{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1280","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1280,"authors_free":[{"id":1869,"entry_id":1280,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides","main_title":{"title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides"},"abstract":"The text discusses a disputed line in Parmenides, quoted in Plato's Theaetetus and Simplicius' Physics. Some editors deny the line's independent existence, claiming it was created by Plato by misquoting another verse. The author disagrees with this view, arguing that the line is meaningful and could have been in their texts of Parmenides. The author also argues that there is no reason to believe that Simplicius took the line from Plato, and that Plato was not slovenly in his treatment of Parmenides. The author proposes a corrected version of the line and suggests that it may be Parmenides' last word on the unity and unchangeableness of Being. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/22AiAGR3zgXhXHY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1280,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"49","issue":"4","pages":"122-123"}},"sort":["A New Fragment of Parmenides"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1423","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1423,"authors_free":[{"id":2233,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":62,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Simplicius, Cilicius","free_first_name":"Cilicius","free_last_name":"Simplicius","norm_person":{"id":62,"first_name":"Cilicius","last_name":"Simplicius ","full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118642421","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2234,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":407,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","free_first_name":"Ferdinand","free_last_name":"Rudio","norm_person":{"id":407,"first_name":"Ferdinand","last_name":"Rudio","full_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116670533","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2653,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates","main_title":{"title":"Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates"},"abstract":"Der Bericlit des Simplicius \u00fcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates ist eine der wichtigsten Quellen f\u00fcr die Geschichte der griechischen Geometrie vor Euklid. Enth\u00e4lt doch dieser Bericht, neben vielen anderen historisch h\u00f6chst wertvollen Mitteilungen, einen umfangreichen w\u00f6rtlichen Auszug aus der leider verloren gegangenen Geschichte der Geometrie des Eudemus! Das uns auf diese Weise erhaltene Referat des Eudemus bezieht sich auf die scharfsinnigen Untersuchungen, die Hippokrates von Chios etwa ums Jahr 440 v. Chr. in einer ebenfalls verloren gegangenen Abhandlung \u00fcber die Quadraturen der sogenannten M\u00f6ndchen angestellt hat, Untersuchungen, die vielleicht als Vorbereitungen zu der von alters her umworbenen Quadratur des Kreises gedient haben. Die Abhandlung des Hippokrates ist um so wertvoller, als sie die \u00e4lteste auf griechischem Boden entstandene mathematische Arbeit darstellt, die uns in gesicherter und zugleich ausf\u00fchrlicher und zusammenh\u00e4ngender \u00dcberlieferung vorliegt. [introduction]","btype":1,"date":"1907","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/yrVeMUwJkJZZU4a","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":62,"full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":407,"full_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1423,"pubplace":"Charleston","publisher":"Nabu Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"207","_score":null,"_source":{"id":207,"authors_free":[{"id":264,"entry_id":207,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":413,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zeller, Edward","free_first_name":"Edward","free_last_name":"Zeller","norm_person":{"id":413,"first_name":"Eduard","last_name":"Zeller,","full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118636383","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung","main_title":{"title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung"},"abstract":"Das erstmals zwischen 1844 und 1852 erschienene Werk \u203aDie Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung \u00fcber Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung\u2039 gilt als eine der monumentalsten philosophischen Studien der Geschichte. In nie wieder erreichter Vollst\u00e4ndigkeit und Geschlossenheit beschreibt Eduard Zeller hier den Entwicklungsgang der Philosophie Griechenlands. Als \u00dcbersichts- und Grundlagenwerk ist \u203aDer Zeller\u2039 auch heute noch von gro\u00dfer Bedeutung. Hervorhebenswert an der Arbeit Eduard Zellers ist vor allem, dass er eine akribische Quellenarbeit mit systematisch-philosophischem Interesse verbindet. Obwohl ein klassischer Gelehrter des 19. Jahrhunderts, philosophiert er in modernem wissenschaftlichen Sinne. Zeller, der den Begriff \u203aErkenntnistheorie\u2039 \u00fcberhaupt erst in die philosophische Diskussion eingef\u00fchrt hat, hat mit der \u203aPhilosophie der Griechen\u2039 ein Werk geschaffen, dessen Bedeutung auch im 21. Jahrhundert unbestritten ist. [offical abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1903","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/wqWO03gtyLISydF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":413,"full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":207,"pubplace":"Leipzig","publisher":"Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft","series":"","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"866","_score":null,"_source":{"id":866,"authors_free":[{"id":1270,"entry_id":866,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":278,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nicol, A. T.","free_first_name":"A. T.","free_last_name":"Nicol","norm_person":{"id":278,"first_name":"Nicol","last_name":"A. T.","full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Indivisible Lines","main_title":{"title":"Indivisible Lines"},"abstract":"To summarize, Democritus, who had moved beyond the confusion between point and atom, also avoided the notion of indivisible lines. The people who confused points and atoms probably held a similar theory of motion and space. However, it was not they but Plato who proposed the existence of indivisible lines, driven by his conception of the problem of continuity. This idea, however, was not straightforward to understand, and Plato did not explain it in detail in the dialogues.\r\n\r\nAnyone reading the Timaeus and knowing that Plato believed in indivisible lines might become confused trying to locate references to them in that dialogue. It was Xenocrates who made the theory widely known, but he further complicated the issue by introducing the concept of the ideal line, potentially adding other misunderstandings. Aristotle described this as \"giving in\" to a dichotomy argument, which directly suggests Zeno. All this made it easy for those who did not fully grasp the theory to conflate it with the ideas of the point-atomists.\r\n\r\nThe argument is as follows: if indivisible lines exist, then there must also be surfaces that are divided by those indivisible lines, and all surfaces could be reduced to indivisible surfaces. For example, if x is the length of an indivisible line, a surface measuring x by 2x could be divided into two square surfaces with sides of length x. These squares could then be divided diagonally, but no further division would be possible, as this would require either cutting the indivisible length x or creating a line shorter than x. The same logic applies to solids divided along indivisible surfaces.\r\n\r\nIn this reasoning, the indivisible surface is treated as a surface bounded by indivisible lines. This has been noted by the Oxford translator. The author of \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u1f76 \u1f00\u03c4\u03cc\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd \u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd (Peri atom\u014dn gramm\u014dn) either realized, or was informed, that indivisible lines were essentially points but did not recognize that indivisible surfaces were lines.\r\n\r\nIf there existed, alongside Plato's theory of indivisible lines, another theory positing that matter, space, and motion were composed of tiny indivisibles, it would have been easy to conflate the two ideas. The passage quoted from Peri atom\u014dn gramm\u014dn serves as an example of such a confusion. [conclusion p. 125-126 ]","btype":3,"date":"1936","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/WmfjXuXivBEx38o","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":278,"full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":866,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"30","issue":"2","pages":"120-126"}},"sort":["Indivisible Lines"]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1013,"authors_free":[{"id":1529,"entry_id":1013,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":32,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Allan, Donald J.","free_first_name":"Donald J.","free_last_name":"Allan","norm_person":{"id":32,"first_name":"Donald J.","last_name":"Allan","full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1158470029","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"},"abstract":"The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the \r\nauthorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made \r\ntheir appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt \r\nto begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers \r\nconcerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became \r\nknown in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82]","btype":3,"date":"1950","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0PjZnKu9FMvQiNF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":32,"full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies","volume":"2","issue":"","pages":"82\u2013120"}},"sort":["Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"]}