Title | Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1957 |
Journal | Vigiliae Christianae |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 179-185 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Shiel, James |
Editor(s) | |
Translator(s) |
G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession—what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E |
{"_index":"sire","_id":"853","_score":null,"_source":{"id":853,"authors_free":[{"id":1257,"entry_id":853,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":315,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shiel, James","free_first_name":"James","free_last_name":"Shiel","norm_person":{"id":315,"first_name":"James","last_name":"Shiel","full_name":"Shiel, James","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131572202","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes","main_title":{"title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"},"abstract":"G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession\u2014what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]","btype":3,"date":"1957","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":315,"full_name":"Shiel, James","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":853,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vigiliae Christianae","volume":"11","issue":"3","pages":"179-185"}},"sort":[1957]}
Title | Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1957 |
Journal | Vigiliae Christianae |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 179-185 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Shiel, James |
Editor(s) | |
Translator(s) |
G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession—what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179] |
Online Resources | https://uni-koeln.sciebo.de/s/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E |
{"_index":"sire","_id":"853","_score":null,"_source":{"id":853,"authors_free":[{"id":1257,"entry_id":853,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":315,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shiel, James","free_first_name":"James","free_last_name":"Shiel","norm_person":{"id":315,"first_name":"James","last_name":"Shiel","full_name":"Shiel, James","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131572202","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes","main_title":{"title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"},"abstract":"G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession\u2014what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]","btype":3,"date":"1957","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":315,"full_name":"Shiel, James","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":853,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vigiliae Christianae","volume":"11","issue":"3","pages":"179-185"}},"sort":["Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"]}