| Title | Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Publication Place | New Brunswick |
| Publisher | Transaction Books |
| Series | Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | |
| Editor(s) | Fortenbaugh, William W. , Huby, Pamela M. , Long, Anthony A. |
| Translator(s) |
| This series in the field of classics grew out of Project Theophrastus, an international undertaking whose goal is to collect, edit, and comment on the fragments of Theophrastus, Greek philosopher, Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Contributions are by international experts, and each volume will have a particular focus. Volume I is devoted to Arius Didymus, court philosopher to Caesar Augustus and author of an extensive survey of Stoic and Peripatetic ethics. Volumes II and III will concentrate on Theophrastus and disseminate knowledge gained through work on the project. Volume IV will focus on Cicero and his knowledge of Hellenistic philosophy. |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/LrsshmpZ2bN6Q9v |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"284","_score":null,"_source":{"id":284,"authors_free":[{"id":2508,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":7,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W.","free_first_name":"William W.","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":7,"first_name":"William W. ","last_name":"Fortenbaugh","full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/110233700","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2509,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":200,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Huby, Pamela M. ","free_first_name":"Pamela M.","free_last_name":"Huby","norm_person":{"id":200,"first_name":"Pamela M.","last_name":"Huby","full_name":"Huby, Pamela M.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120868962","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2510,"entry_id":284,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":515,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Long, Anthony A.","free_first_name":"Anthony A.","free_last_name":"Long","norm_person":{"id":515,"first_name":"Anthony A.","last_name":"Long","full_name":"Long, Anthony A.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118959603","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work","main_title":{"title":"Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work"},"abstract":"This series in the field of classics grew out of Project Theophrastus, an international undertaking whose goal is to collect, edit, and comment on the fragments of Theophrastus, Greek philosopher, Aristotle's pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School. Contributions are by international experts, and each volume will have a particular focus. Volume I is devoted to Arius Didymus, court philosopher to Caesar Augustus and author of an extensive survey of Stoic and Peripatetic ethics. Volumes II and III will concentrate on Theophrastus and disseminate knowledge gained through work on the project. Volume IV will focus on Cicero and his knowledge of Hellenistic philosophy.","btype":1,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/LrsshmpZ2bN6Q9v","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":7,"full_name":"Fortenbaugh, William W. ","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":200,"full_name":"Huby, Pamela M.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":515,"full_name":"Long, Anthony A.","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":284,"pubplace":"New Brunswick","publisher":"Transaction Books","series":"Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1985]}
| Title | Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1985 |
| Publication Place | Catania |
| Publisher | Universita di Catania |
| Series | Symbolon |
| Volume | 3 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Romano, Francesco |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Tra i commentari ad Aristotele quelli di Porfirio occupano senza dubbio un posto preminente. Francesco Romano presenta uno studio sulla figura e sull’opera di Porfirio di cui analizza l’attività commentaria e i termini dell’interesse specifico per Aristotele attraverso la ricostruzione dei frammenti e delle testimonianze relativi al Commentario alla Fisica. Per fare questo l’autore presenta la traduzione dell’opera chiarendo anche i rapporti di Porfirio con Eudemo, Nicola, Alessandro, Temistio e Simplicio. [a.a.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/tivi4S8KV7VK4gv |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"60","_score":null,"_source":{"id":60,"authors_free":[{"id":68,"entry_id":60,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":305,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Romano, Francesco","free_first_name":"Francesco","free_last_name":"Romano","norm_person":{"id":305,"first_name":"Francesco","last_name":"Romano","full_name":"Romano, Francesco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1028249454","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica","main_title":{"title":"Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica"},"abstract":"Tra i commentari ad Aristotele quelli di Porfirio occupano senza dubbio un posto preminente.\r\nFrancesco Romano presenta uno studio sulla figura e sull\u2019opera di Porfirio di cui analizza l\u2019attivit\u00e0 commentaria e i termini dell\u2019interesse specifico per Aristotele attraverso la ricostruzione dei frammenti e delle testimonianze relativi al Commentario alla Fisica.\r\nPer fare questo l\u2019autore presenta la traduzione dell\u2019opera chiarendo anche i rapporti di Porfirio con Eudemo, Nicola, Alessandro, Temistio e Simplicio. [a.a.]","btype":1,"date":"1985","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/tivi4S8KV7VK4gv","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":305,"full_name":"Romano, Francesco","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":60,"pubplace":"Catania","publisher":"Universita di Catania","series":"Symbolon","volume":"3","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1985]}
| Title | Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr. |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1984 |
| Publication Place | Berlin – New York |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Series | Peripatoi |
| Volume | 6 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Moraux, Paul |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Durch seine Tendenzen und seine Leistungen unterscheidet sich der Aristotelismus der beiden ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte kaum von dem der zweiten Hälfte des ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. In der hier behandelten frühen Kaiserzeit lassen sich keine neuen Merkmale beobachten, die eine scharfe Trennung zwischen diesen beiden Jahrhunderten und dem vorhergehenden rechtfertigten. Vielmehr erscheint die Periode von Andronikos bis einschließlich Alexander von Aphrodisias als relativ einheitlich in ihrer Interpretation des Aristoteles. Sie unterscheidet sich vom neuplatonischen Aristotelesverständnis hauptsächlich dadurch, dass sie sich noch nicht zur grundsätzlichen Identität zwischen Aristoteles und Platon bekennt. Nur die Menge des Materials, das es zu untersuchen galt, hat mich gezwungen, die Darstellung dieser ganzen Periode auf drei Bände zu verteilen. [...] In der zweiten Hälfte dieser Arbeit wollen wir uns mit dem Aristotelismus in der Sicht anderer Schulen befassen. Die Entlehnungen aus dem Aristotelismus bei einigen Mittelplatonikern, ferner die gegen Aristoteles gerichtete Kritik und schließlich die Auseinandersetzungen von Nicht-Aristotelikern mit Schriften des Stagiriten dürfen in einer Untersuchung über den Aristotelismus in den ersten beiden nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten nicht außer Acht gelassen werden. Auch dort wird sich zeigen, wie in der Einleitung zum zweiten Buch ausführlicher dargelegt wird, dass etwa bei Platonikern das grundsätzliche Bekenntnis zum Platonismus oft Hand in Hand geht mit einem tatsächlichen Eklektizismus. Die Deutung Platons unter Benutzung typisch aristotelischer Errungenschaften erschien also als durchaus legitim. [preface] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/nSxL9S7Z1RoD9mZ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"65","_score":null,"_source":{"id":65,"authors_free":[{"id":73,"entry_id":65,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Moraux, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Moraux","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"Paul ","last_name":"Moraux","full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117755591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr.","main_title":{"title":"Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n.Chr."},"abstract":"Durch seine Tendenzen und seine Leistungen unterscheidet sich der Aristotelismus der beiden ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte kaum von dem der zweiten H\u00e4lfte des ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. In der hier behandelten fr\u00fchen Kaiserzeit lassen sich keine neuen Merkmale beobachten, die eine scharfe Trennung zwischen diesen beiden Jahrhunderten und dem vorhergehenden rechtfertigten. Vielmehr erscheint die Periode von Andronikos bis einschlie\u00dflich Alexander von Aphrodisias als relativ einheitlich in ihrer Interpretation des Aristoteles. Sie unterscheidet sich vom neuplatonischen Aristotelesverst\u00e4ndnis haupts\u00e4chlich dadurch, dass sie sich noch nicht zur grunds\u00e4tzlichen Identit\u00e4t zwischen Aristoteles und Platon bekennt. Nur die Menge des Materials, das es zu untersuchen galt, hat mich gezwungen, die Darstellung dieser ganzen Periode auf drei B\u00e4nde zu verteilen. [...]\r\nIn der zweiten H\u00e4lfte dieser Arbeit wollen wir uns mit dem Aristotelismus in der Sicht anderer Schulen befassen. Die Entlehnungen aus dem Aristotelismus bei einigen Mittelplatonikern, ferner die gegen Aristoteles gerichtete Kritik und schlie\u00dflich die Auseinandersetzungen von Nicht-Aristotelikern mit Schriften des Stagiriten d\u00fcrfen in einer Untersuchung \u00fcber den Aristotelismus in den ersten beiden nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten nicht au\u00dfer Acht gelassen werden. Auch dort wird sich zeigen, wie in der Einleitung zum zweiten Buch ausf\u00fchrlicher dargelegt wird, dass etwa bei Platonikern das grunds\u00e4tzliche Bekenntnis zum Platonismus oft Hand in Hand geht mit einem tats\u00e4chlichen Eklektizismus. Die Deutung Platons unter Benutzung typisch aristotelischer Errungenschaften erschien also als durchaus legitim. [preface]","btype":1,"date":"1984","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/nSxL9S7Z1RoD9mZ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Moraux, Paul ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":65,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi","volume":"6","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1984]}
| Title | Simplicius as a Source for and an Interpreter of Parmenides |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1983 |
| Publication Place | University of Washington |
| Series | Ph.D. Dissertation |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Perry, Bruce M. |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Simplicius, a Neoplatonist of the sixth century, wrote extensive commentaries on Aristotle's works, with his commentary on Physics I being of particular significance for the history of ancient philosophy. In this commentary, Simplicius aimed to demonstrate the harmony of doctrines presented by the Presocratic philosophers, both in the physical and metaphysical realms. However, his work has been largely overlooked, partly due to the dominance of the Vorsokratiker collection as the standard source for Presocratic material. This neglect is also attributed to Simplicius being a late Neoplatonist and a commentator, which led to simplistic assessments of his interpretations. Despite being dismissed as derivative and his interpretations considered anachronistic, Simplicius' commentaries and quotations of the Presocratic authors are valuable sources for understanding their philosophies. His work cannot be separated from his interpretations, and their examination can provide important insights into the context and focus of the Presocratics' ideas. While Simplicius employs Neoplatonic concepts in his interpretations, dismissing them solely on this basis overlooks the depth and philological rigor present in his work. Rejecting his interpretations on these grounds may hinder a comprehensive understanding of the Presocratic philosophers and their contributions to ancient philosophy. [introduction] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/aM3r1B1irPNEpCt |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1404","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1404,"authors_free":[{"id":2189,"entry_id":1404,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Perry, Bruce M.","free_first_name":"Bruce M.","free_last_name":"Perry","norm_person":{"id":381,"first_name":"Bruce M.","last_name":"Perry","full_name":"Perry, Bruce M.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1127083376","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplicius as a Source for and an Interpreter of Parmenides","main_title":{"title":"Simplicius as a Source for and an Interpreter of Parmenides"},"abstract":"Simplicius, a Neoplatonist of the sixth century, wrote extensive commentaries on Aristotle's works, with his commentary on Physics I being of particular significance for the history of ancient philosophy. In this commentary, Simplicius aimed to demonstrate the harmony of doctrines presented by the Presocratic philosophers, both in the physical and metaphysical realms. However, his work has been largely overlooked, partly due to the dominance of the Vorsokratiker collection as the standard source for Presocratic material. This neglect is also attributed to Simplicius being a late Neoplatonist and a commentator, which led to simplistic assessments of his interpretations. Despite being dismissed as derivative and his interpretations considered anachronistic, Simplicius' commentaries and quotations of the Presocratic authors are valuable sources for understanding their philosophies. His work cannot be separated from his interpretations, and their examination can provide important insights into the context and focus of the Presocratics' ideas. While Simplicius employs Neoplatonic concepts in his interpretations, dismissing them solely on this basis overlooks the depth and philological rigor present in his work. Rejecting his interpretations on these grounds may hinder a comprehensive understanding of the Presocratic philosophers and their contributions to ancient philosophy. [introduction]","btype":1,"date":"1983","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/aM3r1B1irPNEpCt","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":381,"full_name":"Perry, Bruce M.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1404,"pubplace":"University of Washington","publisher":"","series":"Ph.D. Dissertation","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1983]}
| Title | Diogène d'Apollonie: La dernière cosmologie présocratique |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1983 |
| Publication Place | Sankt Augustin |
| Publisher | Academia-Verlag |
| Series | International pre-Platonic studies |
| Volume | 6 |
| Edition No. | 2 (1st 1998) |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Laks, André |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Cet ouvrage s'inscrit dans la série des travaux que le Centre de Recherche Philosophique de l'Université de Lille III consacre à l'étude des cosmologies grecques. Après le système classique d'Empédocle et la réflexion critique d'Epicure à l'époque hellénistique, on s'intéresse ici à un penseur charnière, le dernier représentant de l' "ancienne physique".La notoriété de Diogène d'Apollonie est faible, au-delà du cercle restreint des spécialistes du Ve siècle grec. Ce tard venu n'a pas le renom d'Anaximandre ou d'Empédocle, ni celui de Démocrite, dont il est contemporain. Et pourtant, sa pensée n'est pas seulement l'ultime avatar d'une lignée dont il serait au fond indigne. Elle représente au contraire une forme d'achèvement, offrant une solution possible, dans le cadre du paradigme cosmologique hérité, au problème, laissé ouvert par le système d'Anaxagore, du mode d'action de "l'intellect" (νούς) dans le monde. La pertinence et la spécificité de la démarche, qui induit une doctrine de l'immanence, ressortent clairement quand on la confronte avec la célèbre critique d'Anaxagore menée par Socrate au nom de la téléologie dans le Phédon de Platon, et qui signe l'arrêt de mort de la spéculation présocratique. [a.a] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/KVFpTS2HQXnKwpF |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"20","_score":null,"_source":{"id":20,"authors_free":[{"id":21,"entry_id":20,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":225,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laks, Andr\u00e9","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9","free_last_name":"Laks","norm_person":{"id":225,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9","last_name":"Laks","full_name":"Laks, Andr\u00e9","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/135869161","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Diog\u00e8ne d'Apollonie: La derni\u00e8re cosmologie pr\u00e9socratique","main_title":{"title":"Diog\u00e8ne d'Apollonie: La derni\u00e8re cosmologie pr\u00e9socratique"},"abstract":"Cet ouvrage s'inscrit dans la s\u00e9rie des travaux que le Centre de Recherche Philosophique de l'Universit\u00e9 de Lille III consacre \u00e0 l'\u00e9tude des cosmologies grecques. Apr\u00e8s le syst\u00e8me classique d'Emp\u00e9docle et la r\u00e9flexion critique d'Epicure \u00e0 l'\u00e9poque hell\u00e9nistique, on s'int\u00e9resse ici \u00e0 un penseur charni\u00e8re, le dernier repr\u00e9sentant de l' \"ancienne physique\".La notori\u00e9t\u00e9 de Diog\u00e8ne d'Apollonie est faible, au-del\u00e0 du cercle restreint des sp\u00e9cialistes du Ve si\u00e8cle grec. Ce tard venu n'a pas le renom d'Anaximandre ou d'Emp\u00e9docle, ni celui de D\u00e9mocrite, dont il est contemporain. Et pourtant, sa pens\u00e9e n'est pas seulement l'ultime avatar d'une lign\u00e9e dont il serait au fond indigne. Elle repr\u00e9sente au contraire une forme d'ach\u00e8vement, offrant une solution possible, dans le cadre du paradigme cosmologique h\u00e9rit\u00e9, au probl\u00e8me, laiss\u00e9 ouvert par le syst\u00e8me d'Anaxagore, du mode d'action de \"l'intellect\" (\u03bd\u03bf\u03cd\u03c2) dans le monde. La pertinence et la sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9marche, qui induit une doctrine de l'immanence, ressortent clairement quand on la confronte avec la c\u00e9l\u00e8bre critique d'Anaxagore men\u00e9e par Socrate au nom de la t\u00e9l\u00e9ologie dans le Ph\u00e9don de Platon, et qui signe l'arr\u00eat de mort de la sp\u00e9culation pr\u00e9socratique. [a.a]","btype":1,"date":"1983","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/KVFpTS2HQXnKwpF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":225,"full_name":"Laks, Andr\u00e9","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":20,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia-Verlag","series":"International pre-Platonic studies","volume":"6","edition_no":"2 (1st 1998)","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1983]}
| Title | Simplikios: Über die Zeit. Ein Kommentar zum Corollarium de tempore |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1982 |
| Publication Place | Göttingen |
| Publisher | Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht |
| Series | Hypomnemata |
| Volume | 70 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sonderegger, Erwin , Simplicius |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ezFzmrX4TL58a3Q |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"235","_score":null,"_source":{"id":235,"authors_free":[{"id":301,"entry_id":235,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":322,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sonderegger, Erwin","free_first_name":"Erwin","free_last_name":"Sonderegger","norm_person":{"id":322,"first_name":"Erwin","last_name":"Sonderegger","full_name":"Sonderegger, Erwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130152013","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2313,"entry_id":235,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":62,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Simplicius","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":62,"first_name":"Cilicius","last_name":"Simplicius ","full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118642421","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplikios: \u00dcber die Zeit. Ein Kommentar zum Corollarium de tempore","main_title":{"title":"Simplikios: \u00dcber die Zeit. Ein Kommentar zum Corollarium de tempore"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1982","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ezFzmrX4TL58a3Q","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":322,"full_name":"Sonderegger, Erwin","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":62,"full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":235,"pubplace":"G\u00f6ttingen","publisher":"Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht","series":"Hypomnemata","volume":"70","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1982]}
| Title | Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1981 |
| Publication Place | Leiden |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Ebbesen, S |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| About thirteen years ago when I was preparing an edition of some Latin 13th century quaestiones on the Sophistici Elenchi, I discovered some puzzling references to a commentary by "Alexander", obviously a Greek. He appeared to have been a very important man to the Westerners, for often he was simply called 'Commentator', a title reserved in other contexts for Averroes. This discovery gave rise to the questions,(!) Who was Alexander? (2) Are there more references to him in other Latin texts? (3) Is his work extant in Latin? (4) Is it extant in Greek? Re 1 At first I thought he must be Alexander of Aphrodisias. Now I do not know how to answer the question. Re 2 I soon found that Minio-Paluello and De Rijk had already signalled some other references to Alexander. Re 3 My first investigations indicated the answer would be no, and I still have not found the text in any manuscript. Re 4 My early research indicated the answer would be no, but that extant Greek scholia were often comparable to the Latin quotations of Alexander. The preliminary probings suggested that a search for more Latin references to Alexander and an inquiry into the Greek scholia on the Elenchi might throw light on the origins of Western scholasticism and at the same time prove the existence of a Byzantine scholasticism comparable to that of Western Europe in the High Middle Ages. A systematic search for more fragments of the Latin translation of Alexanders's commentary resulted in the collection that figures as Vol. II, Part 2, of this study. Studying the Greek scholia I soon realized that they could not be used for any serious purpose as long as elementary questions of dating and attribution had not been solved. Trying to find the answer to such questions, I found that investigating the whole manuscript tradition was inescapable. The results of that investigation are presented in Vol. 1 chapter V and the appendices (in Vol. III). Reading the Greek scholia I became convinced that Byzantine scholasticism never produced results comparable to those of its Western counterpart; but, on the other hand, a study of the late ancient and medieval Greek scholastic tradition could, indeed, throw light on the origins of Western logic. The results of my investigations are presented partly in the notes on "Alexander's" fragments (in Vol. Ill), partly in a series of essays on central problems (Vol. I ch.IV). Vol. I chapters I-II contain sketches of pre-scholastic theories of fallacies, some of which were to influence the scholastics, whereas chapter III introduces scholasticism. As both Vol. I and Vol. III discuss Greek texts that have never been printed, I have collected a number of such texts in Vol. II, editing also Galen's De captionibus because the earlier editions are no longer satisfactory. Chapters I through W of Vol. I all have a speculative character. I have tried to rein in my imagination, but I may not always have achieved my aim. I feel sure I have misunderstood the old philosophers on several points. Perhaps it can serve as an excuse that most of the problems I deal with have not been investigated before. If there are fundamental errors in chapter V, the consequences for the rest of 'Commentators and Commentaries' will be serious, if not disastrous. I trust, however, that my results concerning the Byzantine tradition are essentially correct. [preface] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/gtXiqKQ2uGtS14q |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"34","_score":null,"_source":{"id":34,"authors_free":[{"id":40,"entry_id":34,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ebbesen, S","free_first_name":"S","free_last_name":"Ebbesen","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition","main_title":{"title":"Commentators and commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi. A study of Post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies. Vol. 1 The Greek Tradition"},"abstract":"About thirteen years ago when I was preparing an edition of some Latin 13th century quaestiones on the Sophistici Elenchi, I discovered some puzzling references to a commentary\r\nby \"Alexander\", obviously a Greek. He appeared to have been a very important man to the\r\nWesterners, for often he was simply called 'Commentator', a title reserved in other contexts for Averroes.\r\nThis discovery gave rise to the questions,(!) Who was Alexander? (2) Are there more references to him in other Latin texts? (3) Is his work extant in Latin? (4) Is it extant in Greek?\r\nRe 1 At first I thought he must be Alexander of Aphrodisias. Now I do not know how to answer the question.\r\nRe 2 I soon found that Minio-Paluello and De Rijk had already signalled some other references to Alexander.\r\nRe 3 My first investigations indicated the answer would be no, and I still have not found the text in any manuscript. \r\nRe 4 My early research indicated the answer would be no, but that extant Greek scholia were often comparable to the Latin quotations of Alexander.\r\nThe preliminary probings suggested that a search for more Latin references to Alexander and an inquiry into the Greek scholia on the Elenchi might throw light on the origins of Western scholasticism and at the same time prove the existence of a Byzantine scholasticism comparable to that of Western Europe in the High Middle Ages. A systematic search for more fragments of the Latin translation of Alexanders's commentary resulted in the collection that figures as Vol. II, Part 2, of this study.\r\nStudying the Greek scholia I soon realized that they could not be used for any serious purpose as long as elementary questions of dating and attribution had not been solved. Trying to find the answer to such questions, I found that investigating the whole manuscript tradition\r\nwas inescapable. The results of that investigation are presented in Vol. 1 chapter V and the appendices (in Vol. III).\r\nReading the Greek scholia I became convinced that Byzantine scholasticism never produced results comparable to those of its Western counterpart; but, on the other hand, a study of the late ancient and medieval Greek scholastic tradition could, indeed, throw light on the\r\norigins of Western logic.\r\nThe results of my investigations are presented partly in the notes on \"Alexander's\" fragments (in Vol. Ill), partly in a series of essays on central problems (Vol. I ch.IV).\r\nVol. I chapters I-II contain sketches of pre-scholastic theories of fallacies, some of which were to influence the scholastics, whereas chapter III introduces scholasticism.\r\nAs both Vol. I and Vol. III discuss Greek texts that have never been printed, I have collected a number of such texts in Vol. II, editing also Galen's De captionibus because the earlier editions are no longer satisfactory.\r\nChapters I through W of Vol. I all have a speculative character. I have tried to rein in my imagination, but I may not always have achieved my aim. I feel sure I have misunderstood the old philosophers on several points. Perhaps it can serve as an excuse that most of the problems I deal with have not been investigated before. If there are fundamental errors in chapter V, the consequences for the rest of 'Commentators and Commentaries' will be serious, if not disastrous. I trust, however, that my results concerning the Byzantine tradition are\r\nessentially correct. [preface]\r\n","btype":1,"date":"1981","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/gtXiqKQ2uGtS14q","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[],"book":{"id":34,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1981]}
| Title | Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1981 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Université Paris IV-Sorbonne |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hoffmann, Philippe |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/FCQ06BefzUIofrf |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"70","_score":null,"_source":{"id":70,"authors_free":[{"id":78,"entry_id":70,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":138,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe","free_first_name":"Philippe","free_last_name":"Hoffmann","norm_person":{"id":138,"first_name":"Philippe ","last_name":"Hoffmann","full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/189361905","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote","main_title":{"title":"Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1981","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/FCQ06BefzUIofrf","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":138,"full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":70,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Universit\u00e9 Paris IV-Sorbonne","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1981]}
| Title | The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism; Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1978 |
| Publication Place | Brüssel |
| Publisher | Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Steel, Carlos |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/YauXCnZmEvR1roR |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1445","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1445,"authors_free":[{"id":2314,"entry_id":1445,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":14,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steel, Carlos","free_first_name":"Carlos","free_last_name":"Steel","norm_person":{"id":14,"first_name":"Carlos ","last_name":"Steel","full_name":"Steel, Carlos ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122963083","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism; Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus","main_title":{"title":"The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism; Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1978","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/YauXCnZmEvR1roR","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":14,"full_name":"Steel, Carlos ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1445,"pubplace":"Br\u00fcssel","publisher":"Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1978]}
| Title | Le Problème du Néoplatonisme Alexandrin: Hiéroclès et Simplicius. |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1978 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Études Augustiniennes |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hadot, Ilsetraut |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Review by Victor Goldschmidt: "La modestie de son titre ne révèle qu'imparfaitement l'objet et la portée de ce livre. Il s'agit en réalité de réformer l'idée traditionnelle qu'on se faisait de deux courants de la pensée antique. C'est entre le début du ve siècle de notre ère, en effet, jusqu'au début du viie que s'étend l'espace temporel où K. Praechter, suivi par tous les savants venus après lui, avait situé ce qu'il appelait « L'École alexandrine ». Ce mouvement se distinguerait fondamentalement de l'École d'Athènes, par son abandon partiel des constructions métaphysiques de Proclus et de ses élèves, par un retour au « moyen platonisme », par ses rapports de bon voisinage avec les milieux chrétiens, et représenterait « un lieu de culture philosophiquement neutre, sans credo platonico-païen », et plaçant l'étude d'Aristote au-dessus de celle de Platon. Les traits de cette École se verraient avec une particulière netteté dans le commentaire d'Hiéroclès sur les Vers Dorés attribués à Pythagore, et dans le commentaire que Simplicius, avant d'être entré en rapport avec l'École d'Athènes, a consacré au Manuel d'Épictète. Or c'est précisément en préparant une édition commentée du commentaire de Simplicius (à paraître dans la Collection G. Budé), que l'A. a rencontré « le problème du néoplatonisme alexandrin » ; la thèse traditionnelle lui a semblé alors insoutenable, pour des raisons tant historiques que de doctrine. En bref, comme le dit l'auteur dans une formule remarquable, ce que l'on a pris pour un « néoplatonisme plus simple » est en réalité un « néoplatonisme simplifié », et même « fragmenté », et cela uniquement pour les besoins de l'enseignement. Il est montré, en effet, d'une façon convaincante, que les deux Commentaires, d'Hiéroclès et de Simplicius, relèvent de ce que nous appellerions une propédeutique, c'est-à-dire qu'ils s'adressent à des débutants qu'il s'agit d'initier dans la « première » partie de la philosophie, réputée la plus accessible, en l'espèce l'éthique. On sait que ce problème pédagogique s'est posé dès le début dans l'École stoïcienne et qu'il a été longuement discuté par les commentateurs d'Aristote, qui donnent toutefois, généralement, la première place à la logique. Le VIIe chapitre apporte une contribution importante à l'histoire de ce problème. D'où l'on voit déjà que c'est en apparence seulement que le résultat de l'ouvrage est négatif. Sans doute s'agit-il surtout de réfuter la thèse de K. Praechter, renouvelée par A. Cameron et Ph. Merlan ; la Conclusion se termine sur cette affirmation qu'« il n'y a pas d'école néoplatonicienne d'Alexandrie dont les tendances doctrinales différeraient des tendances propres à l'école d'Athènes ». De fait, le livre contient une interprétation développée des fragments d'Hiéroclès conservés par Photius et, surtout, de son Commentaire sur les Vers Dorés, montrant l'accord de ces textes avec le néoplatonisme « athénien ». Ces exégèses sont conduites avec fermeté, appuyées sur une vaste information, et emportent la conviction, quoi qu'il en soit de tel ou tel point de détail. Quelques questions, d'ordre plus général, pourraient être pesées. — P. 37 : il est certain que le thème du « philosophe dans l'État corrompu » est un lieu commun et que le τειχίον, dans le texte de Simplicius est clairement une réminiscence de la République (VI, 496 c-d). Est-ce suffisant pour infirmer la thèse d'A. Cameron, qui voit dans ce texte une allusion à la place faite aux philosophes néoplatoniciens après l'édit de Justinien ? De telles citations, l'auteur en convient lui-même deux pages plus loin, n'excluent nullement un « intérêt personnel » et, plus généralement, la négation de principe de « remarques autobiographiques chez les auteurs antiques » (p. 39) est exagérée et même inexacte. — P. 128 : l'exposé de Chalcidius sur le Destin, qui est un texte canonique et qui au surplus avait servi à K. Praechter à caractériser le « moyen platonisme », méritait mieux qu'un bref résumé : il était bon de rappeler qu'il s'agit, à la suite d'ailleurs de Chrysippe, du commentaire d'un texte du Xe Livre de la République ; on ne peut pas, en l'espèce, parler de « l'implication mutuelle de la providence et de VHeimarménè », et la note 40 simplifie le problème de la liberté stoïcienne, qu'on n'était pas sans doute obligé de traiter, mais auquel il fallait laisser sa complexité de problème, précisément ; l'on ne saurait écrire, en tout état de cause, que « pour les choses qui sont faites par fatalité, leur contraire aurait pu aussi bien se faire », thèse qui ne semble avoir été soutenue que par le seul Cléanthe. — Le chapitre VII répond à la question, naguère posée par R. Walzer : « Comment peut-on expliquer le fait que Simplicius, en tant que platonicien, commente les maximes éthiques d'un stoïcien ? ». La réponse combine essentiellement deux considérations : l'apathie du sage stoïcien est déjà admise dans le traité de Plotin Sur les Vertus (I, ii) et le caractère sententieux du Manuel qui convient bien à des débutants. Sans doute, du point de vue historique, est-ce là tout ce qu'on peut alléguer. De fait, l'éthique plotinienne ne se résume pas à l'idéal d'apathie et le genre gnomologique qu'on peut faire remonter aux Sept Sages avait trouvé bien d'autres illustrations, ne serait-ce que, comme l'auteur le rappelle avec raison, chez les Pythagoriciens. On se demandera plutôt si, de la part de Simplicius, le choix du Manuel ne s'explique pas plus simplement par l'attrait extraordinaire que ce petit livre a exercé de tout temps sur les lecteurs, et cela en dehors de toute appartenance à telle ou telle secte. Une dernière question, enfin. On doit considérer que Mme Hadot a établi son propos, et que l'on ne parlera plus d'une « école alexandrine », opposée à celle d'Athènes et différenciée de celle-ci selon les traits que Praechter avait cru pouvoir constater. Il reste qu'il y a eu, dans la période en question, des néoplatoniciens vivant et enseignant à Alexandrie. Même en admettant leur « orthodoxie » foncière, ces hommes (sans parler d'Hypatie qui a subi pour la philosophie un martyre qui lui eût été épargné à Athènes) ne présentent-ils pas quelques caractères communs : rien que leur environnement culturel le ferait conjecturer. Mais ce serait là l'objet d'une autre recherche, complémentaire de celle-ci. En attendant, on saura gré à l'auteur de cet ouvrage doublement précieux : par ses résultats intrinsèques, et en tant qu'introduction à son édition à paraître d'un texte jusqu'à présent fort peu étudié." |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/yVaEGm6PWAcLlQ0 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"180","_score":null,"_source":{"id":180,"authors_free":[{"id":236,"entry_id":180,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":4,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","free_first_name":"Ilsetraut","free_last_name":"Hadot","norm_person":{"id":4,"first_name":"Ilsetraut","last_name":"Hadot","full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/107415011","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Le Probl\u00e8me du N\u00e9oplatonisme Alexandrin: Hi\u00e9rocl\u00e8s et Simplicius.","main_title":{"title":"Le Probl\u00e8me du N\u00e9oplatonisme Alexandrin: Hi\u00e9rocl\u00e8s et Simplicius."},"abstract":"Review by Victor Goldschmidt: \"La modestie de son titre ne r\u00e9v\u00e8le qu'imparfaitement l'objet et la port\u00e9e de ce livre. Il s'agit en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de r\u00e9former l'id\u00e9e traditionnelle qu'on se faisait de deux courants de la pens\u00e9e antique. C'est entre le d\u00e9but du ve si\u00e8cle de notre \u00e8re, en effet, jusqu'au d\u00e9but du viie que s'\u00e9tend l'espace temporel o\u00f9 K. Praechter, suivi par tous les savants venus apr\u00e8s lui, avait situ\u00e9 ce qu'il appelait \u00ab L'\u00c9cole alexandrine \u00bb. Ce mouvement se distinguerait fondamentalement de l'\u00c9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes, par son abandon partiel des constructions m\u00e9taphysiques de Proclus et de ses \u00e9l\u00e8ves, par un retour au \u00ab moyen platonisme \u00bb, par ses rapports de bon voisinage avec les milieux chr\u00e9tiens, et repr\u00e9senterait \u00ab un lieu de culture philosophiquement neutre, sans credo platonico-pa\u00efen \u00bb, et pla\u00e7ant l'\u00e9tude d'Aristote au-dessus de celle de Platon. Les traits de cette \u00c9cole se verraient avec une particuli\u00e8re nettet\u00e9 dans le commentaire d'Hi\u00e9rocl\u00e8s sur les Vers Dor\u00e9s attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Pythagore, et dans le commentaire que Simplicius, avant d'\u00eatre entr\u00e9 en rapport avec l'\u00c9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes, a consacr\u00e9 au Manuel d'\u00c9pict\u00e8te. Or c'est pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment en pr\u00e9parant une \u00e9dition comment\u00e9e du commentaire de Simplicius (\u00e0 para\u00eetre dans la Collection G. Bud\u00e9), que l'A. a rencontr\u00e9 \u00ab le probl\u00e8me du n\u00e9oplatonisme alexandrin \u00bb ; la th\u00e8se traditionnelle lui a sembl\u00e9 alors insoutenable, pour des raisons tant historiques que de doctrine.\r\nEn bref, comme le dit l'auteur dans une formule remarquable, ce que l'on a pris pour un \u00ab n\u00e9oplatonisme plus simple \u00bb est en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 un \u00ab n\u00e9oplatonisme simplifi\u00e9 \u00bb, et m\u00eame \u00ab fragment\u00e9 \u00bb, et cela uniquement pour les besoins de l'enseignement. Il est montr\u00e9, en effet, d'une fa\u00e7on convaincante, que les deux Commentaires, d'Hi\u00e9rocl\u00e8s et de Simplicius, rel\u00e8vent de ce que nous appellerions une prop\u00e9deutique, c'est-\u00e0-dire qu'ils s'adressent \u00e0 des d\u00e9butants qu'il s'agit d'initier dans la \u00ab premi\u00e8re \u00bb partie de la philosophie, r\u00e9put\u00e9e la plus accessible, en l'esp\u00e8ce l'\u00e9thique. On sait que ce probl\u00e8me p\u00e9dagogique s'est pos\u00e9 d\u00e8s le d\u00e9but dans l'\u00c9cole sto\u00efcienne et qu'il a \u00e9t\u00e9 longuement discut\u00e9 par les commentateurs d'Aristote, qui donnent toutefois, g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement, la premi\u00e8re place \u00e0 la logique. Le VIIe chapitre apporte une contribution importante \u00e0 l'histoire de ce probl\u00e8me.\r\nD'o\u00f9 l'on voit d\u00e9j\u00e0 que c'est en apparence seulement que le r\u00e9sultat de l'ouvrage est n\u00e9gatif. Sans doute s'agit-il surtout de r\u00e9futer la th\u00e8se de K. Praechter, renouvel\u00e9e par A. Cameron et Ph. Merlan ; la Conclusion se termine sur cette affirmation qu'\u00ab il n'y a pas d'\u00e9cole n\u00e9oplatonicienne d'Alexandrie dont les tendances doctrinales diff\u00e9reraient des tendances propres \u00e0 l'\u00e9cole d'Ath\u00e8nes \u00bb. De fait, le livre contient une interpr\u00e9tation d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e des fragments d'Hi\u00e9rocl\u00e8s conserv\u00e9s par Photius et, surtout, de son Commentaire sur les Vers Dor\u00e9s, montrant l'accord de ces textes avec le n\u00e9oplatonisme \u00ab ath\u00e9nien \u00bb. Ces ex\u00e9g\u00e8ses sont conduites avec fermet\u00e9, appuy\u00e9es sur une vaste information, et emportent la conviction, quoi qu'il en soit de tel ou tel point de d\u00e9tail. Quelques questions, d'ordre plus g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, pourraient \u00eatre pes\u00e9es. \u2014 P. 37 : il est certain que le th\u00e8me du \u00ab philosophe dans l'\u00c9tat corrompu \u00bb est un lieu commun et que le \u03c4\u03b5\u03b9\u03c7\u03af\u03bf\u03bd, dans le texte de Simplicius est clairement une r\u00e9miniscence de la R\u00e9publique (VI, 496 c-d). Est-ce suffisant pour infirmer la th\u00e8se d'A. Cameron, qui voit dans ce texte une allusion \u00e0 la place faite aux philosophes n\u00e9oplatoniciens apr\u00e8s l'\u00e9dit de Justinien ? De telles citations, l'auteur en convient lui-m\u00eame deux pages plus loin, n'excluent nullement un \u00ab int\u00e9r\u00eat personnel \u00bb et, plus g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement, la n\u00e9gation de principe de \u00ab remarques autobiographiques chez les auteurs antiques \u00bb (p. 39) est exag\u00e9r\u00e9e et m\u00eame inexacte. \u2014 P. 128 : l'expos\u00e9 de Chalcidius sur le Destin, qui est un texte canonique et qui au surplus avait servi \u00e0 K. Praechter \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser le \u00ab moyen platonisme \u00bb, m\u00e9ritait mieux qu'un bref r\u00e9sum\u00e9 : il \u00e9tait bon de rappeler qu'il s'agit, \u00e0 la suite d'ailleurs de Chrysippe, du commentaire d'un texte du Xe Livre de la R\u00e9publique ; on ne peut pas, en l'esp\u00e8ce, parler de \u00ab l'implication mutuelle de la providence et de VHeimarm\u00e9n\u00e8 \u00bb, et la note 40 simplifie le probl\u00e8me de la libert\u00e9 sto\u00efcienne, qu'on n'\u00e9tait pas sans doute oblig\u00e9 de traiter, mais auquel il fallait laisser sa complexit\u00e9 de probl\u00e8me, pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment ; l'on ne saurait \u00e9crire, en tout \u00e9tat de cause, que \u00ab pour les choses qui sont faites par fatalit\u00e9, leur contraire aurait pu aussi bien se faire \u00bb, th\u00e8se qui ne semble avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 soutenue que par le seul Cl\u00e9anthe. \u2014 Le chapitre VII r\u00e9pond \u00e0 la question, nagu\u00e8re pos\u00e9e par R. Walzer : \u00ab Comment peut-on expliquer le fait que Simplicius, en tant que platonicien, commente les maximes \u00e9thiques d'un sto\u00efcien ? \u00bb. La r\u00e9ponse combine essentiellement deux consid\u00e9rations : l'apathie du sage sto\u00efcien est d\u00e9j\u00e0 admise dans le trait\u00e9 de Plotin Sur les Vertus (I, ii) et le caract\u00e8re sententieux du Manuel qui convient bien \u00e0 des d\u00e9butants. Sans doute, du point de vue historique, est-ce l\u00e0 tout ce qu'on peut all\u00e9guer. De fait, l'\u00e9thique plotinienne ne se r\u00e9sume pas \u00e0 l'id\u00e9al d'apathie et le genre gnomologique qu'on peut faire remonter aux Sept Sages avait trouv\u00e9 bien d'autres illustrations, ne serait-ce que, comme l'auteur le rappelle avec raison, chez les Pythagoriciens. On se demandera plut\u00f4t si, de la part de Simplicius, le choix du Manuel ne s'explique pas plus simplement par l'attrait extraordinaire que ce petit livre a exerc\u00e9 de tout temps sur les lecteurs, et cela en dehors de toute appartenance \u00e0 telle ou telle secte.\r\nUne derni\u00e8re question, enfin. On doit consid\u00e9rer que Mme Hadot a \u00e9tabli son propos, et que l'on ne parlera plus d'une \u00ab \u00e9cole alexandrine \u00bb, oppos\u00e9e \u00e0 celle d'Ath\u00e8nes et diff\u00e9renci\u00e9e de celle-ci selon les traits que Praechter avait cru pouvoir constater. Il reste qu'il y a eu, dans la p\u00e9riode en question, des n\u00e9oplatoniciens vivant et enseignant \u00e0 Alexandrie. M\u00eame en admettant leur \u00ab orthodoxie \u00bb fonci\u00e8re, ces hommes (sans parler d'Hypatie qui a subi pour la philosophie un martyre qui lui e\u00fbt \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9pargn\u00e9 \u00e0 Ath\u00e8nes) ne pr\u00e9sentent-ils pas quelques caract\u00e8res communs : rien que leur environnement culturel le ferait conjecturer. Mais ce serait l\u00e0 l'objet d'une autre recherche, compl\u00e9mentaire de celle-ci.\r\nEn attendant, on saura gr\u00e9 \u00e0 l'auteur de cet ouvrage doublement pr\u00e9cieux : par ses r\u00e9sultats intrins\u00e8ques, et en tant qu'introduction \u00e0 son \u00e9dition \u00e0 para\u00eetre d'un texte jusqu'\u00e0 pr\u00e9sent fort peu \u00e9tudi\u00e9.\"","btype":1,"date":"1978","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/yVaEGm6PWAcLlQ0","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":4,"full_name":"Hadot, Ilsetraut","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":180,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"\u00c9tudes Augustiniennes","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1978]}
| Title | Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore à Simplicius |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1990 |
| Publication Place | Louvain |
| Publisher | Peeters |
| Series | Bibliothèque de l'Ecole des hautes études. Section des sciences religieuses |
| Volume | 94 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Tardieu, Michel |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/UBo5JA5w5Fo2bCn |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"197","_score":null,"_source":{"id":197,"authors_free":[{"id":254,"entry_id":197,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":331,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tardieu, Michel","free_first_name":"Michel","free_last_name":"Tardieu","norm_person":{"id":331,"first_name":"Michel","last_name":"Tardieu","full_name":"Tardieu, Michel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140490701","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore \u00e0 Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore \u00e0 Simplicius"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1990","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UBo5JA5w5Fo2bCn","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":331,"full_name":"Tardieu, Michel","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":197,"pubplace":"Louvain","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Biblioth\u00e8que de l'Ecole des hautes \u00e9tudes. Section des sciences religieuses","volume":"94","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d'Isidore \u00e0 Simplicius"]}
| Title | Matter, Space, and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1988 |
| Publication Place | London |
| Publisher | Duckworth |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Sorabji, Richard |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
The nature of matter was as intriguing a question for ancient philosophers as it is for contemporary physicists, and Matter, Space, and Motion presents a fresh and illuminating account of the rich legacy of the physical theories of the Greeks from the fifth century B.C. to the late sixth century A.D. [a.a] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/UMwsdcucXfrqkbZ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"5","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5,"authors_free":[{"id":5,"entry_id":5,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":133,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sorabji, Richard","free_first_name":"Richard","free_last_name":"Sorabji","norm_person":{"id":133,"first_name":"Richard","last_name":"Sorabji","full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130064165","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Matter, Space, and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel","main_title":{"title":"Matter, Space, and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel"},"abstract":"The nature of matter was as intriguing a question for ancient philosophers as it is for contemporary physicists, and Matter, Space, and Motion presents a fresh and illuminating account of the rich legacy of the physical theories of the Greeks from the fifth century B.C. to the late sixth century A.D. [a.a]","btype":1,"date":"1988","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/UMwsdcucXfrqkbZ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":133,"full_name":"Sorabji, Richard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":5,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Duckworth","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Matter, Space, and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel"]}
| Title | PS.-Aristoteles, MXG : Der historische Wert des Xenophanesreferats. Beiträge zur Geschichte des Eleatismus |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1974 |
| Publication Place | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | Hakkert |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Wiesner, Jürgen |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/wvYIPOcDKdaOGFN |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"2","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2,"authors_free":[{"id":1821,"entry_id":2,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":75,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","free_first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","free_last_name":"Wiesner","norm_person":{"id":75,"first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","last_name":"Wiesner","full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140610847","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"PS.-Aristoteles, MXG : Der historische Wert des Xenophanesreferats. Beitr\u00e4ge zur Geschichte des Eleatismus","main_title":{"title":"PS.-Aristoteles, MXG : Der historische Wert des Xenophanesreferats. Beitr\u00e4ge zur Geschichte des Eleatismus"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1974","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/wvYIPOcDKdaOGFN","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":75,"full_name":"Wiesner, J\u00fcrgen","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":2,"pubplace":"Amsterdam","publisher":"Hakkert","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["PS.-Aristoteles, MXG : Der historische Wert des Xenophanesreferats. Beitr\u00e4ge zur Geschichte des Eleatismus"]}
| Title | Philoponus: Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1987 |
| Publication Place | London |
| Publisher | Duckworth |
| Series | Ancient Commentators on Aristotle |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Philoponos, Johannes |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Wildberg, Christian(Wildberg, Christian) |
Philoponus' treatise Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World, an attack on Aristotle's astronomy and theology is concerned mainly with the eternity and divinity of the fifth element, or 'quintessence', of which Aristotle took the stars to be composed. Pagans and Christians were divided on whether the world had a beginning, and on whether a belief that the heavens were divine was a mark of religion. Philoponus claimed on behalf of Christianity that the universe was not eternal. His most spectacular arguments, where wrung paradox out of the pagan belief in an infinite past, have been wrongly credited by historians of science to a period 700 years later. The treatise was to influence Islamic, Jewish, Byzantine and Latin thought, though the fifth element was defended against Philoponus even beyond the time of Copernicus. The influence of the treatise was not easy to trace before the fragments were assembled. Dr. Wildberg has brought them together for the first time and provided a summary which makes coherent sense of the whole. He has also studied a Syriac fragment, which reveals that the treatise originally contained an explicitly theological section on the Christian expectation of a new heaven and a new earth. [Author’s abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/8Iylo91nPxiKHhJ |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"42","_score":null,"_source":{"id":42,"authors_free":[{"id":49,"entry_id":42,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":439,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Philoponos, Johannes","free_first_name":"Johannes","free_last_name":"Philoponos","norm_person":{"id":439,"first_name":"Johannes","last_name":"Philoponos","full_name":"Philoponos, Johannes ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2296,"entry_id":42,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":360,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Wildberg, Christian","free_first_name":"Christian","free_last_name":"Wildberg","norm_person":{"id":360,"first_name":"Christian","last_name":"Wildberg","full_name":"Wildberg, Christian","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139018964","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Philoponus: Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World","main_title":{"title":"Philoponus: Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World"},"abstract":"Philoponus' treatise Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World, an attack on Aristotle's astronomy and theology is concerned mainly with the eternity and divinity of the fifth element, or 'quintessence', of which Aristotle took the stars to be composed. Pagans and Christians were divided on whether the world had a beginning, and on whether a belief that the heavens were divine was a mark of religion. Philoponus claimed on behalf of Christianity that the universe was not eternal. His most spectacular arguments, where wrung paradox out of the pagan belief in an infinite past, have been wrongly credited by historians of science to a period 700 years later. The treatise was to influence Islamic, Jewish, Byzantine and Latin thought, though the fifth element was defended against Philoponus even beyond the time of Copernicus. The influence of the treatise was not easy to trace before the fragments were assembled. Dr. Wildberg has brought them together for the first time and provided a summary which makes coherent sense of the whole. He has also studied a Syriac fragment, which reveals that the treatise originally contained an explicitly theological section on the Christian expectation of a new heaven and a new earth. [Author\u2019s abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1987","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/8Iylo91nPxiKHhJ","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":439,"full_name":"Philoponos, Johannes ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":360,"full_name":"Wildberg, Christian","role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"}}],"book":{"id":42,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Duckworth","series":"Ancient Commentators on Aristotle","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Philoponus: Against Aristotle on the Eternity of the World"]}
| Title | Plutarco di Atene. L’Uno, l’Anima, le Forme |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1989 |
| Publication Place | Rom |
| Publisher | Università di Catania, Catania und L’Erma di Bretschneider |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Taormina, Daniela |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Questo volume ottavo della Collana "Symbolon" è frutto di lunga e intelligente fatica di ricerca e di studio da parte di una delle mie più valenti allieve e collaboratrici, la dott. D. P. Taormina, che ha il merito di avere fornito, con i risultati di questo suo lavoro, la prima monografia completa, corredata dalla raccolta delle fonti mai prima d'ora compiuta (testo, traduzione e ampio commento), su uno dei più decisivi, ancorché poco studiati, anelli di collegamento tra il primo e l'ultimo neoplatonismo, ovverossia tra l'eredità immediata di Plotino e l'esplosione dell'attività speculativa più matura e sistematica della filosofia neoplatonica. Alla fine del IV secolo d. C., quando il pensiero cristiano era ormai divenuto adulto ad opera di pensatori quali Origene, Mario Vittorino e Agostino (tutti debitori del platonismo e del neoplatonismo), si ebbe ad Atene, nella vecchia e gloriosa culla della civiltà antica, una rinascita della tradizione platonica ad opera di un pensatore destinato a divenire maestro degli ultimi maestri di platonismo dell'antichità. Plutarco di Atene, finora considerato piu un termine di continuità storica che un caposaldo dello sviluppo del pensiero neoplatonico, esce dalla ricerca della Taormina in tutta la sua dimensione teoretica di esegeta e filosofo che ha contribuito a preparare (assieme al suo più famoso primo discepolo, Siriano) le fondamenta piu solide dell'ultima sistemazione del platonismo (Proclo e Damscio)... [offical abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/aXQUa3pSMwL9r98 |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"247","_score":null,"_source":{"id":247,"authors_free":[{"id":1941,"entry_id":247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":431,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taormina, Daniela","free_first_name":"Daniela","free_last_name":"Taormina","norm_person":{"id":431,"first_name":"Daniela Patrizia","last_name":"Taormina","full_name":"Taormina, Daniela Patrizia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1113305185","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Plutarco di Atene. L\u2019Uno, l\u2019Anima, le Forme","main_title":{"title":"Plutarco di Atene. L\u2019Uno, l\u2019Anima, le Forme"},"abstract":"Questo volume ottavo della Collana \"Symbolon\" \u00e8 frutto di lunga e intelligente fatica di ricerca e di studio da parte di una delle mie pi\u00f9 valenti allieve e collaboratrici, la dott. D. P. Taormina, che ha il merito di avere fornito, con i risultati di questo suo lavoro, la prima monografia completa, corredata dalla raccolta delle fonti mai prima d'ora compiuta (testo, traduzione e ampio commento), su uno dei pi\u00f9 decisivi, ancorch\u00e9 poco studiati, anelli di collegamento tra il primo e l'ultimo neoplatonismo, ovverossia tra l'eredit\u00e0 immediata di Plotino e l'esplosione dell'attivit\u00e0 speculativa pi\u00f9 matura e sistematica della filosofia neoplatonica. Alla fine del IV secolo d. C., quando il pensiero cristiano era ormai divenuto adulto ad opera di pensatori quali Origene, Mario Vittorino e Agostino (tutti debitori del platonismo e del neoplatonismo), si ebbe ad Atene, nella vecchia e gloriosa culla della civilt\u00e0 antica, una rinascita della tradizione platonica ad opera di un pensatore destinato a divenire maestro degli ultimi maestri di platonismo dell'antichit\u00e0. Plutarco di Atene, finora considerato piu un termine di continuit\u00e0 storica che un caposaldo dello sviluppo del pensiero neoplatonico, esce dalla ricerca della Taormina in tutta la sua dimensione teoretica di esegeta e filosofo che ha contribuito a preparare (assieme al suo pi\u00f9 famoso primo discepolo, Siriano) le fondamenta piu solide dell'ultima sistemazione del platonismo (Proclo e Damscio)... [offical abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1989","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/aXQUa3pSMwL9r98","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":431,"full_name":"Taormina, Daniela Patrizia","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":247,"pubplace":"Rom","publisher":"Universit\u00e0 di Catania, Catania und L\u2019Erma di Bretschneider","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Plutarco di Atene. L\u2019Uno, l\u2019Anima, le Forme"]}
| Title | Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1985 |
| Publication Place | Catania |
| Publisher | Universita di Catania |
| Series | Symbolon |
| Volume | 3 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Romano, Francesco |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
Tra i commentari ad Aristotele quelli di Porfirio occupano senza dubbio un posto preminente. Francesco Romano presenta uno studio sulla figura e sull’opera di Porfirio di cui analizza l’attività commentaria e i termini dell’interesse specifico per Aristotele attraverso la ricostruzione dei frammenti e delle testimonianze relativi al Commentario alla Fisica. Per fare questo l’autore presenta la traduzione dell’opera chiarendo anche i rapporti di Porfirio con Eudemo, Nicola, Alessandro, Temistio e Simplicio. [a.a.] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/tivi4S8KV7VK4gv |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"60","_score":null,"_source":{"id":60,"authors_free":[{"id":68,"entry_id":60,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":305,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Romano, Francesco","free_first_name":"Francesco","free_last_name":"Romano","norm_person":{"id":305,"first_name":"Francesco","last_name":"Romano","full_name":"Romano, Francesco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1028249454","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica","main_title":{"title":"Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica"},"abstract":"Tra i commentari ad Aristotele quelli di Porfirio occupano senza dubbio un posto preminente.\r\nFrancesco Romano presenta uno studio sulla figura e sull\u2019opera di Porfirio di cui analizza l\u2019attivit\u00e0 commentaria e i termini dell\u2019interesse specifico per Aristotele attraverso la ricostruzione dei frammenti e delle testimonianze relativi al Commentario alla Fisica.\r\nPer fare questo l\u2019autore presenta la traduzione dell\u2019opera chiarendo anche i rapporti di Porfirio con Eudemo, Nicola, Alessandro, Temistio e Simplicio. [a.a.]","btype":1,"date":"1985","language":"Italian","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/tivi4S8KV7VK4gv","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":305,"full_name":"Romano, Francesco","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":60,"pubplace":"Catania","publisher":"Universita di Catania","series":"Symbolon","volume":"3","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica"]}
| Title | Pseudo-Archytas über die Kategorien |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1972 |
| Publication Place | Berlin – New York |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Series | Peripatoi |
| Volume | 4 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Szlezák, Thomas Alexander |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/ZcsapEJyDS8Uc5F |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"220","_score":null,"_source":{"id":220,"authors_free":[{"id":282,"entry_id":220,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":509,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","free_first_name":"Thomas Alexander","free_last_name":"Szlez\u00e1k","norm_person":{"id":509,"first_name":"Thomas Alexander","last_name":"Szlez\u00e1k","full_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11775403X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Pseudo-Archytas \u00fcber die Kategorien","main_title":{"title":"Pseudo-Archytas \u00fcber die Kategorien"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1972","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZcsapEJyDS8Uc5F","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":509,"full_name":"Szlez\u00e1k, Thomas Alexander","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":220,"pubplace":"Berlin \u2013 New York","publisher":"de Gruyter","series":"Peripatoi","volume":"4","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Pseudo-Archytas \u00fcber die Kategorien"]}
| Title | Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Publication Place | Oxford |
| Publisher | Clarendon Press |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Dominic J., O'Meara |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
The Pythagorean idea that number is the key to understanding reality inspired Neoplatonist philosophers in Late Antiquity to develop theories in physics and metaphysics based on mathematical models. This book examines this theme, describing first the Pythagorean interests of Platonists in the second and third centuries and then Iamblichus's programme to Pythagoreanize Platonism in the fourth century in his work On Pythagoreanism (whose unity of conception is shown and parts of which are reconstructed for the first time). The impact of Iamblichus's programme is examined as regards Hierocles of Alexandria and Syrianus and Proclus in Athens: their conceptions of the figure of Pythagoras and of mathematics and its relation to physics and metaphysics are examined and compared with those of Iamblichus. This provides insight into Iamblichus's contribution to the evolution of Neoplatonism, to the revival of interest in mathematics, and to the development of a philosophy of mathematics and a mathematizing physics and metaphysics. [author's abstract] |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/clhKHxsFRwrAjFN |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1441","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1441,"authors_free":[{"id":2302,"entry_id":1441,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":279,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dominic J., O'Meara","free_first_name":"Dominic J.","free_last_name":"O'Meara","norm_person":{"id":279,"first_name":"Dominic J.","last_name":"O'Meara","full_name":"O'Meara, Dominic J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11180664X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity","main_title":{"title":"Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity"},"abstract":"The Pythagorean idea that number is the key to understanding reality inspired Neoplatonist philosophers in Late Antiquity to develop theories in physics and metaphysics based on mathematical models. This book examines this theme, describing first the Pythagorean interests of Platonists in the second and third centuries and then Iamblichus's programme to Pythagoreanize Platonism in the fourth century in his work On Pythagoreanism (whose unity of conception is shown and parts of which are reconstructed for the first time). The impact of Iamblichus's programme is examined as regards Hierocles of Alexandria and Syrianus and Proclus in Athens: their conceptions of the figure of Pythagoras and of mathematics and its relation to physics and metaphysics are examined and compared with those of Iamblichus. This provides insight into Iamblichus's contribution to the evolution of Neoplatonism, to the revival of interest in mathematics, and to the development of a philosophy of mathematics and a mathematizing physics and metaphysics. [author's abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/clhKHxsFRwrAjFN","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":279,"full_name":"O'Meara, Dominic J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1441,"pubplace":"Oxford","publisher":"Clarendon Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity"]}
| Title | Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1981 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Université Paris IV-Sorbonne |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Hoffmann, Philippe |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/FCQ06BefzUIofrf |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"70","_score":null,"_source":{"id":70,"authors_free":[{"id":78,"entry_id":70,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":138,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe","free_first_name":"Philippe","free_last_name":"Hoffmann","norm_person":{"id":138,"first_name":"Philippe ","last_name":"Hoffmann","full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/189361905","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote","main_title":{"title":"Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1981","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/FCQ06BefzUIofrf","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":138,"full_name":"Hoffmann, Philippe ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":70,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Universit\u00e9 Paris IV-Sorbonne","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Recherches sur la tradition manuscrite du Commentaire de Simplicius au De caelo d'Aristote"]}
| Title | Recherches sur le néoplatonisme après Plotin |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1990 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Vrin |
| Series | Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Saffrey, Henri Dominique |
| Editor(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/PXWKxSDEtCXXJtb |
{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1461","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1461,"authors_free":[{"id":2526,"entry_id":1461,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":228,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","free_first_name":"Henri Dominique","free_last_name":"Saffrey","norm_person":{"id":228,"first_name":"Henri Dominique","last_name":"Saffrey","full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130160059","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Recherches sur le n\u00e9oplatonisme apr\u00e8s Plotin","main_title":{"title":"Recherches sur le n\u00e9oplatonisme apr\u00e8s Plotin"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1990","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/PXWKxSDEtCXXJtb","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":228,"full_name":"Saffrey, Henri Dominique","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":1461,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Vrin","series":"Histoire des doctrines de l\u2019antiquit\u00e9 classique","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Recherches sur le n\u00e9oplatonisme apr\u00e8s Plotin"]}