| Title | Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-5 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bicknell, Peter J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner of atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of these being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a Parmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I shall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other argument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- phrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that Leucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"772","_score":null,"_source":{"id":772,"authors_free":[{"id":1136,"entry_id":772,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":399,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","free_first_name":"Peter J.","free_last_name":"Bicknell","norm_person":{"id":399,"first_name":"Peter J.","last_name":"Bicknell","full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1162157143","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication"},"abstract":"It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner \r\nof atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of \r\nthese being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a \r\nParmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I \r\nshall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other \r\nargument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- \r\nphrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that \r\nLeucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":399,"full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":772,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"12","issue":"1","pages":"1-5"}},"sort":[1967]}
| Title | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Publication Place | London, New York |
| Publisher | Crowell-Collier Publishing Company |
| Volume | 7 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
| Translator(s) |
| The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as "a remarkable and unique work" (Saturday Review) that contained "the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history" (Library Journal). [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1371","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1371,"authors_free":[{"id":2068,"entry_id":1371,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy"},"abstract":"The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as \"a remarkable and unique work\" (Saturday Review) that contained \"the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history\" (Library Journal). [author's abstract]","btype":4,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1967]}
| Title | The End of the Ancient Universities |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1966 |
| Journal | Journal of World History |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 653-673 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Cameron, Alan |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Strictliy speaking, there were no universities in the Ancient World,if by university we understand a corporate institution offering avariety of courses and granting degrees in the way modern univer sities do. There were, however, university towns, Rome, Constantinople, Athens, Alexandria, Bordeaux, with established chairs, where the leading teachers of the day lectured to classes drawn from all over the Empire. And so many of the ideas we associate with a university were both present and fostered in this atmosphere, that it would clearly he pedantic to avoid using the term. But there were significant differences nonetheless.Not least, each professor in these university towns was independent of, and indeed a rival of, every other professor there. In every city of the Empire except Constantinople, and not there till 425, it was possible for freelance teachers to set up in opposition lo holders of the established chairs (and sometimes entice away their pupils, too). Even holders of the chairs competed with each other for pupils. It was normal for students to sign on with just one professor, and attend his courses alone. Indeed, the rivalry between professors was transmitted to their pupils. Up to a point competion was natural and healthy enough. But by the period that forms the subject of this paper, the fourth to sixth centuries A.D., it far exceeded that point, and cannot but have impaired both the proficiency and the standing of the profession. [Introduction, pp. 653 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/atNV1VbXvQJ1nCM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1048","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1048,"authors_free":[{"id":1593,"entry_id":1048,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":20,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cameron, Alan","free_first_name":"Alan","free_last_name":"Cameron","norm_person":{"id":20,"first_name":"Alan","last_name":"Cameron","full_name":"Cameron, Alan ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143568914","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The End of the Ancient Universities","main_title":{"title":"The End of the Ancient Universities"},"abstract":"Strictliy speaking, there were no universities in the Ancient World,if by university we understand a corporate institution offering avariety of courses and granting degrees in the way modern univer\u00ad\r\nsities do.\r\nThere were, however, university towns, Rome, Constantinople, \r\nAthens, Alexandria, Bordeaux, with established chairs, where the leading \r\nteachers of the day lectured to classes drawn from all over the Empire. \r\nAnd so many of the ideas we associate with a university were both present \r\nand fostered in this atmosphere, that it would clearly he pedantic to avoid \r\nusing the term. But there were significant differences nonetheless.Not least, each professor in these university towns was independent \r\nof, and indeed a rival of, every other professor there. In every city of the \r\nEmpire except Constantinople, and not there till 425, it was possible for \r\nfreelance teachers to set up in opposition lo holders of the established \r\nchairs (and sometimes entice away their pupils, too). Even holders of the \r\nchairs competed with each other for pupils. It was normal for students to \r\nsign on with just one professor, and attend his courses alone. Indeed, the \r\nrivalry between professors was transmitted to their pupils. Up to a point competion was natural and healthy enough. But by the period that\r\nforms the subject of this paper, the fourth to sixth centuries A.D., it\r\nfar exceeded that point, and cannot but have impaired both the \r\nproficiency and the standing of the profession. [Introduction, pp. 653 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1966","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/atNV1VbXvQJ1nCM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":20,"full_name":"Cameron, Alan ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1048,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of World History","volume":"10","issue":"","pages":"653-673"}},"sort":[1966]}
| Title | Aristote, Du ciel. Texte établi et traduit par Paul Moraux |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1965 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Les Belles Lettres |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul , Aristote |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/W0FrLs9BKUEyoH3 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1374","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1374,"authors_free":[{"id":2084,"entry_id":1374,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2113,"entry_id":1374,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":263,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Aristote","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":263,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Aristoteles","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118650130","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristote, Du ciel. Texte \u00e9tabli et traduit par Paul Moraux","main_title":{"title":"Aristote, Du ciel. Texte \u00e9tabli et traduit par Paul Moraux"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1965","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/W0FrLs9BKUEyoH3","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":263,"full_name":"Aristoteles","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1374,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Les Belles Lettres","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-148 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Solmsen, Friedrich |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent as long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or groups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is worked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to admit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an alternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von Arnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a good purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly grounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.] our interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and revisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large hypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now near the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- struction of a dual cosmogony in his "cycle", originally a theory which had to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, treated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further inferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which backs up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the merits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since its publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the relative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of Aristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital bearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text book which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- mogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"846","_score":null,"_source":{"id":846,"authors_free":[{"id":1250,"entry_id":846,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","free_first_name":"Friedrich","free_last_name":"Solmsen","norm_person":{"id":316,"first_name":"Friedrich","last_name":"Solmsen","full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117754641","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology","main_title":{"title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology"},"abstract":"In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent \r\nas long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or \r\ngroups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is \r\nworked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to \r\nadmit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an \r\nalternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von \r\nArnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a \r\ngood purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly \r\ngrounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.]\r\nour interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and \r\nrevisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large \r\nhypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now \r\nnear the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- \r\nstruction of a dual cosmogony in his \"cycle\", originally a theory which \r\nhad to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, \r\ntreated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further \r\ninferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which \r\nbacks up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the \r\nmerits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since \r\nits publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the \r\nrelative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of \r\nAristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital \r\nbearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text \r\nbook which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- \r\nmogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":316,"full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":846,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"109-148"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Oriental Society |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 318-327 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kraemer, Joel L. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In view of Philoponus' achievement, the loss of the Contra Aristotelem is, to say the least, regret- table. Fortunately, extracts from the work are preserved in the commentaries on the Physica and the De caelo of Philoponus' pagan philosophi- cal opponent, Simplicius, which provide a fair sampling of the drift of the argument.9 Also, there is reason to believe that the Contra Aristotelem was known to the medieval Arabs... [p. 320] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/GlgWKDL2kQWNuuf |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"735","_score":null,"_source":{"id":735,"authors_free":[{"id":1098,"entry_id":735,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":220,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","free_first_name":"Joel, L.","free_last_name":"Kraemer","norm_person":{"id":220,"first_name":"Joel L.","last_name":"Kraemer","full_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113182023","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation","main_title":{"title":"A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation"},"abstract":"In view of Philoponus' achievement, the loss of \r\nthe Contra Aristotelem is, to say the least, regret- \r\ntable. Fortunately, extracts from the work are \r\npreserved in the commentaries on the Physica \r\nand the De caelo of Philoponus' pagan philosophi- \r\ncal opponent, Simplicius, which provide a fair \r\nsampling of the drift of the argument.9 Also, there \r\nis reason to believe that the Contra Aristotelem \r\nwas known to the medieval Arabs... [p. 320]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GlgWKDL2kQWNuuf","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":220,"full_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":735,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the American Oriental Society","volume":"85","issue":"3","pages":"318-327"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-33 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hölscher, Uvo |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Der Text untersucht die Lehre des griechischen Philosophen Empedokles über die periodischen Entstehungs- und Vergehenszyklen der Welt. Es wird diskutiert, dass es bisher keine Einigkeit darüber gibt, wie diese Zyklen im Detail zu verstehen sind. Eine verbreitete Auffassung besagt, dass sich der Zyklus in vier Phasen abspielt, in denen sich jeweils eine Welt bildet, die durch Trennungs- und Vereinigungsprozesse der Elemente entstehen und vergehen. Es wird jedoch argumentiert, dass diese Vorstellung widersprüchlich ist und es keine klare Entscheidung darüber gibt, welche Phase die aktuelle Welt repräsentiert. Der Autor kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Vorstellung von nur vier Phasen nicht ausreichend ist und dass die Vorstellung eines Ruhezustands der getrennten Elemente unzureichend belegt ist. Stattdessen schlägt der Autor vor, dass es nur zwei Phasen gibt, in denen sich die Kosmogonie und Zoogonie ereignen. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/3i3dIX2FiiNPQoT |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1353","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1353,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1353,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":198,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","free_first_name":"Uvo","free_last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","norm_person":{"id":198,"first_name":"Uvo","last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118705571","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachpr\u00fcfung der Empedokles-Doxographie","main_title":{"title":"Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachpr\u00fcfung der Empedokles-Doxographie"},"abstract":"Der Text untersucht die Lehre des griechischen Philosophen Empedokles \u00fcber die periodischen Entstehungs- und Vergehenszyklen der Welt. Es wird diskutiert, dass es bisher keine Einigkeit dar\u00fcber gibt, wie diese Zyklen im Detail zu verstehen sind. Eine verbreitete Auffassung besagt, dass sich der Zyklus in vier Phasen abspielt, in denen sich jeweils eine Welt bildet, die durch Trennungs- und Vereinigungsprozesse der Elemente entstehen und vergehen. Es wird jedoch argumentiert, dass diese Vorstellung widerspr\u00fcchlich ist und es keine klare Entscheidung dar\u00fcber gibt, welche Phase die aktuelle Welt repr\u00e4sentiert. Der Autor kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Vorstellung von nur vier Phasen nicht ausreichend ist und dass die Vorstellung eines Ruhezustands der getrennten Elemente unzureichend belegt ist. Stattdessen schl\u00e4gt der Autor vor, dass es nur zwei Phasen gibt, in denen sich die Kosmogonie und Zoogonie ereignen. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/3i3dIX2FiiNPQoT","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":198,"full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1353,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"93","issue":"1","pages":"7-33"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Aristote, Du ciel. Texte établi et traduit par Paul Moraux. Introduction |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1965 |
| Published in | Aristote, Du ciel. Texte établi et traduit par Paul Moraux |
| Pages | VII-CXC |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The introduction discusses the object and structure of Aristotle's treatise De caelo, which presents a challenge for commentators due to its lack of unity. While some ancient commentators saw the study of the world as a whole as the main object of the treatise, others focused on the study of the celestial body and its relation to the sublunar world. The modern understanding of the genesis of Aristotle's works suggests that the treatise may have been formed by combining previously independent monographs. Additionally, Aristotle himself may have attempted to give his works a coherent structure, but did so in a somewhat artificial way. Despite these challenges, the treatise is seen as an important work in the history of philosophy and science. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/EzAHeSeExATtJIm |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1375","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1375,"authors_free":[{"id":2085,"entry_id":1375,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristote, Du ciel. Texte \u00e9tabli et traduit par Paul Moraux. Introduction","main_title":{"title":"Aristote, Du ciel. Texte \u00e9tabli et traduit par Paul Moraux. Introduction"},"abstract":"The introduction discusses the object and structure of Aristotle's treatise De caelo, which presents a challenge for commentators due to its lack of unity. While some ancient commentators saw the study of the world as a whole as the main object of the treatise, others focused on the study of the celestial body and its relation to the sublunar world. The modern understanding of the genesis of Aristotle's works suggests that the treatise may have been formed by combining previously independent monographs. Additionally, Aristotle himself may have attempted to give his works a coherent structure, but did so in a somewhat artificial way. Despite these challenges, the treatise is seen as an important work in the history of philosophy and science. [introduction]","btype":2,"date":"1965","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/EzAHeSeExATtJIm","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1375,"section_of":1374,"pages":"VII-CXC","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1374,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":1,"language":"fr","title":"Aristote, Du ciel. Texte \u00e9tabli et traduit par Paul Moraux","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1965","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/W0FrLs9BKUEyoH3","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1374,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Les Belles Lettres","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This text discusses the interpretation of the word "zôros" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1376,"authors_free":[{"id":2120,"entry_id":1376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation of the word \"z\u00f4ros\" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"15","issue":"1","pages":"1-4"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Anaximander: Zu den Quellen und seiner Einordnung im Vorsokratischen Denken |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1964 |
| Journal | Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 59-72 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Schwabl, Hans |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| ANAXIMANDERZU DEN QUELLEN UND SEINER EINORDNUNG IM VORS OKRATISCHEN DENKEN. Hans Schwabl Die alten Milesier können erst nach einiger kritischer Vorarbeit Ge genstand begriffsgeschichtlicher Forschung sein. Der Anfang der grie chischen Philosophie ist uns ja nur durch die Berichte Späterer überliefert und aus dem Blickwinkel einer Problemstellung, die nicht mehr die der ersten Philosophen ist. So scheint der Versuch, die Eigenart der milesischen Philosophie zu bestimmen, zunächst so gut wie aussichtslos, insbesondere wenn man bedenkt, daß nicht einmal die eigentliche Quelle unserer Nach richten, das Werk Theophrasts, uns als solche überkommen ist, sondern daß wir auch hier erst rekonstruieren müssen.Der Anfang muß also sein, zu erforschen, was Theophrast gesagt und gemeint hat. Erst dann stellt sich die Aufgabe einer Rückübersetzung sei ner Berichte ins Archaische. Diese Rückübersetzung ist nur möglich inner halb einer entwicklungsgeschichtlichen Linie, die von den Früheren zu den Milesiern1) und von diesen wieder zu den späteren Vorsokratikern2) zu ziehen ist. In unserer kurzen Skizze kann das dafür schon Geleistete bzw. noch zu Leistende nur angedeutet werden. Wir beschränken uns außerdem auf Anaximander, einmal wegen der besonderen Stellung, die ihm zukommt, dann aber auch wegen der Quellenlage, die, wenn man sie nur recht einzuschätzen weiß, doch einigermaßen tragfähige Schlüsse auf den Ansatzpunkt und die Eigenart dieses frühen Denkers gestattet. [pp. 59 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/TtvN2KY9lnbgZdC |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1031","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1031,"authors_free":[{"id":1561,"entry_id":1031,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Schwabl, Hans","free_first_name":"Hans","free_last_name":"Schwabl","norm_person":{"id":288,"first_name":"Hans","last_name":"Schwabl","full_name":"Schwabl, Hans","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107871211","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Anaximander: Zu den Quellen und seiner Einordnung im Vorsokratischen Denken","main_title":{"title":"Anaximander: Zu den Quellen und seiner Einordnung im Vorsokratischen Denken"},"abstract":"ANAXIMANDERZU DEN QUELLEN UND SEINER EINORDNUNG \r\nIM VORS OKRATISCHEN DENKEN.\r\nHans Schwabl\r\nDie alten Milesier k\u00f6nnen erst nach einiger kritischer Vorarbeit Ge\u00ad\r\ngenstand begriffsgeschichtlicher Forschung sein. Der Anfang der grie\u00ad\r\nchischen Philosophie ist uns ja nur durch die Berichte Sp\u00e4terer \u00fcberliefert \r\nund aus dem Blickwinkel einer Problemstellung, die nicht mehr die der \r\nersten Philosophen ist. So scheint der Versuch, die Eigenart der milesischen \r\nPhilosophie zu bestimmen, zun\u00e4chst so gut wie aussichtslos, insbesondere \r\nwenn man bedenkt, da\u00df nicht einmal die eigentliche Quelle unserer Nach\u00ad\r\nrichten, das Werk Theophrasts, uns als solche \u00fcberkommen ist, sondern \r\nda\u00df wir auch hier erst rekonstruieren m\u00fcssen.Der Anfang mu\u00df also sein, zu erforschen, was Theophrast gesagt und \r\ngemeint hat. Erst dann stellt sich die Aufgabe einer R\u00fcck\u00fcbersetzung sei\u00ad\r\nner Berichte ins Archaische. Diese R\u00fcck\u00fcbersetzung ist nur m\u00f6glich inner\u00ad\r\nhalb einer entwicklungsgeschichtlichen Linie, die von den Fr\u00fcheren zu \r\nden Milesiern1) und von diesen wieder zu den sp\u00e4teren Vorsokratikern2) \r\nzu ziehen ist. In unserer kurzen Skizze kann das daf\u00fcr schon Geleistete \r\nbzw. noch zu Leistende nur angedeutet werden. Wir beschr\u00e4nken uns \r\nau\u00dferdem auf Anaximander, einmal wegen der besonderen Stellung, die \r\nihm zukommt, dann aber auch wegen der Quellenlage, die, wenn man sie nur recht einzusch\u00e4tzen wei\u00df, doch einigerma\u00dfen tragf\u00e4hige Schl\u00fcsse auf \r\nden Ansatzpunkt und die Eigenart dieses fr\u00fchen Denkers gestattet. [pp. 59 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1964","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/TtvN2KY9lnbgZdC","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":288,"full_name":"Schwabl, Hans","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1031,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv f\u00fcr Begriffsgeschichte","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"59-72"}},"sort":[1964]}
| Title | Die Widerlegung des Manichäismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-57 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Die Widerlegung des Manichäismus im Kommentar des Simplikios zu Epiktet von Ilsetraut Hadot ist eine Studie über die Existenz und den Ursprung des Bösen, ein Thema, das im Encheiridion des Epiktet seinen Platz findet. Hadot zeigt, dass Simplikios mit Epiktet in der Ablehnung des ontologischen Charakters des Bösen übereinstimmt, da die Natur des Bösen keinen Platz in der Welt hat, und er verwendet auch stoische Argumente, die auch im Neuplatonismus und im Christentum verwendet werden, um das Thema zu behandeln. Simplikios argumentiert gegen das manichäische System mit einem polemischen Ton, der den polemischen Werken anderer Autoren gegen die Manichäer ähnelt. Simplikios hält die gründliche Widerlegung des manichäischen Systems für notwendig, insbesondere seit dem Wiederaufleben der Manichäer im byzantinischen Reich. Simplikios' Kommentar soll als Anleitung zur Selbstvervollkommnung dienen, und aus diesem Grund bietet er nicht nur eine umfassende Diskussion über den Ursprung des Bösen, sondern widmet auch einen beträchtlichen Teil seines Werks der gründlichen Widerlegung des manichäischen Systems. Simplikios stützt sich bei seiner Argumentation auf das philosophische System von Proklos und erwähnt die Manichäer nur im zweiten Teil seiner Erörterung, in dem er die Hypothese widerlegt, dass das Böse als Prinzip neben dem Guten angesehen werden kann. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HFw9upuC8f3LCzo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1131","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1131,"authors_free":[{"id":1706,"entry_id":1131,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios"},"abstract":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Kommentar des Simplikios zu Epiktet von Ilsetraut Hadot ist eine Studie \u00fcber die Existenz und den Ursprung des B\u00f6sen, ein Thema, das im Encheiridion des Epiktet seinen Platz findet. Hadot zeigt, dass Simplikios mit Epiktet in der Ablehnung des ontologischen Charakters des B\u00f6sen \u00fcbereinstimmt, da die Natur des B\u00f6sen keinen Platz in der Welt hat, und er verwendet auch stoische Argumente, die auch im Neuplatonismus und im Christentum verwendet werden, um das Thema zu behandeln. Simplikios argumentiert gegen das manich\u00e4ische System mit einem polemischen Ton, der den polemischen Werken anderer Autoren gegen die Manich\u00e4er \u00e4hnelt. Simplikios h\u00e4lt die gr\u00fcndliche Widerlegung des manich\u00e4ischen Systems f\u00fcr notwendig, insbesondere seit dem Wiederaufleben der Manich\u00e4er im byzantinischen Reich. Simplikios' Kommentar soll als Anleitung zur Selbstvervollkommnung dienen, und aus diesem Grund bietet er nicht nur eine umfassende Diskussion \u00fcber den Ursprung des B\u00f6sen, sondern widmet auch einen betr\u00e4chtlichen Teil seines Werks der gr\u00fcndlichen Widerlegung des manich\u00e4ischen Systems. Simplikios st\u00fctzt sich bei seiner Argumentation auf das philosophische System von Proklos und erw\u00e4hnt die Manich\u00e4er nur im zweiten Teil seiner Er\u00f6rterung, in dem er die Hypothese widerlegt, dass das B\u00f6se als Prinzip neben dem Guten angesehen werden kann. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HFw9upuC8f3LCzo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1131,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie","volume":"51","issue":"1","pages":"31-57"}},"sort":["Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios"]}
| Title | Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the interpretation of the word "zôros" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1376,"authors_free":[{"id":2120,"entry_id":1376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation of the word \"z\u00f4ros\" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"15","issue":"1","pages":"1-4"}},"sort":["Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"]}
| Title | Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-40 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or a complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence for Empedocles’ main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments and of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"865","_score":null,"_source":{"id":865,"authors_free":[{"id":1269,"entry_id":865,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle"},"abstract":"Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or \r\na complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence \r\nfor Empedocles\u2019 main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments \r\nand of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":865,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"17","issue":"1","pages":"29-40"}},"sort":["Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle"]}
| Title | Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-111 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Arundel, Maureen Rosemary |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word "zôros" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means "mixed" while others argue it means "undiluted." The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to "zôra" meaning "undiluted" and that the modern interpretation of "mixed" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of "zôra" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means "mixed." [whole text] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1262","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1262,"authors_free":[{"id":1848,"entry_id":1262,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":36,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","free_first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","free_last_name":"Arundel","norm_person":{"id":36,"first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","last_name":"Arundel","full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word \"z\u00f4ros\" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means \"mixed\" while others argue it means \"undiluted.\" The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to \"z\u00f4ra\" meaning \"undiluted\" and that the modern interpretation of \"mixed\" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of \"z\u00f4ra\" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means \"mixed.\" [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":36,"full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1262,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"12","issue":"2","pages":"109-111"}},"sort":["Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15"]}
| Title | Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Dutch |
| Date | 1956 |
| Journal | L'Antiquité Classique |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 351-385 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Valckenaere de, Erik |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/45s78Kq0g2yDLuk |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"836","_score":null,"_source":{"id":836,"authors_free":[{"id":1240,"entry_id":836,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","free_first_name":"Erik","free_last_name":"Valckenaere de","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"Erik","last_name":"Valckenaere de","full_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?","main_title":{"title":"Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1956","language":"Dutch","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/45s78Kq0g2yDLuk","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":836,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'Antiquit\u00e9 Classique","volume":"25","issue":"2","pages":"351-385"}},"sort":["Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?"]}
| Title | Heraklit zitiert Anaximander |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1956 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 382-384 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bröcker, Walter |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Note on a quote of Heraclitus |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/toXxGP6G9zJTv6B |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1069","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1069,"authors_free":[{"id":1623,"entry_id":1069,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":19,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","free_first_name":"Walter","free_last_name":"Br\u00f6cker","norm_person":{"id":19,"first_name":"Walter ","last_name":"Br\u00f6cker","full_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116559500","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Heraklit zitiert Anaximander","main_title":{"title":"Heraklit zitiert Anaximander"},"abstract":"Note on a quote of Heraclitus","btype":3,"date":"1956","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/toXxGP6G9zJTv6B","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":19,"full_name":"Br\u00f6cker, Walter ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1069,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"84","issue":"3","pages":"382-384"}},"sort":["Heraklit zitiert Anaximander"]}
| Title | Il commento di Simplicio al De Anima nelle controversie della fine del secolo XV e del secolo XVI |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1958 |
| Published in | |
| Pages | 365-442 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Nardi, Bruno |
| Editor(s) | Nardi, Bruno |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/duE56yUxUWNmSVU |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"244","_score":null,"_source":{"id":244,"authors_free":[{"id":313,"entry_id":244,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":493,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nardi, Bruno","free_first_name":"Bruno","free_last_name":"Nardi","norm_person":{"id":493,"first_name":"Bruno","last_name":"Nardi","full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119470691","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2463,"entry_id":244,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":493,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Nardi, Bruno","free_first_name":"Bruno","free_last_name":"Nardi","norm_person":{"id":493,"first_name":"Bruno","last_name":"Nardi","full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119470691","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Il commento di Simplicio al De Anima nelle controversie della fine del secolo XV e del secolo XVI","main_title":{"title":"Il commento di Simplicio al De Anima nelle controversie della fine del secolo XV e del secolo XVI"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1958","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/duE56yUxUWNmSVU","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":493,"full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":493,"full_name":"Nardi, Bruno","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":244,"pubplace":"Padova","publisher":"Liviana","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":{"id":244,"section_of":203,"pages":"365-442","is_catalog":null,"book":null},"article":null},"sort":["Il commento di Simplicio al De Anima nelle controversie della fine del secolo XV e del secolo XVI"]}
| Title | John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Oriental Society |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 357-391 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Davidson, Herbert A. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Information from a number of sources has established that John Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem, a refutation of Aristotle's proofs of the eternity of the world, was at least partially available to the Arabic philosophers in the Middle Ages. The present article shows that the Arabic Jewish writer Sacadia used a set of proofs of creation ultimately deriving from Philoponus. With the aid of this result the following further conclusions are also drawn: Kindi too used a set of proofs of creation ultimately deriving from Philoponus; a variety of medieval arguments from the impossibility of an infinite are to be traced to Philoponus; the standard Kalām proof of creation, the proof from "accidents," originated as a reformulation of one of Philoponus' arguments. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/S0gw5n3A3GJL79C |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1295","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1295,"authors_free":[{"id":1888,"entry_id":1295,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":84,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Davidson, Herbert A.","free_first_name":"Herbert A.","free_last_name":"Davidson","norm_person":{"id":84,"first_name":"Herbert A.","last_name":"Davidson","full_name":"Davidson, Herbert A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15814743X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation","main_title":{"title":"John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation"},"abstract":"Information from a number of sources has established that John Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem, a refutation of Aristotle's proofs of the eternity of the world, was at least partially available to the Arabic philosophers in the Middle Ages. The present article shows that the Arabic Jewish writer Sacadia used a set of proofs of creation ultimately deriving from Philoponus. With the aid of this result the following further conclusions are also drawn: Kindi too used a set of proofs of creation ultimately deriving from Philoponus; a variety of medieval arguments from the impossibility of an infinite are to be traced to Philoponus; the standard Kal\u0101m proof of creation, the proof from \"accidents,\" originated as a reformulation of one of Philoponus' arguments. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/S0gw5n3A3GJL79C","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":84,"full_name":"Davidson, Herbert A.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1295,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the American Oriental Society","volume":"89","issue":"2","pages":"357-391"}},"sort":["John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation"]}
| Title | Le chrétien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'École d'Alexandrie au VIe siècle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1954 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Grecques |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 316-318 |
| Pages | 396-410 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Saffrey, Henri Dominique |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Ammonias, bien que païen et élève de Proclus, avait su, dès la fin du Ve siècle, faire à l'Église les concessionsnécessaires pour que fût toléré son enseignement officiel à Alexandrie. Mais il convient de reconnaître le rôle capital quedut jouer, quelque vingt à trente ans plus tard, un de ses élèves chrétiens, Jean le grammairien, philoponos dans l'Églised'Alexandrie : il couvrit son maître, et en éditant sous son nom à lui ses rédactions des commentaires à Aristote exposésoralement par Ammonius, et en publiant, dans l'année critique 529, son propre ouvrage De aeternitate mundi ContraProclum, qui détachait opportunément de l'École d'Athènes l'École d'Alexandrie. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/C0QcH7vjb2PYNkY |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"401","_score":null,"_source":{"id":401,"authors_free":[{"id":536,"entry_id":401,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":228,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","free_first_name":"Henri Dominique","free_last_name":"Saffrey","norm_person":{"id":228,"first_name":"Henri Dominique","last_name":"Saffrey","full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130160059","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Le chr\u00e9tien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie au VIe si\u00e8cle","main_title":{"title":"Le chr\u00e9tien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie au VIe si\u00e8cle"},"abstract":"Ammonias, bien que pa\u00efen et \u00e9l\u00e8ve de Proclus, avait su, d\u00e8s la fin du Ve si\u00e8cle, faire \u00e0 l'\u00c9glise les concessionsn\u00e9cessaires pour que f\u00fbt tol\u00e9r\u00e9 son enseignement officiel \u00e0 Alexandrie. Mais il convient de reconna\u00eetre le r\u00f4le capital quedut jouer, quelque vingt \u00e0 trente ans plus tard, un de ses \u00e9l\u00e8ves chr\u00e9tiens, Jean le grammairien, philoponos dans l'\u00c9glised'Alexandrie : il couvrit son ma\u00eetre, et en \u00e9ditant sous son nom \u00e0 lui ses r\u00e9dactions des commentaires \u00e0 Aristote expos\u00e9soralement par Ammonius, et en publiant, dans l'ann\u00e9e critique 529, son propre ouvrage De aeternitate mundi ContraProclum, qui d\u00e9tachait opportun\u00e9ment de l'\u00c9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1954","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/C0QcH7vjb2PYNkY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":228,"full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":401,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Grecques","volume":"67","issue":"316-318","pages":"396-410"}},"sort":["Le chr\u00e9tien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'\u00c9cole d'Alexandrie au VIe si\u00e8cle"]}
| Title | Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux «Météorologiques» |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1953 |
| Journal | Bulletin de la classe des lettres, sciences morales et politiques de l'Académie Royale de Belgique |
| Volume | 5e Série, Tome 39 |
| Pages | 299–357 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Evrard, Étienne |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Philopon était probablement un chrétien de naissance. Rien en tout cas n’indique qu'il ait jamais été païen. Dès le début de son activité littéraire, il manifeste son christianisme en interprétant Aristote d’une manière favorable à l’immortalité de l'âme humaine et en le critiquant à propos de la création du monde et de l’éternité du mouvement. Il fut peut-être séduit un instant par les idées d’Origène, mais les abandonna bientôt. La fermeture de l’école d’Athènes a sans doute produit sur son esprit une assez forte impression. Il est remarquable en tout cas que son Contre Proclus est l’exact contemporain de cet événement. Peut-être la mesure de Justinien fut-elle difficilement admise dans les cercles philosophiques d'Alexandrie, où païens et chrétiens semblent avoir fait un effort pour harmoniser leurs points de vue. Philopon aurait alors voulu montrer qu’elle atteignait les disciples d’un philosophe dont l’enseignement était fort criticable et qui n’avait consenti aucune concession au christianisme. C’est peut-être pour la même raison qu’un peu après, dans son Commentaire aux Météorologiques, il attaqua à plusieurs reprises Damascius, qui dirigeait l’école d'Athènes au moment de sa fermeture. A ce moment encore, il prit apparemment une conscience plus nette des contradictions entre les doctrines des païen’s et sa religion. C’est en effet dans le Contre Proclus qu’apparaît pour la première fois la critique de la cinquième essence. Un ouvrage postérieur que nous ne possédons plus y ajoutait une réfutation de la théorie du mouvement surnaturel du feu. On peut penser que Philopon craignait dans ces doctrines une certaine divinisation du ciel dans laquelle il voyait une atteinte à la majesté de Dieu. Le Commentaire aux Météorologiques, composé après 529, révèle une accentuation de cette attitude. On y voit en plus apparaître la critique de l’astrologie. Enfin le Contre Aristote constitue comme une somme des griefs de Philopon contre le système péripatéticien. Dans le De Opificio mundi, postérieur au Contre Aristote et écrit après 557, la philosophie n’apparaît plus qu’indirectement et cède la place à la théologie et à l’exégèse biblique.Seule une étude exhaustive des œuvres de Philopon révélerait le degré d'exactitude de cette reconstitution provisoire. Celle-ci me semble du moins respecter plus complètement que celle de Gudeman les indications sur lesquelles j’ai attiré l’attention. Elle permet en outre de mieux comprendre les répercussions des événements de la première moitié du VIe siècle sur l'esprit de Philopon. [conclusion, p. 356-357] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/vWLkdYndnRLFCbW |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"553","_score":null,"_source":{"id":553,"authors_free":[{"id":782,"entry_id":553,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":92,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","free_first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","free_last_name":"Evrard","norm_person":{"id":92,"first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","last_name":"Evrard","full_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118945750","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux \u00abM\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques\u00bb","main_title":{"title":"Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux \u00abM\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques\u00bb"},"abstract":"Philopon \u00e9tait probablement un chr\u00e9tien de naissance. Rien en tout cas n\u2019indique qu'il ait jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 pa\u00efen. D\u00e8s le d\u00e9but de son activit\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire, il manifeste son christianisme en interpr\u00e9tant Aristote d\u2019une mani\u00e8re favorable \u00e0 l\u2019immortalit\u00e9 de l'\u00e2me humaine et en le \r\ncritiquant \u00e0 propos de la cr\u00e9ation du monde et de l\u2019\u00e9ternit\u00e9 du mouvement. Il fut peut-\u00eatre s\u00e9duit un instant par les id\u00e9es d\u2019Orig\u00e8ne, mais les abandonna bient\u00f4t. La fermeture de l\u2019\u00e9cole \r\nd\u2019Ath\u00e8nes a sans doute produit sur son esprit une assez forte impression. Il est remarquable en tout cas que son Contre Proclus est l\u2019exact contemporain de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement. Peut-\u00eatre la mesure de Justinien fut-elle difficilement admise dans les cercles philoso\u00adphiques d'Alexandrie, o\u00f9 pa\u00efens et chr\u00e9tiens semblent avoir \r\nfait un effort pour harmoniser leurs points de vue. Philopon aurait alors voulu montrer qu\u2019elle atteignait les disciples d\u2019un philosophe dont l\u2019enseignement \u00e9tait fort criticable et qui n\u2019avait \r\nconsenti aucune concession au christianisme. C\u2019est peut-\u00eatre pour la m\u00eame raison qu\u2019un peu apr\u00e8s, dans son Commentaire aux M\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques, il attaqua \u00e0 plusieurs reprises Damascius, qui dirigeait l\u2019\u00e9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes au moment de sa fermeture. A ce moment encore, il prit apparemment une conscience plus nette \r\ndes contradictions entre les doctrines des pa\u00efen\u2019s et sa religion. C\u2019est en effet dans le Contre Proclus qu\u2019appara\u00eet pour la premi\u00e8re fois la critique de la cinqui\u00e8me essence. Un ouvrage post\u00e9rieur \r\nque nous ne poss\u00e9dons plus y ajoutait une r\u00e9futation de la th\u00e9orie du mouvement surnaturel du feu. On peut penser que Philopon craignait dans ces doctrines une certaine divinisation du ciel dans laquelle il voyait une atteinte \u00e0 la majest\u00e9 de Dieu. Le Com\u00admentaire aux M\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques, compos\u00e9 apr\u00e8s 529, r\u00e9v\u00e8le une accentuation de cette attitude. On y voit en plus appara\u00eetre la \r\ncritique de l\u2019astrologie. Enfin le Contre Aristote constitue comme une somme des griefs de Philopon contre le syst\u00e8me p\u00e9ripat\u00e9ticien. Dans le De Opificio mundi, post\u00e9rieur au Contre Aristote \r\net \u00e9crit apr\u00e8s 557, la philosophie n\u2019appara\u00eet plus qu\u2019indirectement et c\u00e8de la place \u00e0 la th\u00e9ologie et \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8se biblique.Seule une \u00e9tude exhaustive des \u0153uvres de Philopon r\u00e9v\u00e9lerait le degr\u00e9 d'exactitude de cette reconstitution provisoire. Celle-ci me semble du moins respecter plus compl\u00e8tement que celle de Gudeman les indications sur lesquelles j\u2019ai attir\u00e9 l\u2019attention. \r\nElle permet en outre de mieux comprendre les r\u00e9percussions des \u00e9v\u00e9nements de la premi\u00e8re moiti\u00e9 du VIe si\u00e8cle sur l'esprit \r\nde Philopon. [conclusion, p. 356-357]","btype":3,"date":"1953","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/vWLkdYndnRLFCbW","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":92,"full_name":"Evrard, \u00c9tienne ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":553,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de la classe des lettres, sciences morales et politiques de l'Acad\u00e9mie Royale de Belgique","volume":"5e S\u00e9rie, Tome 39","issue":"","pages":"299\u2013357"}},"sort":["Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux \u00abM\u00e9t\u00e9orologiques\u00bb"]}