Simplikios, Neplatoniker, 1927
By: Praechter, Karl, Wissowa, Georg (Ed.), Kroll, Wilhelm (Ed.), Mittelhaus, Karl (Ed.)
Eintrag zu Simplikios in der Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1380","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1380,"authors_free":[{"id":2124,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2128,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":297,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Wissowa, Georg","free_first_name":"Georg","free_last_name":"Wissowa","norm_person":{"id":297,"first_name":"Georg","last_name":"Wissowa","full_name":"Wissowa, Georg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117413755","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2129,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":300,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm ","free_first_name":"Wilhelm","free_last_name":"Kroll","norm_person":{"id":300,"first_name":"Wilhelm","last_name":"Kroll","full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116552581","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2130,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":301,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Mittelhaus","norm_person":{"id":301,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Mittelhaus","full_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11706355X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplikios, Neplatoniker","main_title":{"title":"Simplikios, Neplatoniker"},"abstract":"Eintrag zu Simplikios in der Paulys Realencyclop\u00e4die der classischen Altertumswissenschaft","btype":2,"date":"1927","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/MKvSYjVl9KIu03S","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":297,"full_name":"Wissowa, Georg","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":300,"full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":301,"full_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1380,"section_of":1381,"pages":"204-213","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1381,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Paulys Realencyclop\u00e4die der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung begonnen von Georg Wissowa unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher Fachgenossen, herausgegeben von Wilhelm Kroll und Karl Mittelhaus. Zweite Reihe, F\u00fcnfter Halbband: Silacenis bis Sparsus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1927","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GO1BxyFsBoAXlMx","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1381,"pubplace":"Stuttgart","publisher":"Alfred Druckenm\u00fcller Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1927]}

Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H, 1924
By: Praechter, Karl
Title Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H
Type Article
Language German
Date 1924
Journal Hermes
Volume 59
Issue 1
Pages 118-119
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Dieser Beitrag untersucht einen zentralen Passus aus den Schriften des Neuplatonikers Simplikios, der für seine polemische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Christentum von besonderem Interesse ist. Anhand der Überlieferung bei Heiberg wird die Bedeutung der Formulierung διαβεβλαμμένοι („verwirrt“ oder „zerfallen“) im Kontext der Darstellung christlicher Vorstellungen von Himmel und Gottheit analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Simplikios die Christen als unter dem Einfluss falscher metaphysischer Annahmen stehend betrachtet, was ihn dazu veranlasst, ihre Auffassung vom Himmel als Sitz Gottes zu kritisieren. Darüber hinaus wird ein intertextueller Bezug zu Heraklit (fr. 96 Diels) aufgezeigt, der für das Verständnis der Stelle essenziell ist. Die Argumentation von Simplikios reiht sich in die breitere neuplatonische Kritik an der christlichen Theologie ein, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Verehrung des toten Christus und den Gräberkult. Diese Analyse trägt zur Erhellung der spätantiken Debatten zwischen Neuplatonikern und Christen bei und verdeutlicht zugleich die methodischen Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation antiker philosophischer Texte. [derived from the whole text]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1477","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1477,"authors_free":[{"id":2558,"entry_id":1477,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H","main_title":{"title":"Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H"},"abstract":"Dieser Beitrag untersucht einen zentralen Passus aus den Schriften des Neuplatonikers Simplikios, der f\u00fcr seine polemische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Christentum von besonderem Interesse ist. Anhand der \u00dcberlieferung bei Heiberg wird die Bedeutung der Formulierung \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03b2\u03b5\u03b2\u03bb\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 (\u201everwirrt\u201c oder \u201ezerfallen\u201c) im Kontext der Darstellung christlicher Vorstellungen von Himmel und Gottheit analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Simplikios die Christen als unter dem Einfluss falscher metaphysischer Annahmen stehend betrachtet, was ihn dazu veranlasst, ihre Auffassung vom Himmel als Sitz Gottes zu kritisieren.\r\n\r\nDar\u00fcber hinaus wird ein intertextueller Bezug zu Heraklit (fr. 96 Diels) aufgezeigt, der f\u00fcr das Verst\u00e4ndnis der Stelle essenziell ist. Die Argumentation von Simplikios reiht sich in die breitere neuplatonische Kritik an der christlichen Theologie ein, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Verehrung des toten Christus und den Gr\u00e4berkult. Diese Analyse tr\u00e4gt zur Erhellung der sp\u00e4tantiken Debatten zwischen Neuplatonikern und Christen bei und verdeutlicht zugleich die methodischen Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation antiker philosophischer Texte. [derived from the whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1924","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GHLXvIo8dgtPSpy","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1477,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"59","issue":"1","pages":"118-119"}},"sort":[1924]}

Nikostratos der Platoniker, 1922
By: Praechter, Karl
Title Nikostratos der Platoniker
Type Article
Language German
Date 1922
Journal Hermes
Volume 57
Issue 4
Pages 481-517
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Als Beitrag zur Vor- und Entwicklungsgeschichte des Neu­ platonismus auf einem Teilgebiet seiner Lehre möchte [...] die vorliegende Untersuchung betrachtet werden. Ich selbst habe zu zeigen versucht, daß der alexandrinische Neuplatonismus keines­ wegs die Linie Plotin-Porphyrios-Iamblich fortsetzt, sondern an ein früheres Stadium platonischer Lehrentwicklung anschließt. [conclusion p. 517]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"775","_score":null,"_source":{"id":775,"authors_free":[{"id":1139,"entry_id":775,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Nikostratos der Platoniker","main_title":{"title":"Nikostratos der Platoniker"},"abstract":"Als Beitrag zur Vor- und Entwicklungsgeschichte des Neu\u00ad\r\nplatonismus auf einem Teilgebiet seiner Lehre m\u00f6chte [...] die \r\nvorliegende Untersuchung betrachtet werden. Ich selbst habe zu \r\nzeigen versucht, da\u00df der alexandrinische Neuplatonismus keines\u00ad\r\nwegs die Linie Plotin-Porphyrios-Iamblich fortsetzt, sondern an ein \r\nfr\u00fcheres Stadium platonischer Lehrentwicklung anschlie\u00dft. [conclusion p. 517]","btype":3,"date":"1922","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/VI1pJau1eYyh9C4","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":775,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"57","issue":"4","pages":"481-517"}},"sort":[1922]}

Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus, 1910
By: Praechter, Karl, Robert, Carl (Ed.)
Title Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus
Type Book Section
Language German
Date 1910
Published in Genethliakon
Pages 105-156
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s) Robert, Carl
Translator(s)
Karl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity. [from the notices of the book]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1065","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1065,"authors_free":[{"id":1615,"entry_id":1065,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1616,"entry_id":1065,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":294,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Robert, Carl","free_first_name":"Carl","free_last_name":"Robert","norm_person":{"id":294,"first_name":"Carl","last_name":"Robert","full_name":"Robert, Carl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116575956","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus","main_title":{"title":"Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus"},"abstract":"Karl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity. [from the notices of the book]","btype":2,"date":"1910","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZUNcPDq2qaf1DRB","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":294,"full_name":"Robert, Carl","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1065,"section_of":1600,"pages":"105-156","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1600,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"de","title":"Genethliakon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Robert1910","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1910","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This is a series of studies on different subjects dedicated by friends and former pupils to Carl Robert on his attaining his sixtieth birthday. The first two, by Benedictus Niese and Georg Wissowa respectively, deal with three chapters in the history of Elis and Naevius and the Metelli. Both these historical inquiries are characterized by the employment of similar methods of criticism. Certain events, said to have taken place at a particular period, are held never to have taken place at that time, but to have been carried back from the history of a later day. Thus, Niese believes that the stories of the repeated quarrels between Elis and Pisa have no historical foundation, except in the single instance of the years 365\u2013364 B.C., when the Pisatae for a brief period formed a separate community and, in conjunction with the Arcadians, carried out the Olympic Games. Wissowa, in Naevius and the Metelli, endeavors to show that the story of the poet's quarrel with that house is a figment derived from a later period. The line fato Metelli Romae fiunt consules is, he thinks, quite pointless in relation to the Metelli of Naevius' day. It would apply forcibly, however, to the period of the Gracchi, in which the Metelli were singularly prominent as holders of high office. The traditional reply, malum dabunt Metelli Naevio poetae, Wissowa attributes to Caesius Bassus in Nero's time, when it was composed as a model of a Saturnian line. It may be suggested that the above method of historical criticism (very popular at the present time) may be carried a little too far. It is true that the historian is frequently tempted to add to the glory of his country in early times, but is it true that there is an equal tendency to fabricate history when no such motive can be assigned? The arguments of both Niese and Wissowa are ingenious, but hardly convincing.\r\n\r\nBechtel subjects the names of persons as published by Frankel in the fourth volume of I.O. to a searching criticism. A fair number of errors, certain or probable, are pointed out, but they are perhaps scarcely serious enough (consideration being had to the magnitude of the work) to justify the rather severe tone of criticism employed. Bechtel's proposed corrections are, however, likely to win approval for the most part. Otto Kern discusses the origin of the collection of hymns comprehended under the title \u1f48\u03c1\u03c6\u03ad\u03c9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u039c\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03bd \u03b5\u1f50\u03c4\u03c5\u03c7\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c2 \u03c7\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03c4\u03b9. These were apparently designed for the use of a body of mystae devoted to the service of Dionysos. The occurrence of the names of the goddess Hipta and of Dionysos Erikepaios both in these hymns and in inscriptions recently discovered in Asia Minor leads Kern to look to Asia Minor rather than to Egypt for their origin. The connection between the later Orphism and magical inscriptions is rightly pointed out by Kern. There is no doubt that the Gnostic and magical inscriptions on metal foil are a continuation of the Orphic inscriptions on similar material.\r\n\r\nKarl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity.\r\n\r\nEduard Meyer chooses for his study Hesiod's Works and Days, and in particular the part dealing with the Five Races of Mankind. In general, it may be remarked that his interpretations do not differ greatly from those of the late Dr. Adam in his Religious Teachers of Greece. The central idea of the poem is, according to Meyer, 'the dignity of labour'; according to Adam, 'Justice between man and man.' These views, it may be pointed out, are united in the Platonic conception of Justice as consisting in the doing by each man of the work nature intended him to do. These broodings over the relation of man to man (says Wissowa) lead the poet to take a wider view of the development of mankind in his description of the Five Ages. The golden and silver ages are a picture of decline in a race of ideal beings; the bronze and iron ages are a picture of a decline in morals accompanying an improvement in culture, a phenomenon noted by the poet from his own observation. The heroic age is interpolated between these two in order to suit the general belief in its existence; it is also a ray of hope piercing the gloom of Hesiod's pessimism. Professor Meyer, as Professor Mair in his recent translation of Hesiod, emphasizes the almost Hebraic spirit of religion pervading the poem.\r\n\r\nUlrich Wilcken devotes an extremely interesting article to a fresh study of a Greek papyrus found by Prof. Petrie at Hawara in 1889. This was at first regarded by Prof. Sayce as a fragment of a lost history of Sicily, perhaps that of Timaeus. Dr. Wilcken, however, in that same year expressed the opinion that the fragment really formed part of a descriptive guide to Athens and the Peiraeus. This conclusion is amply confirmed by the present very ingenious study. Dr. Wilcken successfully distinguishes portions describing the Peiraeus (including the mention of an otherwise unknown sundial), Munichia (with a mention of 'the famous shrine of Artemis'), and the circuit of the Peiraeus wall, which is here said to measure ninety-odd stades, whereas the Themistoclean wall described by Thucydides measured but sixty. Hence, the wall described must be the wall of Konon. The manuscript goes on to describe the Long Walls and the Phaleric wall (mentioning the hill Sikelia) and breaks off just at the beginning of an account of 'the town of Theseus.' It is probable that this guide was written at the beginning of the third century B.C., though the papyrus is to be dated at about 100 A.D. The name of the author must remain uncertain, though it is conceivably the work of Diodorus the Periegetes.\r\n\r\nThe concluding study by Benno Erdmann on the philosophy of Spinoza falls outside the scope of this Journal. [notices of book]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/wxEGw3MZ3aRDjPW","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1600,"pubplace":"Berlin","publisher":"Weidmann","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1910]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1
Nikostratos der Platoniker, 1922
By: Praechter, Karl
Title Nikostratos der Platoniker
Type Article
Language German
Date 1922
Journal Hermes
Volume 57
Issue 4
Pages 481-517
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Als  Beitrag  zur  Vor-  und  Entwicklungsgeschichte  des  Neu­
platonismus  auf  einem  Teilgebiet  seiner  Lehre  möchte  [...] die 
vorliegende  Untersuchung  betrachtet  werden. Ich  selbst  habe  zu 
zeigen  versucht,  daß  der  alexandrinische  Neuplatonismus  keines­
wegs  die  Linie  Plotin-Porphyrios-Iamblich  fortsetzt,  sondern  an ein 
früheres  Stadium  platonischer  Lehrentwicklung  anschließt. [conclusion p. 517]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"775","_score":null,"_source":{"id":775,"authors_free":[{"id":1139,"entry_id":775,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Nikostratos der Platoniker","main_title":{"title":"Nikostratos der Platoniker"},"abstract":"Als Beitrag zur Vor- und Entwicklungsgeschichte des Neu\u00ad\r\nplatonismus auf einem Teilgebiet seiner Lehre m\u00f6chte [...] die \r\nvorliegende Untersuchung betrachtet werden. Ich selbst habe zu \r\nzeigen versucht, da\u00df der alexandrinische Neuplatonismus keines\u00ad\r\nwegs die Linie Plotin-Porphyrios-Iamblich fortsetzt, sondern an ein \r\nfr\u00fcheres Stadium platonischer Lehrentwicklung anschlie\u00dft. [conclusion p. 517]","btype":3,"date":"1922","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/VI1pJau1eYyh9C4","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":775,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"57","issue":"4","pages":"481-517"}},"sort":["Nikostratos der Platoniker"]}

Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus, 1910
By: Praechter, Karl, Robert, Carl (Ed.)
Title Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus
Type Book Section
Language German
Date 1910
Published in Genethliakon
Pages 105-156
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s) Robert, Carl
Translator(s)
Karl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity. [from the notices of the book]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1065","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1065,"authors_free":[{"id":1615,"entry_id":1065,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":1616,"entry_id":1065,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":294,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Robert, Carl","free_first_name":"Carl","free_last_name":"Robert","norm_person":{"id":294,"first_name":"Carl","last_name":"Robert","full_name":"Robert, Carl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116575956","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus","main_title":{"title":"Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus"},"abstract":"Karl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity. [from the notices of the book]","btype":2,"date":"1910","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/ZUNcPDq2qaf1DRB","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":294,"full_name":"Robert, Carl","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1065,"section_of":1600,"pages":"105-156","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1600,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"de","title":"Genethliakon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"Robert1910","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1910","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This is a series of studies on different subjects dedicated by friends and former pupils to Carl Robert on his attaining his sixtieth birthday. The first two, by Benedictus Niese and Georg Wissowa respectively, deal with three chapters in the history of Elis and Naevius and the Metelli. Both these historical inquiries are characterized by the employment of similar methods of criticism. Certain events, said to have taken place at a particular period, are held never to have taken place at that time, but to have been carried back from the history of a later day. Thus, Niese believes that the stories of the repeated quarrels between Elis and Pisa have no historical foundation, except in the single instance of the years 365\u2013364 B.C., when the Pisatae for a brief period formed a separate community and, in conjunction with the Arcadians, carried out the Olympic Games. Wissowa, in Naevius and the Metelli, endeavors to show that the story of the poet's quarrel with that house is a figment derived from a later period. The line fato Metelli Romae fiunt consules is, he thinks, quite pointless in relation to the Metelli of Naevius' day. It would apply forcibly, however, to the period of the Gracchi, in which the Metelli were singularly prominent as holders of high office. The traditional reply, malum dabunt Metelli Naevio poetae, Wissowa attributes to Caesius Bassus in Nero's time, when it was composed as a model of a Saturnian line. It may be suggested that the above method of historical criticism (very popular at the present time) may be carried a little too far. It is true that the historian is frequently tempted to add to the glory of his country in early times, but is it true that there is an equal tendency to fabricate history when no such motive can be assigned? The arguments of both Niese and Wissowa are ingenious, but hardly convincing.\r\n\r\nBechtel subjects the names of persons as published by Frankel in the fourth volume of I.O. to a searching criticism. A fair number of errors, certain or probable, are pointed out, but they are perhaps scarcely serious enough (consideration being had to the magnitude of the work) to justify the rather severe tone of criticism employed. Bechtel's proposed corrections are, however, likely to win approval for the most part. Otto Kern discusses the origin of the collection of hymns comprehended under the title \u1f48\u03c1\u03c6\u03ad\u03c9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u039c\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03bd \u03b5\u1f50\u03c4\u03c5\u03c7\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c2 \u03c7\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03c4\u03b9. These were apparently designed for the use of a body of mystae devoted to the service of Dionysos. The occurrence of the names of the goddess Hipta and of Dionysos Erikepaios both in these hymns and in inscriptions recently discovered in Asia Minor leads Kern to look to Asia Minor rather than to Egypt for their origin. The connection between the later Orphism and magical inscriptions is rightly pointed out by Kern. There is no doubt that the Gnostic and magical inscriptions on metal foil are a continuation of the Orphic inscriptions on similar material.\r\n\r\nKarl Praechter deals at some length with the tendencies and schools of Neoplatonism. His classification differs materially from that of Zeller, who divided the Neoplatonists into three schools according to their order of progress, viz. the school of Plotinus, the Syrian school of Iamblichus, and the school of Athens, whose foremost representative was Proclus. Praechter maintains that the system was founded by Plotinus and Porphyrius; that Iamblichus then developed the doctrines in a speculative and mystic direction, the result being seen in two schools, the Syrian and the Athenian. A separate and distinctively religious tendency is manifested in the Pergamene school of Aidesios and Chrysanthios. Neoplatonism ends with the learned schools of Alexandria and the West, of which Hypatia and Macrobius were representative. Neoplatonism undoubtedly derives much of its interest from the fact that it forms a kind of connecting link between Ancient Philosophy and Christianity.\r\n\r\nEduard Meyer chooses for his study Hesiod's Works and Days, and in particular the part dealing with the Five Races of Mankind. In general, it may be remarked that his interpretations do not differ greatly from those of the late Dr. Adam in his Religious Teachers of Greece. The central idea of the poem is, according to Meyer, 'the dignity of labour'; according to Adam, 'Justice between man and man.' These views, it may be pointed out, are united in the Platonic conception of Justice as consisting in the doing by each man of the work nature intended him to do. These broodings over the relation of man to man (says Wissowa) lead the poet to take a wider view of the development of mankind in his description of the Five Ages. The golden and silver ages are a picture of decline in a race of ideal beings; the bronze and iron ages are a picture of a decline in morals accompanying an improvement in culture, a phenomenon noted by the poet from his own observation. The heroic age is interpolated between these two in order to suit the general belief in its existence; it is also a ray of hope piercing the gloom of Hesiod's pessimism. Professor Meyer, as Professor Mair in his recent translation of Hesiod, emphasizes the almost Hebraic spirit of religion pervading the poem.\r\n\r\nUlrich Wilcken devotes an extremely interesting article to a fresh study of a Greek papyrus found by Prof. Petrie at Hawara in 1889. This was at first regarded by Prof. Sayce as a fragment of a lost history of Sicily, perhaps that of Timaeus. Dr. Wilcken, however, in that same year expressed the opinion that the fragment really formed part of a descriptive guide to Athens and the Peiraeus. This conclusion is amply confirmed by the present very ingenious study. Dr. Wilcken successfully distinguishes portions describing the Peiraeus (including the mention of an otherwise unknown sundial), Munichia (with a mention of 'the famous shrine of Artemis'), and the circuit of the Peiraeus wall, which is here said to measure ninety-odd stades, whereas the Themistoclean wall described by Thucydides measured but sixty. Hence, the wall described must be the wall of Konon. The manuscript goes on to describe the Long Walls and the Phaleric wall (mentioning the hill Sikelia) and breaks off just at the beginning of an account of 'the town of Theseus.' It is probable that this guide was written at the beginning of the third century B.C., though the papyrus is to be dated at about 100 A.D. The name of the author must remain uncertain, though it is conceivably the work of Diodorus the Periegetes.\r\n\r\nThe concluding study by Benno Erdmann on the philosophy of Spinoza falls outside the scope of this Journal. [notices of book]","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/wxEGw3MZ3aRDjPW","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1600,"pubplace":"Berlin","publisher":"Weidmann","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus"]}

Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H, 1924
By: Praechter, Karl
Title Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H
Type Article
Language German
Date 1924
Journal Hermes
Volume 59
Issue 1
Pages 118-119
Categories no categories
Author(s) Praechter, Karl
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Dieser Beitrag untersucht einen zentralen Passus aus den Schriften des Neuplatonikers Simplikios, der für seine polemische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Christentum von besonderem Interesse ist. Anhand der Überlieferung bei Heiberg wird die Bedeutung der Formulierung διαβεβλαμμένοι („verwirrt“ oder „zerfallen“) im Kontext der Darstellung christlicher Vorstellungen von Himmel und Gottheit analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Simplikios die Christen als unter dem Einfluss falscher metaphysischer Annahmen stehend betrachtet, was ihn dazu veranlasst, ihre Auffassung vom Himmel als Sitz Gottes zu kritisieren.

Darüber hinaus wird ein intertextueller Bezug zu Heraklit (fr. 96 Diels) aufgezeigt, der für das Verständnis der Stelle essenziell ist. Die Argumentation von Simplikios reiht sich in die breitere neuplatonische Kritik an der christlichen Theologie ein, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Verehrung des toten Christus und den Gräberkult. Diese Analyse trägt zur Erhellung der spätantiken Debatten zwischen Neuplatonikern und Christen bei und verdeutlicht zugleich die methodischen Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation antiker philosophischer Texte. [derived from the whole text]

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1477","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1477,"authors_free":[{"id":2558,"entry_id":1477,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H","main_title":{"title":"Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H"},"abstract":"Dieser Beitrag untersucht einen zentralen Passus aus den Schriften des Neuplatonikers Simplikios, der f\u00fcr seine polemische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Christentum von besonderem Interesse ist. Anhand der \u00dcberlieferung bei Heiberg wird die Bedeutung der Formulierung \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03b2\u03b5\u03b2\u03bb\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 (\u201everwirrt\u201c oder \u201ezerfallen\u201c) im Kontext der Darstellung christlicher Vorstellungen von Himmel und Gottheit analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Simplikios die Christen als unter dem Einfluss falscher metaphysischer Annahmen stehend betrachtet, was ihn dazu veranlasst, ihre Auffassung vom Himmel als Sitz Gottes zu kritisieren.\r\n\r\nDar\u00fcber hinaus wird ein intertextueller Bezug zu Heraklit (fr. 96 Diels) aufgezeigt, der f\u00fcr das Verst\u00e4ndnis der Stelle essenziell ist. Die Argumentation von Simplikios reiht sich in die breitere neuplatonische Kritik an der christlichen Theologie ein, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Verehrung des toten Christus und den Gr\u00e4berkult. Diese Analyse tr\u00e4gt zur Erhellung der sp\u00e4tantiken Debatten zwischen Neuplatonikern und Christen bei und verdeutlicht zugleich die methodischen Herausforderungen bei der Interpretation antiker philosophischer Texte. [derived from the whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1924","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GHLXvIo8dgtPSpy","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1477,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"59","issue":"1","pages":"118-119"}},"sort":["Simpl. in Aristot. de Caelo p. 370, 29 ff. H"]}

Simplikios, Neplatoniker, 1927
By: Praechter, Karl, Wissowa, Georg (Ed.), Kroll, Wilhelm (Ed.), Mittelhaus, Karl (Ed.)
Eintrag zu Simplikios in der Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft

{"_index":"sire","_id":"1380","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1380,"authors_free":[{"id":2124,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":293,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Praechter, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Praechter","norm_person":{"id":293,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Praechter","full_name":"Praechter, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116278609","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2128,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":297,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Wissowa, Georg","free_first_name":"Georg","free_last_name":"Wissowa","norm_person":{"id":297,"first_name":"Georg","last_name":"Wissowa","full_name":"Wissowa, Georg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117413755","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2129,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":300,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm ","free_first_name":"Wilhelm","free_last_name":"Kroll","norm_person":{"id":300,"first_name":"Wilhelm","last_name":"Kroll","full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116552581","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2130,"entry_id":1380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":301,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","free_first_name":"Karl","free_last_name":"Mittelhaus","norm_person":{"id":301,"first_name":"Karl","last_name":"Mittelhaus","full_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11706355X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Simplikios, Neplatoniker","main_title":{"title":"Simplikios, Neplatoniker"},"abstract":"Eintrag zu Simplikios in der Paulys Realencyclop\u00e4die der classischen Altertumswissenschaft","btype":2,"date":"1927","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/MKvSYjVl9KIu03S","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":293,"full_name":"Praechter, Karl","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":297,"full_name":"Wissowa, Georg","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":300,"full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}},{"id":301,"full_name":"Mittelhaus, Karl","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1380,"section_of":1381,"pages":"204-213","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1381,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Paulys Realencyclop\u00e4die der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung begonnen von Georg Wissowa unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher Fachgenossen, herausgegeben von Wilhelm Kroll und Karl Mittelhaus. Zweite Reihe, F\u00fcnfter Halbband: Silacenis bis Sparsus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1927","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GO1BxyFsBoAXlMx","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1381,"pubplace":"Stuttgart","publisher":"Alfred Druckenm\u00fcller Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Simplikios, Neplatoniker"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1