{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"731","_score":null,"_source":{"id":731,"authors_free":[{"id":1094,"entry_id":731,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":456,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Long, Herbert S.","free_first_name":"Herbert S.","free_last_name":"Long","norm_person":{"id":456,"first_name":"Herbert, S.","last_name":"Long","full_name":"Long, Herbert, S.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Unity of Empedocles' Thought","main_title":{"title":"The Unity of Empedocles' Thought"},"abstract":"In this paper I shall first \r\nstate the problem of the unity of Empedocles' thought, then \r\nconsider two difficulties in the way of a solution and the effect \r\nthat not observing them has had, and finally propose and attempt to justify what appears to me to be a reasonable explanation of \r\nthe problem. [p. 142]","btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Glli8IC1bpJB9RU","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":456,"full_name":"Long, Herbert, S.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":731,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"70","issue":"2","pages":"142-158"}},"sort":[1949]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":1109,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":115,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","free_first_name":"Hermann","free_last_name":"Fraenkel","norm_person":{"id":115,"first_name":"Hermann","last_name":"Fraenkel","full_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119051478","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality","main_title":{"title":"Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality"},"abstract":"In recent decades students of mathematics, philosophy, and \r\nthe classics have again and again raised their voices 1 to vindicate \r\nthe serious importance of Zeno's paradoxes of motion (Vorsokr.2 29 A 25-28 - Lee,3 nos. 19-36), not even excluding the Stadium. \r\nNo longer can the problem implied in the paradoxes be disposed of by simply pointing out that time and space are equally divisible. The question which is at the bottom of all four of \r\nthem is far more profound. [...] Fur- \r\nthermore, it has been shown that Aristotle, when qriticizing the \r\nparadoxes, was not concerned conscientiously to adjust his objec- tions to that which the historical Zeno had tried to prove, or \r\nrather disprove. [...] If it is \r\nthus established that Zeno's syllogisms must not necessarily be \r\ncondemned as a futile play of dialectics 6 and that Aristotle's \r\ncensure fails to do Zeno justice, a road seems to be open to a \r\nfull rehabilitation and, perhaps, glorification. But one doubt \r\nremains. How adequately did the real Zeno actually deal with \r\nthe problems he had in hand? And how sincere was he about \r\nthem? [pp. 1 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1942","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/thc7ngkOcyyG7Iz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":115,"full_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"63","issue":"1","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":[1942]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1281","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1281,"authors_free":[{"id":1870,"entry_id":1281,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9"},"abstract":"In this passage from Aristotle's De Caelo, he explores why the heavens revolve in one direction rather than the other. He suggests that the universe has a front and a back, which implies a forward motion that is superior to backward motion, just as upward and rightward motions are superior to their respective opposites. Aristotle argues that since nature always follows the best course, the direction of the heaven's revolution must be forward and therefore better. The text is difficult to understand due to possible corruptions, but a comparison with Simplicius' paraphrase suggests that both the subject and object of the main verb are missing and need to be restored. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1939","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/NfJMuZWhRJUPSCS","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1281,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"33","issue":"1","pages":"34-35"}},"sort":[1939]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"866","_score":null,"_source":{"id":866,"authors_free":[{"id":1270,"entry_id":866,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":278,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nicol, A. T.","free_first_name":"A. T.","free_last_name":"Nicol","norm_person":{"id":278,"first_name":"Nicol","last_name":"A. T.","full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Indivisible Lines","main_title":{"title":"Indivisible Lines"},"abstract":"The name of Democritus can claim a place in any discussion of indivisibles. \r\nYet its introduction in this paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle ; \r\nfor Democritus did not believe in the existence of indivisible lines. Nowhere is the \r\nbelief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the scholion on \r\nDe Caelo 268a x, which says he made his elements indivisible solids, as contrasted \r\nwith lines or surfaces. Two passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will show why he could not believe in indivisible lines. [p. 120]","btype":3,"date":"1936","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/j7CSmqxKwIBye6i","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":278,"full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":866,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"30","issue":"2","pages":"120-126"}},"sort":[1936]}

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1209","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1209,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1209,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":258,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Merlan, Philipp","free_first_name":"Philipp","free_last_name":"Merlan","norm_person":{"id":258,"first_name":"Philip","last_name":"Merlan","full_name":"Merlan, Philip","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/128860502","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios"},"abstract":"In diesem Text geht es um Simplikios' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' De caelo II, 1, 284 a 14 ff. und Pseudo-Alexandros' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' Metaphysik A, 8, 1074aff. Beide diskutieren Fragen zur Bewegung des Himmels und stellen \u00e4hnliche Gedanken zum Verh\u00e4ltnis von Seele und Bewegung dar. Der Text betrachtet die M\u00f6glichkeit, dass Simplikios und Pseudo-Alexandros einander zitiert haben oder dass sie beide den echten Alexandros zitieren. Es wird auch auf die Interpretation von Aristoteles' De caelo H, 1,284a 27 ff. durch Simplikios eingegangen. [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/7lVxYR3sHQ2Ie0a","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":258,"full_name":"Merlan, Philip","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1209,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie. Neue Folge","volume":"84","issue":"2","pages":"154-160"}},"sort":[1935]}