| Title | Parmenides, Fragment 10 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 629-631 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bicknell, Peter J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This text is a critical analysis of the location of two fragments of the work of the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides. The author of the text suggests that the two fragments, VS 28 B 10 (Clement, Strom. 5, I38) and VS 28 B 11 (Simplicius, de Caelo 559, 20), are incorrectly placed together in Parmenides' Way of Seeming. The author argues that there is no evidence to suggest that the two fragments were meant to be together, and that they do not fit into the context of Parmenides' work. The author also suggests that VS 28 B 10 may not be Parmenidean at all, and discusses its possible attribution to Empedocles. The text concludes by considering the language and style of the two fragments, and their relationship to Parmenides' other works. [summary of the whole text] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2uPg3j4nE0Tu1v1 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1124","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1124,"authors_free":[{"id":1700,"entry_id":1124,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":399,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","free_first_name":"Peter J.","free_last_name":"Bicknell","norm_person":{"id":399,"first_name":"Peter J.","last_name":"Bicknell","full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1162157143","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides, Fragment 10","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides, Fragment 10"},"abstract":"This text is a critical analysis of the location of two fragments of the work of the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides. The author of the text suggests that the two fragments, VS 28 B 10 (Clement, Strom. 5, I38) and VS 28 B 11 (Simplicius, de Caelo 559, 20), are incorrectly placed together in Parmenides' Way of Seeming. The author argues that there is no evidence to suggest that the two fragments were meant to be together, and that they do not fit into the context of Parmenides' work. The author also suggests that VS 28 B 10 may not be Parmenidean at all, and discusses its possible attribution to Empedocles. The text concludes by considering the language and style of the two fragments, and their relationship to Parmenides' other works. [summary of the whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2uPg3j4nE0Tu1v1","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":399,"full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1124,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"96","issue":"4","pages":"629-631"}},"sort":[1968]}
| Title | The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius' Commentary on Aristotle's Physics i-iv |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 70-75 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Coxon, Allan D. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The critical text of the first four books of Simplicius’ commentary on the Physics, which was published by Diels in Berlin in 1882 and serves as the foundation for the text of many fragments of the Presocratics, was based on collations by Vitelli of three manuscripts (DEF) and of a fragment of Book I in a copy made by the scribe of E, which Diels refers to as Ea. Besides these, Diels lists a considerable number of later manuscripts, which I have examined and found justifiably ignored in his critical apparatus. The total number of manuscripts listed by Diels of some part of Books I-VIII is 44; a further 25 not mentioned by Diels are listed in A. Wartelle’s "Inventaire des manuscrits grecs d’Aristote et de ses commentateurs" (Belles Lettres, 1963). I shall argue that Diels seriously underrated both the value of F and the probability of contamination between his manuscripts, and consequently, his text of some fragments of the Presocratics rests on a false foundation. However, it should be said at the outset that Diels’s understanding of Presocratic thought prevented him from going far wrong in the readings he adopted and printed. [Introduction, p. 70] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HfdVbtSYTkutnV9 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1283","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1283,"authors_free":[{"id":1872,"entry_id":1283,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":57,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Coxon, Allan D.","free_first_name":"Allan D. ","free_last_name":"Coxon","norm_person":{"id":57,"first_name":"Allan D.","last_name":"Coxon","full_name":"Coxon, Allan D.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1053041829","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius' Commentary on Aristotle's Physics i-iv","main_title":{"title":"The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius' Commentary on Aristotle's Physics i-iv"},"abstract":"The critical text of the first four books of Simplicius\u2019 commentary on the Physics, which was published by Diels in Berlin in 1882 and serves as the foundation for the text of many fragments of the Presocratics, was based on collations by Vitelli of three manuscripts (DEF) and of a fragment of Book I in a copy made by the scribe of E, which Diels refers to as Ea. Besides these, Diels lists a considerable number of later manuscripts, which I have examined and found justifiably ignored in his critical apparatus. The total number of manuscripts listed by Diels of some part of Books I-VIII is 44; a further 25 not mentioned by Diels are listed in A. Wartelle\u2019s \"Inventaire des manuscrits grecs d\u2019Aristote et de ses commentateurs\" (Belles Lettres, 1963). I shall argue that Diels seriously underrated both the value of F and the probability of contamination between his manuscripts, and consequently, his text of some fragments of the Presocratics rests on a false foundation. However, it should be said at the outset that Diels\u2019s understanding of Presocratic thought prevented him from going far wrong in the readings he adopted and printed. [Introduction, p. 70]","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HfdVbtSYTkutnV9","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":57,"full_name":"Coxon, Allan D.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1283,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"18","issue":"1","pages":"70-75 "}},"sort":[1968]}
| Title | Aristote, «De la prière» |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger |
| Volume | 157 |
| Pages | 59-70 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Pépin, Jean |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Au nombre des Aristotelis fragmenta figure un bref témoignage de Simplicius, selon lequel Aristote, sur la fin de son livre Περ ευχής, aurait dit que Dieu est ou bien intellect, ou bien quelque chose au-delà de l'intellect, ὃτι ό θεός ή νους εστίν ή καΐ έπέκεινά τι του νου. Simplicius est le seul auteur à rapporter cette surprenante doxographie, et même à évoquer le contenu de cet écrit aristotélicien. Son témoignage étant ainsi l'unique point de départ, on doit avant tout l'examiner de très près, en lui adjoignant les quelques lignes qui le précèdent. Cette investigation permettra peut-être d'en évaluer les chances d'authenticité. Il restera alors à s'interroger sur le sens exact de la doctrine ainsi rapportée à Aristote. [Introduction, p. 59] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/SE4b7Gg647e99Gx |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1089","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1089,"authors_free":[{"id":1647,"entry_id":1089,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":227,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"P\u00e9pin, Jean","free_first_name":"Jean","free_last_name":"P\u00e9pin","norm_person":{"id":227,"first_name":"Jean","last_name":"P\u00e9pin","full_name":"P\u00e9pin, Jean","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119165147","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristote, \u00abDe la pri\u00e8re\u00bb","main_title":{"title":"Aristote, \u00abDe la pri\u00e8re\u00bb"},"abstract":"Au nombre des Aristotelis fragmenta figure un bref t\u00e9moignage de Simplicius, selon lequel Aristote, sur la fin de son livre \u03a0\u03b5\u03c1 \u03b5\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae\u03c2, aurait dit que Dieu est ou bien intellect, ou bien quelque chose au-del\u00e0 de l'intellect, \u1f43\u03c4\u03b9 \u03cc \u03b8\u03b5\u03cc\u03c2 \u03ae \u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03b5\u03c3\u03c4\u03af\u03bd \u03ae \u03ba\u03b1\u0390 \u03ad\u03c0\u03ad\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd\u03ac \u03c4\u03b9 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03bd\u03bf\u03c5. Simplicius est le seul auteur \u00e0 rapporter cette surprenante doxographie, et m\u00eame \u00e0 \u00e9voquer le contenu de cet \u00e9crit aristot\u00e9licien. Son t\u00e9moignage \u00e9tant ainsi l'unique point de d\u00e9part, on doit avant tout l'examiner de tr\u00e8s pr\u00e8s, en lui adjoignant les quelques lignes qui le pr\u00e9c\u00e8dent. Cette investigation permettra peut-\u00eatre d'en \u00e9valuer les chances d'authenticit\u00e9. Il restera alors \u00e0 s'interroger sur le sens exact de la doctrine ainsi rapport\u00e9e \u00e0 Aristote. [Introduction, p. 59]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/SE4b7Gg647e99Gx","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":227,"full_name":"P\u00e9pin, Jean","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1089,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'\u00c9tranger","volume":"157","issue":"","pages":"59-70"}},"sort":[1967]}
| Title | Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-40 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or a complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence for Empedocles’ main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments and of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"865","_score":null,"_source":{"id":865,"authors_free":[{"id":1269,"entry_id":865,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle"},"abstract":"Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or \r\na complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence \r\nfor Empedocles\u2019 main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments \r\nand of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":865,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"17","issue":"1","pages":"29-40"}},"sort":[1967]}
| Title | Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-5 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bicknell, Peter J. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner of atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of these being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a Parmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I shall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other argument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- phrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that Leucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"772","_score":null,"_source":{"id":772,"authors_free":[{"id":1136,"entry_id":772,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":399,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","free_first_name":"Peter J.","free_last_name":"Bicknell","norm_person":{"id":399,"first_name":"Peter J.","last_name":"Bicknell","full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1162157143","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication","main_title":{"title":"Parmenides' Refutation of Motion and an Implication"},"abstract":"It is commonly maintained that Melissus was the major forerunner \r\nof atomism. This has been argued on a number of grounds, one of \r\nthese being that Leucippus reacted to a Melissean rather than a \r\nParmenidean refutation of locomotion. In the following short paper I \r\nshall challenge this view and point out that not only is one other \r\nargument for Melissus' influence on atomism insecure, but that Theo- \r\nphrastus, our most important witness, unequivocally states that \r\nLeucippus opposed a pre-Melissean eleaticism. [p. 1]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HVrwO25mQS4JsxM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":399,"full_name":"Bicknell, Peter J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":772,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"12","issue":"1","pages":"1-5"}},"sort":[1967]}
| Title | The End of the Ancient Universities |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1966 |
| Journal | Journal of World History |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 653-673 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Cameron, Alan |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Strictliy speaking, there were no universities in the Ancient World,if by university we understand a corporate institution offering avariety of courses and granting degrees in the way modern univer sities do. There were, however, university towns, Rome, Constantinople, Athens, Alexandria, Bordeaux, with established chairs, where the leading teachers of the day lectured to classes drawn from all over the Empire. And so many of the ideas we associate with a university were both present and fostered in this atmosphere, that it would clearly he pedantic to avoid using the term. But there were significant differences nonetheless.Not least, each professor in these university towns was independent of, and indeed a rival of, every other professor there. In every city of the Empire except Constantinople, and not there till 425, it was possible for freelance teachers to set up in opposition lo holders of the established chairs (and sometimes entice away their pupils, too). Even holders of the chairs competed with each other for pupils. It was normal for students to sign on with just one professor, and attend his courses alone. Indeed, the rivalry between professors was transmitted to their pupils. Up to a point competion was natural and healthy enough. But by the period that forms the subject of this paper, the fourth to sixth centuries A.D., it far exceeded that point, and cannot but have impaired both the proficiency and the standing of the profession. [Introduction, pp. 653 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/atNV1VbXvQJ1nCM |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1048","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1048,"authors_free":[{"id":1593,"entry_id":1048,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":20,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cameron, Alan","free_first_name":"Alan","free_last_name":"Cameron","norm_person":{"id":20,"first_name":"Alan","last_name":"Cameron","full_name":"Cameron, Alan ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143568914","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The End of the Ancient Universities","main_title":{"title":"The End of the Ancient Universities"},"abstract":"Strictliy speaking, there were no universities in the Ancient World,if by university we understand a corporate institution offering avariety of courses and granting degrees in the way modern univer\u00ad\r\nsities do.\r\nThere were, however, university towns, Rome, Constantinople, \r\nAthens, Alexandria, Bordeaux, with established chairs, where the leading \r\nteachers of the day lectured to classes drawn from all over the Empire. \r\nAnd so many of the ideas we associate with a university were both present \r\nand fostered in this atmosphere, that it would clearly he pedantic to avoid \r\nusing the term. But there were significant differences nonetheless.Not least, each professor in these university towns was independent \r\nof, and indeed a rival of, every other professor there. In every city of the \r\nEmpire except Constantinople, and not there till 425, it was possible for \r\nfreelance teachers to set up in opposition lo holders of the established \r\nchairs (and sometimes entice away their pupils, too). Even holders of the \r\nchairs competed with each other for pupils. It was normal for students to \r\nsign on with just one professor, and attend his courses alone. Indeed, the \r\nrivalry between professors was transmitted to their pupils. Up to a point competion was natural and healthy enough. But by the period that\r\nforms the subject of this paper, the fourth to sixth centuries A.D., it\r\nfar exceeded that point, and cannot but have impaired both the \r\nproficiency and the standing of the profession. [Introduction, pp. 653 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1966","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/atNV1VbXvQJ1nCM","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":20,"full_name":"Cameron, Alan ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1048,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of World History","volume":"10","issue":"","pages":"653-673"}},"sort":[1966]}
| Title | Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Phronesis |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-148 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Solmsen, Friedrich |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent as long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or groups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is worked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to admit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an alternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von Arnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a good purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly grounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.] our interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and revisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large hypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now near the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- struction of a dual cosmogony in his "cycle", originally a theory which had to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, treated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further inferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which backs up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the merits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since its publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the relative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of Aristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital bearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text book which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- mogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"846","_score":null,"_source":{"id":846,"authors_free":[{"id":1250,"entry_id":846,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","free_first_name":"Friedrich","free_last_name":"Solmsen","norm_person":{"id":316,"first_name":"Friedrich","last_name":"Solmsen","full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117754641","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology","main_title":{"title":"Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology"},"abstract":"In Heracitus and Parmenides assumptions which form the basis of on the contrary it may be said that difficulties which were less apparent \r\nas long as the discussion confined itself to individual fragments or \r\ngroups of fragments become more visible when the entire scheme is \r\nworked out and presented. Perhaps the wisest course would be to \r\nadmit ignorance on crucial points. If I, nevertheless, prefer to offer an \r\nalternative reconstruction - in essential aspects a revival of von \r\nArnim's3 - my hope is that, whether right or wrong, it will serve a \r\ngood purpose if it shows that opinions currently accepted are not firmly \r\ngrounded in the evidence at our disposal. [pp. 109 f.]\r\nour interpretation are subject to frequent reexaminations and \r\nrevisions. With Empedocles matters are different. Here large \r\nhypotheses have for a long time remained unchallenged and are now \r\nnear the point of hardening into dogmas. In particular the recon- \r\nstruction of a dual cosmogony in his \"cycle\", originally a theory which \r\nhad to contend with others, is now often regarded as established, \r\ntreated as though it were a fact, and used as premise for further \r\ninferences. The only full scale interpretation of the evidence which \r\nbacks up this theory is Ettore Bignone's Empedoclel; yet whatever the \r\nmerits of this book, it can hardly be denied that in the fifty years since \r\nits publication we have learned many new lessons regarding the \r\nrelative value of testimonies and fragments, the trustworthiness of \r\nAristotle's reports on his precursors, and other questions of vital \r\nbearing on the reconstruction of a Presocratic system. A recent text \r\nbook which seeks to fit the material into the framework of two cos- \r\nmogonies does not in my opinion succeed in strengthening this position","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mpJ8Nqzof1sydeV","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":316,"full_name":"Solmsen, Friedrich","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":846,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"109-148"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Oriental Society |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 318-327 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Kraemer, Joel L. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In view of Philoponus' achievement, the loss of the Contra Aristotelem is, to say the least, regret- table. Fortunately, extracts from the work are preserved in the commentaries on the Physica and the De caelo of Philoponus' pagan philosophi- cal opponent, Simplicius, which provide a fair sampling of the drift of the argument.9 Also, there is reason to believe that the Contra Aristotelem was known to the medieval Arabs... [p. 320] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/GlgWKDL2kQWNuuf |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"735","_score":null,"_source":{"id":735,"authors_free":[{"id":1098,"entry_id":735,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":220,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","free_first_name":"Joel, L.","free_last_name":"Kraemer","norm_person":{"id":220,"first_name":"Joel L.","last_name":"Kraemer","full_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113182023","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation","main_title":{"title":"A Lost Passage from Philoponus' Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation"},"abstract":"In view of Philoponus' achievement, the loss of \r\nthe Contra Aristotelem is, to say the least, regret- \r\ntable. Fortunately, extracts from the work are \r\npreserved in the commentaries on the Physica \r\nand the De caelo of Philoponus' pagan philosophi- \r\ncal opponent, Simplicius, which provide a fair \r\nsampling of the drift of the argument.9 Also, there \r\nis reason to believe that the Contra Aristotelem \r\nwas known to the medieval Arabs... [p. 320]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GlgWKDL2kQWNuuf","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":220,"full_name":"Kraemer, Joel L.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":735,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the American Oriental Society","volume":"85","issue":"3","pages":"318-327"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-33 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hölscher, Uvo |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Der Text untersucht die Lehre des griechischen Philosophen Empedokles über die periodischen Entstehungs- und Vergehenszyklen der Welt. Es wird diskutiert, dass es bisher keine Einigkeit darüber gibt, wie diese Zyklen im Detail zu verstehen sind. Eine verbreitete Auffassung besagt, dass sich der Zyklus in vier Phasen abspielt, in denen sich jeweils eine Welt bildet, die durch Trennungs- und Vereinigungsprozesse der Elemente entstehen und vergehen. Es wird jedoch argumentiert, dass diese Vorstellung widersprüchlich ist und es keine klare Entscheidung darüber gibt, welche Phase die aktuelle Welt repräsentiert. Der Autor kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Vorstellung von nur vier Phasen nicht ausreichend ist und dass die Vorstellung eines Ruhezustands der getrennten Elemente unzureichend belegt ist. Stattdessen schlägt der Autor vor, dass es nur zwei Phasen gibt, in denen sich die Kosmogonie und Zoogonie ereignen. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/3i3dIX2FiiNPQoT |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1353","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1353,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1353,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":198,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","free_first_name":"Uvo","free_last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","norm_person":{"id":198,"first_name":"Uvo","last_name":"H\u00f6lscher","full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118705571","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachpr\u00fcfung der Empedokles-Doxographie","main_title":{"title":"Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachpr\u00fcfung der Empedokles-Doxographie"},"abstract":"Der Text untersucht die Lehre des griechischen Philosophen Empedokles \u00fcber die periodischen Entstehungs- und Vergehenszyklen der Welt. Es wird diskutiert, dass es bisher keine Einigkeit dar\u00fcber gibt, wie diese Zyklen im Detail zu verstehen sind. Eine verbreitete Auffassung besagt, dass sich der Zyklus in vier Phasen abspielt, in denen sich jeweils eine Welt bildet, die durch Trennungs- und Vereinigungsprozesse der Elemente entstehen und vergehen. Es wird jedoch argumentiert, dass diese Vorstellung widerspr\u00fcchlich ist und es keine klare Entscheidung dar\u00fcber gibt, welche Phase die aktuelle Welt repr\u00e4sentiert. Der Autor kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Vorstellung von nur vier Phasen nicht ausreichend ist und dass die Vorstellung eines Ruhezustands der getrennten Elemente unzureichend belegt ist. Stattdessen schl\u00e4gt der Autor vor, dass es nur zwei Phasen gibt, in denen sich die Kosmogonie und Zoogonie ereignen. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/3i3dIX2FiiNPQoT","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":198,"full_name":"H\u00f6lscher, Uvo","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1353,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"93","issue":"1","pages":"7-33"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This text discusses the interpretation of the word "zôros" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1376,"authors_free":[{"id":2120,"entry_id":1376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation of the word \"z\u00f4ros\" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"15","issue":"1","pages":"1-4"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Der Platoniker Ptolemaios |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1957 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 314-325 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Dihle, Albrecht |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
In den philosophischen Texten der späten Kaiserzeit stößt man zuweilen auf den Namen Ptolemaios, ohne daß dabei an einen Lagiden oder an den berühmten Astronomen zu denken wäre. Wie jene Zitate auf einen oder mehrere Träger dieses Namens zu verteilen seien, war eine einst viel diskutierte Frage, die dann allerdings im Anschluß an eine Vermutung W. v. Christs durch das Buch von A. Chatzis (Der Philosoph und Grammatiker Ptolemaios Chennos I = Stud. z Gesch. u. Kult. d. Altert. VII 2, Paderborn 1914) endgültig dahin beantwortet schien, es handele sich bei all diesen Ptolemaioi immer wieder um Ptolemaios Chennos aus der Zeit um 100 n. Chr., der uns durch den Auszug des Photios aus seiner καινὴ ἱστορία (cod. 190) recht gut bekannt ist. Diese Frage soll hier einer erneuten Prüfung unterzogen werden. [introduction, p. 314] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/vFgmnYtr8RbZ3BD |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1305","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1305,"authors_free":[{"id":1929,"entry_id":1305,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":93,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dihle, Albrecht","free_first_name":"Albrecht","free_last_name":"Dihle","norm_person":{"id":93,"first_name":"Albrecht","last_name":"Dihle","full_name":"Dihle, Albrecht","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119194503","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Platoniker Ptolemaios","main_title":{"title":"Der Platoniker Ptolemaios"},"abstract":"In den philosophischen Texten der sp\u00e4ten Kaiserzeit st\u00f6\u00dft man zuweilen auf den Namen Ptolemaios, ohne da\u00df dabei an einen Lagiden oder an den ber\u00fchmten Astronomen zu denken w\u00e4re. Wie jene Zitate auf einen oder mehrere Tr\u00e4ger dieses Namens zu verteilen seien, war eine einst viel diskutierte Frage, die dann allerdings im Anschlu\u00df an eine Vermutung W. v. Christs durch das Buch von A. Chatzis (Der Philosoph und Grammatiker Ptolemaios Chennos I = Stud. z Gesch. u. Kult. d. Altert. VII 2, Paderborn 1914) endg\u00fcltig dahin beantwortet schien, es handele sich bei all diesen Ptolemaioi immer wieder um Ptolemaios Chennos aus der Zeit um 100 n. Chr., der uns durch den Auszug des Photios aus seiner \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u1f74 \u1f31\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c1\u1f77\u03b1 (cod. 190) recht gut bekannt ist. Diese Frage soll hier einer erneuten Pr\u00fcfung unterzogen werden. [introduction, p. 314]","btype":3,"date":"1957","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/vFgmnYtr8RbZ3BD","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":93,"full_name":"Dihle, Albrecht","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1305,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"85","issue":"3","pages":"314-325"}},"sort":["Der Platoniker Ptolemaios"]}
| Title | Did Melissus Believe in Incorporeal Being? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1958 |
| Journal | The American Journal of Philology |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-65 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Booth, N. B. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
G. Vlastos, in Gnomon, XXV (1953), pp. 34-5, claims that he (and J. E. Raven before him) have laid to rest "the alleged corporeality of Melissean Being in the grave which contains Burnet's famous dogma of Eleatic materialism." There is a surprising finality about this claim of Vlastos', and it behooves his critics to consider whether such finality is justified. I think myself that, while Vlastos' arguments are forceful and well ex- pressed, they still fail to carry absolute conviction; and in this brief discussion I shall try to set out the reasons for my scepticism. [p. 61] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0OSvPVeLSMxRqoo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":769,"authors_free":[{"id":1133,"entry_id":769,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":10,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Booth, N. B.","free_first_name":"N. B.","free_last_name":"Booth","norm_person":{"id":10,"first_name":"N. B.","last_name":"Booth","full_name":"Booth, N. B.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Did Melissus Believe in Incorporeal Being?","main_title":{"title":"Did Melissus Believe in Incorporeal Being?"},"abstract":"G. Vlastos, in Gnomon, XXV (1953), pp. 34-5, claims that \r\nhe (and J. E. Raven before him) have laid to rest \"the alleged \r\ncorporeality of Melissean Being in the grave which contains \r\nBurnet's famous dogma of Eleatic materialism.\" There is a \r\nsurprising finality about this claim of Vlastos', and it behooves \r\nhis critics to consider whether such finality is justified. I think \r\nmyself that, while Vlastos' arguments are forceful and well ex- \r\npressed, they still fail to carry absolute conviction; and in this \r\nbrief discussion I shall try to set out the reasons for my \r\nscepticism. [p. 61]","btype":3,"date":"1958","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0OSvPVeLSMxRqoo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":10,"full_name":"Booth, N. B.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"79","issue":"1","pages":"61-65"}},"sort":["Did Melissus Believe in Incorporeal Being?"]}
| Title | Die Entstehung physikalischer Terminologie aus der neuplatonischen Metaphysik |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 7-33 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Tsouyopoulos, Nelly |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/5pNxkufH3Ik3PjS |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"457","_score":null,"_source":{"id":457,"authors_free":[{"id":614,"entry_id":457,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":410,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tsouyopoulos, Nelly","free_first_name":"Nelly","free_last_name":"Tsouyopoulos","norm_person":{"id":410,"first_name":" Nelly ","last_name":"Tsouyopoulos","full_name":"Tsouyopoulos, Nelly ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Entstehung physikalischer Terminologie aus der neuplatonischen Metaphysik","main_title":{"title":"Die Entstehung physikalischer Terminologie aus der neuplatonischen Metaphysik"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/5pNxkufH3Ik3PjS","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":410,"full_name":"Tsouyopoulos, Nelly ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":457,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv f\u00fcr Begriffsgeschichte","volume":"13","issue":"","pages":"7-33"}},"sort":["Die Entstehung physikalischer Terminologie aus der neuplatonischen Metaphysik"]}
| Title | Die Neuplatonischen Aristoteleskommentatoren über die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Rheinisches Museum für Philologie |
| Volume | 112 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 120-126 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Müller, Carl Werner |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Das am häufigsten interpretierte Werk des Corpus Aristote- licum in der Antike ist die Kategorienschrift. Die den Kommen taren vorausgeschickte Einleitung kommt dabei meist einer all gemeinen Einführung in das Studium der aristotelischen Philo sophie gleich. Seit Ammonios, dem Sohn des Hermeias, wird in diesem Zusammenhang auch das Problem der vöfta ßißXLa be rührt (CAG IV4, 8, 2-6)x). Während aber Ammonios selbst nur kurz das Faktum, viele hätten ihre eigenen Werke unter dem Namen des Aristoteles herausgegeben, erwähnt zu haben scheint2), erfährt dieser Punkt bei seinen Schülern eine mehr oder weniger umfangreiche Ausgestaltung. [p. 120] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0XdjWLb1V5DzrX9 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"950","_score":null,"_source":{"id":950,"authors_free":[{"id":1426,"entry_id":950,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":273,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M\u00fcller, Carl Werner","free_first_name":"Carl Werner","free_last_name":"M\u00fcller","norm_person":{"id":273,"first_name":"Carl Werner","last_name":"M\u00fcller","full_name":"M\u00fcller, Carl Werner","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11944027X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Neuplatonischen Aristoteleskommentatoren \u00fcber die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie","main_title":{"title":"Die Neuplatonischen Aristoteleskommentatoren \u00fcber die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie"},"abstract":"Das am h\u00e4ufigsten interpretierte Werk des Corpus Aristote- \r\nlicum in der Antike ist die Kategorienschrift. Die den Kommen\u00ad\r\ntaren vorausgeschickte Einleitung kommt dabei meist einer all\u00ad\r\ngemeinen Einf\u00fchrung in das Studium der aristotelischen Philo\u00ad\r\nsophie gleich. Seit Ammonios, dem Sohn des Hermeias, wird in \r\ndiesem Zusammenhang auch das Problem der v\u00f6fta \u00dfi\u00dfXLa be\u00ad\r\nr\u00fchrt (CAG IV4, 8, 2-6)x). W\u00e4hrend aber Ammonios selbst nur \r\nkurz das Faktum, viele h\u00e4tten ihre eigenen Werke unter dem \r\nNamen des Aristoteles herausgegeben, erw\u00e4hnt zu haben \r\nscheint2), erf\u00e4hrt dieser Punkt bei seinen Sch\u00fclern eine mehr \r\noder weniger umfangreiche Ausgestaltung. [p. 120]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0XdjWLb1V5DzrX9","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":273,"full_name":"M\u00fcller, Carl Werner","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":950,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie","volume":"112","issue":"2","pages":"120-126"}},"sort":["Die Neuplatonischen Aristoteleskommentatoren \u00fcber die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie"]}
| Title | Die Welt, Ungeworden und Unvergänglch: Interpretation und Textkritik zu Aristoteles, De caelo A 11-12 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Hermes |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 198-204 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Mau, Jürgen |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Das Thema für Kap. n — 12 ist am Schluß von Kap. 10 gegeben; 280a 28: »Einige vertreten die Ansicht, etwas dem Werden nicht Unterliegendes (aye- vy)tov) könne vergehen, und etwas Entstandenes könne unvergänglich bestehen bleiben, wie im Timaios. Dort nämlich sagt (Platon), der Himmel sei zwar ge worden, indessen werde er die übrige immerwährende Zeit existieren. Mit diesen haben wir uns bisher nur unter physikalischen Gesichtspunkten betreffs des Himmels auseinandergesetzt. Nachdem wir die Untersuchung aber allge mein über alles angestellt haben, wird auch hierüber Klarheit sein.«Wir dürfen also eine Argumentation erwarten, der Form: »Wenn für jedes Subjekt gilt: Es kann nicht geworden und unvergänglich sein, dann gilt es auch für den Himmel. Nun gilt es für jedes, also auch für den Himmel.« Dieser Beweis — besser: diese Beweise, denn es handelt sich nicht um eine elemen- tatio, wie Aristoteles sie für die Geometrie kannte und wie, aus Aristoteles schöpfend, 700 Jahre später Proklos sie für Physik und Theologie schrieb, — finden sich in Kap. 12... [p. 198] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/fufmk0R2fa91Fgd |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"994","_score":null,"_source":{"id":994,"authors_free":[{"id":1498,"entry_id":994,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":241,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mau, J\u00fcrgen","free_first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","free_last_name":"Mau","norm_person":{"id":241,"first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","last_name":"Mau","full_name":"Mau,J\u00fcrgen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117747351","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Welt, Ungeworden und Unverg\u00e4nglch: Interpretation und Textkritik zu Aristoteles, De caelo A 11-12","main_title":{"title":"Die Welt, Ungeworden und Unverg\u00e4nglch: Interpretation und Textkritik zu Aristoteles, De caelo A 11-12"},"abstract":"Das Thema f\u00fcr Kap. n \u2014 12 ist am Schlu\u00df von Kap. 10 gegeben; 280a 28: \r\n\u00bbEinige vertreten die Ansicht, etwas dem Werden nicht Unterliegendes (aye- \r\nvy)tov) k\u00f6nne vergehen, und etwas Entstandenes k\u00f6nne unverg\u00e4nglich bestehen \r\nbleiben, wie im Timaios. Dort n\u00e4mlich sagt (Platon), der Himmel sei zwar ge\u00ad\r\nworden, indessen werde er die \u00fcbrige immerw\u00e4hrende Zeit existieren. Mit \r\ndiesen haben wir uns bisher nur unter physikalischen Gesichtspunkten betreffs \r\ndes Himmels auseinandergesetzt. Nachdem wir die Untersuchung aber allge\u00ad\r\nmein \u00fcber alles angestellt haben, wird auch hier\u00fcber Klarheit sein.\u00abWir d\u00fcrfen also eine Argumentation erwarten, der Form: \u00bbWenn f\u00fcr jedes \r\nSubjekt gilt: Es kann nicht geworden und unverg\u00e4nglich sein, dann gilt es \r\nauch f\u00fcr den Himmel. Nun gilt es f\u00fcr jedes, also auch f\u00fcr den Himmel.\u00ab Dieser \r\nBeweis \u2014 besser: diese Beweise, denn es handelt sich nicht um eine elemen- \r\ntatio, wie Aristoteles sie f\u00fcr die Geometrie kannte und wie, aus Aristoteles \r\nsch\u00f6pfend, 700 Jahre sp\u00e4ter Proklos sie f\u00fcr Physik und Theologie schrieb, \r\n\u2014 finden sich in Kap. 12... [p. 198]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/fufmk0R2fa91Fgd","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":241,"full_name":"Mau,J\u00fcrgen","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":994,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"97","issue":"2","pages":"198-204"}},"sort":["Die Welt, Ungeworden und Unverg\u00e4nglch: Interpretation und Textkritik zu Aristoteles, De caelo A 11-12"]}
| Title | Die Widerlegung des Manichäismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-57 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Die Widerlegung des Manichäismus im Kommentar des Simplikios zu Epiktet von Ilsetraut Hadot ist eine Studie über die Existenz und den Ursprung des Bösen, ein Thema, das im Encheiridion des Epiktet seinen Platz findet. Hadot zeigt, dass Simplikios mit Epiktet in der Ablehnung des ontologischen Charakters des Bösen übereinstimmt, da die Natur des Bösen keinen Platz in der Welt hat, und er verwendet auch stoische Argumente, die auch im Neuplatonismus und im Christentum verwendet werden, um das Thema zu behandeln. Simplikios argumentiert gegen das manichäische System mit einem polemischen Ton, der den polemischen Werken anderer Autoren gegen die Manichäer ähnelt. Simplikios hält die gründliche Widerlegung des manichäischen Systems für notwendig, insbesondere seit dem Wiederaufleben der Manichäer im byzantinischen Reich. Simplikios' Kommentar soll als Anleitung zur Selbstvervollkommnung dienen, und aus diesem Grund bietet er nicht nur eine umfassende Diskussion über den Ursprung des Bösen, sondern widmet auch einen beträchtlichen Teil seines Werks der gründlichen Widerlegung des manichäischen Systems. Simplikios stützt sich bei seiner Argumentation auf das philosophische System von Proklos und erwähnt die Manichäer nur im zweiten Teil seiner Erörterung, in dem er die Hypothese widerlegt, dass das Böse als Prinzip neben dem Guten angesehen werden kann. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/HFw9upuC8f3LCzo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1131","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1131,"authors_free":[{"id":1706,"entry_id":1131,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios"},"abstract":"Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Kommentar des Simplikios zu Epiktet von Ilsetraut Hadot ist eine Studie \u00fcber die Existenz und den Ursprung des B\u00f6sen, ein Thema, das im Encheiridion des Epiktet seinen Platz findet. Hadot zeigt, dass Simplikios mit Epiktet in der Ablehnung des ontologischen Charakters des B\u00f6sen \u00fcbereinstimmt, da die Natur des B\u00f6sen keinen Platz in der Welt hat, und er verwendet auch stoische Argumente, die auch im Neuplatonismus und im Christentum verwendet werden, um das Thema zu behandeln. Simplikios argumentiert gegen das manich\u00e4ische System mit einem polemischen Ton, der den polemischen Werken anderer Autoren gegen die Manich\u00e4er \u00e4hnelt. Simplikios h\u00e4lt die gr\u00fcndliche Widerlegung des manich\u00e4ischen Systems f\u00fcr notwendig, insbesondere seit dem Wiederaufleben der Manich\u00e4er im byzantinischen Reich. Simplikios' Kommentar soll als Anleitung zur Selbstvervollkommnung dienen, und aus diesem Grund bietet er nicht nur eine umfassende Diskussion \u00fcber den Ursprung des B\u00f6sen, sondern widmet auch einen betr\u00e4chtlichen Teil seines Werks der gr\u00fcndlichen Widerlegung des manich\u00e4ischen Systems. Simplikios st\u00fctzt sich bei seiner Argumentation auf das philosophische System von Proklos und erw\u00e4hnt die Manich\u00e4er nur im zweiten Teil seiner Er\u00f6rterung, in dem er die Hypothese widerlegt, dass das B\u00f6se als Prinzip neben dem Guten angesehen werden kann. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/HFw9upuC8f3LCzo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1131,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie","volume":"51","issue":"1","pages":"31-57"}},"sort":["Die Widerlegung des Manich\u00e4ismus im Epiktetkommentar des Simplikios"]}
| Title | Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the interpretation of the word "zôros" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1376,"authors_free":[{"id":2120,"entry_id":1376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation of the word \"z\u00f4ros\" in a couplet attributed to Empedocles, as quoted by various ancient authors such as Plutarch, Simplicius, Theophrastus, Aristotle, Athenaeus, and Eustathius. The author considers the different meanings attributed to the word, including mixed and unmixed, and argues that the context and source of the quotations must be considered in interpreting the couplet. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/i3e86dj5n6bGM5G","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"15","issue":"1","pages":"1-4"}},"sort":["Empedocles fr. 35. 14-15"]}
| Title | Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1967 |
| Journal | The Classical Quarterly |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-40 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | O'Brien, Denis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or a complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence for Empedocles’ main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments and of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"865","_score":null,"_source":{"id":865,"authors_free":[{"id":1269,"entry_id":865,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle"},"abstract":"Hitherto reconstructions of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle have usually been offered as part of a larger work, a complete history of Presocratic thought, or \r\na complete study of Empedocles. Consequently there has perhaps been a lack of thoroughness in collecting and sifting evidence that relates exclusively to the main features of the cosmic cycle. There is in fact probably more evidence \r\nfor Empedocles\u2019 main views than for those of any other Presocratic except Parmenides in his Way of Truth. From a close examination of the fragments \r\nand of the secondary sources, principally Aristotle, Plutarch, and Simplicius, there can be formed a reasonably complete picture of the main temporal and spatial features of Empedocles\u2019 cosmic cycle. [Introduction, p. 29]","btype":3,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/V0ZiYaivjBF7p8f","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":865,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"17","issue":"1","pages":"29-40"}},"sort":["Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle"]}
| Title | Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-111 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Arundel, Maureen Rosemary |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word "zôros" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means "mixed" while others argue it means "undiluted." The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to "zôra" meaning "undiluted" and that the modern interpretation of "mixed" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of "zôra" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means "mixed." [whole text] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1262","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1262,"authors_free":[{"id":1848,"entry_id":1262,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":36,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","free_first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","free_last_name":"Arundel","norm_person":{"id":36,"first_name":"Maureen Rosemary","last_name":"Arundel","full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15","main_title":{"title":"Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15"},"abstract":"This text discusses the interpretation and translation of a fragment of Theophrastus and Plutarch. The word \"z\u00f4ros\" is of particular concern, as there is difficulty in determining its meaning, with some suggesting it means \"mixed\" while others argue it means \"undiluted.\" The author suggests that the reading of the Empedocles line should be restored to \"z\u00f4ra\" meaning \"undiluted\" and that the modern interpretation of \"mixed\" is unjustifiable. The text also examines the use of \"z\u00f4ra\" in Philumenus' work and argues that there is no occurrence in which it means \"mixed.\" [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0KVfT1jwCVuVr5m","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":36,"full_name":"Arundel, Maureen Rosemary","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1262,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"12","issue":"2","pages":"109-111"}},"sort":["Empedocles, fr. 35. 12-15"]}
| Title | Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Dutch |
| Date | 1956 |
| Journal | L'Antiquité Classique |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 351-385 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Valckenaere de, Erik |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/45s78Kq0g2yDLuk |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"836","_score":null,"_source":{"id":836,"authors_free":[{"id":1240,"entry_id":836,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","free_first_name":"Erik","free_last_name":"Valckenaere de","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"Erik","last_name":"Valckenaere de","full_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?","main_title":{"title":"Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1956","language":"Dutch","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/45s78Kq0g2yDLuk","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Valckenaere de, Erik","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":836,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'Antiquit\u00e9 Classique","volume":"25","issue":"2","pages":"351-385"}},"sort":["Herakleides Pontikos de Ontdekker van het Heliocentrisme?"]}