{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1318","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1318,"authors_free":[{"id":1952,"entry_id":1318,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":128,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Glasner, Ruth","free_first_name":"Ruth","free_last_name":"Glasner","norm_person":{"id":128,"first_name":"Ruth","last_name":"Glasner","full_name":"Glasner, Ruth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138576793","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Zeno of Elea's Argument from Bisection: Newly Discovered Evidence in a Hebrew Translation of Averroes","main_title":{"title":"Zeno of Elea's Argument from Bisection: Newly Discovered Evidence in a Hebrew Translation of Averroes"},"abstract":"To conclude, in the Hebrew version of Averroes' long commentary on the Physics, comment 1.30, we find what seems to be Alexander's version of Zeno's argument ek tes dichotomias against plurality. Averroes interprets Zeno's argument as contradicting Parmenides', \r\nthus drawing attention to a problem that is latent in Simplicius' commentary. [conclusion, p. 293]","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/qBSmUD61VUYUfx6","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":128,"full_name":"Glasner, Ruth","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1318,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph","volume":"1","issue":"","pages":"285-293"}},"sort":["Zeno of Elea's Argument from Bisection: Newly Discovered Evidence in a Hebrew Translation of Averroes"]}