| Title | Empedokleův sfairos v pohledech antických interpretů |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Czech |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Listy filologické / Folia philologica |
| Volume | 131 |
| Issue | 3/4 |
| Pages | 379-439 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hladký, Vojtech |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Caps1tYazG8VPNA |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"778","_score":null,"_source":{"id":778,"authors_free":[{"id":1142,"entry_id":778,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":180,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hladk\u00fd, Vojtech ","free_first_name":"Vojtech","free_last_name":"Hladk\u00fd","norm_person":{"id":180,"first_name":"Vojt\u011bch","last_name":"Hladk\u00fd","full_name":"Hladk\u00fd, Vojt\u011bch","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Empedokle\u016fv sfairos v pohledech antick\u00fdch interpret\u016f","main_title":{"title":"Empedokle\u016fv sfairos v pohledech antick\u00fdch interpret\u016f"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"Czech","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Caps1tYazG8VPNA","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":180,"full_name":"Hladk\u00fd, Vojt\u011bch","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":778,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Listy filologick\u00e9 \/ Folia philologica","volume":"131","issue":"3\/4","pages":"379-439"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Methods in examining sense-perception: John Philoponus and Ps.-Simplicius |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Laval théologique et philosophique |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 651-661 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Lautner, Peter |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The paper discusses the methods applied by Philoponus and Pseudo-Simplicius in commenting on Aristotle’s theory of sense-perception, and indicates their differences. Philoponus frequently employs medical theories and empirical material, mostly taken from Aristotle, to highlight not only the activities of the particular senses, but also a certain kind of awareness and the way we experience our inner states. By contrast, his Athenian contemporary Pseudo-Simplicius disregards such aspects altogether. His method is deductive: He relies on some general thesis, partly taken from Iamblichus, from which to derive theses on sense-perception. The emphasis falls on Philoponus’ doctrine since his reliance on medical views leads to an interesting blend of Platonic and medical/empirical theories. [Author’s abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/JzNEyDM8dW3P1qs |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"820","_score":null,"_source":{"id":820,"authors_free":[{"id":1221,"entry_id":820,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":236,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lautner, Peter","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Lautner","norm_person":{"id":236,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Lautner","full_name":"Lautner, Peter","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1157740766","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Methods in examining sense-perception: John Philoponus and Ps.-Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Methods in examining sense-perception: John Philoponus and Ps.-Simplicius"},"abstract":"The paper discusses the methods applied by Philoponus and Pseudo-Simplicius in commenting on Aristotle\u2019s theory of sense-perception, and indicates their differences. Philoponus frequently employs medical theories and empirical material, mostly taken from Aristotle, to highlight not only the activities of the particular senses, but also a certain kind of awareness and the way we experience our inner states. By contrast, his Athenian contemporary Pseudo-Simplicius disregards such aspects altogether. His method is deductive: He relies on some general thesis, partly taken from Iamblichus, from which to derive theses on sense-perception. The emphasis falls on Philoponus\u2019 doctrine since his reliance on medical views leads to an interesting blend of Platonic and medical\/empirical theories. [Author\u2019s abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/JzNEyDM8dW3P1qs","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":236,"full_name":"Lautner, Peter","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":820,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Laval th\u00e9ologique et philosophique","volume":"64","issue":"3","pages":"651-661"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Nicolas, l'auteur du Sommaire de la philosophie d'Aristote : doutes sur son identité, sa datation, son origine |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Grecques |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 99-126 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Fazzo, Silvia |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The paper discusses the attribution of the compendium De Philosophia Aristotelis to Nicolaus of Damascus the general historian (fl.: end 1st c. BC). By contrast, there are reasons to believe that the work was written by a Peripatetic Nicolaus between the 3rd and the 6th century, most likely from Syria in the 4th c. AD. Among the consequences: one piece of evidence for interest in a wide range of Aristotle's works already in the 1st century BC-lst century AD is removed; the supposedly earliest evidence for Metaphysics as the title of Aristotle's work is moved to a later date; the idea that Peripatetic activity more or less ceased with Alexander, Thémistius being the only exception, is weakened by another counter-example. On the contrary, a distinctively Peripatetic culture must have been still alive in Themistius' and Nicolas' time, when special tools were produced both for teaching activity and for the transmission of Aristotle's philosophy to later eras. [Author’s abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/sCFgkfu7LGnlGGN |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"822","_score":null,"_source":{"id":822,"authors_free":[{"id":1223,"entry_id":822,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":77,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fazzo, Silvia","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Fazzo","norm_person":{"id":77,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Fazzo","full_name":"Fazzo, Silvia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Nicolas, l'auteur du Sommaire de la philosophie d'Aristote : doutes sur son identit\u00e9, sa datation, son origine","main_title":{"title":"Nicolas, l'auteur du Sommaire de la philosophie d'Aristote : doutes sur son identit\u00e9, sa datation, son origine"},"abstract":"The paper discusses the attribution of the compendium De Philosophia Aristotelis to Nicolaus of Damascus the general historian (fl.: end 1st c. BC). By contrast, there are reasons to believe that the work was written by a Peripatetic Nicolaus between the 3rd and the 6th century, most likely from Syria in the 4th c. AD. Among the consequences: one piece of evidence for interest in a wide range of Aristotle's works already in the 1st century BC-lst century AD is removed; the supposedly earliest evidence for Metaphysics as the title of Aristotle's work is moved to a later date; the idea that Peripatetic activity more or less ceased with Alexander, Th\u00e9mistius being the only exception, is weakened by another counter-example. On the contrary, a distinctively Peripatetic culture must have been still alive in Themistius' and Nicolas' time, when special tools were produced both for teaching activity and for the transmission of Aristotle's philosophy to later eras. [Author\u2019s abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/sCFgkfu7LGnlGGN","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":77,"full_name":"Fazzo, Silvia","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":822,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Grecques ","volume":"121","issue":"1","pages":"99-126"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | La Brillance de Nestis (Empédocle, fr. 96) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Revue de Philosophie Ancienne |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 75-100 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Picot, Jean-Claude |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/k1gvTP9pacx3dXb |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"863","_score":null,"_source":{"id":863,"authors_free":[{"id":1267,"entry_id":863,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":291,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Picot, Jean-Claude","free_first_name":"Jean-Claude","free_last_name":"Picot","norm_person":{"id":291,"first_name":"Jean-Claude","last_name":"Picot","full_name":"Picot, Jean-Claude","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"La Brillance de Nestis (Emp\u00e9docle, fr. 96)","main_title":{"title":"La Brillance de Nestis (Emp\u00e9docle, fr. 96)"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/k1gvTP9pacx3dXb","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":291,"full_name":"Picot, Jean-Claude","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":863,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de Philosophie Ancienne","volume":"26","issue":"1","pages":"75-100"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Albert le Grand sur la dérivation des formes géométriques: Un témoignage de l'influence de Simplicius par le biais des Arabes? (forthcoming) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2008 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Chase, Michael |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The text discusses Albert the Great's arguments in his commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge, focusing on the second of the three questions Porphyry posed about universals: whether they are corporeal or incorporeal. Albert attributes the idea of the separate existence of lines and surfaces in mathematical bodies to Plato. This attribution is problematic, but it is not absurd to suggest that Plato taught such doctrines, according to the Tübingen School's work on Plato's unwritten teachings. The text suggests that Albert's presentation of Plato's philosophy reflects his reliance on difficult translations of Aristotle and his commentators, rather than direct engagement with Plato's dialogues. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/xQTHT9jCvKbdAcS |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1259","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1259,"authors_free":[{"id":1838,"entry_id":1259,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":25,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chase, Michael ","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Chase","norm_person":{"id":25,"first_name":"Michael ","last_name":"Chase","full_name":"Chase, Michael ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1031917152","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Albert le Grand sur la d\u00e9rivation des formes g\u00e9om\u00e9triques: Un t\u00e9moignage de l'influence de Simplicius par le biais des Arabes? (forthcoming)","main_title":{"title":"Albert le Grand sur la d\u00e9rivation des formes g\u00e9om\u00e9triques: Un t\u00e9moignage de l'influence de Simplicius par le biais des Arabes? (forthcoming)"},"abstract":"The text discusses Albert the Great's arguments in his commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge, focusing on the second of the three questions Porphyry posed about universals: whether they are corporeal or incorporeal. Albert attributes the idea of the separate existence of lines and surfaces in mathematical bodies to Plato. This attribution is problematic, but it is not absurd to suggest that Plato taught such doctrines, according to the T\u00fcbingen School's work on Plato's unwritten teachings. The text suggests that Albert's presentation of Plato's philosophy reflects his reliance on difficult translations of Aristotle and his commentators, rather than direct engagement with Plato's dialogues. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/xQTHT9jCvKbdAcS","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":25,"full_name":"Chase, Michael ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Metaphysicizing the Aristotelian Categories. Two References to the Parmenides in Simplicius’ Commentary on the Categories (Simplicius, In Categorias 4 [CAG 8, 75,6 Kalbfleisch] and In Categorias 8 [291,2 K.]) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 150-165 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bechtle, Gerald |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| From a systematic point of view this paper is situated in the wider context of the metaphysization of the Aristotelian categories. What does it mean to metaphysicize the Aristotelian categories? [...] n what follows I wish to take a closer look at two passages from Simplicius’ Commentary on the Categories. As we will see, Simplicius sum- marizes, paraphrases, and also criticizes some already traditional aspects and problems in relation to the theme of noetic categories. [pp. 150-152] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/VrwVynEStcTOcIK |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"824","_score":null,"_source":{"id":824,"authors_free":[{"id":1225,"entry_id":824,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":420,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bechtle, Gerald","free_first_name":"Gerald","free_last_name":"Bechtle","norm_person":{"id":420,"first_name":"Gerald","last_name":"Bechtle","full_name":"Bechtle, Gerald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120560038","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Metaphysicizing the Aristotelian Categories. Two References to the Parmenides in Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on the Categories (Simplicius, In Categorias 4 [CAG 8, 75,6 Kalbfleisch] and In Categorias 8 [291,2 K.])","main_title":{"title":"Metaphysicizing the Aristotelian Categories. Two References to the Parmenides in Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on the Categories (Simplicius, In Categorias 4 [CAG 8, 75,6 Kalbfleisch] and In Categorias 8 [291,2 K.])"},"abstract":"From a systematic point of view this paper is situated in the wider context \r\nof the metaphysization of the Aristotelian categories. What does it mean \r\nto metaphysicize the Aristotelian categories? [...] n what follows I wish to take a closer look at two passages from \r\nSimplicius\u2019 Commentary on the Categories. As we will see, Simplicius sum-\r\nmarizes, paraphrases, and also criticizes some already traditional aspects \r\nand problems in relation to the theme of noetic categories. [pp. 150-152]","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/VrwVynEStcTOcIK","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":420,"full_name":"Bechtle, Gerald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":824,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Antikes Christentum","volume":"12","issue":"1","pages":"150-165"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle, De Caelo 2.10-12: An Annotated Translation, Part 2 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | SCIAMVS: Sources and Commentaries in Exact Sciences |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 25-131 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Bowen, Alan C. , Simplicius |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This completes my translation of the narrowly astronomical sections of Simplicius’ com- mentary on Aristotle’s De caelo that first appeared in SCIAMVS 4 (2003) 23–58. Its aim, as before, is to supply the reader with a suitably annotated rendering of Simplicius’ text that will facilitate addressing the critical questions of the nature, construction, and historical value of Simplicius’ commentary, especially as it bears on the history of earlier Greek astronomical theorizing. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/2UHM1mtpgYGOwNe |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1480","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1480,"authors_free":[{"id":2561,"entry_id":1480,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":16,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bowen, Alan C.","free_first_name":"Alan C.","free_last_name":"Bowen","norm_person":{"id":16,"first_name":"Bowen C.","last_name":"Bowen","full_name":"Bowen, Alan C. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140052720","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2600,"entry_id":1480,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":62,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Simplicius","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":62,"first_name":"Cilicius","last_name":"Simplicius ","full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118642421","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on Aristotle, De Caelo 2.10-12: An Annotated Translation, Part 2","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius\u2019 Commentary on Aristotle, De Caelo 2.10-12: An Annotated Translation, Part 2"},"abstract":"This completes my translation of the narrowly astronomical sections of Simplicius\u2019 com-\r\nmentary on Aristotle\u2019s De caelo that first appeared in SCIAMVS 4 (2003) 23\u201358. Its\r\naim, as before, is to supply the reader with a suitably annotated rendering of Simplicius\u2019\r\ntext that will facilitate addressing the critical questions of the nature, construction, and\r\nhistorical value of Simplicius\u2019 commentary, especially as it bears on the history of earlier\r\nGreek astronomical theorizing. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/2UHM1mtpgYGOwNe","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":16,"full_name":"Bowen, Alan C. ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":62,"full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1480,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"SCIAMVS: Sources and Commentaries in Exact Sciences","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"25-131"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Un commentaire perpétuel de Georges Pachymère à la Physique d'Aristote, faussement attribué à Michel Psellos |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 637-676 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Golitsis, Pantelis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Récapitulons l essentiel des raisonnements philologiques qui nous ont permis de restituer le véritable auteur du commentaire, qui dorénavant doit être attribué à Georges Pachymère. Nous avons vu que l 'ensemble de la tradition manuscrite qui attribue le commentaire à Psellos descend d' un ancêtre commun, l' Ambrosianus H 44 sup., écrit à la fin du XIVe siècle. Celui-ci remonte pourtant à un archétype, écrit vers l 'an 1300 et aujourd hui perdu (l 'Escori- alensis D. IV. 24), dans lequel le commentaire figurait sous le nom de Pachymère, ainsi que nous avons pu le montrer grâce au Vindobonensis phil. gr. 248 et à des témoignages du XVIe siècle. Cet archétype de l 'ensemble de la tradition manuscrite du commentaire a été copié sur le Laurentianus plut. 87,5, autographe stricto sensu de Pachymère, dont il se servait pour assurer son enseignement de la Physique. [conclusion, p. 676] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/RuATZsvpBh8r0qp |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"536","_score":null,"_source":{"id":536,"authors_free":[{"id":758,"entry_id":536,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":129,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Golitsis, Pantelis","free_first_name":"Pantelis","free_last_name":"Golitsis","norm_person":{"id":129,"first_name":"Pantelis","last_name":"Golitsis","full_name":"Golitsis, Pantelis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Un commentaire perp\u00e9tuel de Georges Pachym\u00e8re \u00e0 la Physique d'Aristote, faussement attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 Michel Psellos","main_title":{"title":"Un commentaire perp\u00e9tuel de Georges Pachym\u00e8re \u00e0 la Physique d'Aristote, faussement attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 Michel Psellos"},"abstract":"R\u00e9capitulons l\u001dessentiel des raisonnements philologiques qui nous ont permis de restituer le v\u00e9ritable auteur du commentaire, qui dor\u00e9navant doit \u00eatre attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 Georges Pachym\u00e8re. Nous avons vu que l\u001d'ensemble de la tradition\r\nmanuscrite qui attribue le commentaire \u00e0 Psellos descend d'\u001dun anc\u00eatre commun, l'\u001dAmbrosianus H 44 sup., \u00e9crit \u00e0 la fin du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Celui-ci remonte pourtant \u00e0 un arch\u00e9type, \u00e9crit vers l\u001d'an 1300 et aujourd\u001dhui perdu (l\u001d'Escori-\r\nalensis D. IV. 24), dans lequel le commentaire figurait sous le nom de Pachym\u00e8re, ainsi que nous avons pu le montrer gr\u00e2ce au Vindobonensis phil. gr. 248 et \u00e0 des t\u00e9moignages du XVIe si\u00e8cle. Cet arch\u00e9type de l\u001d'ensemble de la tradition\r\nmanuscrite du commentaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 copi\u00e9 sur le Laurentianus plut. 87,5, autographe stricto sensu de Pachym\u00e8re, dont il se servait pour assurer son enseignement de la Physique. [conclusion, p. 676]","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/RuATZsvpBh8r0qp","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":129,"full_name":"Golitsis, Pantelis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":536,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Byzantinische Zeitschrift ","volume":"100","issue":"2","pages":"637-676"}},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Vivarum |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 113-124 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Deitz, Luc |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Francesco Patrizi da Chersos Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most com- prehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger s Aristoteles . The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true. The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon , and deals with the implications for the history of ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/DzEPBU5tsCY5gSu |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1299","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1299,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1299,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":88,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deitz, Luc","free_first_name":"Luc","free_last_name":"Deitz","norm_person":{"id":88,"first_name":"Luc","last_name":"Deitz","full_name":"Deitz, Luc","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113154011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic","main_title":{"title":"Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic"},"abstract":"Francesco Patrizi da Chersos Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most com- prehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger s Aristoteles . The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true. The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon , and deals with the implications for the history of ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/DzEPBU5tsCY5gSu","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":88,"full_name":"Deitz, Luc","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1299,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarum","volume":"45","issue":"1","pages":"113-124"}},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | Remarque complémentaire à mon article “Dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fondé son école de mathémathiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen?” |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition |
| Volume | 1 |
| Pages | 263-269 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Concerning the book by R. Arnzen Abū l-‘Abbās an-Nayrīzīs Exzerpte aus (Ps.-?) Simplicius’ Kommentar zu den Definitionen, Postulaten und Axiomen in Euclids Elementa I, the present paper off ers a survey of the way the late Neoplatonists used to conceive and compose their commentaries. Far from trying to be original, each commentary is largely based on the works of predecessors. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/xrqzydBuUrvFpY3 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1179","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1179,"authors_free":[{"id":1753,"entry_id":1179,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Remarque compl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 mon article \u201cDans quel lieu le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fond\u00e9 son \u00e9cole de math\u00e9mathiques, et o\u00f9 a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manich\u00e9en?\u201d","main_title":{"title":"Remarque compl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 mon article \u201cDans quel lieu le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius a-t-il fond\u00e9 son \u00e9cole de math\u00e9mathiques, et o\u00f9 a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manich\u00e9en?\u201d"},"abstract":"Concerning the book by R. Arnzen Ab\u016b l-\u2018Abb\u0101s an-Nayr\u012bz\u012bs Exzerpte aus (Ps.-?) Simplicius\u2019 Kommentar zu den Definitionen, Postulaten und Axiomen in Euclids Elementa I, the present paper off ers a survey of the way the late Neoplatonists used to conceive and compose their commentaries. Far from trying to be original, each commentary is largely based on the works of predecessors. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/xrqzydBuUrvFpY3","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1179,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition","volume":"1","issue":"","pages":"263-269"}},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | Review of Steel 2013: 'Simplicius’: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6–13 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 436-437 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Van Dusen, David |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/OyKRZAvTUAa6dAC |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1504","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1504,"authors_free":[{"id":2614,"entry_id":1504,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":74,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Van Dusen, David","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Van Dusen","norm_person":{"id":74,"first_name":"David ","last_name":"Van Dusen","full_name":"Van Dusen, David ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1066385637","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of Steel 2013: 'Simplicius\u2019: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6\u201313","main_title":{"title":"Review of Steel 2013: 'Simplicius\u2019: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6\u201313"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/OyKRZAvTUAa6dAC","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":74,"full_name":"Van Dusen, David ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1504,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"64","issue":"2","pages":"436-437"}},"sort":["Review of Steel 2013: 'Simplicius\u2019: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6\u201313"]}
| Title | Review of: Baltussen: Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | The Classical World |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 117-118 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Menn, Stephen |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Review of: an Baltussen. Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator. London: Duckworth, 2008. Pp. xii, 292. $80.00. ISBN 978-0-7156-350 |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/kyq7dKtLUkqGVRs |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"978","_score":null,"_source":{"id":978,"authors_free":[{"id":1477,"entry_id":978,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":255,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Menn, Stephen","free_first_name":"Stephen","free_last_name":"Menn","norm_person":{"id":255,"first_name":"Stephen","last_name":"Menn","full_name":"Menn, Stephen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/174092768","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Baltussen: Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Baltussen: Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator"},"abstract":"Review of: an Baltussen. Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology \r\nof a Commentator. London: Duckworth, 2008. Pp. xii, 292. $80.00. ISBN \r\n978-0-7156-350","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/kyq7dKtLUkqGVRs","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":255,"full_name":"Menn, Stephen","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":978,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical World","volume":"104","issue":"1","pages":"117-118"}},"sort":["Review of: Baltussen: Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator"]}
| Title | Review of: Dorotheus, Guilelmus (trans.), Simplicius Commentarium in decem Categorias Aristotelis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Versiones Latinae temporis resuscitatarum litterarum, Bd. 8) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Bochumer philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 262-263 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Summerell, Orrin Finn |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ZEJa6VeWZQ1Np4O |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1476","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1476,"authors_free":[{"id":2557,"entry_id":1476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":546,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Summerell, Orrin Finn","free_first_name":"Orrin Finn","free_last_name":"Summerell","norm_person":{"id":546,"first_name":"Orrin Finn","last_name":"Summerell","full_name":"Summerell, Orrin Finn","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142836877","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Dorotheus, Guilelmus (trans.), Simplicius Commentarium in decem Categorias Aristotelis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Versiones Latinae temporis resuscitatarum litterarum, Bd. 8)","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Dorotheus, Guilelmus (trans.), Simplicius Commentarium in decem Categorias Aristotelis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Versiones Latinae temporis resuscitatarum litterarum, Bd. 8)"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZEJa6VeWZQ1Np4O","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":546,"full_name":"Summerell, Orrin Finn","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1476,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bochumer philosophisches Jahrbuch f\u00fcr Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"5","issue":"1","pages":"262-263"}},"sort":["Review of: Dorotheus, Guilelmus (trans.), Simplicius Commentarium in decem Categorias Aristotelis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Versiones Latinae temporis resuscitatarum litterarum, Bd. 8)"]}
| Title | Review of: Han Baltussen, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London, Duckworth, 2008 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor Filosofie |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 193 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Janssens, Jules L. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Het lijdt geen twijfel dat Baltussen met zijn Studie baanbrekend werk heeft geleverd. Hij toont op overtuigende wijze aan dat Simplicius meer was dan een 'archivaris'. Hij was daadwerkelijk een 'filosoof met een project. De grote lijnen hiervan worden in dit boek meesterlijk uitgetekend. [conclusion, p. 193] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/tcjT26g8SMZmJ0w |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1360","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1360,"authors_free":[{"id":2036,"entry_id":1360,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":205,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Janssens, Jules L.","free_first_name":"Jules L.","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":205,"first_name":"Jules L.","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Janssens, Jules L.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Han Baltussen, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London, Duckworth, 2008","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Han Baltussen, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London, Duckworth, 2008"},"abstract":"Het lijdt geen twijfel dat Baltussen met zijn Studie baanbrekend werk heeft geleverd. Hij toont op overtuigende wijze aan dat Simplicius meer was dan een 'archivaris'. Hij was daadwerkelijk een 'filosoof met een project. De grote lijnen hiervan \r\nworden in dit boek meesterlijk uitgetekend. [conclusion, p. 193]","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/tcjT26g8SMZmJ0w","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":205,"full_name":"Janssens, Jules L.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1360,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Tijdschrift voor Filosofie","volume":"72","issue":"1","pages":"193"}},"sort":["Review of: Han Baltussen, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London, Duckworth, 2008"]}
| Title | Review of: I. Hadot, Le néoplatonicien Simplicius à la lumière des recherches contemporaines |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 385-388 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Chemi, Germana |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
The book reviewed in this text is I. Hadot's "Le néoplatonicien Simplicius à la lumière des recherches contemporaines. Un bilan critique", which presents a comprehensive evaluation of contemporary research on the life and work of the Neoplatonist philosopher Simplicius, as well as his reception in the Arab world. The book consists of three sections that respectively cover Simplicius's biography, his preserved works, and his lost works. The volume offers a rich panorama of Simplicius's studies and analyzes them to provide a complete status quaestionis on the author. The book, however, does not consider two crucial works of Simplicius: the commentaries on Physics and De Caelo, which limits its usefulness. The presentation of Simplicius's intellectual biography centers on the hypothesis that he settled in the city of Ḥarrān after leaving the court of the king Chosroes I, which the author supports with some evidence but does not provide any new conclusive arguments. [introduction/conclusion] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/xYIQr3RQSJ1L8xL |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1310","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1310,"authors_free":[{"id":1936,"entry_id":1310,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":99,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chemi, Germana","free_first_name":"Germana","free_last_name":"Chemi","norm_person":{"id":99,"first_name":"Germana","last_name":"Chemi","full_name":"Chemi, Germana","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: I. Hadot, Le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des recherches contemporaines","main_title":{"title":"Review of: I. Hadot, Le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des recherches contemporaines"},"abstract":"The book reviewed in this text is I. Hadot's \"Le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des recherches contemporaines. Un bilan critique\", which presents a comprehensive evaluation of contemporary research on the life and work of the Neoplatonist philosopher Simplicius, as well as his reception in the Arab world. The book consists of three sections that respectively cover Simplicius's biography, his preserved works, and his lost works. The volume offers a rich panorama of Simplicius's studies and analyzes them to provide a complete status quaestionis on the author. The book, however, does not consider two crucial works of Simplicius: the commentaries on Physics and De Caelo, which limits its usefulness. The presentation of Simplicius's intellectual biography centers on the hypothesis that he settled in the city of \u1e24arr\u0101n after leaving the court of the king Chosroes I, which the author supports with some evidence but does not provide any new conclusive arguments. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/xYIQr3RQSJ1L8xL","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":99,"full_name":"Chemi, Germana","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1310,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"5","issue":"","pages":"385-388"}},"sort":["Review of: I. Hadot, Le n\u00e9oplatonicien Simplicius \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des recherches contemporaines"]}
| Title | Review of: Ph. Soulier, Simplicius et l'infini, préface par Ph. Hoffmann |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Revue de Philosophie Ancienne |
| Volume | 33 |
| Pages | 115-128 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Gavray, Marc-Antoine |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/3g3aGCg3qe681AY |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"406","_score":null,"_source":{"id":406,"authors_free":[{"id":2456,"entry_id":406,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":125,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gavray, Marc-Antoine","free_first_name":"Marc-Antoine","free_last_name":"Gavray","norm_person":{"id":125,"first_name":"Marc-Antoine","last_name":"Gavray","full_name":"Gavray, Marc-Antoine","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1078511411","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Ph. Soulier, Simplicius et l'infini, pr\u00e9face par Ph. Hoffmann","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Ph. Soulier, Simplicius et l'infini, pr\u00e9face par Ph. Hoffmann"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/3g3aGCg3qe681AY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":125,"full_name":"Gavray, Marc-Antoine","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":406,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de Philosophie Ancienne","volume":"33","issue":"","pages":"115-128"}},"sort":["Review of: Ph. Soulier, Simplicius et l'infini, pr\u00e9face par Ph. Hoffmann"]}
| Title | Review of: Thiel 1999: Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Mnemosyne |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 482–500 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Luna, Concetta |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
This is an extensive review of R. Thiel’s monograph Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen. The author of the review, C. Luna, reproduces the book’s discussion of the location where Neoplatonic philosophers settled after leaving Athens due to the ban on pagan philosophy in 529 AD. They went to Persia and later returned to the Byzantine Empire after the peace treaty was signed. The only known historical account of their location is from Agathias, who states that they were attracted to the wisdom of King Chosroes and stayed at his court. However, they eventually left and, using a clause in the peace treaty, returned to the Byzantine Empire without having to renounce their philosophical or religious beliefs. The text examines two hypotheses as to where they went: Athens or Alexandria, but a new hypothesis is presented based on Simplicius' texts that the philosophers settled in Harran, a city close to the Persian border. The text also discusses the possibility of Simplicius returning to Athens, Alexandria, or Harran. Thiel, believes it is unlikely the philosophers went to Alexandria because the patriarch of the city would not have allowed them to continue their philosophical and anti-Christian activities. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/UfUB2Ay7nmnX4P7 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1115","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1115,"authors_free":[{"id":1684,"entry_id":1115,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":458,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luna, Concetta","free_first_name":"Concetta","free_last_name":"Luna","norm_person":{"id":458,"first_name":"Concetta","last_name":"Luna","full_name":"Luna, Concetta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1153489031","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Thiel 1999: Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Thiel 1999: Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen"},"abstract":"This is an extensive review of R. Thiel\u2019s monograph Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen. The author of the review, C. Luna, reproduces the book\u2019s discussion of the location where Neoplatonic philosophers settled after leaving Athens due to the ban on pagan philosophy in 529 AD. They went to Persia and later returned to the Byzantine Empire after the peace treaty was signed. The only known historical account of their location is from Agathias, who states that they were attracted to the wisdom of King Chosroes and stayed at his court. However, they eventually left and, using a clause in the peace treaty, returned to the Byzantine Empire without having to renounce their philosophical or religious beliefs. The text examines two hypotheses as to where they went: Athens or Alexandria, but a new hypothesis is presented based on Simplicius' texts that the philosophers settled in Harran, a city close to the Persian border. The text also discusses the possibility of Simplicius returning to Athens, Alexandria, or Harran. Thiel, believes it is unlikely the philosophers went to Alexandria because the patriarch of the city would not have allowed them to continue their philosophical and anti-Christian activities. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UfUB2Ay7nmnX4P7","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":458,"full_name":"Luna, Concetta","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1115,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mnemosyne","volume":"54","issue":"4","pages":"482\u2013500"}},"sort":["Review of: Thiel 1999: Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen"]}
| Title | Review: Bowen, A.C., Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions. In Defense of a Heresy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 294-301 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | D'Ancona Costa, Cristina |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/oNzrcy2efzDdXD4 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1410","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1410,"authors_free":[{"id":2205,"entry_id":1410,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":60,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"D'Ancona Costa, Cristina","free_first_name":"D'Ancona Costa","free_last_name":"Cristina","norm_person":{"id":60,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"D'Ancona Costa","full_name":"D'Ancona Costa, Cristina","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138912297","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review: Bowen, A.C., Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions. In Defense of a Heresy","main_title":{"title":"Review: Bowen, A.C., Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions. In Defense of a Heresy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/oNzrcy2efzDdXD4","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":60,"full_name":"D'Ancona Costa, Cristina","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1410,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"294-301"}},"sort":["Review: Bowen, A.C., Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions. In Defense of a Heresy"]}
| Title | Self-motion according to Iamblichus |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Elenchos |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 259-290 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Opsomer, Jan |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Iamblichus' theory of self-motion has to be pieced together from various texts and passing remarks. Ever since Aristotle's critique, Plato's concept of the self-motive soul was felt to be problematic. Taking his lead from Plotinus, Iamblichus counters Aristotle's criticism by claiming that true self-motion transcends the opposition between activity and passivity. He moreover argues that it does not involve motion that is spatially extended. Hence it is non-physical. Primary self-motion is the reversion of the soul to itself, by which the soul constitutes itself, i.e. imparts life to itself. This motion is located at the level of essence or substance. The bestowal of life upon the body derives from this fundamental motion. As a result, animals are derivatively self-motive. Secondary self-motions are acts of thought in the broad sense. Contrary to the unmoved motion of intellect, the self-motion of the soul is not beyond time. This somehow fits Iamblichus' theory of the “changing self”. Iamblichus anticipates much of the later Platonic accounts of self-motion. [Author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/WLS6DSydki0wSq9 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1093","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1093,"authors_free":[{"id":1651,"entry_id":1093,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":211,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Opsomer, Jan","free_first_name":"Jan","free_last_name":"Opsomer","norm_person":{"id":211,"first_name":"Jan","last_name":"Opsomer","full_name":"Opsomer, Jan","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1120966310","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Self-motion according to Iamblichus","main_title":{"title":"Self-motion according to Iamblichus"},"abstract":"Iamblichus' theory of self-motion has to be pieced together from various texts and passing remarks. Ever since Aristotle's critique, Plato's concept of the self-motive soul was felt to be problematic. Taking his lead from Plotinus, Iamblichus counters Aristotle's criticism by claiming that true self-motion transcends the opposition between activity and passivity. He moreover argues that it does not involve motion that is spatially extended. Hence it is non-physical. Primary self-motion is the reversion of the soul to itself, by which the soul constitutes itself, i.e. imparts life to itself. This motion is located at the level of essence or substance. The bestowal of life upon the body derives from this fundamental motion. As a result, animals are derivatively self-motive. Secondary self-motions are acts of thought in the broad sense. Contrary to the unmoved motion of intellect, the self-motion of the soul is not beyond time. This somehow fits Iamblichus' theory of the \u201cchanging self\u201d. Iamblichus anticipates much of the later Platonic accounts of self-motion. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/WLS6DSydki0wSq9","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":211,"full_name":"Opsomer, Jan","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1093,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Elenchos","volume":"33","issue":"2","pages":"259-290"}},"sort":["Self-motion according to Iamblichus"]}
| Title | Semence, vertu formatrice et intellect agent chez Nicolò Leoniceno entre la tradition arabo-latine et la renaissance des commentateurs grecs |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Early Science and Medicine |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 134-165 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hiro, Harai |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
The treatise On Formative Power (Venice, 1506) of Ferrara's emblematic medical humanist, Nicolo Leoniceno (1428-1524), is the one of the first embryological monographs of the Renaissance. It shows, at the same time, the continuity of medi eval Arabo-Latin tradition and the new elements brought by Renaissance medical humanism, namely through the use of the ancient Greek commentators of Aristotle like Simplicius. Thus this treatise stands at the crossroad of these two currents. The present study analyses the range of Leoniceno's philosophical discussion, determines its exact sources and brings to light premises for the early modern development of the concept of formative force, which will end up in the theory of "plastic nature" at the heart of the Scientific Revolution. [Author’s abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/tejgzx3TVrHpnu1 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"806","_score":null,"_source":{"id":806,"authors_free":[{"id":1193,"entry_id":806,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":179,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hiro, Harai","free_first_name":"Harai","free_last_name":"Hiro","norm_person":{"id":179,"first_name":"Harai","last_name":"Hiro","full_name":"Hiro, Harai","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1078284075","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Semence, vertu formatrice et intellect agent chez Nicol\u00f2 Leoniceno entre la tradition arabo-latine et la renaissance des commentateurs grecs","main_title":{"title":"Semence, vertu formatrice et intellect agent chez Nicol\u00f2 Leoniceno entre la tradition arabo-latine et la renaissance des commentateurs grecs"},"abstract":"The treatise On Formative Power (Venice, 1506) of Ferrara's emblematic medical humanist, Nicolo Leoniceno (1428-1524), is the one of the first embryological monographs of the Renaissance. It shows, at the same time, the continuity of medi eval Arabo-Latin tradition and the new elements brought by Renaissance medical humanism, namely through the use of the ancient Greek commentators of Aristotle like Simplicius. Thus this treatise stands at the crossroad of these two currents. The present study analyses the range of Leoniceno's philosophical discussion, determines its exact sources and brings to light premises for the early modern development of the concept of formative force, which will end up in the theory of \"plastic nature\" at the heart of the Scientific Revolution. [Author\u2019s abstract]","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/tejgzx3TVrHpnu1","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":179,"full_name":"Hiro, Harai","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":806,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Early Science and Medicine","volume":"12","issue":"2","pages":"134-165"}},"sort":["Semence, vertu formatrice et intellect agent chez Nicol\u00f2 Leoniceno entre la tradition arabo-latine et la renaissance des commentateurs grecs"]}