| Title | Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Antiquorum Philosophia |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 101-119 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Barney, Rachel |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| So to understand Neoplatonic harmonization we must look beyond their reconcilia tion of Plato and Aristotle, however crazy or compelling we may happen to find it. Two further questions also need to be addressed: first, how and why different Neoplatonists constructed their more comprehensive projects o f harmonization as they did, each with its distinctive scope and strategies; and second, what if anything we can say about the salient features of harmonization as such, as an interpretive and philosophical prac tice with rules and rewards of its own. In this paper, I will try to address these questions, albeit in a brief and preliminary way, with regard to die late commentator Simplicius.4 First, I will outline the norms and methods which govern Simplicius' argument for the essential harmony o f his tradition. Second, I will sketch, in admittedly rather abstract terms, some o f the intellectual attractions o f harmonizing projects in philosophy, and w ill attempt to locate Simplicius within this broad genre. [pp. 102 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/A8TFmCyUiKsZjZ8 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"825","_score":null,"_source":{"id":825,"authors_free":[{"id":1226,"entry_id":825,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":418,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Barney, Rachel","free_first_name":"Rachel","free_last_name":"Barney","norm_person":{"id":418,"first_name":"Rachel","last_name":"Barney","full_name":"Barney, Rachel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/17355959X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority"},"abstract":"So to understand Neoplatonic harmonization we must look beyond their reconcilia\u00ad\r\ntion of Plato and Aristotle, however crazy or compelling we may happen to find it. Two \r\nfurther questions also need to be addressed: first, how and why different Neoplatonists \r\nconstructed their more comprehensive projects o f harmonization as they did, each \r\nwith its distinctive scope and strategies; and second, what if anything we can say about \r\nthe salient features of harmonization as such, as an interpretive and philosophical prac\u00ad\r\ntice with rules and rewards of its own. In this paper, I will try to address these questions, \r\nalbeit in a brief and preliminary way, with regard to die late commentator Simplicius.4 \r\nFirst, I will outline the norms and methods which govern Simplicius' argument for the essential harmony o f his tradition. Second, I will sketch, in admittedly rather abstract \r\nterms, some o f the intellectual attractions o f harmonizing projects in philosophy, and \r\nw ill attempt to locate Simplicius within this broad genre. [pp. 102 f.]","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/A8TFmCyUiKsZjZ8","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":418,"full_name":"Barney, Rachel","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":825,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Antiquorum Philosophia","volume":"3","issue":"","pages":"101-119"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Antiquorum Philosophia |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 101-119 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Barney, Rachel |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
So to understand Neoplatonic harmonization we must look beyond their reconcilia tion of Plato and Aristotle, however crazy or compelling we may happen to find it. Two further questions also need to be addressed: first, how and why different Neoplatonists constructed their more comprehensive projects o f harmonization as they did, each with its distinctive scope and strategies; and second, what if anything we can say about the salient features of harmonization as such, as an interpretive and philosophical prac tice with rules and rewards of its own. In this paper, I will try to address these questions, albeit in a brief and preliminary way, with regard to die late commentator Simplicius.4 First, I will outline the norms and methods which govern Simplicius' argument for the essential harmony o f his tradition. Second, I will sketch, in admittedly rather abstract terms, some o f the intellectual attractions o f harmonizing projects in philosophy, and w ill attempt to locate Simplicius within this broad genre. [pp. 102 f.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/A8TFmCyUiKsZjZ8 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"825","_score":null,"_source":{"id":825,"authors_free":[{"id":1226,"entry_id":825,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":418,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Barney, Rachel","free_first_name":"Rachel","free_last_name":"Barney","norm_person":{"id":418,"first_name":"Rachel","last_name":"Barney","full_name":"Barney, Rachel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/17355959X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority"},"abstract":"So to understand Neoplatonic harmonization we must look beyond their reconcilia\u00ad\r\ntion of Plato and Aristotle, however crazy or compelling we may happen to find it. Two \r\nfurther questions also need to be addressed: first, how and why different Neoplatonists \r\nconstructed their more comprehensive projects o f harmonization as they did, each \r\nwith its distinctive scope and strategies; and second, what if anything we can say about \r\nthe salient features of harmonization as such, as an interpretive and philosophical prac\u00ad\r\ntice with rules and rewards of its own. In this paper, I will try to address these questions, \r\nalbeit in a brief and preliminary way, with regard to die late commentator Simplicius.4 \r\nFirst, I will outline the norms and methods which govern Simplicius' argument for the essential harmony o f his tradition. Second, I will sketch, in admittedly rather abstract \r\nterms, some o f the intellectual attractions o f harmonizing projects in philosophy, and \r\nw ill attempt to locate Simplicius within this broad genre. [pp. 102 f.]","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/A8TFmCyUiKsZjZ8","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":418,"full_name":"Barney, Rachel","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":825,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Antiquorum Philosophia","volume":"3","issue":"","pages":"101-119"}},"sort":["Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority"]}