Title | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
Type | Edited Book |
Language | English |
Date | 1967 |
Publication Place | London, New York |
Publisher | Crowell-Collier Publishing Company |
Volume | 7 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | |
Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
Translator(s) |
The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as "a remarkable and unique work" (Saturday Review) that contained "the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history" (Library Journal). [author's abstract] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1371","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1371,"authors_free":[{"id":2068,"entry_id":1371,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy"},"abstract":"The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as \"a remarkable and unique work\" (Saturday Review) that contained \"the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history\" (Library Journal). [author's abstract]","btype":4,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1967]}
Title | Simplicius |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 1967 |
Published in | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
Pages | 448-449 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Lloyd, Antony C. |
Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
Translator(s) |
"SIMPLICIUS, sixth-century Neoplatonist and commen tator on Aristotle, studied in Alexandria under Ammonius and in Athens under Damascius. The School at Athens was closed in 529, and Simplicius withdrew to Persia. When he returned, his paganism barred him from lecturing. His surviving commentaries (on Aristotle’s Categories, Physics, De Caelo, and De Anima) are both more learned and more polemic than would have been suitable for students. His chief importance in the history of philosophy probably lies in his being a source of our knowledge of other ancient philosophers, notably the pre-Socratics.Simplicius takes for granted the metaphysics of Neopla tonism as it had been systematized in the Athenian School of the fifth century. He accepts the usual three hypostases but follows Iamblichus and Damascius in making much of the distinction between each hypostasis and, indeed, be tween each self-subsistent reality as it is undifferentiated (remaining in the One) and as it is differentiated or plural- ized (proceeding). (See, for example, In De Caelo, pp. 93- 94, Heiberg.) It is one of the concepts or devices by which he carries out the task that dominates his work, to reconcile Plato and Aristotle. They appear to disagree, for instance, about motion: a self-moving or an unmoved mover, the motion or immobility of reason, and so on. According to Simplicius, Plato is usually writing of the primary kind of motion, and Aristotle of the secondary, or proceeding, kind. Simplicius’ interpretation of the De Anima is based on that of Iamblichus, which took it as a valid description of the embodied soul, to be supplemented by a metaphysical account of the “separate” intellectIn natural philosophy, Simplicius, like other Neoplaton- ists, is more ready to criticize Aristotle, so that the result is more often a compromise, rather than a reconciliation, with Plato. Aristotelian matter had long been identi fied with Plato's not-being; Simplicius has little to add here to Plotinus and Porphyry. But the problems of space, mo tion, place, and allied concepts had repeatedly been ex amined and were already beginning to suggest relational definitions foreign to Aristotle's physics. In an excursus on the notion of place (In Physica, VoL XI, pp. 601-645, Diels) Simplicius describes some interesting and original views of Darnascius, which he reconciles with Aristotle only by implying, implausibly, that the two are complemen tary, A similar but less scientific treatment of time as a kind of metaphysical cause of the existence of motion and things in motion depends on the distinction already referred to be tween remaining in the One and proceeding; the latter aspect accounts for flowing time, which is the measure of succession,Simplicius also wrote an extant commentary on the Stoic Epictetus' Enchiridion (or handbook of ethics). In moral philosophy the Neoplafconists borrowed much from Stoi cism, and while well expressed, most of the commentary is commonplace for the period. However, it does contain a semipopular presentation of Neoplatonic theology or metaphysics (pp. 95-101, Diibner), and this has been claimed as a survival of Alexandrian Platonism in which (as in the Middle Academy) the highest hypostasis is not the One, but Intellect, The text i% not unambiguous but dubiously supports the claim." [the whole entry] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/EDqpmOHmXAWfsyj |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"393","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":393,"authors_free":[{"id":516,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":465,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","free_first_name":"Antony C.","free_last_name":"Lloyd","norm_person":{"id":465,"first_name":"Antony C.","last_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1052318118","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":517,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius"},"abstract":"\"SIMPLICIUS, sixth-century Neoplatonist and commen\u00ad\r\ntator on Aristotle, studied in Alexandria under Ammonius \r\nand in Athens under Damascius. The School at Athens was \r\nclosed in 529, and Simplicius withdrew to Persia. When he \r\nreturned, his paganism barred him from lecturing. His \r\nsurviving commentaries (on Aristotle\u2019s Categories, Physics, \r\nDe Caelo, and De Anima) are both more learned and more \r\npolemic than would have been suitable for students. His \r\nchief importance in the history of philosophy probably lies \r\nin his being a source of our knowledge of other ancient \r\nphilosophers, notably the pre-Socratics.Simplicius takes for granted the metaphysics of Neopla\u00ad\r\ntonism as it had been systematized in the Athenian School \r\nof the fifth century. He accepts the usual three hypostases \r\nbut follows Iamblichus and Damascius in making much of \r\nthe distinction between each hypostasis and, indeed, be\u00ad\r\ntween each self-subsistent reality as it is undifferentiated \r\n(remaining in the One) and as it is differentiated or plural- \r\nized (proceeding). (See, for example, In De Caelo, pp. 93- \r\n94, Heiberg.) It is one of the concepts or devices by \r\nwhich he carries out the task that dominates his work, to \r\nreconcile Plato and Aristotle. They appear to disagree, for \r\ninstance, about motion: a self-moving or an unmoved \r\nmover, the motion or immobility of reason, and so on. \r\nAccording to Simplicius, Plato is usually writing of the \r\nprimary kind of motion, and Aristotle of the secondary, or \r\nproceeding, kind. Simplicius\u2019 interpretation of the De \r\nAnima is based on that of Iamblichus, which took it as a \r\nvalid description of the embodied soul, to be supplemented \r\nby a metaphysical account of the \u201cseparate\u201d intellectIn natural philosophy, Simplicius, like other Neoplaton- \r\nists, is more ready to criticize Aristotle, so that the result\r\nis more often a compromise, rather than a reconciliation, \r\nwith Plato. Aristotelian matter had long been identi\u00ad\r\nfied with Plato's not-being; Simplicius has little to add here \r\nto Plotinus and Porphyry. But the problems of space, mo\u00ad\r\ntion, place, and allied concepts had repeatedly been ex\u00ad\r\namined and were already beginning to suggest relational \r\ndefinitions foreign to Aristotle's physics. In an excursus \r\non the notion of place (In Physica, VoL XI, pp. 601-645, \r\nDiels) Simplicius describes some interesting and original \r\nviews of Darnascius, which he reconciles with Aristotle \r\nonly by implying, implausibly, that the two are complemen\u00ad\r\ntary, A similar but less scientific treatment of time as a kind \r\nof metaphysical cause of the existence of motion and things \r\nin motion depends on the distinction already referred to be\u00ad\r\ntween remaining in the One and proceeding; the latter \r\naspect accounts for flowing time, which is the measure of \r\nsuccession,Simplicius also wrote an extant commentary on the Stoic \r\nEpictetus' Enchiridion (or handbook of ethics). In moral \r\nphilosophy the Neoplafconists borrowed much from Stoi\u00ad\r\ncism, and while well expressed, most of the commentary is \r\ncommonplace for the period. However, it does contain a \r\nsemipopular presentation of Neoplatonic theology or \r\nmetaphysics (pp. 95-101, Diibner), and this has been \r\nclaimed as a survival of Alexandrian Platonism in which (as \r\nin the Middle Academy) the highest hypostasis is not the \r\nOne, but Intellect, The text i% not unambiguous but \r\ndubiously supports the claim.\" [the whole entry]","btype":2,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/EDqpmOHmXAWfsyj","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":465,"full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":393,"section_of":1371,"pages":"448-449","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1371,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Edwards1967","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1967","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as \"a remarkable and unique work\" (Saturday Review) that contained \"the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history\" (Library Journal). [author's abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1967]}
Title | Simplicius |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 1967 |
Published in | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
Pages | 448-449 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Lloyd, Antony C. |
Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
Translator(s) |
"SIMPLICIUS, sixth-century Neoplatonist and commen tator on Aristotle, studied in Alexandria under Ammonius and in Athens under Damascius. The School at Athens was closed in 529, and Simplicius withdrew to Persia. When he returned, his paganism barred him from lecturing. His surviving commentaries (on Aristotle’s Categories, Physics, De Caelo, and De Anima) are both more learned and more polemic than would have been suitable for students. His chief importance in the history of philosophy probably lies in his being a source of our knowledge of other ancient philosophers, notably the pre-Socratics.Simplicius takes for granted the metaphysics of Neopla tonism as it had been systematized in the Athenian School of the fifth century. He accepts the usual three hypostases but follows Iamblichus and Damascius in making much of the distinction between each hypostasis and, indeed, be tween each self-subsistent reality as it is undifferentiated (remaining in the One) and as it is differentiated or plural- ized (proceeding). (See, for example, In De Caelo, pp. 93- 94, Heiberg.) It is one of the concepts or devices by which he carries out the task that dominates his work, to reconcile Plato and Aristotle. They appear to disagree, for instance, about motion: a self-moving or an unmoved mover, the motion or immobility of reason, and so on. According to Simplicius, Plato is usually writing of the primary kind of motion, and Aristotle of the secondary, or proceeding, kind. Simplicius’ interpretation of the De Anima is based on that of Iamblichus, which took it as a valid description of the embodied soul, to be supplemented by a metaphysical account of the “separate” intellectIn natural philosophy, Simplicius, like other Neoplaton- ists, is more ready to criticize Aristotle, so that the result is more often a compromise, rather than a reconciliation, with Plato. Aristotelian matter had long been identi fied with Plato's not-being; Simplicius has little to add here to Plotinus and Porphyry. But the problems of space, mo tion, place, and allied concepts had repeatedly been ex amined and were already beginning to suggest relational definitions foreign to Aristotle's physics. In an excursus on the notion of place (In Physica, VoL XI, pp. 601-645, Diels) Simplicius describes some interesting and original views of Darnascius, which he reconciles with Aristotle only by implying, implausibly, that the two are complemen tary, A similar but less scientific treatment of time as a kind of metaphysical cause of the existence of motion and things in motion depends on the distinction already referred to be tween remaining in the One and proceeding; the latter aspect accounts for flowing time, which is the measure of succession,Simplicius also wrote an extant commentary on the Stoic Epictetus' Enchiridion (or handbook of ethics). In moral philosophy the Neoplafconists borrowed much from Stoi cism, and while well expressed, most of the commentary is commonplace for the period. However, it does contain a semipopular presentation of Neoplatonic theology or metaphysics (pp. 95-101, Diibner), and this has been claimed as a survival of Alexandrian Platonism in which (as in the Middle Academy) the highest hypostasis is not the One, but Intellect, The text i% not unambiguous but dubiously supports the claim." [the whole entry] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/EDqpmOHmXAWfsyj |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"393","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":393,"authors_free":[{"id":516,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":465,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","free_first_name":"Antony C.","free_last_name":"Lloyd","norm_person":{"id":465,"first_name":"Antony C.","last_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1052318118","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":517,"entry_id":393,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius"},"abstract":"\"SIMPLICIUS, sixth-century Neoplatonist and commen\u00ad\r\ntator on Aristotle, studied in Alexandria under Ammonius \r\nand in Athens under Damascius. The School at Athens was \r\nclosed in 529, and Simplicius withdrew to Persia. When he \r\nreturned, his paganism barred him from lecturing. His \r\nsurviving commentaries (on Aristotle\u2019s Categories, Physics, \r\nDe Caelo, and De Anima) are both more learned and more \r\npolemic than would have been suitable for students. His \r\nchief importance in the history of philosophy probably lies \r\nin his being a source of our knowledge of other ancient \r\nphilosophers, notably the pre-Socratics.Simplicius takes for granted the metaphysics of Neopla\u00ad\r\ntonism as it had been systematized in the Athenian School \r\nof the fifth century. He accepts the usual three hypostases \r\nbut follows Iamblichus and Damascius in making much of \r\nthe distinction between each hypostasis and, indeed, be\u00ad\r\ntween each self-subsistent reality as it is undifferentiated \r\n(remaining in the One) and as it is differentiated or plural- \r\nized (proceeding). (See, for example, In De Caelo, pp. 93- \r\n94, Heiberg.) It is one of the concepts or devices by \r\nwhich he carries out the task that dominates his work, to \r\nreconcile Plato and Aristotle. They appear to disagree, for \r\ninstance, about motion: a self-moving or an unmoved \r\nmover, the motion or immobility of reason, and so on. \r\nAccording to Simplicius, Plato is usually writing of the \r\nprimary kind of motion, and Aristotle of the secondary, or \r\nproceeding, kind. Simplicius\u2019 interpretation of the De \r\nAnima is based on that of Iamblichus, which took it as a \r\nvalid description of the embodied soul, to be supplemented \r\nby a metaphysical account of the \u201cseparate\u201d intellectIn natural philosophy, Simplicius, like other Neoplaton- \r\nists, is more ready to criticize Aristotle, so that the result\r\nis more often a compromise, rather than a reconciliation, \r\nwith Plato. Aristotelian matter had long been identi\u00ad\r\nfied with Plato's not-being; Simplicius has little to add here \r\nto Plotinus and Porphyry. But the problems of space, mo\u00ad\r\ntion, place, and allied concepts had repeatedly been ex\u00ad\r\namined and were already beginning to suggest relational \r\ndefinitions foreign to Aristotle's physics. In an excursus \r\non the notion of place (In Physica, VoL XI, pp. 601-645, \r\nDiels) Simplicius describes some interesting and original \r\nviews of Darnascius, which he reconciles with Aristotle \r\nonly by implying, implausibly, that the two are complemen\u00ad\r\ntary, A similar but less scientific treatment of time as a kind \r\nof metaphysical cause of the existence of motion and things \r\nin motion depends on the distinction already referred to be\u00ad\r\ntween remaining in the One and proceeding; the latter \r\naspect accounts for flowing time, which is the measure of \r\nsuccession,Simplicius also wrote an extant commentary on the Stoic \r\nEpictetus' Enchiridion (or handbook of ethics). In moral \r\nphilosophy the Neoplafconists borrowed much from Stoi\u00ad\r\ncism, and while well expressed, most of the commentary is \r\ncommonplace for the period. However, it does contain a \r\nsemipopular presentation of Neoplatonic theology or \r\nmetaphysics (pp. 95-101, Diibner), and this has been \r\nclaimed as a survival of Alexandrian Platonism in which (as \r\nin the Middle Academy) the highest hypostasis is not the \r\nOne, but Intellect, The text i% not unambiguous but \r\ndubiously supports the claim.\" [the whole entry]","btype":2,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/EDqpmOHmXAWfsyj","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":465,"full_name":"Lloyd, Antony C.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":393,"section_of":1371,"pages":"448-449","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1371,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Edwards1967","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1967","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as \"a remarkable and unique work\" (Saturday Review) that contained \"the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history\" (Library Journal). [author's abstract]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Simplicius"]}
Title | The Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
Type | Edited Book |
Language | English |
Date | 1967 |
Publication Place | London, New York |
Publisher | Crowell-Collier Publishing Company |
Volume | 7 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | |
Editor(s) | Edwards, Paul |
Translator(s) |
The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as "a remarkable and unique work" (Saturday Review) that contained "the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history" (Library Journal). [author's abstract] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1371","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1371,"authors_free":[{"id":2068,"entry_id":1371,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":237,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Edwards, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Edwards","norm_person":{"id":237,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Edwards","full_name":"Edwards, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy","main_title":{"title":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy"},"abstract":"The first English-language reference of its kind, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy was hailed as \"a remarkable and unique work\" (Saturday Review) that contained \"the international who's who of philosophy and cultural history\" (Library Journal). [author's abstract]","btype":4,"date":"1967","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/9TYFlO2oFqfGwvz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":237,"full_name":"Edwards, Paul","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1371,"pubplace":"London, New York","publisher":"Crowell-Collier Publishing Company","series":"","volume":"7","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["The Encyclopedia of Philosophy"]}