Matière et résolution : Anaxagore et ses interprètes, 1996
By: Lefebvre, René
Title Matière et résolution : Anaxagore et ses interprètes
Type Article
Language French
Date 1996
Journal Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger
Volume 186
Issue 1
Pages 31-54
Categories no categories
Author(s) Lefebvre, René
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"872","_score":null,"_source":{"id":872,"authors_free":[{"id":1281,"entry_id":872,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":243,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lefebvre, Ren\u00e9 ","free_first_name":"Ren\u00e9 ","free_last_name":"Lefebvre","norm_person":{"id":243,"first_name":"Ren\u00e9","last_name":"Lefebvre","full_name":"Lefebvre, Ren\u00e9","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/136649084","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Mati\u00e8re et r\u00e9solution : Anaxagore et ses interpr\u00e8tes","main_title":{"title":"Mati\u00e8re et r\u00e9solution : Anaxagore et ses interpr\u00e8tes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/y9cv5nwOW1HTNyj","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":243,"full_name":"Lefebvre, Ren\u00e9","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":872,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'\u00c9tranger","volume":"186","issue":"1","pages":"31-54"}},"sort":[1996]}

Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7, 1995
By: Smith, Andrew
Title Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7
Type Article
Language English
Date 1995
Journal The Classical Review, New Series
Volume 45
Issue 2
Pages 464-465
Categories no categories
Author(s) Smith, Andrew
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Review of: C. HAGEN (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7. (The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.) Pp. 195. London: Duckworth, 1994. Cased, ?35

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"847","_score":null,"_source":{"id":847,"authors_free":[{"id":1251,"entry_id":847,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":232,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Smith, Andrew","free_first_name":"Andrew","free_last_name":"Smith","norm_person":{"id":232,"first_name":"Andrew","last_name":"Smith","full_name":"Smith, Andrew","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122322606","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7","main_title":{"title":"Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7"},"abstract":"Review of: C. HAGEN (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7. (The Ancient \r\nCommentators on Aristotle.) Pp. 195. London: Duckworth, 1994. \r\nCased, ?35","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/1tpBVwh9LJ4OAlq","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":232,"full_name":"Smith, Andrew","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":847,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review, New Series","volume":"45","issue":"2","pages":"464-465"}},"sort":[1995]}

Alexandre d'Aphrodise et la « magna quaestio ». Rôle et indépendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristotélicien, 1995
By: Rashed, Marwan
Title Alexandre d'Aphrodise et la « magna quaestio ». Rôle et indépendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristotélicien
Type Article
Language French
Date 1995
Journal Les Études Classiques
Volume 63
Pages 295–351
Categories no categories
Author(s) Rashed, Marwan
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1062","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1062,"authors_free":[{"id":1612,"entry_id":1062,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":194,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rashed, Marwan","free_first_name":"Marwan","free_last_name":"Rashed","norm_person":{"id":194,"first_name":"Marwan","last_name":"Rashed","full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054568634","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Alexandre d'Aphrodise et la \u00ab magna quaestio \u00bb. R\u00f4le et ind\u00e9pendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristot\u00e9licien","main_title":{"title":"Alexandre d'Aphrodise et la \u00ab magna quaestio \u00bb. R\u00f4le et ind\u00e9pendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristot\u00e9licien"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/S5o83BIxmzevo8X","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":194,"full_name":"Rashed, Marwan","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1062,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Les \u00c9tudes Classiques","volume":"63","issue":"","pages":"295\u2013351"}},"sort":[1995]}

Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts, 1995
By: Lloyd, Geoffrey
Title Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts
Type Article
Language English
Date 1995
Journal Extrême-Orient Extrême-Occident
Volume 17
Pages 141-153
Categories no categories
Author(s) Lloyd, Geoffrey
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The papers in this collection raise a variety of important issues and illustrate the complexity of the phenomena that « quotation » may cover. But for anyone attempting to bring to bear some of the ancient Greek and Latin data on this topic, one immediate problem must be confronted at the outset, namely the difference that different degrees of orality and literacy may make. [introduction, p. 141]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1369","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1369,"authors_free":[{"id":2062,"entry_id":1369,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":234,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","free_first_name":"Geoffrey","free_last_name":"Lloyd","norm_person":{"id":234,"first_name":"Geoffrey","last_name":"Lloyd","full_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/12380504X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts","main_title":{"title":"Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts"},"abstract":"The papers in this collection raise a variety of important issues and \r\nillustrate the complexity of the phenomena that \u00ab quotation \u00bb may \r\ncover. But for anyone attempting to bring to bear some of the ancient \r\nGreek and Latin data on this topic, one immediate problem must be \r\nconfronted at the outset, namely the difference that different degrees of \r\norality and literacy may make. [introduction, p. 141]","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/dOg8vr3Yw9XB23W","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":234,"full_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1369,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Extr\u00eame-Orient Extr\u00eame-Occident","volume":"17","issue":"","pages":"141-153"}},"sort":[1995]}

Plural Worlds in Anaximander, 1994
By: Finkelberg, Aryeh
Title Plural Worlds in Anaximander
Type Article
Language English
Date 1994
Journal The American Journal of Philology
Volume 115
Issue 4
Pages 485-506
Categories no categories
Author(s) Finkelberg, Aryeh
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The ancients ascribed to Anaximander a belief in plural worlds, but the state of the evidence does not make it immediately clear whether these worlds are coexistent or successive. Zeller argued that they could not be coexistent, but his view was challenged by Burnet; yet Cornford, as Kirk puts it, "demonstrated that Burnet's argument . . . rested on a false assessment of the doxographic evidence on this point, as well as on the misinterpretation of several later Presocratics." So far so good, but Kirk goes further and contends not only that coexis- tent worlds have been wrongly assigned to Anaximander, as Zeller and Cornford have shown, but that successive worlds are also a doxo- graphic error; a similar view is argued by Kahn. In this essay I propose to scrutinize our evidence on Anaximander's plural worlds and to exam- ine, systematically and exhaustively, Kirk's and Kahn's criticism of this evidence-both as against the doxographic testimony and on its own merits. [Author's abstract]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"596","_score":null,"_source":{"id":596,"authors_free":[{"id":847,"entry_id":596,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":113,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","free_first_name":"Aryeh","free_last_name":"Finkelberg","norm_person":{"id":113,"first_name":"Aryeh","last_name":"Finkelberg","full_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1124815007","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Plural Worlds in Anaximander","main_title":{"title":"Plural Worlds in Anaximander"},"abstract":"The ancients ascribed to Anaximander a belief in plural worlds, but the state of the evidence does not make it immediately clear whether these worlds are coexistent or successive. Zeller argued that they could not be coexistent, but his view was challenged by Burnet; yet Cornford, as Kirk puts it, \"demonstrated that Burnet's argument . . . rested on a false assessment of the doxographic evidence on this point, as well as on the misinterpretation of several later Presocratics.\" So far so good, but Kirk goes further and contends not only that coexis- tent worlds have been wrongly assigned to Anaximander, as Zeller and Cornford have shown, but that successive worlds are also a doxo- graphic error; a similar view is argued by Kahn. In this essay I propose to scrutinize our evidence on Anaximander's plural worlds and to exam- ine, systematically and exhaustively, Kirk's and Kahn's criticism of this evidence-both as against the doxographic testimony and on its own merits. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mcqsVGIwcLUKvP2","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":113,"full_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":596,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"115","issue":"4","pages":"485-506"}},"sort":[1994]}

Proclus on Corporeal Space, 1994
By: Schrenk, Lawrence P.
Title Proclus on Corporeal Space
Type Article
Language English
Date 1994
Journal Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Volume 76
Pages 151 –167
Categories no categories
Author(s) Schrenk, Lawrence P.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In his survey of ancient theories of space1 the Aristotelian commen- tator Simplicius considers the rather peculiar account offered by the Neoplatonic philosopher, Proclus.2 This philosopher's analysis of space3 is unique in that it contains the unusual claim that space is corporeal.4 In this paper, I shall explore this claim and argue that it is by no means as absurd as might at first appear. It results from a rea- soned attempt to develop a theory of space which meets the needs of Proclus' ontology of emanation. We shall begin by seeking a precise understanding of the assertion that space is a body (through an analysis of two detailed proofs Proclus offers in its support5) and then investi- gate the philosophical motives compelling him to make the claim by inquiring about the function of space in his comprehensive ontology. [Introduction, pp. 151 f.]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1033","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1033,"authors_free":[{"id":1564,"entry_id":1033,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":287,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","free_first_name":"Lawrence P.","free_last_name":"Schrenk","norm_person":{"id":287,"first_name":"Lawrence P.","last_name":"Schrenk","full_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114719551X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Proclus on Corporeal Space","main_title":{"title":"Proclus on Corporeal Space"},"abstract":"In his survey of ancient theories of space1 the Aristotelian commen-\r\ntator Simplicius considers the rather peculiar account offered by the\r\nNeoplatonic philosopher, Proclus.2 This philosopher's analysis of\r\nspace3 is unique in that it contains the unusual claim that space is corporeal.4 In this paper, I shall explore this claim and argue that it is\r\nby no means as absurd as might at first appear. It results from a rea-\r\nsoned attempt to develop a theory of space which meets the needs of\r\nProclus' ontology of emanation. We shall begin by seeking a precise\r\nunderstanding of the assertion that space is a body (through an analysis\r\nof two detailed proofs Proclus offers in its support5) and then investi-\r\ngate the philosophical motives compelling him to make the claim by\r\ninquiring about the function of space in his comprehensive ontology. [Introduction, pp. 151 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/c20vZemWAzwfhpO","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":287,"full_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1033,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv f\u00fcr Geschichte der Philosophie","volume":"76","issue":"","pages":"151 \u2013167"}},"sort":[1994]}

Sur les pas d'un pèlerin païen à travers la Syrie chrétienne: À propos du livre de Michel Tardieu, 1994
By: Bauzou, Thomas
Title Sur les pas d'un pèlerin païen à travers la Syrie chrétienne: À propos du livre de Michel Tardieu
Type Article
Language French
Date 1994
Journal Syria
Volume 71
Issue 1/2
Pages 217-226
Categories no categories
Author(s) Bauzou, Thomas
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
This à propos to the book Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore à Simplicius by Michel Tardieu discusses how Tardieu's book collects and comments on previously unknown fragments by Damascius and Simplicius, the last pagan intellectuals of a region that was in the process of complete Christianisation. [introduction]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1121","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1121,"authors_free":[{"id":1695,"entry_id":1121,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":419,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bauzou, Thomas","free_first_name":"Thomas","free_last_name":"Bauzou","norm_person":{"id":419,"first_name":"Thomas","last_name":"Bauzou","full_name":"Bauzou, Thomas","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1137532572","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Sur les pas d'un p\u00e8lerin pa\u00efen \u00e0 travers la Syrie chr\u00e9tienne: \u00c0 propos du livre de Michel Tardieu","main_title":{"title":"Sur les pas d'un p\u00e8lerin pa\u00efen \u00e0 travers la Syrie chr\u00e9tienne: \u00c0 propos du livre de Michel Tardieu"},"abstract":"This \u00e0 propos to the book Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore \u00e0 Simplicius by Michel Tardieu discusses how Tardieu's book collects and comments on previously unknown fragments by Damascius and Simplicius, the last pagan intellectuals of a region that was in the process of complete Christianisation. [introduction]","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/bS3xW770wCVF9Ge","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":419,"full_name":"Bauzou, Thomas","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1121,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Syria","volume":"71","issue":"1\/2","pages":"217-226"}},"sort":[1994]}

Review: Urmson, trans. Simplicius: On Aristotle's Physics 4.1-5,10-14, 1993
By: Keyser, Paul T.
Title Review: Urmson, trans. Simplicius: On Aristotle's Physics 4.1-5,10-14
Type Article
Language English
Date 1993
Journal Canadian Philosophical Reviews
Volume 13
Issue 5
Pages 277-279
Categories no categories
Author(s) Keyser, Paul T.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"254","_score":null,"_source":{"id":254,"authors_free":[{"id":323,"entry_id":254,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":45,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Keyser, Paul T. ","free_first_name":"Paul T.","free_last_name":"Keyser","norm_person":{"id":45,"first_name":"Paul T. ","last_name":"Keyser","full_name":"Keyser, Paul T. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050677153","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review: Urmson, trans. Simplicius: On Aristotle's Physics 4.1-5,10-14","main_title":{"title":"Review: Urmson, trans. Simplicius: On Aristotle's Physics 4.1-5,10-14"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Mef0u0YVxwv2mUA","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":45,"full_name":"Keyser, Paul T. ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":254,"pubplace":"","publisher":"Cornell University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":{"id":254,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Canadian Philosophical Reviews","volume":"13","issue":"5","pages":"277-279"}},"sort":[1993]}

Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius, 1993
By: Ide, Harry A.
Title Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius
Type Article
Language English
Date 1993
Journal The Philosophical Review
Volume 102
Issue 1
Pages 89-91
Categories no categories
Author(s) Ide, Harry A.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Review of PLACE, VOID, AND ETERNITY. PHILOPONUS: COROLLARIES ON PLACE AND VOID. SIMPLICIUS: AGAINST PHILOPONUS ON THE ETERNITY OF THE WORLD. By PHILOPONUS and SIMPLICIUS. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press, 1991. Pp. 153: "This volume is one of a series of translations of later ancient philosophy, edited by Richard Sorabij..."

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"740","_score":null,"_source":{"id":740,"authors_free":[{"id":1103,"entry_id":740,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":230,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ide, Harry A.","free_first_name":"Harry A.","free_last_name":"Ide","norm_person":{"id":230,"first_name":"Harry A.","last_name":"Ide","full_name":"Ide, Harry A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius"},"abstract":"Review of PLACE, VOID, AND ETERNITY. PHILOPONUS: COROLLARIES ON \r\nPLACE AND VOID. SIMPLICIUS: AGAINST PHILOPONUS ON THE \r\nETERNITY OF THE WORLD. By PHILOPONUS and SIMPLICIUS. Ithaca, \r\nN.Y., Cornell University Press, 1991. Pp. 153: \"This volume is one of a series of translations of later ancient philosophy, \r\nedited by Richard Sorabij...\"","btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/rvBOaVrkWWQOSVa","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":230,"full_name":"Ide, Harry A.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":740,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Philosophical Review","volume":"102","issue":"1","pages":"89-91"}},"sort":[1993]}

Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories, 1993
By: Asztalos, Monika
Title Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories
Type Article
Language English
Date 1993
Journal Harvard Studies in Classical Philology
Volume 95
Pages 367-407
Categories no categories
Author(s) Asztalos, Monika
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
lassicists are often repelled by Boethius' inelegant Latin, awkwardly influenced by the Greek, and his- torians of philosophy complain about his lack of originality. While acknowledging the essential fairness of these two judgments, my pur- pose in this paper is to bring out what these commentaries, and espe- cially the ones on the Isagoge and the Categories,1 reveal about Boethius' working methods in his earliest works on Greek logic. I intend to deal less with the end product than with the road to it, and to point to the stages of development and improvement exhibited within these early works. [p. 367]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"773","_score":null,"_source":{"id":773,"authors_free":[{"id":1137,"entry_id":773,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":37,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Asztalos, Monika","free_first_name":"Monika","free_last_name":"Asztalos","norm_person":{"id":37,"first_name":"Asztalos","last_name":"Monika","full_name":"Asztalos, Monika","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories","main_title":{"title":"Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories"},"abstract":"lassicists are often repelled by Boethius' inelegant Latin, awkwardly influenced by the Greek, and his- \r\ntorians of philosophy complain about his lack of originality. While \r\nacknowledging the essential fairness of these two judgments, my pur- \r\npose in this paper is to bring out what these commentaries, and espe- \r\ncially the ones on the Isagoge and the Categories,1 reveal about \r\nBoethius' working methods in his earliest works on Greek logic. I \r\nintend to deal less with the end product than with the road to it, and to \r\npoint to the stages of development and improvement exhibited within \r\nthese early works. [p. 367] ","btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/7zOB26qvmBzAEdb","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":37,"full_name":"Asztalos, Monika","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":773,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Harvard Studies in Classical Philology","volume":"95","issue":"","pages":"367-407"}},"sort":[1993]}

  • PAGE 4 OF 6
Plato as "Architect of Science", 1998
By: Zhmud, Leonid
Title Plato as "Architect of Science"
Type Article
Language English
Date 1998
Journal Phronesis
Volume 43
Issue 3
Pages 211-244
Categories no categories
Author(s) Zhmud, Leonid
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The figure of the cordial host of the Academy, who invited the most gifted mathematicians and cultivated pure research, whose keen intellect was able if not to solve the particular problem then at least to show the method for its solution: this figure is quite familiar to students of Greek science. But was the Academy as such a center of scientific research, and did Plato really set for mathematicians and astronomers the problems they should study and methods they should 
use? Our sources tell about Plato's friendship or at least acquaintance with many brilliant mathematicians of his day (Theodorus, Archytas, Theaetetus), but they were never his pupils, rather vice versa - he learned much from them and actively used this knowledge in developing his philosophy. There is no reliable evidence that Eudoxus, Menaechmus, Dinostratus, Theudius, and others, whom many scholars unite into the group of so-called "Academic mathematicians," ever were his pupils or close associates. Our analysis of the relevant passages (Eratosthenes' Platonicus, Sosigenes ap. Simplicius, Proclus' Catalogue of geometers, and 
Philodemus' History of the Academy, etc.) shows that the very tendency of portraying Plato as the architect of science goes back to the early Academy and is born out of interpretations of his dialogues. [Author’s abstract]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"837","_score":null,"_source":{"id":837,"authors_free":[{"id":1241,"entry_id":837,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":368,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zhmud, Leonid","free_first_name":"Leonid","free_last_name":"Zhmud","norm_person":{"id":368,"first_name":"Leonid","last_name":"Zhmud","full_name":"Zhmud, Leonid","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1028558643","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Plato as \"Architect of Science\"","main_title":{"title":"Plato as \"Architect of Science\""},"abstract":"The figure of the cordial host of the Academy, who invited the most gifted mathematicians and cultivated pure research, whose keen intellect was able if not to solve the particular problem then at least to show the method for its solution: this figure is quite familiar to students of Greek science. But was the Academy as such a center of scientific research, and did Plato really set for mathematicians and astronomers the problems they should study and methods they should \r\nuse? Our sources tell about Plato's friendship or at least acquaintance with many brilliant mathematicians of his day (Theodorus, Archytas, Theaetetus), but they were never his pupils, rather vice versa - he learned much from them and actively used this knowledge in developing his philosophy. There is no reliable evidence that Eudoxus, Menaechmus, Dinostratus, Theudius, and others, whom many scholars unite into the group of so-called \"Academic mathematicians,\" ever were his pupils or close associates. Our analysis of the relevant passages (Eratosthenes' Platonicus, Sosigenes ap. Simplicius, Proclus' Catalogue of geometers, and \r\nPhilodemus' History of the Academy, etc.) shows that the very tendency of portraying Plato as the architect of science goes back to the early Academy and is born out of interpretations of his dialogues. [Author\u2019s abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/wTEFRDjVbeb4tqV","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":368,"full_name":"Zhmud, Leonid","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":837,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Phronesis","volume":"43","issue":"3","pages":"211-244"}},"sort":["Plato as \"Architect of Science\""]}

Platon et Plotin sur la doctrine des parties de l'autre, 1991
By: O'Brien, Denis
Title Platon et Plotin sur la doctrine des parties de l'autre
Type Article
Language French
Date 1991
Journal Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger
Volume 181
Issue 4
Pages 501-512
Categories no categories
Author(s) O'Brien, Denis
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
La matière est-elle identique à V alterile ? » Plotin se pose cette question au commencement du dernier chapitre de son traité Sur la  matière (Enn., II  4 [12] 16). « Plutôt non », répond-il. « Elle est en revanche identique à cette partie de Valtérité qui s'oppose aux êtres proprement dits. » En s'exprimant de la sorte, Plotin fait allusion à un passage du Sophiste (258 E 2-3). Son allusion suppose pourtant l'existence d'un texte qui n'est pas  attesté dans les manuscrits. Cette différence textuelle implique un changement fonda- mental de doctrine, dont les éditeurs modernes ne se sont pas avisés. [Author's abstract]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"418","_score":null,"_source":{"id":418,"authors_free":[{"id":558,"entry_id":418,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":144,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"O'Brien, Denis","free_first_name":"Denis","free_last_name":"O'Brien","norm_person":{"id":144,"first_name":"Denis","last_name":"O'Brien","full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134134079","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Platon et Plotin sur la doctrine des parties de l'autre","main_title":{"title":"Platon et Plotin sur la doctrine des parties de l'autre"},"abstract":"La mati\u00e8re est-elle identique \u00e0 V alterile ? \u00bb Plotin se pose cette question au commencement du dernier chapitre de son trait\u00e9 Sur la mati\u00e8re (Enn., II 4 [12] 16). \u00ab Plut\u00f4t non \u00bb, r\u00e9pond-il. \u00ab Elle est en revanche identique \u00e0 cette partie de Valt\u00e9rit\u00e9 qui s'oppose aux \u00eatres proprement dits. \u00bb En s'exprimant de la sorte, Plotin fait allusion \u00e0 un passage du Sophiste (258 E 2-3). Son allusion suppose pourtant l'existence d'un texte qui n'est pas attest\u00e9 dans les manuscrits. Cette diff\u00e9rence textuelle implique un changement fonda- mental de doctrine, dont les \u00e9diteurs modernes ne se sont pas avis\u00e9s. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1991","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/L2UyM6cduHAfZX3","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":144,"full_name":"O'Brien, Denis","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":418,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'\u00c9tranger","volume":"181","issue":"4","pages":"501-512"}},"sort":["Platon et Plotin sur la doctrine des parties de l'autre"]}

Plural Worlds in Anaximander, 1994
By: Finkelberg, Aryeh
Title Plural Worlds in Anaximander
Type Article
Language English
Date 1994
Journal The American Journal of Philology
Volume 115
Issue 4
Pages 485-506
Categories no categories
Author(s) Finkelberg, Aryeh
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The ancients ascribed to Anaximander a belief in plural worlds, but the state of the evidence does not make it immediately clear whether these worlds are coexistent or successive. Zeller argued that they could not be coexistent, but his view was challenged by Burnet; yet Cornford, as Kirk puts it, "demonstrated that Burnet's argument . . . rested on a false assessment of the doxographic evidence on this point, as well as on the misinterpretation of several later Presocratics." So far so good, but Kirk goes further and contends not only that coexis- tent worlds have been wrongly assigned to Anaximander, as Zeller and Cornford have shown, but that successive worlds are also a doxo- graphic error; a similar view is argued by Kahn. In this essay I propose to scrutinize our evidence on Anaximander's plural worlds and to exam- ine, systematically and exhaustively, Kirk's and Kahn's criticism of this evidence-both as against the doxographic testimony and on its own merits. [Author's abstract]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"596","_score":null,"_source":{"id":596,"authors_free":[{"id":847,"entry_id":596,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":113,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","free_first_name":"Aryeh","free_last_name":"Finkelberg","norm_person":{"id":113,"first_name":"Aryeh","last_name":"Finkelberg","full_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1124815007","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Plural Worlds in Anaximander","main_title":{"title":"Plural Worlds in Anaximander"},"abstract":"The ancients ascribed to Anaximander a belief in plural worlds, but the state of the evidence does not make it immediately clear whether these worlds are coexistent or successive. Zeller argued that they could not be coexistent, but his view was challenged by Burnet; yet Cornford, as Kirk puts it, \"demonstrated that Burnet's argument . . . rested on a false assessment of the doxographic evidence on this point, as well as on the misinterpretation of several later Presocratics.\" So far so good, but Kirk goes further and contends not only that coexis- tent worlds have been wrongly assigned to Anaximander, as Zeller and Cornford have shown, but that successive worlds are also a doxo- graphic error; a similar view is argued by Kahn. In this essay I propose to scrutinize our evidence on Anaximander's plural worlds and to exam- ine, systematically and exhaustively, Kirk's and Kahn's criticism of this evidence-both as against the doxographic testimony and on its own merits. [Author's abstract]","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/mcqsVGIwcLUKvP2","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":113,"full_name":"Finkelberg, Aryeh","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":596,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"115","issue":"4","pages":"485-506"}},"sort":["Plural Worlds in Anaximander"]}

Proclus on Corporeal Space, 1994
By: Schrenk, Lawrence P.
Title Proclus on Corporeal Space
Type Article
Language English
Date 1994
Journal Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Volume 76
Pages 151 –167
Categories no categories
Author(s) Schrenk, Lawrence P.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In  his survey of ancient  theories  of space1  the Aristotelian commen-
tator  Simplicius  considers  the  rather  peculiar  account  offered  by  the
Neoplatonic philosopher, Proclus.2 This philosopher's analysis  of
space3  is  unique  in  that  it  contains  the  unusual  claim  that  space  is corporeal.4  In  this  paper,  I  shall  explore this claim  and  argue  that  it is
by  no  means as  absurd  as  might  at  first  appear.  It  results  from  a rea-
soned  attempt  to  develop  a  theory  of  space  which  meets  the  needs  of
Proclus'  ontology  of  emanation.  We  shall  begin  by  seeking  a  precise
understanding of the assertion  that  space  is a body  (through  an  analysis
of  two  detailed proofs  Proclus  offers  in  its  support5)  and  then  investi-
gate  the  philosophical  motives  compelling  him  to  make  the  claim  by
inquiring about  the  function  of space in his comprehensive  ontology. [Introduction, pp. 151 f.]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1033","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1033,"authors_free":[{"id":1564,"entry_id":1033,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":287,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","free_first_name":"Lawrence P.","free_last_name":"Schrenk","norm_person":{"id":287,"first_name":"Lawrence P.","last_name":"Schrenk","full_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114719551X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Proclus on Corporeal Space","main_title":{"title":"Proclus on Corporeal Space"},"abstract":"In his survey of ancient theories of space1 the Aristotelian commen-\r\ntator Simplicius considers the rather peculiar account offered by the\r\nNeoplatonic philosopher, Proclus.2 This philosopher's analysis of\r\nspace3 is unique in that it contains the unusual claim that space is corporeal.4 In this paper, I shall explore this claim and argue that it is\r\nby no means as absurd as might at first appear. It results from a rea-\r\nsoned attempt to develop a theory of space which meets the needs of\r\nProclus' ontology of emanation. We shall begin by seeking a precise\r\nunderstanding of the assertion that space is a body (through an analysis\r\nof two detailed proofs Proclus offers in its support5) and then investi-\r\ngate the philosophical motives compelling him to make the claim by\r\ninquiring about the function of space in his comprehensive ontology. [Introduction, pp. 151 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/c20vZemWAzwfhpO","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":287,"full_name":"Schrenk, Lawrence P.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1033,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archiv f\u00fcr Geschichte der Philosophie","volume":"76","issue":"","pages":"151 \u2013167"}},"sort":["Proclus on Corporeal Space"]}

Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts, 1995
By: Lloyd, Geoffrey
Title Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts
Type Article
Language English
Date 1995
Journal Extrême-Orient Extrême-Occident
Volume 17
Pages 141-153
Categories no categories
Author(s) Lloyd, Geoffrey
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The papers in this collection raise a variety of important issues and 
illustrate the complexity of the phenomena that « quotation » may 
cover. But for anyone attempting to bring to bear some of the ancient 
Greek and Latin data on this topic, one immediate problem must be 
confronted at the outset, namely the difference that different degrees of 
orality and literacy may make. [introduction, p. 141]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1369","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1369,"authors_free":[{"id":2062,"entry_id":1369,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":234,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","free_first_name":"Geoffrey","free_last_name":"Lloyd","norm_person":{"id":234,"first_name":"Geoffrey","last_name":"Lloyd","full_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/12380504X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts","main_title":{"title":"Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts"},"abstract":"The papers in this collection raise a variety of important issues and \r\nillustrate the complexity of the phenomena that \u00ab quotation \u00bb may \r\ncover. But for anyone attempting to bring to bear some of the ancient \r\nGreek and Latin data on this topic, one immediate problem must be \r\nconfronted at the outset, namely the difference that different degrees of \r\norality and literacy may make. [introduction, p. 141]","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/dOg8vr3Yw9XB23W","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":234,"full_name":"Lloyd, Geoffrey","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1369,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Extr\u00eame-Orient Extr\u00eame-Occident","volume":"17","issue":"","pages":"141-153"}},"sort":["Quotation in Greco-Roman contexts"]}

Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7, 1995
By: Smith, Andrew
Title Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7
Type Article
Language English
Date 1995
Journal The Classical Review, New Series
Volume 45
Issue 2
Pages 464-465
Categories no categories
Author(s) Smith, Andrew
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Review of: C. HAGEN (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7.  (The Ancient 
Commentators on  Aristotle.) Pp.  195. London: Duckworth, 1994. 
Cased, ?35

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"847","_score":null,"_source":{"id":847,"authors_free":[{"id":1251,"entry_id":847,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":232,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Smith, Andrew","free_first_name":"Andrew","free_last_name":"Smith","norm_person":{"id":232,"first_name":"Andrew","last_name":"Smith","full_name":"Smith, Andrew","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122322606","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7","main_title":{"title":"Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7"},"abstract":"Review of: C. HAGEN (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7. (The Ancient \r\nCommentators on Aristotle.) Pp. 195. London: Duckworth, 1994. \r\nCased, ?35","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/1tpBVwh9LJ4OAlq","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":232,"full_name":"Smith, Andrew","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":847,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review, New Series","volume":"45","issue":"2","pages":"464-465"}},"sort":["Review of Hagen, C. (tr.): Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 7"]}

Review of Stevens: Postérité de l'être: Simplicius interprète de Parménide, 1992
By: Wright, M.R.
Title Review of Stevens: Postérité de l'être: Simplicius interprète de Parménide
Type Article
Language English
Date 1992
Journal The Classical Review
Volume 42
Issue 2
Pages 454
Categories no categories
Author(s) Wright, M.R.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"421","_score":null,"_source":{"id":421,"authors_free":[{"id":564,"entry_id":421,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":365,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wright, M.R.","free_first_name":"M.R.","free_last_name":"Wright","norm_person":{"id":365,"first_name":"M. R.","last_name":"Wright","full_name":"Wright, M. R.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/174111304","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of Stevens: Post\u00e9rit\u00e9 de l'\u00eatre: Simplicius interpr\u00e8te de Parm\u00e9nide","main_title":{"title":"Review of Stevens: Post\u00e9rit\u00e9 de l'\u00eatre: Simplicius interpr\u00e8te de Parm\u00e9nide"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/BahJCRbggaTczYT","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":365,"full_name":"Wright, M. R.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":421,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"42","issue":"2","pages":"454"}},"sort":["Review of Stevens: Post\u00e9rit\u00e9 de l'\u00eatre: Simplicius interpr\u00e8te de Parm\u00e9nide"]}

Review of: Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1-8. Translated by David Blank. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 2. Translated by Barrie Fleet. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 5. Translated by J. O. Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner, 2000
By: Solère, Jean-Luc
Title Review of: Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1-8. Translated by David Blank. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 2. Translated by Barrie Fleet. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 5. Translated by J. O. Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner
Type Article
Language French
Date 2000
Journal Revue Philosophique de Louvain Année
Volume 98
Issue 2
Pages 358-359
Categories no categories
Author(s) Solère, Jean-Luc
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1478","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1478,"authors_free":[{"id":2559,"entry_id":1478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":547,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sol\u00e8re, Jean-Luc","free_first_name":"Jean-Luc","free_last_name":"Sol\u00e8re","norm_person":{"id":547,"first_name":"Jean-Luc","last_name":"Sol\u00e8re","full_name":"Sol\u00e8re, Jean-Luc","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103699290X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1-8. Translated by David Blank. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 2. Translated by Barrie Fleet. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 5. Translated by J. O. Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1-8. Translated by David Blank. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 2. Translated by Barrie Fleet. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 5. Translated by J. O. Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/AUteKzuNGdwzbTX","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":547,"full_name":"Sol\u00e8re, Jean-Luc","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1478,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Philosophique de Louvain Ann\u00e9e","volume":"98","issue":"2","pages":"358-359"}},"sort":["Review of: Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1-8. Translated by David Blank. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 2. Translated by Barrie Fleet. Simplicius, On Aristotle Physics 5. Translated by J. O. Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner"]}

Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius, 1993
By: Ide, Harry A.
Title Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius
Type Article
Language English
Date 1993
Journal The Philosophical Review
Volume 102
Issue 1
Pages 89-91
Categories no categories
Author(s) Ide, Harry A.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Review of PLACE,  VOID, AND ETERNITY.  PHILOPONUS:  COROLLARIES  ON 
PLACE AND VOID. SIMPLICIUS:  AGAINST PHILOPONUS  ON THE 
ETERNITY  OF THE WORLD. By PHILOPONUS and SIMPLICIUS.  Ithaca, 
N.Y., Cornell University Press, 1991. Pp. 153: "This volume is one of a series of translations of later ancient philosophy, 
edited by Richard Sorabij..."

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"740","_score":null,"_source":{"id":740,"authors_free":[{"id":1103,"entry_id":740,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":230,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ide, Harry A.","free_first_name":"Harry A.","free_last_name":"Ide","norm_person":{"id":230,"first_name":"Harry A.","last_name":"Ide","full_name":"Ide, Harry A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius"},"abstract":"Review of PLACE, VOID, AND ETERNITY. PHILOPONUS: COROLLARIES ON \r\nPLACE AND VOID. SIMPLICIUS: AGAINST PHILOPONUS ON THE \r\nETERNITY OF THE WORLD. By PHILOPONUS and SIMPLICIUS. Ithaca, \r\nN.Y., Cornell University Press, 1991. Pp. 153: \"This volume is one of a series of translations of later ancient philosophy, \r\nedited by Richard Sorabij...\"","btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/rvBOaVrkWWQOSVa","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":230,"full_name":"Ide, Harry A.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":740,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Philosophical Review","volume":"102","issue":"1","pages":"89-91"}},"sort":["Review of: Place, Void, and Eternity. Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void. Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. By Philoponus and Simplicius"]}

Review of: Simplicius, On Aristotle's Physics 5, translated by J.O.Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, 1998
By: Hankey, Wayne J.
Title Review of: Simplicius, On Aristotle's Physics 5, translated by J.O.Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle
Type Article
Language English
Date 1998
Journal Bryn Mawr Classical Review
Volume 3
Issue 19
Categories no categories
Author(s) Hankey, Wayne J.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
This text reviews J. Urmson‘s translation of Simplicius' On Aristotle's Physics 5. The review notes that the volume contains a short introduction, extensive notes, a list of textual emendations, and indices of names and subjects. The commentary addresses a range of philosophical questions, including the distinction between active and passive transformations and the relation of quality and quantity. Overall, Simplicius' commentary is important for understanding the Neoplatonic reconciliations and unifications and the move from substance to subjectivity in western philosophy. [whole text]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1347","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1347,"authors_free":[{"id":2002,"entry_id":1347,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":167,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","free_first_name":"Wayne J.","free_last_name":"Hankey","norm_person":{"id":167,"first_name":" Wayne J.","last_name":"Hankey","full_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054015821","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Review of: Simplicius, On Aristotle's Physics 5, translated by J.O.Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle","main_title":{"title":"Review of: Simplicius, On Aristotle's Physics 5, translated by J.O.Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle"},"abstract":"This text reviews J. Urmson\u2018s translation of Simplicius' On Aristotle's Physics 5. The review notes that the volume contains a short introduction, extensive notes, a list of textual emendations, and indices of names and subjects. The commentary addresses a range of philosophical questions, including the distinction between active and passive transformations and the relation of quality and quantity. Overall, Simplicius' commentary is important for understanding the Neoplatonic reconciliations and unifications and the move from substance to subjectivity in western philosophy. [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/uhM07fCfTUkIVJP","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":167,"full_name":"Hankey, Wayne J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1347,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bryn Mawr Classical Review","volume":"3","issue":"19","pages":""}},"sort":["Review of: Simplicius, On Aristotle's Physics 5, translated by J.O.Urmson, notes by Peter Lautner. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle"]}

  • PAGE 4 OF 6