abstract":"This text discusses the limited knowledge of the history of Aristotle's text, De caelo, due to the large number of Greek manuscripts and translations in various languages. The author focuses on the indirect tradition of the text, which includes summaries, paraphrases, and extracts by ancient commentators such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Proclus, Philoponus, and Simplicius. The author compares this indirect tradition to the direct tradition and notes the difficulties in reconstructing the original text due to the multiple manuscript variants resulting from the philological activities of ancient commentators and scribes. The author's aim is to offer a modest contribution to the study of the text's transmission history. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1954","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/6Fkmqyu6w6bNEsQ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1208,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"82","issue":"2","pages":"145-182"}},"sort":["Notes sur la tradition indirecte du 'de Caelo' d'Aristote"]}
| Title | Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-5 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bicknell, Peter J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner of atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of these being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a Parmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I shall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other argument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- phrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that Leucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"772","_score":null,"_source":{"id":772,"authors_free":[{"id":1136,"entry_id":772,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":399,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","free_first_name":"Peter J.","free_last_name":"Bicknell","norm_person":{"id":399,"first_name":"Peter J.","last_name":"Bicknell","full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1162157143","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication"},"abstract":"It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner \r\nof atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of \r\nthese being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a \r\nParmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I \r\nshall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other \r\nargument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- \r\nphrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that \r\nLeucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":399,"full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":772,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"12","issue":"1","pages":"1-5"}},"sort":["Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication"]}
| Title | Parmenides, B 8. 4 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1970 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 32-34 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wilson, John Richard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
The text of Parmenides 8. 4 is unusually corrupt. [p. 32] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/XNwbpdwwJgZDWs5 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"840","_score":null,"_source":{"id":840,"authors_free":[{"id":1244,"entry_id":840,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":363,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wilson, John Richard","free_first_name":"John Richard","free_last_name":"Wilson","norm_person":{"id":363,"first_name":"John Richard","last_name":"Wilson","full_name":"Wilson, John Richard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/173000916","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides, B 8. 4","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides, B 8. 4"},"abstract":"The text of Parmenides 8. 4 is unusually corrupt. [p. 32]","btype":3,"date":"1970","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/XNwbpdwwJgZDWs5","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":363,"full_name":"Wilson, John Richard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":840,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"20","issue":"1","pages":"32-34"}},"sort":["Parmenides, B 8. 4"]}
| Title | Parmenides, Fragment 10 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 629-631 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bicknell, Peter J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text is a critical analysis of the location of two fragments of the work of the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides. The author of the text suggests that the two fragments, VS 28 B 10 (Clement, Strom. 5, I38) and VS 28 B 11 (Simplicius, de Caelo 559, 20), are incorrectly placed together in Parmenides' Way of Seeming. The author argues that there is no evidence to suggest that the two fragments were meant to be together, and that they do not fit into the context of Parmenides' work. The author also suggests that VS 28 B 10 may not be Parmenidean at all, and discusses its possible attribution to Empedocles. The text concludes by considering the language and style of the two fragments, and their relationship to Parmenides' other works. [summary of the whole text] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2uPg3j4nE0Tu1v1 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1124","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1124,"authors_free":[{"id":1700,"entry_id":1124,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":399,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","free_first_name":"Peter J.","free_last_name":"Bicknell","norm_person":{"id":399,"first_name":"Peter J.","last_name":"Bicknell","full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1162157143","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides, Fragment 10","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides, Fragment 10"},"abstract":"This text is a critical analysis of the location of two fragments of the work of the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides. The author of the text suggests that the two fragments, VS 28 B 10 (Clement, Strom. 5, I38) and VS 28 B 11 (Simplicius, de Caelo 559, 20), are incorrectly placed together in Parmenides' Way of Seeming. The author argues that there is no evidence to suggest that the two fragments were meant to be together, and that they do not fit into the context of Parmenides' work. The author also suggests that VS 28 B 10 may not be Parmenidean at all, and discusses its possible attribution to Empedocles. The text concludes by considering the language and style of the two fragments, and their relationship to Parmenides' other works. [summary of the whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2uPg3j4nE0Tu1v1","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":399,"full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1124,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"96","issue":"4","pages":"629-631"}},"sort":["Parmenides, Fragment 10"]}
| Title | Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. 195 |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1969 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Volume | 195 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Kenney, Edward J. , Dawe, Roger D. |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/WojKRcXNYJ8OQJP |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"277","_score":null,"_source":{"id":277,"authors_free":[{"id":1834,"entry_id":277,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":21,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Kenney, Edward J. ","free_first_name":"Edward J. ","free_last_name":"Kenney","norm_person":{"id":21,"first_name":"Edward J. ","last_name":"Kenney","full_name":"Kenney, Edward J. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/121559602","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1835,"entry_id":277,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":22,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Dawe, Roger D. ","free_first_name":"Roger D. ","free_last_name":"Dawe","norm_person":{"id":22,"first_name":"Roger D. ","last_name":"Dawe","full_name":"Dawe, Roger D. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131727796","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. 195","main_title":{"title":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. 195"},"abstract":"","btype":4,"date":"1969","language":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/WojKRcXNYJ8OQJP","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":21,"full_name":"Kenney, Edward J. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":22,"full_name":"Dawe, Roger D. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":277,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"","series":"","volume":"195","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. 195"]}
| Title | Saggi sull'aristotelismo padovano: dal secolo XIV al XVI |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1958 |
| Publication Place | Firenze |
| Publisher | Sansoni |
| Series | Studi sulla tradizione aristotelica nel Veneto |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Nardi, Bruno |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | http://zotero.org/groups/313293/items/NAC2A3GA |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/EUOhjNAanQcAWDc |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1454","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1454,"authors_free":[{"id":2465,"entry_id":1454,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":493,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nardi, Bruno","free_first_name":"Bruno","free_last_name":"Nardi","norm_person":{"id":493,"first_name":"Bruno","last_name":"Nardi","full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119470691","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Saggi sull'aristotelismo padovano: dal secolo XIV al XVI","main_title":{"title":"Saggi sull'aristotelismo padovano: dal secolo XIV al XVI"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1958","language":"Italian","online_url":"http:\/\/zotero.org\/groups\/313293\/items\/NAC2A3GA","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/EUOhjNAanQcAWDc","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":493,"full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1454,"pubplace":"Firenze","publisher":"Sansoni","series":"Studi sulla tradizione aristotelica nel Veneto","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Saggi sull'aristotelismo padovano: dal secolo XIV al XVI"]}
| Title | Simplicius |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Published in | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
| Pages | 448-449 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Lloyd, Antony C. |
| Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/mtfUR3mKMF1elWE |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"393","_score":null,"_source":{"id":393,"authors_free":[{"id":516,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":465,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","free_first_name":"Antony C.","free_last_name":"Lloyd","norm_person":{"id":465,"first_name":"Antony C.","last_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1052318118","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":517,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mtfUR3mKMF1elWE","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":465,"full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":393,"section_of":1371,"pages":"448-449","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1371,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1967","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Simplicius"]}
| Title | Simplicius |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1963 |
| Published in | Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung |
| Pages | 909-915 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Zeller, Eduard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/jquyO8rap8qG2yd |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1450","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":1450,"authors_free":[{"id":2436,"entry_id":1450,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":413,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zeller, Eduard","free_first_name":"Eduard","free_last_name":"Zeller","norm_person":{"id":413,"first_name":"Eduard","last_name":"Zeller,","full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118636383","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1963","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/jquyO8rap8qG2yd","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":413,"full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1450,"section_of":207,"pages":"909-915","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":207,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":1,"language":"de","title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Zeller1903","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1903","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1903","abstract":"Das erstmals zwischen 1844 und 1852 erschienene Werk \u203aDie Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung \u00fcber Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung\u2039 gilt als eine der monumentalsten philosophischen Studien der Geschichte. In nie wieder erreichter Vollst\u00e4ndigkeit und Geschlossenheit beschreibt Eduard Zeller hier den Entwicklungsgang der Philosophie Griechenlands. Als \u00dcbersichts- und Grundlagenwerk ist \u203aDer Zeller\u2039 auch heute noch von gro\u00dfer Bedeutung. Hervorhebenswert an der Arbeit Eduard Zellers ist vor allem, dass er eine akribische Quellenarbeit mit systematisch-philosophischem Interesse verbindet. Obwohl ein klassischer Gelehrter des 19. Jahrhunderts, philosophiert er in modernem wissenschaftlichen Sinne. Zeller, der den Begriff \u203aErkenntnistheorie\u2039 \u00fcberhaupt erst in die philosophische Diskussion eingef\u00fchrt hat, hat mit der \u203aPhilosophie der Griechen\u2039 ein Werk geschaffen, dessen Bedeutung auch im 21. Jahrhundert unbestritten ist. [offical abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QvrnUKEDOeylIfD","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":207,"pubplace":"Leipzig","publisher":"Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft","series":"","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Simplicius"]}
| Title | Simplicius’s Proof of Euclid’s Parallels Postulate |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes |
| Volume | 32 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sabra, A. I. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
A commentary by Simplicius on the premisses to Book I of Euclid’s Elements survives in an Arabic translation of which the author and the exact date of execution are unknown. The translation is reproduced by the ninth-century mathematician al-Fadl ibn Hâtim al-Nayrïzï in the course of his own com mentary on the Elements. Of Nayrïzî’s commentary, which is based on the earlier translation of the Elements by al-Hajjâj ibn Yûsuf ibn Matar, we have only one manuscript copy at Leiden and Gerard of Cremona’s Latin trans lation, both of which have been published.1The passages quoted by Nayrïzï, owing to their extensiveness and con secutive order, would strongly lead one to assume that they together make up the whole of Simplicius’s text. In what follows, however, I shall argue that they suffer from at least one important omission : a proof by Simplicius himself of Euclid’s parallels postulate. Since the omission occurs both in the Leiden manuscript and in Gerard’s translation, it cannot simply be an accidental feature of the former. My argument will consist in (i) citing evidence (Document I) to the effect that such a proof was known to some Arabic mathematicians, and (2) producing a hitherto unnoticed text (Document II) which, in the light of the evidence cited, may well be taken to be the missing proof. In addition, I shall show how Simplicius’s proof entered Arabic discussions on parallels, first, by being made subject to criticism (Document I), and then by being incorporated into a new proof which was designed to take that criticism into account (Document III). [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/yyXlDjNP3t7ipML |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1055","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1055,"authors_free":[{"id":1602,"entry_id":1055,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":396,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sabra, A. I.","free_first_name":"A. I.","free_last_name":"Sabra","norm_person":{"id":396,"first_name":"A. I.","last_name":"Sabra","full_name":"Sabra, A. I.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1023667843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius\u2019s Proof of Euclid\u2019s Parallels Postulate","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius\u2019s Proof of Euclid\u2019s Parallels Postulate"},"abstract":"A commentary by Simplicius on the premisses to Book I of Euclid\u2019s Elements \r\nsurvives in an Arabic translation of which the author and the exact date \r\nof execution are unknown. The translation is reproduced by the ninth-century \r\nmathematician al-Fadl ibn H\u00e2tim al-Nayr\u00efz\u00ef in the course of his own com\u00ad\r\nmentary on the Elements. Of Nayr\u00efz\u00ee\u2019s commentary, which is based on the \r\nearlier translation of the Elements by al-Hajj\u00e2j ibn Y\u00fbsuf ibn Matar, we have \r\nonly one manuscript copy at Leiden and Gerard of Cremona\u2019s Latin trans\u00ad\r\nlation, both of which have been published.1The passages quoted by Nayr\u00efz\u00ef, owing to their extensiveness and con\u00ad\r\nsecutive order, would strongly lead one to assume that they together make \r\nup the whole of Simplicius\u2019s text. In what follows, however, I shall argue that \r\nthey suffer from at least one important omission : a proof by Simplicius himself \r\nof Euclid\u2019s parallels postulate. Since the omission occurs both in the Leiden \r\nmanuscript and in Gerard\u2019s translation, it cannot simply be an accidental \r\nfeature of the former. My argument will consist in (i) citing evidence \r\n(Document I) to the effect that such a proof was known to some Arabic \r\nmathematicians, and (2) producing a hitherto unnoticed text (Document \r\nII) which, in the light of the evidence cited, may well be taken to be the \r\nmissing proof. In addition, I shall show how Simplicius\u2019s proof entered Arabic \r\ndiscussions on parallels, first, by being made subject to criticism (Document I), \r\nand then by being incorporated into a new proof which was designed to take \r\nthat criticism into account (Document III). [p. 1]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/yyXlDjNP3t7ipML","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":396,"full_name":"Sabra, A. I.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1055,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes","volume":"32","issue":"","pages":"1-24"}},"sort":["Simplicius\u2019s Proof of Euclid\u2019s Parallels Postulate"]}