Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes, 1957
By: Shiel, James
Title Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes
Type Article
Language English
Date 1957
Journal Vigiliae Christianae
Volume 11
Issue 3
Pages 179-185
Categories no categories
Author(s) Shiel, James
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession—what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"853","_score":null,"_source":{"id":853,"authors_free":[{"id":1257,"entry_id":853,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":315,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shiel, James","free_first_name":"James","free_last_name":"Shiel","norm_person":{"id":315,"first_name":"James","last_name":"Shiel","full_name":"Shiel, James","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131572202","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes","main_title":{"title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"},"abstract":"G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession\u2014what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]","btype":3,"date":"1957","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":315,"full_name":"Shiel, James","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":853,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vigiliae Christianae","volume":"11","issue":"3","pages":"179-185"}},"sort":[1957]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1
Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes, 1957
By: Shiel, James
Title Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes
Type Article
Language English
Date 1957
Journal Vigiliae Christianae
Volume 11
Issue 3
Pages 179-185
Categories no categories
Author(s) Shiel, James
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession—what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"853","_score":null,"_source":{"id":853,"authors_free":[{"id":1257,"entry_id":853,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":315,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shiel, James","free_first_name":"James","free_last_name":"Shiel","norm_person":{"id":315,"first_name":"James","last_name":"Shiel","full_name":"Shiel, James","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131572202","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes","main_title":{"title":"Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"},"abstract":"G. Pfligersdorffer has recently described the attitude of the ancient editor, Andronicus of Rhodes, towards the final notes in Aristotle's Categories on opposites, simultaneity, priority, motion, and possession\u2014what the medievals called the postpraedicamenta. The scholar has based his intricate arguments on a passage of Boethius' commentary on the Categories, and as this passage in the printed editions is syntactically unintelligible, he has suggested an emended text of it. Here is the passage as printed, with his emendations alongside and a list of variants beneath. [introduction p. 179]","btype":3,"date":"1957","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Z3seGeZGEaA8j5E","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":315,"full_name":"Shiel, James","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":853,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vigiliae Christianae","volume":"11","issue":"3","pages":"179-185"}},"sort":["Boethius and Andronicus of Rhodes"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1