| Title | Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2008 |
| Publication Place | München |
| Publisher | C.H. Beck |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Keßler, Eckhard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1430","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1430,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1430,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"\u00a0Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert","main_title":{"title":"\u00a0Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2008","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1430,"pubplace":"M\u00fcnchen","publisher":"C.H. Beck","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Publication Place | Hampshire - Brookfield |
| Publisher | Ashgate |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Di Liscia, Daniel A. , Keßler, Eckhard , Methuen, Charlotte |
| Translator(s) |
| The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the ’Foundation for Intellectual History’ at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the ’emergence of modern science’ in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with ’non-regressive’ methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"298","_score":null,"_source":{"id":298,"authors_free":[{"id":368,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":268,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","free_first_name":"Daniel A.","free_last_name":"Di Liscia","norm_person":{"id":268,"first_name":"Daniel A.","last_name":"Di Liscia","full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140744282","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":369,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":370,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":269,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","free_first_name":"Charlotte","free_last_name":"Methuen","norm_person":{"id":269,"first_name":"Charlotte","last_name":"Methuen","full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137191812","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition","main_title":{"title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition"},"abstract":"The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the \u2019Foundation for Intellectual History\u2019 at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenb\u00fcttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the \u2019emergence of modern science\u2019 in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with \u2019non-regressive\u2019 methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions.","btype":4,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":268,"full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":269,"full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":298,"pubplace":"Hampshire - Brookfield","publisher":"Ashgate","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1997]}
| Title | Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Published in | Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Morrison, Donald R. |
| Editor(s) | Keßler, Eckhard , Di Liscia, Daniel A. , Methuen, Charlotte |
| Translator(s) |
| In this paper I shall concentrate on a small but crucial episode in the development of one significant issue: the method by which the physicist acquires knowledge of the principles of physical things. n his commentary on the Physics, the sixth-century Neoplatonist philosopher Simplicius puts forward sign-inference as a general method for acquiring first principles in physics: “Clearly, the grasp (gnosis) of the principles [of physical things] is through necessary signs (tekmeriodes) rather than apodeictic (apodeiktike)."... [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/QNAlabnyOPuOeYD |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"834","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":834,"authors_free":[{"id":1238,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":266,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","free_first_name":"Donald R.","free_last_name":"Morisson","norm_person":{"id":266,"first_name":"Donald R.","last_name":"Morrison","full_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/14341285X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2116,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2117,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":268,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","free_first_name":"Daniel A.","free_last_name":"Di Liscia","norm_person":{"id":268,"first_name":"Daniel A.","last_name":"Di Liscia","full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140744282","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2118,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":269,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","free_first_name":"Charlotte","free_last_name":"Methuen","norm_person":{"id":269,"first_name":"Charlotte","last_name":"Methuen","full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137191812","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof","main_title":{"title":"Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof"},"abstract":"In this paper I shall concentrate on a small but \r\ncrucial episode in the development of one significant issue: the method by \r\nwhich the physicist acquires knowledge of the principles of physical \r\nthings. n his commentary on the Physics, the sixth-century Neoplatonist \r\nphilosopher Simplicius puts forward sign-inference as a general method \r\nfor acquiring first principles in physics: \u201cClearly, the grasp (gnosis) of the \r\nprinciples [of physical things] is through necessary signs (tekmeriodes) \r\nrather than apodeictic (apodeiktike).\"... [p. 1]","btype":2,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QNAlabnyOPuOeYD","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":266,"full_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":268,"full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":269,"full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":834,"section_of":298,"pages":"1-22","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":298,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Liscia1997","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1997","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1997","abstract":"The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the \u2019Foundation for Intellectual History\u2019 at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenb\u00fcttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the \u2019emergence of modern science\u2019 in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with \u2019non-regressive\u2019 methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions.","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":298,"pubplace":"Hampshire - Brookfield","publisher":"Ashgate","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1997]}
| Title | Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Publication Place | Hampshire - Brookfield |
| Publisher | Ashgate |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Di Liscia, Daniel A. , Keßler, Eckhard , Methuen, Charlotte |
| Translator(s) |
The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the ’Foundation for Intellectual History’ at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the ’emergence of modern science’ in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with ’non-regressive’ methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"298","_score":null,"_source":{"id":298,"authors_free":[{"id":368,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":268,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","free_first_name":"Daniel A.","free_last_name":"Di Liscia","norm_person":{"id":268,"first_name":"Daniel A.","last_name":"Di Liscia","full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140744282","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":369,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":370,"entry_id":298,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":269,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","free_first_name":"Charlotte","free_last_name":"Methuen","norm_person":{"id":269,"first_name":"Charlotte","last_name":"Methuen","full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137191812","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition","main_title":{"title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition"},"abstract":"The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the \u2019Foundation for Intellectual History\u2019 at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenb\u00fcttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the \u2019emergence of modern science\u2019 in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with \u2019non-regressive\u2019 methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions.","btype":4,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":268,"full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":269,"full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":298,"pubplace":"Hampshire - Brookfield","publisher":"Ashgate","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition"]}
| Title | Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Published in | Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Morrison, Donald R. |
| Editor(s) | Keßler, Eckhard , Di Liscia, Daniel A. , Methuen, Charlotte |
| Translator(s) |
In this paper I shall concentrate on a small but crucial episode in the development of one significant issue: the method by which the physicist acquires knowledge of the principles of physical things. n his commentary on the Physics, the sixth-century Neoplatonist philosopher Simplicius puts forward sign-inference as a general method for acquiring first principles in physics: “Clearly, the grasp (gnosis) of the principles [of physical things] is through necessary signs (tekmeriodes) rather than apodeictic (apodeiktike)."... [p. 1] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/QNAlabnyOPuOeYD |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"834","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":834,"authors_free":[{"id":1238,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":266,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","free_first_name":"Donald R.","free_last_name":"Morisson","norm_person":{"id":266,"first_name":"Donald R.","last_name":"Morrison","full_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/14341285X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2116,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2117,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":268,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","free_first_name":"Daniel A.","free_last_name":"Di Liscia","norm_person":{"id":268,"first_name":"Daniel A.","last_name":"Di Liscia","full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140744282","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2118,"entry_id":834,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":269,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","free_first_name":"Charlotte","free_last_name":"Methuen","norm_person":{"id":269,"first_name":"Charlotte","last_name":"Methuen","full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137191812","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof","main_title":{"title":"Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof"},"abstract":"In this paper I shall concentrate on a small but \r\ncrucial episode in the development of one significant issue: the method by \r\nwhich the physicist acquires knowledge of the principles of physical \r\nthings. n his commentary on the Physics, the sixth-century Neoplatonist \r\nphilosopher Simplicius puts forward sign-inference as a general method \r\nfor acquiring first principles in physics: \u201cClearly, the grasp (gnosis) of the \r\nprinciples [of physical things] is through necessary signs (tekmeriodes) \r\nrather than apodeictic (apodeiktike).\"... [p. 1]","btype":2,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QNAlabnyOPuOeYD","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":266,"full_name":"Morrison, Donald R.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":268,"full_name":"Di Liscia, Daniel A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":269,"full_name":"Methuen, Charlotte","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":834,"section_of":298,"pages":"1-22","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":298,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":null,"type":4,"language":"en","title":"Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Liscia1997","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1997","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1997","abstract":"The volume results from a seminar sponsored by the \u2019Foundation for Intellectual History\u2019 at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenb\u00fcttel, in 1992. Starting with the theory of regressus as displayed in its most developed form by William Wallace, these papers enter the vast field of the Renaissance discussion on method as such in its historical and systematical context. This is confined neither to the notion of method in the strict sense, nor to the Renaissance in its exact historical limits, nor yet to the Aristotelian tradition as a well defined philosophical school, but requires a new scholarly approach. Thus - besides Galileo, Zabarella and their circles, which are regarded as being crucial for the \u2019emergence of modern science\u2019 in the end of the 16th century - the contributors deal with the ancient and medieval origins as well as with the early modern continuity of the Renaissance concepts of method and with \u2019non-regressive\u2019 methodologies in the various approaches of Renaissance natural philosophy, including the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions.","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UYVQMPV7rKKzfRo","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":298,"pubplace":"Hampshire - Brookfield","publisher":"Ashgate","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof"]}
| Title | Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2008 |
| Publication Place | München |
| Publisher | C.H. Beck |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Keßler, Eckhard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1430","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1430,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1430,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":267,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","free_first_name":"Eckhard","free_last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","norm_person":{"id":267,"first_name":"Eckhard","last_name":"Ke\u00dfler","full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117756431","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"\u00a0Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert","main_title":{"title":"\u00a0Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2008","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":267,"full_name":"Ke\u00dfler, Eckhard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1430,"pubplace":"M\u00fcnchen","publisher":"C.H. Beck","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["\u00a0Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert"]}